In Thompson 2024 et al., on cyanoacrylate enterotomy sealants, what is the suggested clinical implication of adding cyanoacrylate to a handsewn enterotomy repair?
A. Delays healing due to rigidity
B. Increases incisional leakage risk
C. Provides no added benefit
D. Reduces enterotomy leakage by enhancing sealing
E. Replaces need for sutures
Answer: Reduces enterotomy leakage by enhancing sealing
Explanation: The addition of CE significantly increased ILP and reduced leak rate, supporting its potential use adjunctively.
In Thompson 2024 et al., on cyanoacrylate enterotomy sealants, what was the most common leak location in the cyanoacrylate-only (CE) group?
A. Suture hole
B. Transverse staple line
C. Incisional line
D. Serosal edge
E. Mesenteric border
Answer: Incisional line
Explanation: 100% of leaks in the CE group originated from the incisional line.
In Thompson 2024 et al., on cyanoacrylate enterotomy sealants, which group had the lowest maximum intraluminal pressure (MIP)?
A. HSE
B. HS + CE
C. Stapled
D. Cyanoacrylate only
E. Control
Answer: Cyanoacrylate only
Explanation: The CE group had the lowest MIP (mean 22.7 mmHg), significantly lower than suture-based groups.
In Thompson 2024 et al., on cyanoacrylate enterotomy sealants, how did the maximum intraluminal pressure (MIP) compare between the handsewn (HSE) and HS + CE groups?
A. HS + CE significantly higher
B. HSE significantly higher
C. Both significantly lower than CE
D. No significant difference
E. HS + CE was lower but significant
Answer: No significant difference
Explanation: The HSE and HS + CE groups had comparable MIP values (p = .19).
In Thompson 2024 et al., on cyanoacrylate enterotomy sealants, which group had the highest initial leak pressure (ILP)?
A. Cyanoacrylate only
B. Handsewn only
C. Stapled only
D. Handsewn + cyanoacrylate
E. Unrepaired control
Answer: Handsewn + cyanoacrylate
Explanation: The HS + CE group achieved the highest ILP (83.3 mmHg), significantly exceeding all others (p < .001).