Quiz Question

In Otero Balda 2025 et al., on Short-term outcomes after feline cPSS surgery, what was the survival rate in cats pretreated with levetiracetam following the LEV1 protocol?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Cats in LEV1 group had a 100% 30-day survival rate, although the difference was not statistically significant.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 100.0%.
Cats in LEV1 group had a 100% 30-day survival rate, although the difference was not statistically significant.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 78% of cats that developed postattenuation neurologic signs (PANS) after congenital portosystemic shunt (cPSS) surgery survived to 30 days.
  • Postattenuation seizures (PAS) were associated with significantly decreased 30-day survival (50% vs. 78%; OR: 0.015, p = .005).
  • Treatment of PANS with propofol was a negative prognostic factor (OR: 0.112, p = .0008).
  • Generalized PAS accounted for most seizure cases and were more frequently fatal than focal or unknown-type seizures.
  • Pretreatment with levetiracetam (LEV1 protocol) showed a trend toward improved survival (100% vs. 60.6% in untreated cats), though not statistically significant (p = .06).
  • Shunt morphology, method of attenuation, and study period (early vs. late) were not significantly associated with 30-day survival.
  • Electrolyte, glucose, and ammonia abnormalities were not strongly linked to survival outcomes in this study.
  • Majority of PAS-related deaths were due to uncontrolled generalized seizures or euthanasia because of severity.

Otero Balda

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Prognostic factors for short‐term survival of cats that experienced postattenuation neurologic signs after surgical attenuation of single congenital portosystemic shunts

2025-5-VS-otero-5

Article Title: Prognostic factors for short‐term survival of cats that experienced postattenuation neurologic signs after surgical attenuation of single congenital portosystemic shunts

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Miller 2024 et al., on staple vs. hand-sewn feline GI techniques, what was the most common location of leakage for skin staple enterotomy (SSE)?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All SSE constructs leaked from the center of closure, with immediate leakage in 35%.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Center of closure.
All SSE constructs leaked from the center of closure, with immediate leakage in 35%.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Skin staple anastomosis (SSA) had comparable leak pressures to hand-sewn anastomosis (HSA) but required half the time to complete.
  • Skin staple enterotomy (SSE) had significantly lower leak pressures than hand-sewn enterotomy (HSE) and failed in 12/20 constructs during pressure testing.
  • HSE constructs took 8× longer to complete than SSE, but had much higher intraluminal pressure tolerance.
  • All SSE constructs leaked from the center, with 35% leaking immediately and 60% showing catastrophic failure.
  • SSA leakage occurred at the center in 40% of constructs, likely due to a learning curve in early samples.
  • All constructs had higher pressures than normal physiologic intestinal pressure (4.0 mmHg ±2.0), except some SSEs with immediate leaks.
  • Authors recommend SSA as a viable alternative with appropriate training but do not recommend SSE using the tested technique in live cats.
  • Staple size and placement technique are key factors; smaller or more precisely placed staples may reduce leak risk.

Miller

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Performance time and leak pressure of hand-sewn and skin staple intestinal anastomoses and enterotomies in cadaveric cats

2024-4-VS-miller-2

Article Title: Performance time and leak pressure of hand-sewn and skin staple intestinal anastomoses and enterotomies in cadaveric cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Caiazzo 2025 et al., on suture material comparison, what was the overall rate of incisional dehiscence without infection?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 22 out of 232 dogs experienced non-infected incisional dehiscence, equating to a 9.48% rate.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 9.5%.
22 out of 232 dogs experienced non-infected incisional dehiscence, equating to a 9.48% rate.

🔍 Key Findings

  • No significant difference in non-infected incisional dehiscence rates among groups using PDS vs. Monocryl for subcutaneous and skin closure.
  • Overall dehiscence rate: 9.48% (22/232 dogs).
  • Postoperative antibiotic use and signs of inflammation were significantly associated with dehiscence (p = .023 and p < .001, respectively).
  • Dogs not receiving postoperative antibiotics had a higher dehiscence rate (14.74%) than those that did (5.84%).
  • Most dehiscence cases were superficial (85.7%), and the average length of dehiscence was 1.71 cm.
  • No statistically significant impact of weight, BCS, incision length, procedure type, surgeon experience, closure direction, or barrier use on dehiscence rate.

Caiazzo

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Impact of suture materials polydioxanone and poliglecaprone 25 on non-infected clean orthopedic stifle procedure incisional dehiscence rates

2025-3-VS-caiazzo-1

Article Title: Impact of suture materials polydioxanone and poliglecaprone 25 on non-infected clean orthopedic stifle procedure incisional dehiscence rates

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Logothetou 2024 et al., on SPF complications, how did staple use for skin closure compare to sutures in terms of complication rate?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Staples had a higher complication rate (72.2%) vs sutures (49.3%), but not statistically significant.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Not different but numerically higher.
Staples had a higher complication rate (72.2%) vs sutures (49.3%), but not statistically significant.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Complication rate for subdermal plexus flaps (SPFs) in dogs was 53.6%.
  • Skin staples had a numerically higher complication rate (72.2%) than sutures (49.3%), but not statistically significant due to small sample size.
  • Most common complication was wound dehiscence (35%), followed by seroma (14%) and wound discharge (14%).
  • Increased body weight was significantly associated with higher complication risk (OR = 1.056 per kg; p = .029).
  • Advancement flaps were associated with a lower incidence of complications on univariable analysis (p < .001).
  • Head region flap closures had fewer complications, while proximal pelvic limb closures had the highest complication rate.
  • Age was a risk factor—each additional year increased odds of complications (OR = 1.019; p = .004).
  • Closure technique did not significantly influence complication severity, though staple use was numerically worse.

Logothetou

Veterinary Surgery

3

2024

Complications and influence of cutaneous closure technique on subdermal plexus flaps in 97 dogs (2006–2022)

2024-3-VS-logothetou-5

Article Title: Complications and influence of cutaneous closure technique on subdermal plexus flaps in 97 dogs (2006–2022)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Boullenger 2025 et al., on traumatic patellar luxation, what surgical technique was performed in all cases?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All 16 cases received capsular imbrication regardless of severity or direction.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Capsular imbrication.
All 16 cases received capsular imbrication regardless of severity or direction.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Patients: 16 (11 dogs, 5 cats); 6.1% of canine and 23.8% of feline PL cases were traumatic.
  • Most common luxation direction: Medial (81.3%).
  • Surgery: All had capsular imbrication; 75% had fabello-patellar suture (FPS).
  • Short-term results (13/16 cases):
    • 77% had no lameness by 2 months.
    • 85% had no PL recurrence.
    • 3 severe complications: capsulorrhaphy tear, FPS fabellar tear, septic arthritis.
  • Long-term results (13/16 cases):
    • 85% lameness-free.
    • 77% full function; 23% acceptable.
    • 0 reluxations reported by owners.

Boullenger

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

1

2025

Clinical Presentation, Surgical Treatment, and Outcome of Traumatic Patellar Luxation in 11 Dogs and 5 Cats: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study between 2011 and 2022

2025-1-VC-boullenger-3

Article Title: Clinical Presentation, Surgical Treatment, and Outcome of Traumatic Patellar Luxation in 11 Dogs and 5 Cats: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study between 2011 and 2022

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Poggi 2025 et al., on laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cats, which instrument was most frequently used for gallbladder dissection?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Ligasure was used in 14 of 22 cats, making it the most common device for gallbladder dissection.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Ligasure.
Ligasure was used in 14 of 22 cats, making it the most common device for gallbladder dissection.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was successfully performed in all 22 cats without conversion to open surgery.
  • Complication rate was low: 3 cats had postoperative complications (1 seroma, 1 vomiting, 1 EHBDO and death).
  • Median operating time was 41 minutes; median hospitalization was 3 days.
  • No cases required conversion to open laparotomy, even in cats as small as 2.5 kg.
  • Common devices used: Hemoclips or Hem-o-lok for cystic duct ligation; Ligasure, harmonic scalpel, or j-hook for dissection.
  • Most common indications: cholelithiasis (9/22) and cholecystitis (10/22), with one biliary mucocele and one adenoma.
  • Histopathology confirmed diagnosis in all cases; concurrent liver or intestinal biopsies were performed in some cats.
  • Postoperative AUS and bloodwork were routine and important for detecting early signs of EHBDO.

Poggi

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 22 cats (2018–2024)

2025-5-VS-poggi-4

Article Title: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 22 cats (2018–2024)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Kennedy 2024 et al., which muscle group was most frequently damaged by the caudal portal?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Deltoideus was damaged in 90% of shoulders by the caudal portal:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Deltoideus.
Deltoideus was damaged in 90% of shoulders by the caudal portal:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 20 shoulders from 11 medium-to-large breed dogs evaluated
  • Lateral portals used: middle arthroscopic, caudal instrument, cranial egress
  • Musculotendinous lesions unavoidable, but small (18G needle); seen in deltoideus (90%), infraspinatus, teres minor, etc.
  • Neurovascular safety:
    • Caudal portal was closest to axillary artery/nerve branches (as close as 7 mm)
    • Only 2/20 shoulders (10%) had omobrachial vein penetrated
  • Cartilage injuries (IACI) occurred in 65%, primarily minor linear defects; use of guarded cannulas and distractors suggested for minimization
  • Supports overall safety of lateral shoulder arthroscopy with portal placement awareness

Kennedy

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

4

2024

Evaluation of Canine Shoulder Arthroscopy for Anatomical and Safety Considerations

2024-4-VCOT-kennedy-4

Article Title: Evaluation of Canine Shoulder Arthroscopy for Anatomical and Safety Considerations

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Boullenger 2025 et al., on traumatic patellar luxation, what was a proposed strategy to improve FPS outcomes in large or active dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The study suggests alternative isometric anchoring techniques (e.g. femoral condyle bone tunnel) may reduce FPS failure.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Use femoral condyle bone tunnel instead of fabella.
The study suggests alternative isometric anchoring techniques (e.g. femoral condyle bone tunnel) may reduce FPS failure.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Patients: 16 (11 dogs, 5 cats); 6.1% of canine and 23.8% of feline PL cases were traumatic.
  • Most common luxation direction: Medial (81.3%).
  • Surgery: All had capsular imbrication; 75% had fabello-patellar suture (FPS).
  • Short-term results (13/16 cases):
    • 77% had no lameness by 2 months.
    • 85% had no PL recurrence.
    • 3 severe complications: capsulorrhaphy tear, FPS fabellar tear, septic arthritis.
  • Long-term results (13/16 cases):
    • 85% lameness-free.
    • 77% full function; 23% acceptable.
    • 0 reluxations reported by owners.

Boullenger

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

1

2025

Clinical Presentation, Surgical Treatment, and Outcome of Traumatic Patellar Luxation in 11 Dogs and 5 Cats: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study between 2011 and 2022

2025-1-VC-boullenger-5

Article Title: Clinical Presentation, Surgical Treatment, and Outcome of Traumatic Patellar Luxation in 11 Dogs and 5 Cats: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study between 2011 and 2022

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Peng 2025 et al., on topical amikacin gel, what correlation was found between dose and serum levels?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Serum levels showed no correlation to mg, mg/kg, mg/cm², or other dose parameters【90†Veterinary Surgery†L1-L20】
Incorrect. The correct answer is No significant correlation found.
Serum levels showed no correlation to mg, mg/kg, mg/cm², or other dose parameters【90†Veterinary Surgery†L1-L20】

🔍 Key Findings

Objective: Determine if topical 45 mg/mL amikacin in CMC gel leads to systemic absorption in dogs with wounds.

Dogs enrolled: 11 client-owned dogs, with 31 applications of the gel.

Serum findings:

  • Only 5 of 153 samples were above the 2.5 µg/mL quantification limit
  • All values remained <5 µg/mL, the presumed toxicity threshold
  • No correlation was found between dose-related parameters (mg, mg/kg, mg/cm²) and serum amikacin levels

Peak concentrations were observed at ~2 hours post-application, declining rapidly thereafter

No nephrotoxicity observed, and most values were below detection

Conclusion: Topical amikacin gel appears safe at doses up to 24.9 mg/kg, with minimal systemic absorption

Peng

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Serum amikacin concentrations in dogs with naturally occurring open wounds treated with topical amikacin in carboxymethylcellulose hydrogel

2025-3-VS-peng2-5

Article Title: Serum amikacin concentrations in dogs with naturally occurring open wounds treated with topical amikacin in carboxymethylcellulose hydrogel

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Chik 2024 et al., on cholangioscopy feasibility, what was the most distal biliary region consistently visualized using the 3.8 mm disposable flexible endoscope?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. In all eight cadavers, visualization was achievable up to the junction of the hepatic ducts, common bile duct, and cystic duct.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Confluence of hepatic ducts and cystic duct.
In all eight cadavers, visualization was achievable up to the junction of the hepatic ducts, common bile duct, and cystic duct.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Open transcholecystic cholangioscopy was feasible using a 3.8 mm disposable flexible endoscope in all 8 canine cadavers.
  • Visualization was consistently achieved up to the junction of the hepatic ducts, common bile duct, and cystic duct.
  • Advancement past the junction was limited by the endoscope diameter (3.8 mm) and anatomical flexure.
  • The 1.9 mm flexible ureteroscope could visualize the entire biliary tree, including the major duodenal papilla, in a large dog (43.8 kg).
  • Endoscopic tools (e.g., 3 Fr grasping forceps) could be passed through the working channel only after removing the irrigation line.
  • Standard biopsy forceps were incompatible with the disposable endoscope's 1.2 mm working channel.
  • Cadaver study showed no rupture, but clinical extrapolation is limited due to lack of diseased tissue.
  • Disposable endoscope setup cost (~$6,100) was significantly lower than traditional endoscopy systems (~$75,000–100,000), improving accessibility.

Chik

Veterinary Surgery

7

2024

Feasibility of open cholangioscopy with disposable flexible endoscopes

2024-7-VS-chik-1

Article Title: Feasibility of open cholangioscopy with disposable flexible endoscopes

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Suture & Soft Tissue Techniques
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.