← Articles

Alvarez-Sanchez et al: Comparison of indirect computed tomographic lymphography and near-infrared fluorescence sentinel lymph node mapping for integumentary canine mast cell tumors
Veterinary Surgery 3, 2023

🔍 Key Findings

  • Combined ICTL and NIRF detected the same SLN in 80% of cases; each method alone missed sentinel lymph nodes in some dogs.
  • ICLT failed in 5% of dogs, while NIRF failed in 20%; combined use resulted in only 5% failure in SLN detection.
  • Metastatic lymph nodes were detected in 95% of dogs, despite most tumors being low or intermediate grade (95%).
  • 27 of 41 nodes (65.8%) were histologically metastatic (HN2 or HN3), many of which would have been missed using ALN alone.
  • ALN matched the SLN in only 45% of cases with ICTL and 30% with NIRF, supporting the need for SLN mapping.
  • ICLT and NIRF were complementary, often identifying different SLN, with some only fluorescent or enhanced in one modality.
  • Subcutaneous MCT had higher metastatic rates (7/8 dogs) than previously reported, challenging older assumptions about benign behavior.
  • Removing both ALN and SLN (from both methods) improved detection of metastasis to 85–95%, reducing risk of understaging.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

How critical is this paper for crushing the Boards?

🚨 Must-know. I’d bet on seeing this.

📚 Useful background, not must-know.

💤 Skip it. Doubt it’ll ever show up.

Thanks for the feedback!
‍We'll keep fine-tuning the articles vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍Mind trying that again?
← Articles

Alvarez-Sanchez et al: Comparison of indirect computed tomographic lymphography and near-infrared fluorescence sentinel lymph node mapping for integumentary canine mast cell tumors
Veterinary Surgery 3, 2023

🔍 Key Findings

  • Combined ICTL and NIRF detected the same SLN in 80% of cases; each method alone missed sentinel lymph nodes in some dogs.
  • ICLT failed in 5% of dogs, while NIRF failed in 20%; combined use resulted in only 5% failure in SLN detection.
  • Metastatic lymph nodes were detected in 95% of dogs, despite most tumors being low or intermediate grade (95%).
  • 27 of 41 nodes (65.8%) were histologically metastatic (HN2 or HN3), many of which would have been missed using ALN alone.
  • ALN matched the SLN in only 45% of cases with ICTL and 30% with NIRF, supporting the need for SLN mapping.
  • ICLT and NIRF were complementary, often identifying different SLN, with some only fluorescent or enhanced in one modality.
  • Subcutaneous MCT had higher metastatic rates (7/8 dogs) than previously reported, challenging older assumptions about benign behavior.
  • Removing both ALN and SLN (from both methods) improved detection of metastasis to 85–95%, reducing risk of understaging.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

Join Now to Access Key Summaries to more Veterinary Surgery Articles!
Log InSign Up

Multiple Choice Questions on this study

In Alvarez-Sanchez 2023 et al., on SLN mapping in canine MCT, what percentage of dogs had the same SLN identified by both ICTL and NIRF?

A. 40%
B. 55%
C. 65%
D. 80%
E. 95%

Answer: 80%

Explanation: ICLT and NIRF identified the same sentinel node in 80% of dogs, showing strong concordance when both methods were used together.
In Alvarez-Sanchez 2023 et al., on SLN mapping in canine MCT, which tumor type showed unexpectedly high rates of lymph node metastasis?

A. Visceral hemangiosarcoma
B. Cutaneous histiocytoma
C. Subcutaneous mast cell tumor
D. Squamous cell carcinoma
E. Soft tissue sarcoma

Answer: Subcutaneous mast cell tumor

Explanation: 7 of 8 dogs with subcutaneous MCT had metastatic nodes, challenging assumptions of benign behavior in this tumor subtype.
In Alvarez-Sanchez 2023 et al., on SLN mapping in canine MCT, which SLN detection method had the higher failure rate?

A. Near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF)
B. Indirect computed tomographic lymphography (ICTL)
C. Fine-needle aspiration cytology
D. Ultrasound-guided mapping
E. ALN biopsy alone

Answer: Near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF)

Explanation: NIRF failed in 20% of dogs, while ICTL failed in only 5%, making NIRF the less sensitive method individually.
In Alvarez-Sanchez 2023 et al., on SLN mapping in canine MCT, what was the histologic metastasis rate (HN2 or HN3) in excised lymph nodes?

A. 32%
B. 50%
C. 65.8%
D. 80%
E. 90%

Answer: 65.8%

Explanation: 27 of 41 excised lymph nodes were histologically metastatic, a high rate even though most tumors were low-to-intermediate grade.
In Alvarez-Sanchez 2023 et al., on SLN mapping in canine MCT, how often did the anatomic lymph node (ALN) match the SLN identified by ICTL?

A. 25%
B. 30%
C. 45%
D. 60%
E. 75%

Answer: 45%

Explanation: Only 45% of ALNs matched the ICTL-identified SLNs, indicating a high likelihood of misclassification when relying on anatomy alone.

Elevate Your Infection Control Protocol

Implement Simini Protect Lavage for superior, clinically-proven post-operative skin antisepsis and reduced infection risk.

Start Your Free Trial TodayStart Your Free Trial

Review More Key Summaries from this Veterinary Surgery Journal Issue

Peterson

 et al: 

Evaluation of a crescent saw guide for tibial plateau‐leveling osteotomy: An ex vivo study

Mihara

 et al: 

Effects of mitral valve repair on valvular geometry and hemodynamics in dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease

Drudi

 et al: 

Comparison of immediate and short‐term outcomes of cricoarytenoid and thyroarytenoid lateralization in dogs with idiopathic laryngeal paralysis

Scott

 et al: 

Revision of osteointegrated acetabular cup prostheses in nine dogs

Clough

 et al: 

Combined center of rotation of angulation‐based leveling osteotomy and tibial tuberosity transposition: An ex vivo mechanical study