Your Custom Quiz

In Hernon 2023 et al., on flushing the CBD, what was concluded regarding the routine use of CBD flushing during cholecystectomy in dogs with GBM?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The authors concluded that CBD flushing did not yield clinical or clinico-pathological benefits, and should not be routinely performed.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It showed no added benefit and should not be routine.
The authors concluded that CBD flushing did not yield clinical or clinico-pathological benefits, and should not be routinely performed.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Flushing the common bile duct (CBD) during cholecystectomy did not result in improved hepatobiliary markers compared to no flushing.
  • Cholecystectomy alone significantly reduced ALP, ALT, GGT, bilirubin, and cholesterol 3 days postoperatively (p < .05 for all).
  • Survival to discharge was 90.3%, with no survival difference between flushed and non-flushed groups.
  • Postoperative pancreatitis occurred in 12.9% of dogs, evenly distributed between groups, suggesting flushing did not increase risk.
  • Most common complication was regurgitation (29%), not significantly different between groups.
  • Free abdominal fluid had low sensitivity (29%) but moderate specificity (73%) for gallbladder rupture.
  • No difference in duration of hospitalization or postoperative complications between groups.
  • Gallbladder rupture rate was 12.9%, lower than previously reported in literature.

Hernon

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

The effect of flushing of the common bile duct on hepatobiliary markers and short‐term outcomes in dogs undergoing cholecystectomy for the management of gall bladder mucocele: A randomized controlled prospective study

2023-5-VS-hernon-5

Article Title: The effect of flushing of the common bile duct on hepatobiliary markers and short‐term outcomes in dogs undergoing cholecystectomy for the management of gall bladder mucocele: A randomized controlled prospective study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Duvieusart 2025 et al., on lung lobectomy approaches, what conclusion was drawn about stapler success across techniques?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Staplers successfully completed lobectomies in all cases; no group differences noted in success.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Similar across all groups.
Staplers successfully completed lobectomies in all cases; no group differences noted in success.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Study Design: Canine cadaveric study comparing intercostal thoracotomy (ICT), median sternotomy (MS), and transdiaphragmatic with caudal median sternotomy (TDCM) for accessory lung lobectomy (ALL).
  • Main Outcomes:
    • Exposure Area: TDCM (193.5 cm²) > MS (106.5 cm²) > ICT (73.5 cm²) (p = .01).
    • TDCM provided significantly greater exposure than MS (p = .02) and ICT (p = .02); MS > ICT (p = .04).
    • Surgical Time: No significant difference (p = .06).
    • Lobe Excision (% by weight/surface area): No significant difference between groups (p = .4).
    • Staple Line Leak: Leak at ≤40 cmH₂O in 2/4 ICT, 0/4 MS, 0/4 TDCM (p = .09).
  • Complications:
    • 1/4 MS cases had iatrogenic damage to an adjacent lobe.
  • Technical Insights:
    • TDCM approach allowed immediate visualization of all three parts of the right pulmonary ligament.
    • The TDCM approach offers improved access without requiring en bloc removal with the right caudal lobe.
  • Conclusion: The TDCM approach provides improved exposure for ALL lobectomy with no increase in surgical time or complications relative to other approaches.

Duvieusart

Veterinary Surgery

1

2025

Comparison of three approaches for accessory lung lobectomy in the canine cadaveric model: Intercostal thoracotomy, median sternotomy, and a transdiaphragmatic approach combined with caudal median sternotomy

2025-1-VS-duvieusart-4

Article Title: Comparison of three approaches for accessory lung lobectomy in the canine cadaveric model: Intercostal thoracotomy, median sternotomy, and a transdiaphragmatic approach combined with caudal median sternotomy

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Nash 2024 et al., on monitoring technique, what best describes the esophageal pH probe placement method?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Probe was inserted transnasally during TIVA for radiographs and secured to nostril.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Transnasal under anesthesia.
Probe was inserted transnasally during TIVA for radiographs and secured to nostril.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Population: 35 nonbrachycephalic dogs undergoing orthopedic procedures (TPLO)
  • Study design: Prospective observational using transnasal Digitrapper dual-sensor pH probe after short TIVA
  • Upper reference limits:
    • Distal GER events per hour: 2.4
    • Proximal GER events per hour: 0.4
    • Cumulative distal acid exposure: 2.3%
    • Cumulative proximal acid exposure: 0%
  • Median values (normal):
    • Distal GER events per hour: 0.3
    • Proximal GER events per hour: 0
  • Proximal GER observed in 12/31 dogs
  • No regurgitation observed in any dog
  • No major adverse events with probe use
  • Clinical implication: These parameters provide a reference for assessing excessive GER in future canine surgical cases

Nash

Veterinary Surgery

1

2024

Esophageal pH‐monitoring in nonbrachycephalic dogs; a reference

2024-1-VS-nash-3

Article Title: Esophageal pH‐monitoring in nonbrachycephalic dogs; a reference

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Tobias 2022 et al., on perineal hernia repair positioning, which surgical advantage did dorsal recumbency provide?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Dorsal positioning allowed concurrent perineal and abdominal procedures without needing repositioning.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Simultaneous access to abdomen and perineum.
Dorsal positioning allowed concurrent perineal and abdominal procedures without needing repositioning.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Perineal hernia repair was feasible in dorsal recumbency in all 23 dogs, allowing simultaneous perineal and abdominal procedures without repositioning.
  • Internal obturator muscle transposition (IOMT) was successfully performed in 22 dogs, with tendon transection facilitating improved muscle elevation.
  • Complication rate was 60.9% in-hospital and 47.8% post-discharge, mostly minor (e.g., swelling, drainage), with infection suspected in 4 dogs (17.4%).
  • Recurrence rate was 19% overall, but significantly higher in dogs with prior hernia repairs (50% vs 5.9%; p = 0.053).
  • Dogs without prior repairs or organ pexies had no recurrences (p = 0.035), suggesting primary repairs without preexisting interventions fare better.
  • Castration and adjunctive abdominal procedures (e.g., colopexy, cystopexy) were often performed concurrently (18/23 dogs).
  • Colopexy did not prevent recurrence, although it aided in surgical visualization during perineal repair.
  • Dorsal positioning allowed simultaneous access to the abdomen and perineum, improving surgical efficiency without added complications.

Tobias

Veterinary Surgery

5

2022

Perineal hernia repair in dorsal recumbency in 23 dogs: Description of technique, complications, and outcome

2022-5-VS-tobias-1

Article Title: Perineal hernia repair in dorsal recumbency in 23 dogs: Description of technique, complications, and outcome

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In McLean 2024 et al., what was the mean postoperative TPA in dogs **without** rock-back?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The mean follow-up TPA in non-rock-back dogs was 6.8°:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}
Incorrect. The correct answer is 6.8°.
The mean follow-up TPA in non-rock-back dogs was 6.8°:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 95 TPLO procedures reviewed retrospectively with follow-up radiographs
  • Rock-back defined as increase in tibial plateau angle (TPA) ≥2° from immediate post-op to recheck
  • 21% of stifles (20/95) experienced rock-back
  • Mean ΔTPA among rock-back cases = 3.2° ± 2.6°
  • No implant failures or tibial tuberosity fractures were reported in these cases
  • Plate inclination and exit cut angle (ECA) were not associated with increased risk of rock-back (p = 0.4 and 0.2)
  • Authors hypothesize that compression across osteotomy in vivo may mitigate torsional effects from ECA, unlike in gap-model studies
  • Emphasizes that rock-back is relatively common, even with well-placed implants

Mclean

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

6

2024

Effect of Plate Inclination and Osteotomy Positioning on Rock-back following Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomy in Dogs

2024-6-VCOT-mclean-4

Article Title: Effect of Plate Inclination and Osteotomy Positioning on Rock-back following Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomy in Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Wood 2024 et al., on knot security and locking throws, how did the failure mode differ between locking and non-locking constructs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Non-locking knots failed by slipping, while locking versions broke the suture material.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Locking failed by breakage, non-locking by slippage.
Non-locking knots failed by slipping, while locking versions broke the suture material.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Adding a single locking throw significantly increased holding security for specific knots, including the surgeon's throw (p = .0001) and square throw (p = .0002).
  • For the Miller's throw (p = .166) and strangle throw (p = .808), no significant improvement was observed with a locking throw.
  • After locking throw addition, all five knots leaked at similar pressures (p = .5233), and these pressures exceeded physiologic arterial pressures.
  • Surgeon's throw without a locking throw had the lowest leak pressure (62.5 ± 46.2 mm Hg), below physiologic arterial values.
  • The square throw without locking also leaked below physiologic pressures (148.7 ± 109.4 mm Hg), though it outperformed the surgeon's throw.
  • Miller’s and strangle throws performed significantly better than square or surgeon’s throws without locking, achieving leak pressures >200 mm Hg.
  • All knots used 2-0 polyglyconate monofilament (Maxon); no comparisons across suture types or sizes were performed.
  • Authors concluded that correct tensioning and locking throw addition are key to safe vascular ligation. Miller’s, strangle, or slip knots are preferred for challenging surgical fields.

Wood

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Influence of a single locking throw on the in vitro holding security of five friction knots using two monofilament suture materials in a canine model

2024-4-VS-wood-2

Article Title: Influence of a single locking throw on the in vitro holding security of five friction knots using two monofilament suture materials in a canine model

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Low 2025 et al., on machine-learning outcomes in IVDE, what proportion of deep-pain-negative dogs recovered ambulation after decompressive surgery?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Ambulation recovery occurred in 86 out of 162 dogs, a 53.1% success rate.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 53.1%.
Ambulation recovery occurred in 86 out of 162 dogs, a 53.1% success rate.

🔍 Key Findings

The study included 162 deep-pain-negative dogs undergoing decompressive surgery (hemilaminectomy) for acute thoracolumbar intervertebral disc extrusion (IVDE).

Ambulatory recovery occurred in 53.1% of dogs (86/162).

The best performing machine-learning model was XGBoost, with an AUC of 0.9502 and accuracy of 89.1%, outperforming Ridge, AdaBoost, and Naive Bayes models.

Preoperative-only XGBoost models were less accurate, with AUC dropping to 0.8271 and accuracy to 71.9%.

Top predictive features (by SHAP analysis) included:

  1. T2-weighted to L2 spinal cord signal ratio (lower values predicted better outcome)
  2. Use of fenestration (presence associated with better recovery)
  3. Hospitalization duration
  4. Imaging modality used
  5. Duration of nonambulatory status

Machine learning provided better insight into prognostic factors than traditional statistical methods.

Low

Veterinary Surgery

4

2025

Machine-learning-based prediction of functional recovery in deep-pain-negative dogs after decompressive thoracolumbar hemilaminectomy for acute intervertebral disc extrusion

2025-4-VS-low-1

Article Title: Machine-learning-based prediction of functional recovery in deep-pain-negative dogs after decompressive thoracolumbar hemilaminectomy for acute intervertebral disc extrusion

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Carrera 2024 et al., what was the observed long-term effect on aLDFA and tibial torsion at 1-year postoperatively?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Extensor mechanism alignment was maintained long-term, with no reluxations or deformity progression:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}
Incorrect. The correct answer is All values remained close to immediate postoperative values.
Extensor mechanism alignment was maintained long-term, with no reluxations or deformity progression:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 5 juvenile dogs (mean age 7.2 months) with grade III–IV MPL were treated surgically.
  • Most had femoral varus + external tibial torsion; some had shallow trochlear grooves.
  • Distal femoral osteotomy was performed in 4/5 dogs; Tibial tuberosity transposition (TTT) in 3/5; Sulcoplasty in 2/5.
  • Mean time to weight bearing: 9.8 ± 5.5 days; healing: 55 ± 24 days
  • No reluxations, and final radiographic values for aLDFA and torsion were maintained at 1 year.
  • One complication due to domestic trauma, not surgical failure.
  • Early surgery appeared to preserve alignment and prevent deformity progression.

Carrera

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

2

2024

Early Surgical Management of Medial Patellar Luxation in Juvenile Dogs

2024-2-VCOT-carrera-4

Article Title: Early Surgical Management of Medial Patellar Luxation in Juvenile Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Caldeira 2025 et al., on femoral neck fixation, how did displacement values compare among groups?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. There was no statistically significant difference in displacement between the groups
Incorrect. The correct answer is No significant difference among groups.
There was no statistically significant difference in displacement between the groups

🔍 Key Findings

Design: In vitro study on cadaveric femurs (n=21) with basilar femoral neck fractures stabilized using 2 vs 3 titanium cannulated screws.

Stiffness: Control > 3-screw > 2-screw (674 > 120 > 90 N/mm).

Yield Load: 3-screw (586 N) > 2-screw (303 N); both < intact femur (2692 N).

Displacement: No difference across groups.

Complication: 3-screw technique more demanding; higher risk of cortical perforation, especially with narrow femoral necks.

Failure Mode: Dislodgement of femoral head + screw shaft bending.

Conclusion: 3 screws = stronger construct than 2 screws. Clinical implications need further study.

Caldeira

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

1

2025

In Vitro Biomechanical Study of Femoral Neck Fracture Fixation with Two or Three Cannulated Screws in Dogs

2025-1-VC-Caldeira-5

Article Title: In Vitro Biomechanical Study of Femoral Neck Fracture Fixation with Two or Three Cannulated Screws in Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Lin 2025 et al., on surgical approaches to the radius, which benefit did CLA offer over CMA regarding ulna fracture fixation?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. CLA permitted ulna fixation via same skin incision, unlike CMA.
Incorrect. The correct answer is CLA allowed shared incision for ulna.
CLA permitted ulna fixation via same skin incision, unlike CMA.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Craniolateral approach (CLA) exposed significantly more radial surface area than craniomedial approach (CMA) (19.4 cm² vs. 13.8 cm²; p = 0.01).
  • Proximal width of exposure was greater in CLA, especially at 12.5% length (P2 level, p = 0.016), aiding plate placement.
  • No significant difference in exposed bone length between approaches.
  • CLA avoided major neurovascular structures, making dissection cleaner and safer proximally.
  • CMA consistently encountered median nerve/artery/vein, complicating proximal exposure.
  • CLA allowed better access to proximal radius for locking plate application, which may benefit MIPO techniques.
  • CLA also enables ulna fixation via the same incision, whereas CMA requires a separate skin incision.
  • Anatomical tilt of the proximal cranial surface favored CLA, requiring less plate contouring than CMA for proper fit.

Lin

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

3

2025

Does the Craniolateral Approach Provide Better Exposure to the Radius than the Craniomedial Approach for Internal Fracture Fixation in Dogs?

2025-3-VCOT-lin-4

Article Title: Does the Craniolateral Approach Provide Better Exposure to the Radius than the Craniomedial Approach for Internal Fracture Fixation in Dogs?

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.