In Evers 2022 et al., on bone-to-tendon plate fixation, what was the purpose of using human placental matrix (hPM)?
A. To prevent infection
B. To encourage granulation tissue
C. To stimulate angiogenesis and support healing
D. To lubricate the tendon sheath
E. To replace bone grafts
Answer: To stimulate angiogenesis and support healing
Explanation: hPM was used for its pro-angiogenic and regenerative properties, despite uncertain efficacy in this case.
In Evers 2022 et al., on bone-to-tendon plate fixation, what fixation technique was used to secure the plate to the tendon?
A. Krackow suture pattern
B. Simple interrupted sutures
C. Figure-of-8 pattern with Prolene
D. Stapling with metallic clips
E. Locking bone anchors
Answer: Figure-of-8 pattern with Prolene
Explanation: A figure-of-8 suture pattern with 0-Prolene was used to anchor the plate to the tendon.
In Evers 2022 et al., on bone-to-tendon plate fixation, what was the primary reason for anchoring the plate to the tendon instead of the bone?
A. The calcaneal base was unstable
B. The calcaneal tuber was intact
C. The proximal bone fragments were too small for screw purchase
D. Soft tissue swelling precluded bone fixation
E. A tendinous attachment was avulsed
Answer: The proximal bone fragments were too small for screw purchase
Explanation: Small proximal calcaneal fragments limited conventional screw fixation, necessitating tendon anchoring.
In Evers 2022 et al., on bone-to-tendon plate fixation, which complication prompted the second surgery?
A. Nonunion at 12 weeks
B. Infection with fever
C. Screw pull-out of the plantar plate
D. Skin ulceration over the plate
E. Migration of the unsecured tuber fragment
Answer: Skin ulceration over the plate
Explanation: Skin pressure necrosis occurred at the proximal edge of the tendon plate, prompting plate revision.
In Evers 2022 et al., on bone-to-tendon plate fixation, what was the final functional outcome for the patient at 8.5 months?
A. Persistent lameness and reduced range of motion
B. Full function with mild thickening of tendon
C. Weight-bearing lameness and implant failure
D. Continued use of support bandaging
E. Arthrodesis was ultimately required
Answer: Full function with mild thickening of tendon
Explanation: The dog returned to normal function without lameness, though tendon thickening remained.