Carwardine et al: Medial versus lateral transcondylar screw placement for canine humeral intracondylar fissures: A randomized clinical trial
Veterinary Surgery 2, 2024

🔍 Key Findings

  • 73 elbows (52 dogs) underwent randomized medial or lateral transcondylar screw placement for HIF.
  • Lateral-to-medial placement resulted in a significantly higher rate of complications (62.2%) vs medial-to-lateral (19.4%) (p = .001).
  • Odds ratio for complications: 6.11 (95% CI: 2.13–17.52).
  • Most common complications: seromas (n = 13), surgical site infections (n = 16).
  • Implants with lower AMI/bodyweight were significantly associated with major complications (p = .037).
  • Only 4 procedures (5%) required revision surgery (major type I complications), with no difference by screw direction.
  • NNT = 2.3 for medial placement to prevent one complication.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

How critical is this paper for crushing the Boards?

🚨 Must-know. I’d bet on seeing this.

📚 Useful background, not must-know.

💤 Skip it. Doubt it’ll ever show up.

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the articles vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?