In Mullen 2023 et al., on microvascular perfusion, which metric differed significantly between obstructed and healthy intestines?
A. PBR for 5–9 µm vessels
B. PBR for all vessel sizes
C. Subjective viability score
D. Microvascular density
E. PBR for 10–19 µm vessels
Answer: Microvascular density
Explanation: Microvascular density was significantly lower in obstructed intestines compared to controls (p < .01), making it a reliable indicator.
In Mullen 2023 et al., on microvascular perfusion, what was the main advantage of sidestream dark field (SDF) videomicroscopy in assessing intestinal viability?
A. It reduced the need for postoperative imaging
B. It directly visualized the muscularis layer of the intestine
C. It objectively quantified microvascular perfusion and endothelial glycocalyx
D. It allowed for rapid histopathologic diagnosis intraoperatively
E. It facilitated staple line sealing via thermal imaging
Answer: It objectively quantified microvascular perfusion and endothelial glycocalyx
Explanation: SDF videomicroscopy allowed direct intraoperative assessment of perfusion using vessel density and PBR measurements.
In Mullen 2023 et al., on microvascular perfusion, what conclusion was drawn about handsewn versus stapled enterectomies?
A. Stapled enterectomies had higher PBR values
B. Handsewn techniques showed superior perfusion
C. Stapled enterectomies caused more vascular damage
D. No significant difference in perfusion metrics was observed
E. Stapled enterectomies were more likely to dehisce
Answer: No significant difference in perfusion metrics was observed
Explanation: Microvascular density and PBR adjacent to the suture or staple line did not significantly differ between techniques.
In Mullen 2023 et al., on microvascular perfusion, why was the green TA (4.8 mm) cartridge selected for stapled enterectomies?
A. It was the only size available
B. It provides better resistance to dehiscence
C. It matches canine intestinal thickness more closely
D. It reduces thermal spread
E. It improves mucosal healing
Answer: It matches canine intestinal thickness more closely
Explanation: The green TA cartridge matched canine small intestinal thickness (approx. 2.5 mm), supporting its appropriate use.
In Mullen 2023 et al., on microvascular perfusion, which of the following statements best reflects the accuracy of subjective assessment of intestinal viability?
A. It correlated well with microvascular parameters
B. It reliably distinguished viable from nonviable tissue
C. Surgeon assessment had over 90% specificity
D. It poorly predicted viability and often led to unnecessary resections
E. It eliminated the need for intraoperative imaging
Answer: It poorly predicted viability and often led to unnecessary resections
Explanation: Surgeon’s subjective assessment was shown to be unreliable, with no difference in microvascular density between subjectively viable and nonviable intestines.