🔍 Key Findings
- Oversewing the transverse staple line using barbed suture showed no difference in initial (ILP) or maximum leakage pressure (MLP) compared to monofilament suture (p = .439 and .644).
- Barbed suture repairs were ~18% faster (25 seconds faster; p < .001) than monofilament suture.
- No difference was found between unidirectional and bidirectional barbed sutures in leakage resistance or repair time (p = .697).
- Mean ILP and MLP were significantly higher in control jejunal segments (6.6x and 5.1x greater respectively; p < .001).
- Leakage consistently occurred at the crotch of the FEESA in all oversew groups (>80%), not the staple line.
- All oversewn techniques leaked at supraphysiologic pressures, indicating clinical safety against in vivo leakage.
- No leakage was observed from barbed suture holes, addressing concerns of tissue trauma due to barb design.
- The study supports barbed suture as a viable alternative to conventional monofilament suture for FEESA oversew in dogs.

