Paulick et al: Ex vivo comparison of lateral plate repairs of experimental oblique ilial fractures in cats
Veterinary Surgery 1, 2022

🔍 Key Findings

  • Locking plates (except ALPS-5) withstood significantly more cycles before failure than nonlocking DCP constructs.
  • ALPS-6.5, LCP, and FIXIN plates endured higher loads and resisted displacement better than DCP and ALPS-5.
  • ALPS-5 plates showed lower bending stiffness than all other constructs (P < .05).
  • DCP constructs failed due to screw loosening, seen in all specimens.
  • Locking constructs failed by bone slicing, affecting 100% of specimens.
  • Catastrophic implant failure (fracture or plastic deformation) occurred only in ALPS-5 group.
  • Plate size and screw-plate interface both influence resistance to cyclic loading in feline ilial fracture repair.
  • Locking plates are preferable for reducing screw pullout, but plate strength (e.g., cross-section) must match loading forces.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

How critical is this paper for crushing the Boards?

🚨 Must-know. I’d bet on seeing this.

📚 Useful background, not must-know.

💤 Skip it. Doubt it’ll ever show up.

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the articles vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Paulick et al: Ex vivo comparison of lateral plate repairs of experimental oblique ilial fractures in cats
Veterinary Surgery 1, 2022

🔍 Key Findings

  • Locking plates (except ALPS-5) withstood significantly more cycles before failure than nonlocking DCP constructs.
  • ALPS-6.5, LCP, and FIXIN plates endured higher loads and resisted displacement better than DCP and ALPS-5.
  • ALPS-5 plates showed lower bending stiffness than all other constructs (P < .05).
  • DCP constructs failed due to screw loosening, seen in all specimens.
  • Locking constructs failed by bone slicing, affecting 100% of specimens.
  • Catastrophic implant failure (fracture or plastic deformation) occurred only in ALPS-5 group.
  • Plate size and screw-plate interface both influence resistance to cyclic loading in feline ilial fracture repair.
  • Locking plates are preferable for reducing screw pullout, but plate strength (e.g., cross-section) must match loading forces.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

Join Now to Access Key Summaries to more Veterinary Surgery Articles!

Multiple Choice Questions on this study

In Paulick 2022 et al., on feline ilial plating, which of the following statements best describes the failure mode observed in **locking plate constructs**?

A. Screw loosening was common in sacral screws
B. Bone slicing occurred in all specimens
C. Implants failed by corrosion
D. Catastrophic screw pull-out was seen in 50%
E. Loosening was rare in locking plates

Answer: Bone slicing occurred in all specimens

Explanation: Locking constructs consistently failed via bone slicing, not screw loosening.
In Paulick 2022 et al., on feline ilial plating, which failure mode occurred in **100% of specimens** using **nonlocking DCP plates**?

A. Implant fracture
B. Plastic deformation
C. Bone slicing
D. Screw loosening
E. Plate bending

Answer: Screw loosening

Explanation: DCP constructs consistently failed by screw loosening, unlike locking plates.
In Paulick 2022 et al., on feline ilial plating, which implant system demonstrated the **lowest bending stiffness** under cyclic loading?

A. ALPS-6.5
B. FIXIN
C. DCP
D. ALPS-5
E. LCP

Answer: ALPS-5

Explanation: ALPS-5 constructs had significantly lower stiffness than all other groups.
In Paulick 2022 et al., on feline ilial plating, what factor most contributed to the **poor performance** of the ALPS-5 system despite it being a locking plate?

A. Incorrect torque application
B. Improper screw insertion
C. Too many empty screw holes
D. Small cross-section of the plate
E. Inferior screw thread design

Answer: Small cross-section of the plate

Explanation: ALPS-5 failed more often due to its reduced moment of inertia, despite angular stability.
In Paulick 2022 et al., on feline ilial plating, which implant groups endured **more cycles** and **greater load** before displacement compared to DCP?

A. ALPS-5 and FIXIN
B. FIXIN and LCP
C. LCP and ALPS-5
D. ALPS-6.5 and ALPS-5
E. DCP and FIXIN

Answer: FIXIN and LCP

Explanation: Only FIXIN and LCP showed statistically superior performance over DCP in load cycles before displacement.

Elevate Your Infection Control Protocol

Implement Simini Protect Lavage for superior, clinically-proven post-operative skin antisepsis and reduced infection risk.