In Power 2022 et al., on liposomal bupivacaine use, which of the following statements about surgical wound classification and complication rate is true?
A. Contaminated wounds had highest complications and were significant
B. Clean-contaminated wounds had zero complications
C. Complication rates differed significantly across wound classifications
D. Wound classification influenced need for revision surgery
E. No significant difference was seen across wound classifications
Answer: No significant difference was seen across wound classifications
Explanation: The study found no significant differences in complication rates across clean, clean-contaminated, and contaminated wounds (P = 0.55).
In Power 2022 et al., on liposomal bupivacaine use, what was the overall incidence of short-term incisional complications in dogs?
A. 8.5%
B. 12.4%
C. 19.7%
D. 26.3%
E. 31.5%
Answer: 19.7%
Explanation: This was the overall complication rate reported, with most complications being mild.
In Power 2022 et al., on liposomal bupivacaine use, what proportion of incisional complications required only topical treatment or no treatment?
A. 12.4%
B. 25.5%
C. 45.2%
D. 62.8%
E. 80.3%
Answer: 62.8%
Explanation: Of the 43 complications, 27 required only minimal or no treatment (CSS 1).
In Power 2022 et al., on liposomal bupivacaine use, what was concluded about its use in off-label orthopedic procedures?
A. It increased the risk of SSI
B. It showed significantly more complications
C. It was not evaluated
D. It appeared safe
E. It was contraindicated
Answer: It appeared safe
Explanation: The study found no significant difference in complication rates between labeled and off-label orthopedic uses.
In Power 2022 et al., on liposomal bupivacaine use, which group had a significantly higher rate of incisional complications?
A. Clean surgical wounds
B. Orthopedic procedures
C. Contaminated surgical wounds
D. Clean-contaminated wounds
E. Soft tissue procedures
Answer: Soft tissue procedures
Explanation: Soft tissue surgeries showed a higher complication rate (26%) vs orthopedic (11.6%), which was statistically significant (P < 0.01).