đ Key Findings
Design: Ex vivo cadaver study (n=8 dogs, 24 sites)
Comparison: Freehand vs. 3D-printed drill guide-assisted ventral slot (GAVS vs FHVS)
Findings:
- GAVS produced slots not significantly different from planned dimensions (p = .722â.875)
- FHVS produced significantly shorter slots than intended (p < .01)
- No difference in surgical time (p = .071)
- Shape ratio and slot divergence from midline were similar between groups (p > .4)
- Use of guide significantly reduced variability in slot position (63% â 29%), shape (65% â 24%), and divergence (54% â 50%)
Conclusion: 3D-printed guides improved accuracy and consistency of ventral slot creation by novice surgeons; supports future evaluation in live dogs and small breeds