In Trefny 2025 et al., on plate length and stiffness, what was the measured effect of plate length on plate strain?
A. Plate strain was lowest in 6-hole
B. Plate strain was highest in 12-hole
C. Only 10-hole reduced strain significantly
D. 12-hole plates had the lowest strain
E. Strain was not measured
Answer: 12-hole plates had the lowest strain
Explanation: Strain was significantly lower for 12-hole than 6-hole plates at all ROIs.
In Trefny 2025 et al., on plate length and stiffness, strain in the bone model adjacent to the plate end was significantly lower in which configurations?
A. 6-hole and 8-hole
B. 8-hole and 10-hole
C. 10-hole and 12-hole
D. 6-hole only
E. All configurations were equal
Answer: 10-hole and 12-hole
Explanation: ROI7 strain in the bone model was lower in 10- and 12-hole vs 6-hole constructs.
In Trefny 2025 et al., on plate length and stiffness, which plate length significantly increased construct stiffness over all shorter options?
A. 6-hole
B. 8-hole
C. 10-hole
D. 12-hole
E. All were equal
Answer: 12-hole
Explanation: The 12-hole plate (80% plate–bone ratio) had significantly higher stiffness than all other lengths.
In Trefny 2025 et al., on plate length and stiffness, which biomechanical testing method was used to measure stiffness and strain?
A. Axial compression only
B. Rotational fatigue
C. 4-point bending in compression and tension
D. Cyclic torsion
E. Uniaxial shear
Answer: 4-point bending in compression and tension
Explanation: Four-point bending was applied in two planes to mimic relevant long bone loading.
In Trefny 2025 et al., on plate length and stiffness, what plate–bone ratio was required before significant stiffness and strain differences became apparent?
A. 40%
B. 53%
C. 65%
D. 80%
E. No threshold was found
Answer: 80%
Explanation: Biomechanical differences only became significant at the 80% plate–bone ratio (12-hole plate).