Scheuermann et al: Efficacy of virtual surgical planning and a three‐dimensional‐printed surgical guide for canine segmental mandibular reconstruction in a cadaver model
Veterinary Surgery 6, 2024

🔍 Key Findings

  • The study was a prospective clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of a three-dimensional (3D)-printed, patient-specific reduction system for aligning diaphyseal tibial fractures stabilized using minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in fifteen client-owned dogs.
  • Virtual surgical planning (VSP) and fabrication were feasible within a clinically relevant timeframe, with a mean of 50.7 hours. Surgical efficiency improved with experience.
  • Pin-guide placement was accurate, with median translational discrepancies of 2.7 mm (proximal) and 2.9 mm (distal), and angular discrepancies highest in the axial plane.
  • The proximal guide was easier to apply (median Likert score: 8) than the distal guide (median: 6).
  • The 3D-printed system enabled near-anatomic reduction in 87% of cases and acceptable reduction in the remaining 13%; no unacceptable reductions occurred.
  • Postoperative alignment and tibial length were well-restored, with all dogs within 5° or 5 mm of contralateral measurements.
  • Temporary circular fixation was occasionally used to assist reduction and improve alignment.
  • Precontoured plates fit easily, with a median Likert score of 9; total surgical time was shorter than conventional MIPO at the institution.
  • The study lacked a control group but builds on prior cadaveric feasibility work.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

How critical is this paper for crushing the Boards?

🚨 Must-know. I’d bet on seeing this.

📚 Useful background, not must-know.

💤 Skip it. Doubt it’ll ever show up.

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the articles vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Scheuermann et al: Efficacy of virtual surgical planning and a three‐dimensional‐printed surgical guide for canine segmental mandibular reconstruction in a cadaver model
Veterinary Surgery 6, 2024

🔍 Key Findings

  • The study was a prospective clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of a three-dimensional (3D)-printed, patient-specific reduction system for aligning diaphyseal tibial fractures stabilized using minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in fifteen client-owned dogs.
  • Virtual surgical planning (VSP) and fabrication were feasible within a clinically relevant timeframe, with a mean of 50.7 hours. Surgical efficiency improved with experience.
  • Pin-guide placement was accurate, with median translational discrepancies of 2.7 mm (proximal) and 2.9 mm (distal), and angular discrepancies highest in the axial plane.
  • The proximal guide was easier to apply (median Likert score: 8) than the distal guide (median: 6).
  • The 3D-printed system enabled near-anatomic reduction in 87% of cases and acceptable reduction in the remaining 13%; no unacceptable reductions occurred.
  • Postoperative alignment and tibial length were well-restored, with all dogs within 5° or 5 mm of contralateral measurements.
  • Temporary circular fixation was occasionally used to assist reduction and improve alignment.
  • Precontoured plates fit easily, with a median Likert score of 9; total surgical time was shorter than conventional MIPO at the institution.
  • The study lacked a control group but builds on prior cadaveric feasibility work.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

Join Now to Access Key Summaries to more Veterinary Surgery Articles!

Multiple Choice Questions on this study

In Scheuermann 2024 et al., on 3D-printed reduction guides for tibial fractures, which statement best describes the application of precontoured plates?

A. Only applied in distal fractures
B. Required significant intraoperative bending
C. Precontoured to 3D-printed models and fit easily
D. Were templated based on standard measurements
E. Were not used in this study

Answer: Precontoured to 3D-printed models and fit easily

Explanation: Plates were shaped to mirror-image models and were easily applied.
In Scheuermann 2024 et al., on 3D-printed reduction guides for tibial fractures, what was the most common plane for angular pin-guide placement error?

A. Frontal
B. Sagittal
C. Axial
D. Oblique
E. Transverse

Answer: Axial

Explanation: Axial plane showed the highest angular discrepancies for both proximal and distal pin guides.
In Scheuermann 2024 et al., on 3D-printed reduction guides for tibial fractures, what method was occasionally needed to improve fracture reduction intraoperatively?

A. Use of interfragmentary lag screw
B. Temporary circular external fixator
C. Blocking pin application
D. Fenestrated plate fixation
E. Flexible fixation with ESF

Answer: Temporary circular external fixator

Explanation: Some cases required transient circular fixation to improve reduction before plating.
In Scheuermann 2024 et al., on 3D-printed reduction guides for tibial fractures, how was virtual surgical planning efficiency affected by case number?

A. Increased time with each case
B. Stayed constant over study
C. Decreased with each case
D. Inconsistent trend
E. Only improved after 10 cases

Answer: Decreased with each case

Explanation: Planning time improved with experience, trending toward under 48 hours.
In Scheuermann 2024 et al., on 3D-printed reduction guides for tibial fractures, what percentage of fractures achieved near-anatomic reduction postoperatively?

A. 67%
B. 73%
C. 87%
D. 93%
E. 100%

Answer: 87%

Explanation: 13/15 fractures achieved near-anatomic reduction; the rest were acceptable.

Elevate Your Infection Control Protocol

Implement Simini Protect Lavage for superior, clinically-proven post-operative skin antisepsis and reduced infection risk.