Quiz Question

In Miller 2024 et al., on intestinal obstruction and catheter technique in cats, what was the overall success rate of the red rubber catheter technique (RRCT) for removing linear foreign bodies?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The RRCT successfully removed LFBOs in 20 out of 24 cases, representing 83% success.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 83%.
The RRCT successfully removed LFBOs in 20 out of 24 cases, representing 83% success.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Cats with linear (LFBO) and discrete (DFBO) small intestinal obstructions had similar survival (98.2% vs. 97%, p = 1.0).
  • Postoperative complications were not significantly different between LFBO and DFBO cases (p = .1386).
  • Intestinal dehiscence was rare (only 2 cats), both in DFBOs, with no statistical difference between groups.
  • Red rubber catheter technique (RRCT) successfully removed LFBOs in 83% (20/24) of attempts.
  • All failed RRCTs occurred in cats with perforations or tissue nonviability.
  • Cats with failed RRCTs had longer clinical signs pre-surgery (median 6.5 vs. 2.0 days).
  • Surgical time was longer in LFBO cats (median 77 min vs. 58 min, p = .0018).
  • Preoperative septic peritonitis was rare (4/169 cats), but occurred only in linear or mixed FBO cases.

Miller

Veterinary Surgery

7

2024

Linear and discrete foreign body small intestinal obstruction outcomes, complication risk factors, and single incision red rubber catheter technique success in cats

2024-7-VS-miller-1

Article Title: Linear and discrete foreign body small intestinal obstruction outcomes, complication risk factors, and single incision red rubber catheter technique success in cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Otero Balda 2025 et al., on Short-term outcomes after feline cPSS surgery, what was the survival rate in cats pretreated with levetiracetam following the LEV1 protocol?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Cats in LEV1 group had a 100% 30-day survival rate, although the difference was not statistically significant.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 100.0%.
Cats in LEV1 group had a 100% 30-day survival rate, although the difference was not statistically significant.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 78% of cats that developed postattenuation neurologic signs (PANS) after congenital portosystemic shunt (cPSS) surgery survived to 30 days.
  • Postattenuation seizures (PAS) were associated with significantly decreased 30-day survival (50% vs. 78%; OR: 0.015, p = .005).
  • Treatment of PANS with propofol was a negative prognostic factor (OR: 0.112, p = .0008).
  • Generalized PAS accounted for most seizure cases and were more frequently fatal than focal or unknown-type seizures.
  • Pretreatment with levetiracetam (LEV1 protocol) showed a trend toward improved survival (100% vs. 60.6% in untreated cats), though not statistically significant (p = .06).
  • Shunt morphology, method of attenuation, and study period (early vs. late) were not significantly associated with 30-day survival.
  • Electrolyte, glucose, and ammonia abnormalities were not strongly linked to survival outcomes in this study.
  • Majority of PAS-related deaths were due to uncontrolled generalized seizures or euthanasia because of severity.

Otero Balda

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Prognostic factors for short‐term survival of cats that experienced postattenuation neurologic signs after surgical attenuation of single congenital portosystemic shunts

2025-5-VS-otero-5

Article Title: Prognostic factors for short‐term survival of cats that experienced postattenuation neurologic signs after surgical attenuation of single congenital portosystemic shunts

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Kuvaldina 2023 et al., on endoscopic axillary lymphadenectomy, what structure must be carefully preserved during dissection?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The thoracodorsal nerve was consistently identified and preserved to avoid functional loss.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Thoracodorsal nerve bundle.
The thoracodorsal nerve was consistently identified and preserved to avoid functional loss.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Endoscopic excisional biopsy of axillary lymph nodes was successfully performed in cadavers and clinical dogs with minimal complications.
  • The technique used a SILS port and CO₂ insufflation through a small incision between the latissimus dorsi and superficial pectorals.
  • In 4 cadavers (6 limbs), mean time to remove axillary nodes was 33 minutes, and single nodes were found in 5/6 limbs.
  • In 3 clinical dogs, the procedure was successful in 2 cases; 1 required conversion to open surgery due to difficulty manipulating the node.
  • Accessory axillary nodes were successfully excised when present, located adherent to deep latissimus dorsi.
  • No cases developed lymphedema, pneumothorax, or major complications postoperatively.
  • Subjective benefits included better visualization, reduced dissection, and less postoperative morbidity than open techniques.
  • Study suggests MIS lymphadenectomy may improve staging accuracy and reduce complications, though larger studies are needed.

Kuvaldina

Veterinary Surgery

6

2023

Development of a minimally invasive endoscopic technique for excisional biopsy of the axillary lymph nodes in dogs

2023-6-VS-kuvaldina-3-9e740

Article Title: Development of a minimally invasive endoscopic technique for excisional biopsy of the axillary lymph nodes in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Williams 2024 et al., on adrenaline use in maxillary nerve blocks, what was the observed reduction in median intraoperative hemorrhage in the adrenaline group compared to the no-adrenaline group?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Adrenaline reduced median hemorrhage from 7.95 g to 1.82 g, a 77.1% reduction.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 77.1%.
Adrenaline reduced median hemorrhage from 7.95 g to 1.82 g, a 77.1% reduction.

🔍 Key Findings

  • The addition of adrenaline (0.00198%) to bilateral maxillary nerve blocks significantly reduced intraoperative hemorrhage in dogs undergoing sharp staphylectomy (median reduction: 77.1%).
  • Normalized hemorrhage (g/kg) and total hemorrhage (g) were significantly lower in the adrenaline group (p = .021 and p = .013, respectively).
  • Surgeon-assessed hemorrhage scores were also significantly lower in the adrenaline group (median 2 vs. 3; p = .029), indicating improved surgical visibility.
  • No adverse effects (e.g. tachycardia, arrhythmia, or hypertension) were observed with adrenaline administration.
  • A standardized intraoral approach to the maxillary nerve block was used with 0.5 mL per side regardless of dog size.
  • Breed effect observed: English Bulldogs had higher normalized hemorrhage, possibly due to anatomical variation or underdosing relative to size.
  • Adrenaline may also prolong local anesthetic action and reduce blood aspiration risks, though this was not directly measured.
  • The study supports the routine inclusion of adrenaline in maxillary nerve blocks for staphylectomy in BOAS patients to improve surgical field and reduce bleeding.

Williams

Veterinary Surgery

8

2024

Evaluation of the addition of adrenaline in a bilateral maxillary nerve block to reduce hemorrhage in dogs undergoing sharp staphylectomy for brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome. A prospective, randomized study

2024-8-VS-williams-1

Article Title: Evaluation of the addition of adrenaline in a bilateral maxillary nerve block to reduce hemorrhage in dogs undergoing sharp staphylectomy for brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome. A prospective, randomized study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Caiazzo 2025 et al., on suture material comparison, what was the study’s conclusion regarding PDS versus Monocryl use?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The study found no statistically significant difference in dehiscence rates between groups using PDS or Monocryl for skin closure.
Incorrect. The correct answer is PDS and Monocryl had equivalent outcomes.
The study found no statistically significant difference in dehiscence rates between groups using PDS or Monocryl for skin closure.

🔍 Key Findings

  • No significant difference in non-infected incisional dehiscence rates among groups using PDS vs. Monocryl for subcutaneous and skin closure.
  • Overall dehiscence rate: 9.48% (22/232 dogs).
  • Postoperative antibiotic use and signs of inflammation were significantly associated with dehiscence (p = .023 and p < .001, respectively).
  • Dogs not receiving postoperative antibiotics had a higher dehiscence rate (14.74%) than those that did (5.84%).
  • Most dehiscence cases were superficial (85.7%), and the average length of dehiscence was 1.71 cm.
  • No statistically significant impact of weight, BCS, incision length, procedure type, surgeon experience, closure direction, or barrier use on dehiscence rate.

Caiazzo

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Impact of suture materials polydioxanone and poliglecaprone 25 on non-infected clean orthopedic stifle procedure incisional dehiscence rates

2025-3-VS-caiazzo-3

Article Title: Impact of suture materials polydioxanone and poliglecaprone 25 on non-infected clean orthopedic stifle procedure incisional dehiscence rates

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Azuma 2024 et al., on 3D vs 2D laparoscopy, what was the median length of cystic duct stump left distal to the first endoclip?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Both groups had a median stump length of 2.5 mm, consistent with human surgery recommendations.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 2.5 mm.
Both groups had a median stump length of 2.5 mm, consistent with human surgery recommendations.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 3D laparoscopy significantly reduced time to first endoclip placement compared to 2D (median 76 vs. 238 seconds, p = .016).
  • Total surgical time was not significantly different between 3D and 2D groups.
  • No differences were observed in intraoperative complications such as cystic duct injury, clip dislodgment, or gallbladder perforation.
  • Cystic duct stump length was comparable between groups (median 2.5 mm).
  • Liver parenchyma attachment severity did not differ significantly between 2D and 3D groups.
  • All procedures were performed by an experienced surgeon, potentially reducing the benefit seen with 3D visualization.
  • No conversions to open surgery occurred, and no intraoperative complications were reported.
  • The study suggests 3D laparoscopy may aid less experienced surgeons due to enhanced depth perception.

Azuma

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopy for cholecystectomy in a canine cadaveric study

2024-4-VS-azuma-4

Article Title: Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopy for cholecystectomy in a canine cadaveric study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Miller 2024 et al., on staple vs. hand-sewn feline GI techniques, which enterotomy method showed significantly lower intraluminal pressure resistance?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. SSE had significantly lower leak pressures and failed in 12/20 constructs, making it less secure.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Skin staple enterotomy (SSE).
SSE had significantly lower leak pressures and failed in 12/20 constructs, making it less secure.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Skin staple anastomosis (SSA) had comparable leak pressures to hand-sewn anastomosis (HSA) but required half the time to complete.
  • Skin staple enterotomy (SSE) had significantly lower leak pressures than hand-sewn enterotomy (HSE) and failed in 12/20 constructs during pressure testing.
  • HSE constructs took 8× longer to complete than SSE, but had much higher intraluminal pressure tolerance.
  • All SSE constructs leaked from the center, with 35% leaking immediately and 60% showing catastrophic failure.
  • SSA leakage occurred at the center in 40% of constructs, likely due to a learning curve in early samples.
  • All constructs had higher pressures than normal physiologic intestinal pressure (4.0 mmHg ±2.0), except some SSEs with immediate leaks.
  • Authors recommend SSA as a viable alternative with appropriate training but do not recommend SSE using the tested technique in live cats.
  • Staple size and placement technique are key factors; smaller or more precisely placed staples may reduce leak risk.

Miller

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Performance time and leak pressure of hand-sewn and skin staple intestinal anastomoses and enterotomies in cadaveric cats

2024-4-VS-miller-1

Article Title: Performance time and leak pressure of hand-sewn and skin staple intestinal anastomoses and enterotomies in cadaveric cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Barnes 2024 et al., on knot performance, which was a notable disadvantage of the double forwarder knot?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The DF knot had significantly greater volume and weight compared to SQ/SU knots at the same throw count.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Higher knot volume and weight.
The DF knot had significantly greater volume and weight compared to SQ/SU knots at the same throw count.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Double forwarder (DF) knots had significantly higher knot holding capacity (KHC) than square (SQ) and surgeon’s (SU) knots when tied with <6 throws.
  • In 3 USP polyglactin 910, DF knots with 4–5 throws were not significantly stronger than SU knots with 6–8 throws (p > .43).
  • DF knots never unraveled, while SQ and SU knots with 4–5 throws showed substantial unraveling.
  • KHC did not increase in DF knots when throws increased from 3 to 5.
  • Knot volume and weight were significantly higher in DF knots than SQ/SU knots at the same throw count (p < .003).
  • DF knots allow sliding placement, potentially useful in minimally invasive or deep cavity procedures.

Barnes

Veterinary Surgery

2

2024

Evaluation of the in vitro performance of the double forwarder knot, compared to square and surgeon's knots using large gauge suture

2024-2-VS-barnes-4

Article Title: Evaluation of the in vitro performance of the double forwarder knot, compared to square and surgeon's knots using large gauge suture

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Cortez 2024 et al., on feline ectopic ureters, which surgical technique was used most frequently?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Eight of twelve cats underwent UNC, making it the most commonly used surgical technique.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Ureteroneocystostomy (UNC).
Eight of twelve cats underwent UNC, making it the most commonly used surgical technique.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Ectopic ureters in cats are rare, but most are extramural and bilateral.
  • Surgical techniques used included ureteroneocystostomy (UNC), neoureterostomy (NU), nephroureterectomy, and cystoscopic laser ablation (CLA).
  • All cats showed improvement in urinary continence postoperatively, with 11/12 achieving complete resolution.
  • Major complications were rare; one cat developed uroabdomen requiring revision surgery.
  • Diagnostic imaging was effective, with abdominal ultrasound diagnosing 8/10 and CT 3/3 cases.
  • Short- and long-term complications included urethral spasms, UTIs, stranguria, and rectal prolapse; all were manageable.
  • CLA was successful in 2 cats and is noted as a first-time described technique in feline ectopic ureter cases.
  • Median postoperative follow-up was 340 days, supporting good long-term outcomes.

Cortez

Veterinary Surgery

6

2024

Presentation, diagnosis, and outcomes of cats undergoing surgical treatment of ectopic ureters

2024-6-VS-cortez-1

Article Title: Presentation, diagnosis, and outcomes of cats undergoing surgical treatment of ectopic ureters

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Alvarez 2022 et al., on rehabilitation modalities, which statement best reflects the findings on photobiomodulation (PBM)?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Only one of three PBM studies (Rogatko et al.) showed improved PVF; others showed no significant benefit despite low RoB.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Only one PBM study showed improved objective outcomes.
Only one of three PBM studies (Rogatko et al.) showed improved PVF; others showed no significant benefit despite low RoB.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Exercise-based rehabilitation showed benefits in 6 of 7 studies, including increased peak vertical force (PVF) and reduced lameness, though most had high risk of bias (RoB).
  • Cold compression therapy (CCT) had 2 high-quality (Level II, low RoB) studies showing improvements in pain scores, range of motion, and swelling, supporting its clinical use.
  • Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) was supported by 2 Level II studies; only one had low RoB, showing short-term benefits in patellar ligament thickness and PVF, but no long-term benefit on bone healing.
  • Photobiomodulation (PBM) had mixed results across 3 Level II studies (all low RoB); only 1 showed positive impact on PVF, limiting its recommendation.
  • Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) showed no significant impact on gait analysis or bone healing in a Level II, low RoB study.
  • Electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) improved lameness and thigh circumference in one Level III study, but had high-moderate RoB and involved experimentally-induced CCL rupture, limiting clinical relevance.
  • No modality beyond exercise and CCT had consistent or strong evidence for efficacy in post-TPLO or extracapsular repair rehabilitation.
  • The absence of standardized protocols, small sample sizes, and inconsistent outcome measures limited the generalizability of findings.

Alvarez

Veterinary Surgery

2

2022

Systematic review of postoperative rehabilitation interventions after cranial cruciate ligament surgery in dogs

2022-2-VS-alvarez-4

Article Title: Systematic review of postoperative rehabilitation interventions after cranial cruciate ligament surgery in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Suture & Soft Tissue Techniques
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.