Rocheleau et al: Short‐term outcomes of 43 dogs treated with arthroscopic suturing for meniscal tears
Veterinary Surgery 5, 2024

🔍 Key Findings

  • Arthroscopic meniscal suturing was performed in 43 client-owned dogs, involving 44 meniscal repairs (one dog was bilateral). All injuries involved the caudal horn of the medial meniscus and were associated with cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL) disease.
  • All dogs underwent simultaneous TPLO, with some also receiving an internal brace (IB). Most repairs used simple vertical mattress sutures.
  • The overall complication rate was 34.1% (15/44). Most complications were attributed to the TPLO/TPLO+IB and did not compromise the meniscal repair outcome.
  • No median time to “acceptable” or “full” function was reported, but most dogs showed improvement in lameness and LOAD scores (p < .001), indicating good to excellent outcomes.
  • Meniscal repair success rate was 88% (38/44), with TPLO + IB outperforming TPLO-only (93.3% vs 71.4%). Follow-up was performed at 8 weeks (40 dogs) and 6 months (16 dogs).
  • Six failures occurred, all managed with arthroscopic meniscectomy, leading to normal activity in those dogs. Two IB-associated failures led to CrCL instability.
  • The authors concluded the technique was safe, practical, and effective, with a reasonable complication rate.
  • The findings support arthroscopic suturing as a feasible alternative to meniscectomy or meniscal release, offering long-term benefits for preserving the meniscus.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

How critical is this paper for crushing the Boards?

🚨 Must-know. I’d bet on seeing this.

📚 Useful background, not must-know.

💤 Skip it. Doubt it’ll ever show up.

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the articles vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Rocheleau et al: Short‐term outcomes of 43 dogs treated with arthroscopic suturing for meniscal tears
Veterinary Surgery 5, 2024

🔍 Key Findings

  • Arthroscopic meniscal suturing was performed in 43 client-owned dogs, involving 44 meniscal repairs (one dog was bilateral). All injuries involved the caudal horn of the medial meniscus and were associated with cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL) disease.
  • All dogs underwent simultaneous TPLO, with some also receiving an internal brace (IB). Most repairs used simple vertical mattress sutures.
  • The overall complication rate was 34.1% (15/44). Most complications were attributed to the TPLO/TPLO+IB and did not compromise the meniscal repair outcome.
  • No median time to “acceptable” or “full” function was reported, but most dogs showed improvement in lameness and LOAD scores (p < .001), indicating good to excellent outcomes.
  • Meniscal repair success rate was 88% (38/44), with TPLO + IB outperforming TPLO-only (93.3% vs 71.4%). Follow-up was performed at 8 weeks (40 dogs) and 6 months (16 dogs).
  • Six failures occurred, all managed with arthroscopic meniscectomy, leading to normal activity in those dogs. Two IB-associated failures led to CrCL instability.
  • The authors concluded the technique was safe, practical, and effective, with a reasonable complication rate.
  • The findings support arthroscopic suturing as a feasible alternative to meniscectomy or meniscal release, offering long-term benefits for preserving the meniscus.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

Join Now to Access Key Summaries to more Veterinary Surgery Articles!

Multiple Choice Questions on this study

In Rocheleau 2024 et al., on arthroscopic meniscal suturing, what is a proposed benefit of meniscal preservation over meniscectomy?

A. Faster surgical time
B. Lower infection rate
C. Higher owner satisfaction
D. Improved long-term outcomes
E. Lower cost

Answer: Improved long-term outcomes

Explanation: Meniscal preservation is linked to better long-term joint function and reduced OA.
In Rocheleau 2024 et al., on arthroscopic meniscal suturing, which group had the highest meniscal repair success rate?

A. TPLO-only
B. TPLO with lateral fabellar suture
C. TPLO with external fixator
D. TPLO with internal brace
E. TPLO with meniscal release

Answer: TPLO with internal brace

Explanation: TPLO + IB had a 93.3% success rate vs 71.4% for TPLO-only.
In Rocheleau 2024 et al., on arthroscopic meniscal suturing, what structure was repaired in all cases?

A. Lateral meniscus
B. Caudal horn of medial meniscus
C. Cranial horn of medial meniscus
D. CrCL insertion
E. Medial collateral ligament

Answer: Caudal horn of medial meniscus

Explanation: All cases involved tears of the caudal horn of the medial meniscus.
In Rocheleau 2024 et al., on arthroscopic meniscal suturing, how were failed meniscal repairs managed?

A. Open meniscectomy
B. Conservative rehab only
C. Revision TPLO
D. Arthroscopic meniscectomy
E. Tibial tuberosity transposition

Answer: Arthroscopic meniscectomy

Explanation: All failed repairs were managed arthroscopically with good outcomes.
In Rocheleau 2024 et al., on arthroscopic meniscal suturing, what was the overall complication rate?

A. 12%
B. 22%
C. 34%
D. 47%
E. 58%

Answer: 34%

Explanation: The overall complication rate reported was 34.1%.

Elevate Your Infection Control Protocol

Implement Simini Protect Lavage for superior, clinically-proven post-operative skin antisepsis and reduced infection risk.