Scott et al: Revision of osteointegrated acetabular cup prostheses in nine dogs
Veterinary Surgery 3, 2025

🔍 Key Findings

Population: 9 dogs underwent revision of osteointegrated acetabular cups after total hip arthroplasty (THA)

Revision Indications:

  • 7 luxations (5 ventral, 2 craniodorsal)
  • 1 femoral stem fracture
  • 1 aseptic stem loosening

Implants:

  • 8 BFX cups, 1 Helica; all revised to BFX
  • 7/9 required a larger cup than original

Cup removal: Required sectioning with a high-speed burr and modular osteotome; removal fragments extracted

Complications:

  • 1 recurrent luxation
  • 1 low-grade infection with possible metallic debris-associated osteolysis
  • 2 femoral fissures managed intraoperatively

Outcomes:

  • Good to excellent function in 6/6 dogs available at median 621 days
  • Minimal complications with success in re-osteointegration of new cup

Clinical takeaway: Revision of stable, ingrown cups is feasible and offers an alternative to pelvic osteotomies; typically requires upsizing

Revision of osteointegrated acetabular cup prostheses in nine dogs
Revision of osteointegrated acetabular cup prostheses in nine dogs
Revision of osteointegrated acetabular cup prostheses in nine dogs
Revision of osteointegrated acetabular cup prostheses in nine dogs
Revision of osteointegrated acetabular cup prostheses in nine dogs
Revision of osteointegrated acetabular cup prostheses in nine dogs
Revision of osteointegrated acetabular cup prostheses in nine dogs
Revision of osteointegrated acetabular cup prostheses in nine dogs
Revision of osteointegrated acetabular cup prostheses in nine dogs
Revision of osteointegrated acetabular cup prostheses in nine dogs
Revision of osteointegrated acetabular cup prostheses in nine dogs
Revision of osteointegrated acetabular cup prostheses in nine dogs

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

How critical is this paper for crushing the Boards?

🚨 Must-know. I’d bet on seeing this.

📚 Useful background, not must-know.

💤 Skip it. Doubt it’ll ever show up.

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the articles vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?