In Kang 2022 et al., on 3D scaffold reconstruction, what was one key advantage of using a patient-specific osteotomy guide?
A. Reduced cost of surgery
B. Allowed intraoperative adjustment of margins
C. Enabled real-time 3D printing
D. Improved anatomic fit for scaffold placement
E. Enhanced tumor visualization during surgery
Answer: Improved anatomic fit for scaffold placement
Explanation: The custom guide helped match the bone defect with the scaffold for better stability and alignment.
In Kang 2022 et al., on 3D scaffold reconstruction, what was the primary diagnosis confirmed after tumor excision?
A. Multilobular osteochondrosarcoma
B. Fibrosarcoma
C. Fibrous dysplasia
D. Parosteal osteosarcoma
E. Ossifying fibroma
Answer: Parosteal osteosarcoma
Explanation: Histopathology confirmed a well-differentiated variant of parosteal osteosarcoma.
In Kang 2022 et al., on 3D scaffold reconstruction, which material was combined with polycaprolactone (PCL) to enhance osteoconductivity?
A. Hydroxyapatite
B. Polylactic acid
C. Beta-tricalcium phosphate
D. Chitosan
E. Bone morphogenetic protein-2
Answer: Beta-tricalcium phosphate
Explanation: β-TCP was used to improve hydrophilicity and bone regeneration potential of PCL.
In Kang 2022 et al., on 3D scaffold reconstruction, what was the Hounsfield Unit (HU) measurement trend in the scaffold area over time?
A. Decreased from 100 to 20
B. Remained unchanged (~50 HU)
C. Increased from 20.4 to ~98
D. HU dropped initially and normalized at 6 months
E. Fluctuated without trend
Answer: Increased from 20.4 to ~98
Explanation: HU values rose over time, indicating progressive tissue ingrowth (though not full bone regeneration).
In Kang 2022 et al., on 3D scaffold reconstruction, what was the histological status of the surgical margins after resection?
A. Positive margin at 5 mm
B. Complete excision with 2 mm clean margin
C. Marginal but histologically positive
D. Complete excision with 0.3 mm clean margin
E. Incomplete resection with tumor spillage
Answer: Complete excision with 0.3 mm clean margin
Explanation: A 0.3 mm clear margin was achieved; in human literature, such margins are considered adequate for this tumor type.