In Pfund 2025 et al., on femoral cortical thickness, what was the mean CTI for dogs that developed perioperative fractures?
A. 0.285
B. 0.230
C. 0.246
D. 0.301
E. 0.260
Answer: 0.246
Explanation: The mean CTI in dogs with fissures/fractures was 0.246 vs 0.285 in all dogs.
In Pfund 2025 et al., on femoral cortical thickness, what best describes the reliability of CTI measurements across observers?
A. Low variability, ICC = 0.7
B. High variability, ICC = 0.6
C. Moderate agreement, ICC = 0.82
D. Near-perfect agreement, ICC = 0.984
E. Not assessed in the study
Answer: Near-perfect agreement, ICC = 0.984
Explanation: The CTI showed excellent interobserver reliability with minimal variability.
In Pfund 2025 et al., on femoral cortical thickness, what was the observed effect of a 0.001 increase in CTI on fracture risk?
A. No change in risk
B. Increased risk by 1%
C. Decreased risk by 1%
D. Decreased risk by 2–3%
E. Increased risk by 5%
Answer: Decreased risk by 2–3%
Explanation: Each 0.001 increase in CTI reduced fissure/fracture odds by 2–3% depending on timing.
In Pfund 2025 et al., on femoral cortical thickness, what was the key preoperative radiographic predictor of femoral fissure or fracture in dogs undergoing THR?
A. Body condition score
B. Femoral canal flare index
C. Proximal femoral sclerosis
D. Femoral cortical thickness index
E. Implant position
Answer: Femoral cortical thickness index
Explanation: CTI was the only statistically significant risk factor associated with perioperative fractures.
In Pfund 2025 et al., on femoral cortical thickness, what percentage of dogs sustained intraoperative fissures or fractures during THR?
A. 2%
B. 4%
C. 9.8%
D. 15%
E. 21%
Answer: 9.8%
Explanation: 22 out of 224 dogs sustained intraoperative fissures or fractures (mostly fissures).