In Von Pfeil 2024 et al., on acute ulnar shortening in dogs, what surgical fixation approach was used?
A. Dual locking plates
B. Kirschner wires only
C. Cerclage wire alone
D. Plating with orthopedic wire
E. External fixator
Answer: Plating with orthopedic wire
Explanation: A combination of plating and orthopedic wire was used in all cases.
In Von Pfeil 2024 et al., on acute ulnar shortening in dogs, which imaging modality was emphasized as superior for dynamic assessment of joint congruity?
A. CT scan
B. MRI
C. Stress radiographs
D. Fluoroscopy
E. Arthroscopy
Answer: Arthroscopy
Explanation: Arthroscopy allowed dynamic assessment, preferred over static imaging.
In Von Pfeil 2024 et al., on acute ulnar shortening in dogs, what was the median time to radiographic bone healing?
A. 4 weeks
B. 6 weeks
C. 8 weeks
D. 10 weeks
E. 12 weeks
Answer: 8 weeks
Explanation: Median bone healing time was 8 weeks, with a range of 4–14 weeks.
In Von Pfeil 2024 et al., on acute ulnar shortening in dogs, which postoperative complication was reported in the study?
A. Screw loosening in 3 dogs
B. Deep infection in 2 dogs
C. Screw loosening and superficial infection in 1 each
D. No complications observed
E. Implant breakage in 1 dog
Answer: Screw loosening and superficial infection in 1 each
Explanation: Only 2 minor complications were reported: one screw loosening and one superficial infection.
In Von Pfeil 2024 et al., on acute ulnar shortening in dogs, what was the most common clinical outcome?
A. Full function in all dogs
B. Acceptable function in all dogs
C. Acceptable or full function in all dogs
D. Unacceptable function in over 50%
E. Function unchanged in most dogs
Answer: Acceptable or full function in all dogs
Explanation: All dogs achieved acceptable (7) or full (4) functional grading post-op.