In Tani 2022 et al., on FCU tendon reconstruction, what type of fixation was used postoperatively to protect the repair?
A. Type II external fixator
B. Type Ia external fixator
C. Type I external skeletal fixator
D. Padded bandage only
E. Cast and splint
Answer: Type I external skeletal fixator
Explanation: Type I ESF was used to immobilize the radius and metacarpals for 6 weeks to protect the repair.
In Tani 2022 et al., on FCU tendon reconstruction, what diagnostic modality helped identify FCU involvement preoperatively?
A. CT scan
B. Fluoroscopy
C. Ultrasonography
D. MRI
E. Arthrography
Answer: Ultrasonography
Explanation: Ultrasonography revealed a thinner FCU tendon and echogenic changes in the affected limb, aiding diagnosis.
In Tani 2022 et al., on FCU tendon reconstruction, what did histology of the FCU in Case 1 reveal?
A. Pyogranulomatous inflammation
B. Marked fibrosis and ossification
C. Purulent tenosynovitis
D. Mild nonspecific degeneration
E. No abnormalities
Answer: Mild nonspecific degeneration
Explanation: Histology showed mild atrophy and degeneration, consistent with injury rather than systemic disease.
In Tani 2022 et al., on FCU tendon reconstruction, what was the main reason for using a fascia lata autograft in Case 1?
A. To enhance strength of the primary repair
B. To avoid donor site morbidity
C. To bridge a complete tendon rupture
D. To improve cosmetic outcome
E. To prevent immune rejection
Answer: To bridge a complete tendon rupture
Explanation: Primary repair was not possible due to a 24 mm tendon gap; fascia lata was used as a bridging graft.
In Tani 2022 et al., on FCU tendon reconstruction, what was the long-term outcome for both dogs?
A. Development of degenerative joint disease
B. Recurrence of hyperextension
C. Improved flexion but reduced extension
D. Normal gait and joint motion
E. Requirement for arthrodesis later
Answer: Normal gait and joint motion
Explanation: At 36-month follow-up, both dogs had full function with no recurrence of hyperextension.