Your Custom Quiz

In Woelfel 2022 et al., on cervical locked facets, which vertebral levels were exclusively affected in this case series?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All locked facet injuries were at C5/6 or C6/7, based on imaging and intraoperative findings.
Incorrect. The correct answer is C5–C6 and C6–C7.
All locked facet injuries were at C5/6 or C6/7, based on imaging and intraoperative findings.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Locked facet injuries in dogs involved unilateral dorsal displacement of the cranial articular process of the caudal vertebra, most commonly at C5/6 or C6/7.
  • All affected dogs were small/toy breeds, typically following trauma (most often attacks by larger dogs).
  • Neurologic severity ranged from ambulatory tetraparesis to tetraplegia, often with thoracic limb deficits more severe than pelvic limbs — suggesting a central cord syndrome-like pattern.
  • CT and MRI revealed axial rotation, subluxation, and articular process displacement; MRI showed T2 hyperintensity, nerve root impingement, and soft tissue changes.
  • Surgical treatment included ventral fixation with screws, pins, and PMMA, and one case required dorsal facetectomy for reduction.
  • Medical management, including external coaptation or rest, also resulted in functional recovery in select cases.
  • All dogs with follow-up data (8/8) had functional recovery, with nonambulatory dogs regaining ambulation in a median of 4 weeks.
  • No consistent differences in outcome were observed between surgical and nonsurgical management, suggesting locked facets may be biomechanically stable.

Woelfel

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Subaxial cervical articular process subluxation and dislocation: Cervical locked facet injuries in dogs

2022-1-VS-woelfel-1

Article Title: Subaxial cervical articular process subluxation and dislocation: Cervical locked facet injuries in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Miyagi 2025 et al., on endoscopic laser sphincterotomy, what defined the transition between the intramural and extramural common bile duct (CBD)?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. This anatomic separation reliably marked the end of the ICBD and was used to prevent over-ablation.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Separation of the duodenal submucosa from CBD wall.
This anatomic separation reliably marked the end of the ICBD and was used to prevent over-ablation.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Endoscopic-assisted retrograde catheterization (EARC) and laser sphincterotomy were successful in 18/18 cadavers, demonstrating technical feasibility.
  • Intramural common bile duct (ICBD) length ranged from 10 to 21 mm (mean 15.8 mm), with no correlation to body weight (r = 0.06, p = .79).
  • Transition from ICBD to extramural duct was accurately identified endoscopically in 88% (16/18); transition was heralded by separation of the submucosal layer.
  • Partial lateral perforations occurred in 2/18 dogs, only during early learning phase; no leakage was found on open dissection.
  • Laser sphincterotomy preserved the pancreatic duct orifice, aided by protective catheter positioning.
  • Compared to open duodenotomy, this technique allows for a smaller incision and less manipulation of the pancreas, which may reduce morbidity.
  • No adverse events such as intra-abdominal saline egress or full-thickness perforation occurred, and the technique allowed safe access up to 10 mm from the MDP.
  • Cadaveric limitations included absence of biliary pathology and inability to evaluate live complications, but the technique shows promise for future live animal trials.

Miyagi

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Endoscopic‐assisted laser sphincterotomy of the intramural common bile duct: A cadaveric pilot study

2025-5-VS-miyagi-1

Article Title: Endoscopic‐assisted laser sphincterotomy of the intramural common bile duct: A cadaveric pilot study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Nicetto 2024 et al., what was the success rate of patellar luxation correction using TRP?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. TRP corrected patellar luxation in 59 out of 60 treated stifles, a 98.3% success rate.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 98.3%.
TRP corrected patellar luxation in 59 out of 60 treated stifles, a 98.3% success rate.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 48 dogs (60 stifles) underwent custom 3D-printed TRP implantation for patellar luxation
  • 24 treated with TRP alone; 36 with additional procedures (e.g., DFO, TTT)
  • Success rate: 59/60 corrected patellar tracking
  • Functional outcome: 57/60 full function, 2 acceptable, 1 unacceptable
  • Complication rate: 3 total (2 minor, 1 major recurrence)
  • TRP spares cartilage unlike trochleoplasty, offering implant-based ridge augmentation
  • No implant loosening or infection observed

Nicetto

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

2

2024

Trochlear Ridge Prostheses for Reshaping Femoral Trochlear Ridges in Dogs with Patellar Luxation

2024-2-VCOT-nicetto-1

Article Title: Trochlear Ridge Prostheses for Reshaping Femoral Trochlear Ridges in Dogs with Patellar Luxation

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Danielski 2022 et al., on humero-anconeal incongruity, what role did the novel caudo-medial arthroscope portal play in the study?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. This portal provided consistent access to view and assess the HA lesion associated with HIF.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It enabled visualization of the caudal humeral condyle.
This portal provided consistent access to view and assess the HA lesion associated with HIF.

🔍 Key Findings

  • A novel caudo-medial arthroscopic portal allowed visualization of previously undescribed cartilage lesions on the caudal medial humeral condyle.
  • A consistent focal cartilage lesion (HA lesion) was observed in 100% of elbows with HIF (21/21), but in none of the 31 elbows without HIF.
  • Lesions varied from indentations to full-thickness cartilage loss, typically elliptical and located just medial to the humeral condyle isthmus.
  • A clunk-like sensation and dynamic engagement of the anconeal process into the lesion were observed in 16/21 elbows with HIF during elbow manipulation.
  • In 5/21 elbows, engagement of the anconeal process led to observable widening of the HIF line, suggesting dynamic instability.
  • Findings support a novel concept of humero-anconeal incongruity as a contributor to the pathogenesis of HIF.
  • Spaniel breed was not a confounder—the lesion was only present in elbows with HIF, regardless of breed.
  • The study suggests potential for using arthroscopy as a screening tool for early detection of humero-anconeal incongruity and HIF risk.

Danielski

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Humero-anconeal elbow incongruity in spaniel breed dogs with humeral intracondylar fissure: Arthroscopic findings

2022-1-VS-danielski2-5

Article Title: Humero-anconeal elbow incongruity in spaniel breed dogs with humeral intracondylar fissure: Arthroscopic findings

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Hawker 2024 et al., on checklist attitudes, which implementation strategy was most commonly associated with SSC success?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Ongoing SSC modification was reported by 67.9% as a key strategy to improve uptake.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Modification based on staff feedback.
Ongoing SSC modification was reported by 67.9% as a key strategy to improve uptake.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 67.9% of respondents reported using SSCs, with most indicating frequent use (64% used in every surgery).
  • 78.7% agreed SSCs reduce complications, and 89.6% believed SSCs improve communication.
  • Respondents not using SSCs were more likely to view them as a waste of time (p < .001).
  • Forgetfulness (39.6%) and time constraints (36.5%) were leading reasons for checklist noncompletion.
  • Only 23.3% had SSC training during surgical residency, with newer diplomates more likely to have had exposure (p < .001).
  • Key strategies to improve uptake included: staff feedback modifications (67.9%), formal designation of initiator (48.6%), and training (52.2%).
  • Surgeons and OR staff were most commonly identified as noncompliant team members.
  • SSC use was more frequent in small animal practices, and mandating SSCs by management was favored but not always effective alone.

Hawker

Veterinary Surgery

5

2024

Attitudes towards surgical safety checklists among American College of Veterinary Surgeons diplomates

2024-5-VS-hawker-3

Article Title: Attitudes towards surgical safety checklists among American College of Veterinary Surgeons diplomates

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Alvarez-Sanchez 2023 et al., on SLN mapping in canine MCT, how often did the anatomic lymph node (ALN) match the SLN identified by ICTL?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Only 45% of ALNs matched the ICTL-identified SLNs, indicating a high likelihood of misclassification when relying on anatomy alone.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 45%.
Only 45% of ALNs matched the ICTL-identified SLNs, indicating a high likelihood of misclassification when relying on anatomy alone.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Combined ICTL and NIRF detected the same SLN in 80% of cases; each method alone missed sentinel lymph nodes in some dogs.
  • ICLT failed in 5% of dogs, while NIRF failed in 20%; combined use resulted in only 5% failure in SLN detection.
  • Metastatic lymph nodes were detected in 95% of dogs, despite most tumors being low or intermediate grade (95%).
  • 27 of 41 nodes (65.8%) were histologically metastatic (HN2 or HN3), many of which would have been missed using ALN alone.
  • ALN matched the SLN in only 45% of cases with ICTL and 30% with NIRF, supporting the need for SLN mapping.
  • ICLT and NIRF were complementary, often identifying different SLN, with some only fluorescent or enhanced in one modality.
  • Subcutaneous MCT had higher metastatic rates (7/8 dogs) than previously reported, challenging older assumptions about benign behavior.
  • Removing both ALN and SLN (from both methods) improved detection of metastasis to 85–95%, reducing risk of understaging.

Alvarez-Sanchez

Veterinary Surgery

3

2023

Comparison of indirect computed tomographic lymphography and near-infrared fluorescence sentinel lymph node mapping for integumentary canine mast cell tumors

2023-3-VS-alvarez-sanchez-3

Article Title: Comparison of indirect computed tomographic lymphography and near-infrared fluorescence sentinel lymph node mapping for integumentary canine mast cell tumors

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In David 2024 et al., on single-port cryptorchidectomy, what was the median surgical time for unilateral abdominal cryptorchidectomy?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Median surgical time for unilateral SP-LAC was reported as 17 minutes.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 17 minutes.
Median surgical time for unilateral SP-LAC was reported as 17 minutes.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Single-port laparoscopic-assisted cryptorchidectomy (SP-LAC) was feasible in 13/14 dogs with abdominal cryptorchidism.
  • Median surgical time was 17 min for unilateral and 27 min for bilateral cryptorchidectomy.
  • All testes were successfully exteriorized through a 15-mm mini-celiotomy in most dogs; only 2 needed slight enlargement.
  • One major complication occurred (testicular artery hemorrhage, requiring conversion to open surgery).
  • Two minor complications involved trocar-related issues (splenic capsule laceration, capnoretroperitoneum).
  • No incisional complications were reported postoperatively; some dogs had mild dermatitis at the clipped site.
  • The technique requires only one surgeon and no advanced tools beyond a single-port endoscope.
  • Low-pressure capnoperitoneum (6 mmHg) was adequate for visualization in most cases.

David

Veterinary Surgery

3

2024

Single-port laparoscopic-assisted abdominal cryptorchidectomy in 14 dogs

2024-3-VS-david-1

Article Title: Single-port laparoscopic-assisted abdominal cryptorchidectomy in 14 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Alvarez-Sanchez 2023 et al., on SLN mapping in canine MCT, what percentage of dogs had the same SLN identified by both ICTL and NIRF?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. ICLT and NIRF identified the same sentinel node in 80% of dogs, showing strong concordance when both methods were used together.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 80%.
ICLT and NIRF identified the same sentinel node in 80% of dogs, showing strong concordance when both methods were used together.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Combined ICTL and NIRF detected the same SLN in 80% of cases; each method alone missed sentinel lymph nodes in some dogs.
  • ICLT failed in 5% of dogs, while NIRF failed in 20%; combined use resulted in only 5% failure in SLN detection.
  • Metastatic lymph nodes were detected in 95% of dogs, despite most tumors being low or intermediate grade (95%).
  • 27 of 41 nodes (65.8%) were histologically metastatic (HN2 or HN3), many of which would have been missed using ALN alone.
  • ALN matched the SLN in only 45% of cases with ICTL and 30% with NIRF, supporting the need for SLN mapping.
  • ICLT and NIRF were complementary, often identifying different SLN, with some only fluorescent or enhanced in one modality.
  • Subcutaneous MCT had higher metastatic rates (7/8 dogs) than previously reported, challenging older assumptions about benign behavior.
  • Removing both ALN and SLN (from both methods) improved detection of metastasis to 85–95%, reducing risk of understaging.

Alvarez-Sanchez

Veterinary Surgery

3

2023

Comparison of indirect computed tomographic lymphography and near-infrared fluorescence sentinel lymph node mapping for integumentary canine mast cell tumors

2023-3-VS-alvarez-sanchez-1

Article Title: Comparison of indirect computed tomographic lymphography and near-infrared fluorescence sentinel lymph node mapping for integumentary canine mast cell tumors

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Perez Neto 2025 et al., on hip resurfacing arthroplasty, what was the most common site of failure in both groups?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 92% of both prosthetic and control femurs failed at the femoral neck.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Femoral neck.
92% of both prosthetic and control femurs failed at the femoral neck.

🔍 Key Findings

  • In an ex vivo study of 20 canine femur pairs, implantation of a novel hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) prosthesis reduced maximum load (ML) by 22% and load at collapse (LC) by 27% vs. intact controls (p ≤ 0.05).
  • Displacement at maximum load (DML), displacement at collapse (DC), and stiffness (k) were not significantly different between prosthesis and control groups.
  • Both groups showed similar failure patterns, with 92% failing at the femoral neck.
  • All prosthetic femurs still withstood ~6.2× body weight — exceeding estimated in vivo peak loads (~1.64× BW).
  • Prosthesis positioning (neutral vs valgus) had no significant effect on biomechanical outcomes.
  • Implant design preserved more metaphyseal bone stock than total hip replacement, possibly explaining the smaller load reduction compared to other short-stem prostheses.
  • The press-fit cobalt–chromium design with conical stem allowed full contact and stress distribution over the femoral head/neck.
  • Authors conclude the device has adequate immediate biomechanical strength for clinical use, though long-term in vivo studies are needed.

Perez Neto

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

4

2025

Biomechanical Evaluation of a Femoral Implant for Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty in Dogs: An Ex Vivo Study

2025-4-VCOT-perezneto-3

Article Title: Biomechanical Evaluation of a Femoral Implant for Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty in Dogs: An Ex Vivo Study

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Viitanen 2023 et al., on zygomatic sialoadenectomy, which dog conformation was associated with higher difficulty in complete gland removal using IOA?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. In brachycephalic cadavers, remnant gland tissue remained after IOA, likely due to anatomy.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Brachycephalic.
In brachycephalic cadavers, remnant gland tissue remained after IOA, likely due to anatomy.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Intraoral approach (IOA) reduced surgical time compared to lateral orbitotomy (median: 42.0 vs 65.7 minutes, p = .005)
  • Ease of closure (Stage III) was better with IOA (p < .001), though gland removal (Stage II) was easier with LOA (p = .039)
  • Complete gland removal was achieved in 8/10 IOA vs 10/10 LOA cases in cadaveric study
  • All 3 clinical cases had uneventful recoveries post-IOA, including one carcinoma, with no intra- or short-term postoperative complications
  • LOA had superior surgical exposure, but was more invasive and time-consuming
  • IOA posed greater difficulty in complete gland removal in brachycephalic dogs, with remnant tissue noted in 2/10 cadavers
  • IOA avoids osteotomy, reducing potential complications like delayed union and postoperative pain
  • Cosmetic outcomes and healing were better with IOA, and no E-collar was required postoperatively

Viitanen

Veterinary Surgery

2

2023

Intraoral approach for zygomatic sialoadenectomy in dogs: An anatomical study and three clinical cases

2023-2-VS-viitanen-4

Article Title: Intraoral approach for zygomatic sialoadenectomy in dogs: An anatomical study and three clinical cases

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.