Moreira et al: Predicting tibial plateau angles following four different types of cranial closing wedge ostectomy
Veterinary Surgery 1, 2024

🔍 Key Findings

A linear relationship was observed between wedge angle and tibial plateau angle (TPA) correction across all four CCWO techniques.

All techniques produced predictable TPA corrections using linear regression-derived equations, allowing wedge angle extrapolation to achieve a target postoperative TPA of 5°.

TLA shift (tibial long axis) increased with wedge angle and influenced final TPA; greatest in Frederick & Cross method.

Tibial shortening (mTL%) varied by technique, being most severe (up to 40.9%) in traditional Slocum & Devine CCWO and least in newer techniques (7.5–12%).

  • The Oxley mCCWO produced the least TLA shift and tibial shortening, especially at moderate wedge angles.
  • Techniques varied in craniocaudal translation and wedge apex positioning, influencing planning accuracy and mechanical axis alignment.
  • The corrective wedge angle equations reliably predicted TPA within 4–6° across varied tibial conformations.
  • The study supports equation-based planning over static TPA–5° subtraction to reduce risk of under- or over-correction.
  • Simini Surgery Review Podcast

    How critical is this paper for crushing the Boards?

    🚨 Must-know. I’d bet on seeing this.

    📚 Useful background, not must-know.

    💤 Skip it. Doubt it’ll ever show up.

    Thanks for the feedback!
    We'll keep fine-tuning the articles vault.
    Oops — didn’t go through.
    Mind trying that again?

    Moreira et al: Predicting tibial plateau angles following four different types of cranial closing wedge ostectomy
    Veterinary Surgery 1, 2024

    🔍 Key Findings

    A linear relationship was observed between wedge angle and tibial plateau angle (TPA) correction across all four CCWO techniques.

    All techniques produced predictable TPA corrections using linear regression-derived equations, allowing wedge angle extrapolation to achieve a target postoperative TPA of 5°.

    TLA shift (tibial long axis) increased with wedge angle and influenced final TPA; greatest in Frederick & Cross method.

    Tibial shortening (mTL%) varied by technique, being most severe (up to 40.9%) in traditional Slocum & Devine CCWO and least in newer techniques (7.5–12%).

  • The Oxley mCCWO produced the least TLA shift and tibial shortening, especially at moderate wedge angles.
  • Techniques varied in craniocaudal translation and wedge apex positioning, influencing planning accuracy and mechanical axis alignment.
  • The corrective wedge angle equations reliably predicted TPA within 4–6° across varied tibial conformations.
  • The study supports equation-based planning over static TPA–5° subtraction to reduce risk of under- or over-correction.
  • Simini Surgery Review Podcast

    Know What Matters in the Literature - and Why

    We distill peer-reviewed surgical studies into clinically relevant summaries and
    exam-style questions, so you can make informed decisions with confidence.

    Free Access. No Spam. Just Smarter Surgical Learning

    Multiple Choice Questions on this study

    No items found.

    Access the full library of surgical summaries and exam-style questions.

    Educational content developed independently and supported by Simini.

    The maker of Simini Protect Lavage.