Quiz Question

In Miller 2024 et al., on staple vs. hand-sewn feline GI techniques, what was the most common location of leakage for skin staple enterotomy (SSE)?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All SSE constructs leaked from the center of closure, with immediate leakage in 35%.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Center of closure.
All SSE constructs leaked from the center of closure, with immediate leakage in 35%.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Skin staple anastomosis (SSA) had comparable leak pressures to hand-sewn anastomosis (HSA) but required half the time to complete.
  • Skin staple enterotomy (SSE) had significantly lower leak pressures than hand-sewn enterotomy (HSE) and failed in 12/20 constructs during pressure testing.
  • HSE constructs took 8× longer to complete than SSE, but had much higher intraluminal pressure tolerance.
  • All SSE constructs leaked from the center, with 35% leaking immediately and 60% showing catastrophic failure.
  • SSA leakage occurred at the center in 40% of constructs, likely due to a learning curve in early samples.
  • All constructs had higher pressures than normal physiologic intestinal pressure (4.0 mmHg ±2.0), except some SSEs with immediate leaks.
  • Authors recommend SSA as a viable alternative with appropriate training but do not recommend SSE using the tested technique in live cats.
  • Staple size and placement technique are key factors; smaller or more precisely placed staples may reduce leak risk.

Miller

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Performance time and leak pressure of hand-sewn and skin staple intestinal anastomoses and enterotomies in cadaveric cats

2024-4-VS-miller-2

Article Title: Performance time and leak pressure of hand-sewn and skin staple intestinal anastomoses and enterotomies in cadaveric cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Otero Balda 2025 et al., on Short-term outcomes after feline cPSS surgery, what was the survival rate in cats pretreated with levetiracetam following the LEV1 protocol?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Cats in LEV1 group had a 100% 30-day survival rate, although the difference was not statistically significant.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 100.0%.
Cats in LEV1 group had a 100% 30-day survival rate, although the difference was not statistically significant.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 78% of cats that developed postattenuation neurologic signs (PANS) after congenital portosystemic shunt (cPSS) surgery survived to 30 days.
  • Postattenuation seizures (PAS) were associated with significantly decreased 30-day survival (50% vs. 78%; OR: 0.015, p = .005).
  • Treatment of PANS with propofol was a negative prognostic factor (OR: 0.112, p = .0008).
  • Generalized PAS accounted for most seizure cases and were more frequently fatal than focal or unknown-type seizures.
  • Pretreatment with levetiracetam (LEV1 protocol) showed a trend toward improved survival (100% vs. 60.6% in untreated cats), though not statistically significant (p = .06).
  • Shunt morphology, method of attenuation, and study period (early vs. late) were not significantly associated with 30-day survival.
  • Electrolyte, glucose, and ammonia abnormalities were not strongly linked to survival outcomes in this study.
  • Majority of PAS-related deaths were due to uncontrolled generalized seizures or euthanasia because of severity.

Otero Balda

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Prognostic factors for short‐term survival of cats that experienced postattenuation neurologic signs after surgical attenuation of single congenital portosystemic shunts

2025-5-VS-otero-5

Article Title: Prognostic factors for short‐term survival of cats that experienced postattenuation neurologic signs after surgical attenuation of single congenital portosystemic shunts

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Hertel 2025 et al., on portal venotomy for insulinoma, what material and technique were used to close the venotomy site?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. This closure method minimized bleeding and supported vascular integrity.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 5–0 polypropylene in simple continuous pattern reinforced with tissue glue.
This closure method minimized bleeding and supported vascular integrity.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Portal venotomy enabled successful en bloc resection of a pancreatic insulinoma and associated thrombus in the portal vein, a novel approach in veterinary literature.
  • Temporary portal vein occlusion (15 min) was well tolerated, causing only transient small intestinal congestion without lasting hemodynamic compromise.
  • No intraoperative hemorrhage occurred following vascular isolation and venotomy repair with 5–0 polypropylene in a simple continuous pattern.
  • Postoperative complications were minimal, with only moderate pancreatitis managed medically and no portal hypertension observed on follow-up imaging.
  • Histopathology confirmed insulinoma, with no initial metastasis; CT at 6 months revealed hepatic and peritoneal metastases but no local recurrence at the venotomy site.
  • Portal vein luminal stenosis occurred post-repair but was clinically insignificant.
  • Advanced CT imaging and 3D printed modeling significantly enhanced surgical planning and anatomical assessment.
  • Surgical excision achieved good short-term outcomes, and the dog was alive and euglycemic one year later despite metastatic disease.

Hertel

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Successful venotomy for portal tumor thrombus removal due to pancreatic carcinoma in a dog

2025-5-VS-hertel-4

Article Title: Successful venotomy for portal tumor thrombus removal due to pancreatic carcinoma in a dog

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Caiazzo 2025 et al., on suture material comparison, what was the overall rate of incisional dehiscence without infection?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 22 out of 232 dogs experienced non-infected incisional dehiscence, equating to a 9.48% rate.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 9.5%.
22 out of 232 dogs experienced non-infected incisional dehiscence, equating to a 9.48% rate.

🔍 Key Findings

  • No significant difference in non-infected incisional dehiscence rates among groups using PDS vs. Monocryl for subcutaneous and skin closure.
  • Overall dehiscence rate: 9.48% (22/232 dogs).
  • Postoperative antibiotic use and signs of inflammation were significantly associated with dehiscence (p = .023 and p < .001, respectively).
  • Dogs not receiving postoperative antibiotics had a higher dehiscence rate (14.74%) than those that did (5.84%).
  • Most dehiscence cases were superficial (85.7%), and the average length of dehiscence was 1.71 cm.
  • No statistically significant impact of weight, BCS, incision length, procedure type, surgeon experience, closure direction, or barrier use on dehiscence rate.

Caiazzo

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Impact of suture materials polydioxanone and poliglecaprone 25 on non-infected clean orthopedic stifle procedure incisional dehiscence rates

2025-3-VS-caiazzo-1

Article Title: Impact of suture materials polydioxanone and poliglecaprone 25 on non-infected clean orthopedic stifle procedure incisional dehiscence rates

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Buote 2023 et al., on laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in cats, which of the following was true regarding live patient outcomes after LVSG?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Live cats had no GI or healing complications; staple lines were not oversewn.
Incorrect. The correct answer is No complications were reported.
Live cats had no GI or healing complications; staple lines were not oversewn.

🔍 Key Findings

  • LVSG was feasible in 9/10 feline cadavers and both live cats, with no intra- or postoperative complications in live cases.
  • Two cadavers developed suspected stenosis due to staple lines too close to the lesser curvature; avoided with orogastric tube placement in later cases.
  • No evidence of gastric leakage in any cadavers (8/10 tested) or live patients after methylene blue leak tests.
  • Mean surgical time was ~110 min cadavers / 115 min live, and 27.6% of stomach mass was resected.
  • Both live cats recovered uneventfully, lost 21–24% body weight over 3 months, and had no GI complications at 6-month follow-up.
  • Orogastric tube and tension on the greater curvature were critical to avoid staple line misplacement or stenosis.
  • No oversew of the staple line was needed, and unreinforced staples showed no leakage in live patients.
  • Future studies needed to assess metabolic outcomes and ideal staple sizing and closure techniques.

Buote

Veterinary Surgery

6

2023

Laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy in felines: A cadaveric feasibility study and experimental case series in two cats

2023-6-VS-buote2-5

Article Title: Laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy in felines: A cadaveric feasibility study and experimental case series in two cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Parker 2023 et al., on Locoregional analgesia in TPLO, what was the most frequently cited additive to bupivacaine in peripheral nerve blocks?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Dexmedetomidine was the most commonly selected additive for PNB, used by 85% of those adding any agent.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Dexmedetomidine.
Dexmedetomidine was the most commonly selected additive for PNB, used by 85% of those adding any agent.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Peripheral nerve block (PNB) was preferred by 79% of anesthesiologists; lumbosacral epidural (LE) by 21%; PI <1%.
  • Time since board-certification significantly influenced preference: PNB favored by newer diplomates, LE favored by more senior ones (p < .001).
  • Employment sector mattered: PNB was preferred more in private practice, LE more in academia (p = .003).
  • PNB perceived as more effective, with 78% reporting 81–100% effectiveness; compared to 55% for LE.
  • PNB associated with fewer adverse effects (75%) than LE (4%) and PI (21%).
  • PNB required less rescue analgesia intraoperatively (57%) and postoperatively (54%) than LE or PI.
  • LE preferred for bilateral TPLOs and in smaller dogs; PNB for larger dogs, due to motor function preservation.
  • Dexmedetomidine was the most common additive to PNB; bupivacaine-only was most used for PNB.

Parker

Veterinary Surgery

4

2023

Pelvic limb anesthesia and analgesia in dogs undergoing tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO): A survey of board-certified anesthesiologists

2023-4-VS-parker-3

Article Title: Pelvic limb anesthesia and analgesia in dogs undergoing tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO): A survey of board-certified anesthesiologists

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Dekerle 2022 et al., on ectopic ureter correction, **what factor was significantly associated with recurrence of incontinence** after neoureterostomy?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All recurrence cases after neoureterostomy had persistent ureteral remnants.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Ureteral remnant distal to ligation.
All recurrence cases after neoureterostomy had persistent ureteral remnants.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Cystoscopic-guided laser ablation (CLA) was associated with significantly fewer minor complications (13%) than neoureterostomy (100%) (P < .01)
  • CLA resulted in significantly fewer recurrences of incontinence compared to neoureterostomy (0/7 vs 5/12; P < .05)
  • 80% of dogs achieved continence within 1 month postoperatively, with a median continence score of 10
  • Long-term continence was achieved in 88% of dogs, with or without adjunctive treatment, over a median of 66 months
  • Major complications occurred in only 8% of dogs, and all were successfully managed with surgical revision
  • Persistent ureteral remnants were seen only in neoureterostomy dogs, potentially contributing to incontinence recurrence
  • All dogs with incontinence recurrence responded to medical treatment, while only 1/5 with persistent incontinence after surgery did
  • CLA is recommended over open surgery for iEU correction, due to lower complication and recurrence rates

Dekerle

Veterinary Surgery

4

2022

Outcomes of 25 female dogs treated for ectopic ureters by open surgery or cystoscopic-guided laser ablation

2022-4-VS-dekerle-4

Article Title: Outcomes of 25 female dogs treated for ectopic ureters by open surgery or cystoscopic-guided laser ablation

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Bush 2023 et al., on canine salivary gland carcinoma, which complication was most commonly associated with parotid gland excision?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Facial nerve injury was exclusive to parotid sialoadenectomy cases in the study.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Facial nerve injury.
Facial nerve injury was exclusive to parotid sialoadenectomy cases in the study.

🔍 Key Findings

Source: Bush et al., 2023, Veterinary Surgery

  • Median survival time (MST) after surgery was 1886 days, which is significantly longer than previously reported.
  • Lymph node metastasis at surgery was a negative prognostic factor, reducing MST to 248 days (vs. 2340 days without nodal involvement).
  • Local recurrence occurred in 42% of dogs, with a median disease-free interval (DFI) of 191 days.
  • Metastatic disease occurred in 32% of dogs, most commonly to the lungs, with a median DFI of 299 days.
  • Histologic features (e.g., margin status, capsular, lymphatic, or vascular invasion) were not significantly correlated with recurrence or metastasis.
  • Facial nerve injury occurred in 9.7% perioperatively, especially after parotidectomy; intraoperative facial nerve transection led to long-term deficits.
  • Adjuvant therapies (chemotherapy, radiation, NSAIDs) did not significantly affect survival time.
  • Incisional biopsy was only 38% concordant with final excisional histology, suggesting limited reliability for definitive diagnosis.

Bush

Veterinary Surgery

3

2023

Outcomes and clinical features associated with surgically excised canine salivary gland carcinoma: A multi-institutional, retrospective, Veterinary Society of Surgical Oncology study

2023-3-VS-bush-4

Article Title: Outcomes and clinical features associated with surgically excised canine salivary gland carcinoma: A multi-institutional, retrospective, Veterinary Society of Surgical Oncology study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Parker 2023 et al., on Locoregional analgesia in TPLO, what was the most commonly preferred locoregional anesthesia technique among anesthesiologists for dogs undergoing TPLO?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. PNB was preferred by 79% of diplomates, making it the most frequently chosen locoregional technique for TPLO.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Peripheral nerve block.
PNB was preferred by 79% of diplomates, making it the most frequently chosen locoregional technique for TPLO.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Peripheral nerve block (PNB) was preferred by 79% of anesthesiologists; lumbosacral epidural (LE) by 21%; PI <1%.
  • Time since board-certification significantly influenced preference: PNB favored by newer diplomates, LE favored by more senior ones (p < .001).
  • Employment sector mattered: PNB was preferred more in private practice, LE more in academia (p = .003).
  • PNB perceived as more effective, with 78% reporting 81–100% effectiveness; compared to 55% for LE.
  • PNB associated with fewer adverse effects (75%) than LE (4%) and PI (21%).
  • PNB required less rescue analgesia intraoperatively (57%) and postoperatively (54%) than LE or PI.
  • LE preferred for bilateral TPLOs and in smaller dogs; PNB for larger dogs, due to motor function preservation.
  • Dexmedetomidine was the most common additive to PNB; bupivacaine-only was most used for PNB.

Parker

Veterinary Surgery

4

2023

Pelvic limb anesthesia and analgesia in dogs undergoing tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO): A survey of board-certified anesthesiologists

2023-4-VS-parker-1

Article Title: Pelvic limb anesthesia and analgesia in dogs undergoing tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO): A survey of board-certified anesthesiologists

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Beamon 2022 et al., on calcanean tunnel orientation, which failure mode was most commonly observed across all groups?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Suture pull-through occurred in 67% of cases, with no statistical difference among groups.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Suture pull-through.
Suture pull-through occurred in 67% of cases, with no statistical difference among groups.

🔍 Key Findings

  • No significant difference in peak load, failure load, stiffness, or 3 mm gap formation among bone tunnel types.
  • Transverse tunnel (TT) constructs had 25% higher yield load than modified tunnels (MT) (P = .027).
  • Most common failure mode was suture pull-through (67%), with no significant difference between groups.
  • Gap formation ≥3 mm occurred in ~90% of constructs; no significant difference in force needed for gap among groups.
  • All bone tunnel techniques (TT, VT, MT) are viable options for CCT reattachment in dogs.
  • The 3-loop pulley (3LP) pattern provided strong, uniform repair, with higher loads to failure than previously reported.
  • TT constructs showed more tendon distortion at the repair interface during loading.
  • Inclusion of accessory tendon may have improved repair strength compared to prior studies using GT alone.

Beamon

Veterinary Surgery

4

2022

Effect of calcanean bone‐tunnel orientation for teno‐osseous repair in a canine common calcanean tendon avulsion model

2022-4-VS-beamon-2

Article Title: Effect of calcanean bone‐tunnel orientation for teno‐osseous repair in a canine common calcanean tendon avulsion model

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Suture & Soft Tissue Techniques
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.