In Glenn 2024 et al., on client-based SSI surveillance, which major limitation was noted in detecting deep or implant-associated infections?
A. Implant type was not recorded
B. Client response rate was below 10%
C. No algorithm included antibiotic use
D. Algorithms relied on superficial wound signs only
E. Follow-up duration was less than 7 days
Answer: Algorithms relied on superficial wound signs only
Explanation: Algorithms required wound healing problems, which may exclude deep infections not presenting externally.
In Glenn 2024 et al., on client-based SSI surveillance, which of the following statements best describes Algorithm 1?
A. It had the highest specificity and PPV
B. Used only RV data to classify cases
C. It was best used to rule out SSIs
D. It classified all inconclusive cases
E. It required a positive bacterial culture
Answer: It was best used to rule out SSIs
Explanation: Algorithm 1 had the highest sensitivity (87.1%) and negative predictive value (97%), making it suitable for ruling out SSIs.
In Glenn 2024 et al., on client-based SSI surveillance, what proportion of SSIs were identified *only* via active surveillance?
A. 5.1%
B. 12.5%
C. 19.4%
D. 28.9%
E. 33.3%
Answer: 19.4%
Explanation: Active surveillance alone detected 12 of 62 SSIs (19.4%) not found through passive methods.
In Glenn 2024 et al., on client-based SSI surveillance, which algorithm demonstrated the highest overall accuracy for detecting SSIs?
A. Algorithm 1
B. Algorithm 2
C. Algorithm 3
D. Manual review alone
E. Referring veterinarian reports
Answer: Algorithm 3
Explanation: Algorithm 3 had the highest accuracy (95.5%) in detecting surgical site infections from client responses.
In Glenn 2024 et al., on client-based SSI surveillance, what percentage of SSIs required revision surgery?
A. 12.1%
B. 25.8%
C. 33.9%
D. 43.8%
E. 50.0%
Answer: 33.9%
Explanation: Revision surgery was needed in 21 of 62 SSIs, amounting to 33.9%.