Your Custom Quiz

In Azuma 2024 et al., on 3D vs 2D laparoscopy, what was the median length of cystic duct stump left distal to the first endoclip?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Both groups had a median stump length of 2.5 mm, consistent with human surgery recommendations.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 2.5 mm.
Both groups had a median stump length of 2.5 mm, consistent with human surgery recommendations.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 3D laparoscopy significantly reduced time to first endoclip placement compared to 2D (median 76 vs. 238 seconds, p = .016).
  • Total surgical time was not significantly different between 3D and 2D groups.
  • No differences were observed in intraoperative complications such as cystic duct injury, clip dislodgment, or gallbladder perforation.
  • Cystic duct stump length was comparable between groups (median 2.5 mm).
  • Liver parenchyma attachment severity did not differ significantly between 2D and 3D groups.
  • All procedures were performed by an experienced surgeon, potentially reducing the benefit seen with 3D visualization.
  • No conversions to open surgery occurred, and no intraoperative complications were reported.
  • The study suggests 3D laparoscopy may aid less experienced surgeons due to enhanced depth perception.

Azuma

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopy for cholecystectomy in a canine cadaveric study

2024-4-VS-azuma-4

Article Title: Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopy for cholecystectomy in a canine cadaveric study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Wood 2024 et al., on knot security and locking throws, which suture material showed greater holding strength?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Monosyn consistently outperformed PDS in all tested friction knot configurations.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Monosyn.
Monosyn consistently outperformed PDS in all tested friction knot configurations.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Adding a single locking throw significantly increased holding security for specific knots, including the surgeon's throw (p = .0001) and square throw (p = .0002).
  • For the Miller's throw (p = .166) and strangle throw (p = .808), no significant improvement was observed with a locking throw.
  • After locking throw addition, all five knots leaked at similar pressures (p = .5233), and these pressures exceeded physiologic arterial pressures.
  • Surgeon's throw without a locking throw had the lowest leak pressure (62.5 ± 46.2 mm Hg), below physiologic arterial values.
  • The square throw without locking also leaked below physiologic pressures (148.7 ± 109.4 mm Hg), though it outperformed the surgeon's throw.
  • Miller’s and strangle throws performed significantly better than square or surgeon’s throws without locking, achieving leak pressures >200 mm Hg.
  • All knots used 2-0 polyglyconate monofilament (Maxon); no comparisons across suture types or sizes were performed.
  • Authors concluded that correct tensioning and locking throw addition are key to safe vascular ligation. Miller’s, strangle, or slip knots are preferred for challenging surgical fields.

Wood

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Influence of a single locking throw on the in vitro holding security of five friction knots using two monofilament suture materials in a canine model

2024-4-VS-wood-4

Article Title: Influence of a single locking throw on the in vitro holding security of five friction knots using two monofilament suture materials in a canine model

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Gomes 2025 et al., on subdural shunting for TL-AD, what was the significant long-term outcome of SDS placement compared to durotomy alone?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 85.7% of dogs with SDS improved long-term vs. 41.7% with durotomy alone (p = 0.04).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Significantly improved long-term neurological recovery.
85.7% of dogs with SDS improved long-term vs. 41.7% with durotomy alone (p = 0.04).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Modified subdural shunt (SDS) placement was adapted from prior techniques using a hemilaminectomy approach and no suturing of the dura or shunt.
  • Dogs receiving SDS had significantly better long-term outcomes (85.7% improved) compared to those with durotomy alone (41.7%).
  • Recurrence rate was lower in the SDS group (14.3%) than control (41.7%), though not statistically significant.
  • Most recurrences occurred in Pugs (5/7), suggesting a breed predisposition.
  • Shunt size was limited to 25% of spinal cord diameter, typically 3–3.5 Fr.
  • CSF flow through the shunt was confirmed intraoperatively, supporting the role of SDS in maintaining flow and possibly preventing recurrence.
  • Immediate postoperative outcomes were not different between groups (≈42% deteriorated), but long-term recovery was better with SDS.
  • Steroid use pre-surgery did not correlate with improved outcome; fewer SDS dogs received steroids pre-op.

Gomes

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Post‐surgical outcome and recurrence rates in thoracolumbar arachnoid diverticula undergoing durotomy alone or alongside a modified technique of subdural shunt-placement in dogs

2025-5-VS-gomes-2

Article Title: Post‐surgical outcome and recurrence rates in thoracolumbar arachnoid diverticula undergoing durotomy alone or alongside a modified technique of subdural shunt-placement in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Petchell 2025 et al., on CORA-based CCWO, which of the following methods showed the least variability in postoperative outcomes across all breeds?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. CCWOCORA had zero variance in TPAPOST (5.00° in all cases), making it the most predictable.
Incorrect. The correct answer is CCWOCORA.
CCWOCORA had zero variance in TPAPOST (5.00° in all cases), making it the most predictable.

🔍 Key Findings

  • The CORA-based cranial closing wedge ostectomy (CCWOCORA) consistently achieved the target postoperative TPA of 5° across all tibial morphologies.
  • CCWOCORA produced significantly less variability in postoperative TPA compared to other methods (TPA range: 5.00–5.00°; p < .001).
  • Mechanical axis advancement (MAA) was precisely controlled at 3° in CCWOCORA, leading to greater surgical predictability.
  • Other techniques (e.g., CCWOTPA, CCWOTPA–5, CCWOISO) showed greater variance in TPA, MAA, and tibial length.
  • In small-breed dogs, increasing the MAA from 3° to 5° did not affect TPA outcomes, but increased proximal bone stock, improving feasibility.
  • Wedge angles and tibial length changes varied by method, but CCWOCORA maintained length better than TPA-based methods.
  • The technique allows preoperative planning of both desired MAA and TPA, enhancing predictability and customization.
  • CORA methodology enables precise geometric correction and alignment of mechanical axes, reducing reliance on trial-and-error alignment.

Petchell

Veterinary Surgery

7

2025

An in silico comparison of a novel CORA-based cranial closing wedge ostectomy methodology with three other techniques

2025-7-VS-petchell-4

Article Title: An in silico comparison of a novel CORA-based cranial closing wedge ostectomy methodology with three other techniques

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Nicolas 2024 et al., what surgical technique was used to decompress the foramen at T1–2?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The foramen was decompressed using a minimally invasive mini-hemilaminectomy while preserving articular facets:contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Mini-hemilaminectomy.
The foramen was decompressed using a minimally invasive mini-hemilaminectomy while preserving articular facets:contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • The lateral approach via scapular osteotomy allowed safe access to the T1-2 foramen in a French Bulldog with foraminal disc extrusion.
  • A mini-hemilaminectomy was performed, preserving articular facets.
  • The dog had no neurologic deficits postoperatively, returned to ambulation within 24 hours, and was discharged in 3 days.
  • At 10 months, CT confirmed excellent scapular healing and no recurrence.
  • Double 2.4-mm locking plates provided stable fixation across the scapular spine.
  • The technique avoided thoracic entry or dorsal spine dissection, suggesting a less invasive alternative for select T1-2 foraminal cases.

Nicolas

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

2

2024

Scapular Osteotomy for Lateral Access to a T1-2 Foraminal Disc Extrusion, Treated by Mini-Hemilaminectomy in a Dog

2024-2-VCOT-nicolas-5

Article Title: Scapular Osteotomy for Lateral Access to a T1-2 Foraminal Disc Extrusion, Treated by Mini-Hemilaminectomy in a Dog

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In McKay 2023 et al., on patellar tendon augmentation, which augmentation group had the **lowest frequency of 3 mm gap formation**?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Only 6% of constructs in the combined group developed 3 mm gap formation, significantly lower than other groups.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Combined TBW.
Only 6% of constructs in the combined group developed 3 mm gap formation, significantly lower than other groups.

2023-8-VS-mckay-3

Article Title:

Journal:

In Nash 2024 et al., on GER frequency, what was the upper reference limit for distal GER events per hour?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. An upper reference limit of 2.4 distal GER events per hour was established based on 35 healthy dogs.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 2.4.
An upper reference limit of 2.4 distal GER events per hour was established based on 35 healthy dogs.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Population: 35 nonbrachycephalic dogs undergoing orthopedic procedures (TPLO)
  • Study design: Prospective observational using transnasal Digitrapper dual-sensor pH probe after short TIVA
  • Upper reference limits:
    • Distal GER events per hour: 2.4
    • Proximal GER events per hour: 0.4
    • Cumulative distal acid exposure: 2.3%
    • Cumulative proximal acid exposure: 0%
  • Median values (normal):
    • Distal GER events per hour: 0.3
    • Proximal GER events per hour: 0
  • Proximal GER observed in 12/31 dogs
  • No regurgitation observed in any dog
  • No major adverse events with probe use
  • Clinical implication: These parameters provide a reference for assessing excessive GER in future canine surgical cases

Nash

Veterinary Surgery

1

2024

Esophageal pH‐monitoring in nonbrachycephalic dogs; a reference

2024-1-VS-nash-1

Article Title: Esophageal pH‐monitoring in nonbrachycephalic dogs; a reference

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Bondonny 2024 et al., how did the growth plate appear on radiographs at 6–8 weeks in most cases?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The physis appeared closed at 6–8 weeks post-op in 72.3% of follow-up radiographs:contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Closed in 72.3% of cases.
The physis appeared closed at 6–8 weeks post-op in 72.3% of follow-up radiographs:contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Retrospective study of 33 fractures in 31 cats with Salter–Harris I or II distal femoral fractures
  • Used 1 intramedullary Steinmann pin + 1 laterally placed antirotational pin
  • 96.9% achieved full functional outcome at mid-term follow-up
  • No implant migration or removal required
  • Minor complications: 2 seromas; Major: 3 (patellar luxation [2], osteomyelitis [1])
  • Growth plate remained open in 27.3% of cases at 6–8 weeks post-op

Bondonny

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

2

2024

Use of a Modified Intramedullary Pinning Technique for Distal Femoral Physeal Salter–Harris Type I and II Fracture Management

2024-2-VCOT-bondonny-5

Article Title: Use of a Modified Intramedullary Pinning Technique for Distal Femoral Physeal Salter–Harris Type I and II Fracture Management

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Cheon 2025 et al., on guide accuracy in DFO, what was the overall mean angular correction error found using both patient-specific and universal guides?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Mean errors were under 2° for both guide types, with no statistical difference.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Less than 2°.
Mean errors were under 2° for both guide types, with no statistical difference.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Both patient-specific and universal guides yielded correction errors <2°, with no statistically significant difference in accuracy.
  • Universal guide corrected aLDFA up to 24° and AA up to 20°, addressing multiplanar deformities effectively.
  • Patient-specific guides allowed for preoperative simulation, providing more stable pin placement and potentially aiding less-experienced surgeons.
  • Universal guide eliminated the need for CT-based customization, reducing time and cost.
  • Cadaver and bone model trials showed consistent accuracy, validating both methods in vitro and ex vivo.
  • No significant differences in outcome when correcting uniplanar (aLDFA) vs biplanar (aLDFA + AA) deformities.
  • Universal guide's fixed size presented limitations in small dogs, potentially requiring multiple size options.
  • Universal guide showed potential for standard use, offering repeatable outcomes with minimal prep despite needing precise intraoperative placement.

Cheon

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

3

2025

Comparing the Accuracy of Patient-Specific Guide and Universal Guide for Distal Femoral Osteotomy in Dogs

2025-3-VCOT-cheon-1

Article Title: Comparing the Accuracy of Patient-Specific Guide and Universal Guide for Distal Femoral Osteotomy in Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Espinel Rupérez 2023 et al., on hip toggle stabilization, which intraoperative complication occurred most frequently?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. K-wire complications (loss or misplacement) occurred in multiple joints, highlighting it as the most frequent issue.
Incorrect. The correct answer is K-wire misplacement or loss during drilling.
K-wire complications (loss or misplacement) occurred in multiple joints, highlighting it as the most frequent issue.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Arthroscopic-assisted hip toggle stabilization (AA-HTS) was successfully completed in all 14 feline cadaver joints.
  • Femoral and acetabular tunnel creation was feasible in all cases, though femoral tunnel placement had a higher rate of deviations.
  • Intraoperative complications occurred in 5/14 joints, mostly related to femoral tunnel creation and toggle lodging.
  • Minor articular cartilage injury (<10% total cartilage area) occurred in 10/14 joints, but no injury to neurovascular or intrapelvic structures.
  • Thirteen surgical technique deviations (8 major, 5 minor) were identified in 7 joints, all involving the femoral tunnel.
  • Toggle passage through the femoral tunnel was the most challenging step, being mildly difficult in 6 joints.
  • Postoperative CT and gross dissection confirmed all toggles and buttons were in correct position, without damage to major surrounding structures.
  • No deviations, complications, or cartilage injuries occurred in the last 4 joints, suggesting a learning curve effect.

Espinel Rupérez

Veterinary Surgery

6

2023

Arthroscopic-assisted hip toggle stabilization in cats: An ex vivo feasibility study

2023-6-VS-espinel-1

Article Title: Arthroscopic-assisted hip toggle stabilization in cats: An ex vivo feasibility study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.