🔍 Key Findings
- Locking plates (except ALPS-5) withstood significantly more cycles before failure than nonlocking DCP constructs.
- ALPS-6.5, LCP, and FIXIN plates endured higher loads and resisted displacement better than DCP and ALPS-5.
- ALPS-5 plates showed lower bending stiffness than all other constructs (P < .05).
- DCP constructs failed due to screw loosening, seen in all specimens.
- Locking constructs failed by bone slicing, affecting 100% of specimens.
- Catastrophic implant failure (fracture or plastic deformation) occurred only in ALPS-5 group.
- Plate size and screw-plate interface both influence resistance to cyclic loading in feline ilial fracture repair.
- Locking plates are preferable for reducing screw pullout, but plate strength (e.g., cross-section) must match loading forces.
