In Rocheleau 2023 et al., on shoulder stabilization, why were anchor insertion angles considered suboptimal in the study?
A. They were directed too proximally
B. Angles were <30°, reducing pullout strength
C. Angles exceeded 90°, risking articular violation
D. They compromised the glenoid rim
E. They increased suture tension unpredictably
Answer: Angles were <30°, reducing pullout strength
Explanation: Suboptimal anchor insertion angles (<30°) could compromise mechanical pullout strength, per CT assessment.
In Rocheleau 2023 et al., on shoulder stabilization, what was the primary advantage of the suture-toggle technique compared to bone anchors?
A. Required fewer CT scans
B. Enabled bilateral stabilization
C. Simpler technique with fewer failures
D. Higher resistance to pullout forces
E. Better bone integration
Answer: Simpler technique with fewer failures
Explanation: Suture-toggle stabilization was successful in all specimens and had fewer technical issues than the bone anchor group.
In Rocheleau 2023 et al., on shoulder stabilization, which complication was more common with bone anchor placement than with suture-toggle stabilization?
A. Anchor dislodgement
B. Joint capsule rupture
C. Violation of articular cartilage
D. Bone tunnel fracture
E. Anchor migration
Answer: Violation of articular cartilage
Explanation: Articular cartilage violation occurred in 2 bone anchor cases versus 1 suture-toggle case.
In Rocheleau 2023 et al., on shoulder stabilization, which stabilization technique showed a statistically significant reduction in abduction angle postoperatively?
A. Bone anchor
B. Suture-toggle
C. Both equally
D. Neither technique
E. Abduction angle not assessed
Answer: Suture-toggle
Explanation: Postoperative abduction angles were slightly lower than baseline in the suture-toggle group, suggesting some overtightening.
In Rocheleau 2023 et al., on shoulder stabilization, what was the overall targeting accuracy of the intra-articular aiming device (IAD) during shoulder stabilization?
A. 70%
B. 88%
C. 100%
D. 95%
E. 82%
Answer: 88%
Explanation: Use of the intra-articular aiming device (IAD) resulted in an overall targeting accuracy of 88%.