Your Custom Quiz

In Parlier 2024 et al., on insufflation effects on portal pressure in dogs, what was the observed change in portal pressure at 14 mmHg insufflation?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Portal pressure increased by 175% at 14 mmHg compared to baseline.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 175% increase.
Portal pressure increased by 175% at 14 mmHg compared to baseline.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Portal pressure increased proportionally with insufflation pressure: 38% at 6 mmHg, 95% at 10 mmHg, and 175% at 14 mmHg.
  • Exponential model: average increase of 7.45% per mmHg of insufflation pressure (CI: 4.7–10.2%).
  • No systemic hemodynamic adverse effects were observed; MAP remained >60 mmHg throughout.
  • Portal hypertension threshold (15 mmHg) predicted at ~6.4 mmHg insufflation pressure.
  • No statistical impact from patient weight, pressure-to-weight ratio, or order of insufflation rounds.
  • Measurement technique was feasible and safe, with only minor challenges (e.g., catheter kinking).
  • The study supports use of the lowest insufflation pressure needed for visualization to avoid portal hypertension.
  • Baseline portal pressures returned after desufflation, supporting comparison pre- and post-attenuation.

Parlier

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Prospective, randomized, clinical trial on the effects of laparoscopic insufflation pressures on portal pressures in dogs

2024-4-VS-parlier-3

Article Title: Prospective, randomized, clinical trial on the effects of laparoscopic insufflation pressures on portal pressures in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In McLean 2024 et al., what was the average increase in TPA among dogs with rock-back?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Dogs with rock-back had an average TPA increase of 3.2° ± 2.6°:contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}
Incorrect. The correct answer is 3.2° ± 2.6°.
Dogs with rock-back had an average TPA increase of 3.2° ± 2.6°:contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 95 TPLO procedures reviewed retrospectively with follow-up radiographs
  • Rock-back defined as increase in tibial plateau angle (TPA) ≥2° from immediate post-op to recheck
  • 21% of stifles (20/95) experienced rock-back
  • Mean ΔTPA among rock-back cases = 3.2° ± 2.6°
  • No implant failures or tibial tuberosity fractures were reported in these cases
  • Plate inclination and exit cut angle (ECA) were not associated with increased risk of rock-back (p = 0.4 and 0.2)
  • Authors hypothesize that compression across osteotomy in vivo may mitigate torsional effects from ECA, unlike in gap-model studies
  • Emphasizes that rock-back is relatively common, even with well-placed implants

Mclean

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

6

2024

Effect of Plate Inclination and Osteotomy Positioning on Rock-back following Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomy in Dogs

2024-6-VCOT-mclean-3

Article Title: Effect of Plate Inclination and Osteotomy Positioning on Rock-back following Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomy in Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Adair 2023 et al., on PCCLm vs OC in dogs, what was the most common reason for converting PCCLm to OC?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 4 out of 5 conversions from PCCLm to OC were due to uroliths too numerous to retrieve endoscopically.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Uroliths too numerous to retrieve.
4 out of 5 conversions from PCCLm to OC were due to uroliths too numerous to retrieve endoscopically.

🔍 Key Findings

  • PCCLm resulted in significantly fewer postoperative lower urinary tract signs compared to OC (13.0% vs 60.9%, p <.001).
  • Incomplete urolith removal was not significantly different between PCCLm and OC (11.4% vs 20%, p = .112).
  • PCCLm had significantly shorter anesthesia times than OC when no concurrent procedures were performed (97.5 vs 120 min, p < .001).
  • Surgical site infection/inflammation (SSII) rates were low and not significantly different between groups (4.5% PCCLm vs 1.8% OC).
  • Dogs undergoing PCCLm were more frequently discharged same-day (84.7% vs 0% in OC), reflecting faster recovery.
  • PCCLm had higher intraoperative complication rates (22.1% vs 3.4%), mostly due to incision extension or conversions.
  • Time to additional surgery for urolith recurrence was longer in PCCLm dogs (24 vs 11.5 months, p = .004).
  • Calcium oxalate uroliths were more prevalent in PCCLm cases, while OC had more struvite or mixed types.

Adair

Veterinary Surgery

6

2023

Retrospective comparison of modified percutaneous cystolithotomy (PCCLm) and traditional open cystotomy (OC) in dogs: 218 cases (2010–2019)

2023-6-VS-adair-4

Article Title: Retrospective comparison of modified percutaneous cystolithotomy (PCCLm) and traditional open cystotomy (OC) in dogs: 218 cases (2010–2019)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Danielski 2022 et al., on PAUL complications, which factor was significantly associated with increased risk of post-operative complications?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Heavier dogs had a 7% increased risk of complications per kg.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Body weight.
Heavier dogs had a 7% increased risk of complications per kg.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Major complications occurred in 25.6% of limbs treated with PAUL, including non-union, implant failure, and infection requiring revision surgery.
  • Increased body weight was significantly associated with a higher risk of complications (7% increased risk per additional kg; p = .04).
  • Post-operative radiographic assessment was unreliable in predicting complications; inter-observer agreement was poor (kappa ≤ 0.12).
  • Expert evaluation of implant or reduction errors had low predictive value (k < 0.2) for postoperative complications.
  • Common major complications included non-union (6 limbs), screw breakage, and surgical site infections.
  • Implant removal was required in 11.5% of limbs, mostly due to non-union or infection.
  • Being a Labrador appeared protective on univariate analysis, but not on multivariate analysis after adjusting for weight.
  • Radiographs showing suboptimal plate placement or osteotomy reduction did not reliably correlate with actual complication occurrence.

Danielski

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Complications after proximal abducting ulnar osteotomy and prognostic factors in 66 dogs

2022-1-VS-danielski-1

Article Title: Complications after proximal abducting ulnar osteotomy and prognostic factors in 66 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Peng 2025 et al., on topical amikacin gel, at what time point were serum levels consistently above the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ)?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All detectable serum concentrations >2.5 μg/mL occurred at ~2 hours post-application【90†Veterinary Surgery†L1-L20】
Incorrect. The correct answer is 2 hours post-application.
All detectable serum concentrations >2.5 μg/mL occurred at ~2 hours post-application【90†Veterinary Surgery†L1-L20】

🔍 Key Findings

Objective: Determine if topical 45 mg/mL amikacin in CMC gel leads to systemic absorption in dogs with wounds.

Dogs enrolled: 11 client-owned dogs, with 31 applications of the gel.

Serum findings:

  • Only 5 of 153 samples were above the 2.5 µg/mL quantification limit
  • All values remained <5 µg/mL, the presumed toxicity threshold
  • No correlation was found between dose-related parameters (mg, mg/kg, mg/cm²) and serum amikacin levels

Peak concentrations were observed at ~2 hours post-application, declining rapidly thereafter

No nephrotoxicity observed, and most values were below detection

Conclusion: Topical amikacin gel appears safe at doses up to 24.9 mg/kg, with minimal systemic absorption

Peng

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Serum amikacin concentrations in dogs with naturally occurring open wounds treated with topical amikacin in carboxymethylcellulose hydrogel

2025-3-VS-peng2-2

Article Title: Serum amikacin concentrations in dogs with naturally occurring open wounds treated with topical amikacin in carboxymethylcellulose hydrogel

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Almeida 2025 et al., on TPLO and partial CCL rupture, what was the authors’ conclusion on CCL transection as a preventive for desmitis?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Authors do not recommend routine CCL remnant transection to prevent patellar desmitis.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Not recommended.
Authors do not recommend routine CCL remnant transection to prevent patellar desmitis.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Transecting the CCL remnant during TPLO did not reduce patellar ligament thickening (PLT) at any measured point (proximal, mid, distal).
  • Transection also failed to reduce postoperative patellar ligament shortening (PLL) at 6 weeks.
  • Both groups (transected vs non-transected) showed significant thickening and shortening, with greatest PLT increase at the midpoint.
  • Increased PLT was positively correlated with tibial plateau rotation (p = 0.02) and postoperative TPA (p = 0.04).
  • No correlation between TT-O (tibial tuberosity width index) and PLT, suggesting narrow osteotomies did not influence PLT in this population.
  • Partial CCL rupture was not significantly protective; dogs with partial tears still developed ligament thickening.
  • Post-TPLO mid-patellar ligament thickening may relate to Gelpi retractor placement and osteotomy mechanics rather than CCL status.
  • Authors do not recommend CCL transection during TPLO to prevent desmitis, citing possible increased instability and degeneration.

Almeida

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

4

2025

Effect of Cranial Cruciate Ligament Transection during TPLO on Patellar Desmitis in Dogs with Partial Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture

2025-4-VCOT-almeida-4

Article Title: Effect of Cranial Cruciate Ligament Transection during TPLO on Patellar Desmitis in Dogs with Partial Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Schneider 2025 et al., on axillary LN extirpation, what was a key reason cited for not performing FNA of sentinel ALNs before surgery?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. FNA of sentinel nodes was avoided to maintain surgical clarity and prevent bruising that could obscure LN identification.
Incorrect. The correct answer is To avoid local hemorrhage and contamination of the surgical field.
FNA of sentinel nodes was avoided to maintain surgical clarity and prevent bruising that could obscure LN identification.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Lateral approach to ALN extirpation was successful in 100% of cases (44 dogs, 48 ALNs) with consistent anatomical landmarks (costochondral junction of rib 1 and caudal scapular edge).
  • Median time for ALN removal was 16.6 minutes, highlighting a fast and efficient dissection method.
  • No intraoperative complications were recorded (e.g., hemorrhage or inability to find the lymph node).
  • Postoperative complications occurred in 18% of cases, including seromas (n=2), wound dehiscence (n=4), lameness (n=1), and discomfort (n=1).
  • Histopathology revealed 56% of ALNs had tumor-related pathology, including overt metastases, early metastasis (HN2), or premetastatic changes (HN1).
  • Normal-sized ALNs (<2 cm) still harbored metastases in 22% of cases, emphasizing the unreliability of size as a staging criterion.
  • False negatives in cytology occurred in 4 cases, underlining the limitations of cytologic evaluation for staging.
  • The technique was reproducible without specialized tools, suggesting wide applicability in general and referral practice.

Schneider

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Axillary lymph node removal for staging cancer; description of a lateral approach and application in 44 tumor-bearing dogs

2025-6-VS-schneider-4

Article Title: Axillary lymph node removal for staging cancer; description of a lateral approach and application in 44 tumor-bearing dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Larose 2024 et al., on laparoscopic liver biopsies in dogs, which artifact was significantly more common in 3 mm biopsy samples compared to 5 mm samples?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Crush artifact scores were higher in 3 mm samples (p = .035), although fragmentation scores were not different.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Crush artifact.
Crush artifact scores were higher in 3 mm samples (p = .035), although fragmentation scores were not different.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Histologic agreement between 3 mm and 5 mm biopsies was 90%, with a Gwet's AC1 of 0.81 (p < .0001).
  • 5 mm biopsies yielded significantly more portal triads and lobules than 3 mm samples (p = .0003 and p < .0001).
  • Crush artifacts were significantly higher in 3 mm samples (p = .035), though fragmentation scores were similar (p = .935).
  • Both forceps produced adequate samples for histopathology, copper quantification, and bacterial culture.
  • No hemorrhage requiring intervention occurred, and both sizes were deemed safe and minimally invasive.
  • Surface area ≥40 mm² strongly predicted ≥11 portal triads, a desirable threshold for reliable histopathology.
  • Use of 3 mm instruments was easier in small dogs (<12 kg), but more challenging in larger dogs due to shaft length.
  • Clinical diagnoses were unaffected by forceps size, even in the one discordant histologic pair.

Larose

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Comparing 3 mm and 5 mm laparoscopic liver biopsy samples in dogs

2024-4-VS-larose1-3

Article Title: Comparing 3 mm and 5 mm laparoscopic liver biopsy samples in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Anderson 2025 et al., on wound drain configurations, what was the rate of leakage observed across all wounds?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Leakage occurred in 93.8% of wounds, mostly at entry sites for the drain system.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 93.8%.
Leakage occurred in 93.8% of wounds, mostly at entry sites for the drain system.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Study Design: Cadaveric model using four large-breed dogs with 10x10 cm full-thickness wounds at four locations (shoulder, thorax, flank, thigh).
  • Configurations Tested: Diagonal, opposite, parallel, and perpendicular placements of wound infusion catheter and JP drain.
  • Fluid Retrieval:
    • No significant difference by configuration (p = .92) or location (p = .32).
    • Perpendicular configuration had the highest mean retrieval (11.35 mL, 56.8% of instilled volume).
    • Flank location had the lowest retrieval (7.2 mL, 35.9%).
  • Surface Area Coverage:
    • Parallel configuration achieved the highest SA coverage (83.4% ± 11.6%, p < .01).
    • Perpendicular was lowest.
  • Leakage:
    • No difference in leakage between configurations (p = .74) or locations (p = .10).
    • Leakage commonly occurred at drain or catheter entry points (93.8% of wounds).
  • Conclusion: Parallel drain configuration optimized fluid dispersion. Infusion-retrieval systems may allow for topical therapy delivery in closed wounds.

Anderson

Veterinary Surgery

2

2025

Application and influence of four drain configurations on fluid dispersal and retrieval in a cadaveric canine wound infusion-retrieval system model

2025-2-VS-anderson2-3

Article Title: Application and influence of four drain configurations on fluid dispersal and retrieval in a cadaveric canine wound infusion-retrieval system model

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Sisk 2024 et al., what conclusion did the authors draw regarding reamed versus unreamed IMN in dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. One study cited showed improved outcomes with limited reaming vs. extensive reaming in dogs:contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Limited reaming improved outcomes in canine tibial fractures.
One study cited showed improved outcomes with limited reaming vs. extensive reaming in dogs:contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • IMN provides relative stability, resists bending/torsion due to central axis alignment
  • Larger diameter nails = exponentially greater stiffness (∝ D⁴)
  • Trade-off: Larger interlocking holes weaken fatigue strength of the nail
  • Reaming increases contact/stability but has pros/cons:
    • Improves outcomes in closed fractures
    • May reduce endosteal blood flow in thin-walled bones (e.g., cats)
  • Design advances:
    • Angle-stable IMN reduce rotational slack
    • Expandable nails simplify insertion but may compromise removal or compressive load resistance
    • Precontoured nails match bone curvature but lack consistent clinical superiority
  • Material debates continue (e.g., titanium vs. stainless steel vs. magnesium)

Sisk

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

6

2024

Biomechanical Principles of Intramedullary Nails in Veterinary and Human Medicine

2024-6-VCOT-sisk-5

Article Title: Biomechanical Principles of Intramedullary Nails in Veterinary and Human Medicine

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.