Quiz Question

In Lemmon 2025 et al., on synovitis severity scoring, what clinical implication was proposed based on the findings?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Higher synovitis scores were tied to worse cartilage lesions, supporting early treatment.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Earlier intervention may help reduce synovitis.
Higher synovitis scores were tied to worse cartilage lesions, supporting early treatment.

🔍 Key Findings

Synovitis was present in 100% of canine stifles with CCL disease (n = 163).

The most frequent severity score was 3/5 (55.2%), followed by 4/5 (24.5%).

Higher synovitis scores were significantly associated with:

  • Higher median cartilage scores (p = .042, OR = 2.1 per unit increase)
  • Longer duration of clinical signs (p < .001, OR = 1.27 per month)

Bodyweight (p = .083) and sex (p = .17) were not statistically significant in multivariable analysis.

Bucket handle meniscal tears were not associated with synovitis severity.

Clinical implication: Earlier intervention may help reduce synovitis and slow OA progression.

Lemmon

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Arthroscopic synovitis severity scoring in canine stifles with cranial cruciate ligament disease

2025-3-VS-lemmon-5

Article Title: Arthroscopic synovitis severity scoring in canine stifles with cranial cruciate ligament disease

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Curuci 2024 et al., which complication occurred most commonly after DCTPLO?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Observed in 16/18 stifles postoperatively, though no clinical impact was noted:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Patellar ligament thickening.
Observed in 16/18 stifles postoperatively, though no clinical impact was noted:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 16 dogs (18 stifles) with CrCL rupture and TPA >34° were treated using the DCTPLO
  • Mean TPA correction: from 39.4° to 6.3°
  • Bone union at 60 days in 17/18 stifles; remaining healed by 90 days
  • Minor complications (e.g., small wedge gaps) in 2/18 stifles — no major complications
  • Patellar ligament thickening seen in 16/18 stifles but no clinical signs noted
  • The technique enabled safer reduction with less risk of tibial crest fracture vs. conventional TPLO

Curuci

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

6

2024

Double-Cut Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy for the Management of Cranial Cruciate Ligament Insufficiency in Dogs with an Excessive Plateau Angle: Early Clinical Results in 16 Dogs

2024-6-VCOT-curuci-3

Article Title: Double-Cut Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy for the Management of Cranial Cruciate Ligament Insufficiency in Dogs with an Excessive Plateau Angle: Early Clinical Results in 16 Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Guénégo 2025 et al., on AMA-based CCWO, what was the postoperative AMA angle achieved in most dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The AMA angle was reduced to 0° in most dogs, achieving axis alignment.
Incorrect. The correct answer is .
The AMA angle was reduced to 0° in most dogs, achieving axis alignment.

🔍 Key Findings

  • AMA-based CCWO realigned the anatomical and mechanical axes in 82% of dogs >50 kg, with postoperative AMA angle of 0° in most cases.
  • Surgical site infection (SSI) rate was only 0.5%, markedly lower than TPLO-reported rates in similar populations (up to 37.5%).
  • All osteotomies achieved Grade 4 healing by 8 weeks, with no implant failures.
  • AMA-based planning based on preoperative AMA and TPA allowed for better correction of proximal tibial angulation compared to TPLO in large dogs.
  • Use of a double locking plate (DLP) fixation and Robert Jones bandage (RJB) contributed to improved mechanical stability and infection prevention.
  • Dogs with AMA angle >3.4° (hyper-CCAPT) were 38% of the cohort, supporting AMA as a critical metric in planning.
  • Postoperative alignment of the AA and MA was more consistently achieved when preoperative AMA was >2.4°, confirming suitability of AMA-based CCWO for severe angulation.
  • Most infections in TPLOs occur within 15 days, but RJB plus antibiotics in this study appeared protective, suggesting benefit for early-phase SSI prevention.

Guénégo

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

3

2025

Modified Cranial Closing Wedge Osteotomy (AMA-Based CCWO) to Treat Cranial Cruciate Ligament Deficient Stifle in 204 Dogs Over 50 Kg

2025-3-VCOT-guenego-1

Article Title: Modified Cranial Closing Wedge Osteotomy (AMA-Based CCWO) to Treat Cranial Cruciate Ligament Deficient Stifle in 204 Dogs Over 50 Kg

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Knudsen 2024 et al., on lesion types found, which meniscal injury was most commonly identified during surgery?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Bucket handle tears were the most common lesion type, especially in newly diagnosed CCL cases.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Bucket handle tear.
Bucket handle tears were the most common lesion type, especially in newly diagnosed CCL cases.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Study Design: Prospective case series of 52 scans from 44 dogs with CCL injury.
  • Main Technique: 16-slice CTA; evaluated by 3 observers with varying experience; validated against surgical mini-medial arthrotomy findings.
  • Diagnostic Metrics (Reading 2):
    • Sensitivity: 1.00 (Observers 1 & 2), 0.93 (Observer 3)
    • Specificity: 0.78–0.91
    • Positive Likelihood Ratio: Up to 10.71
    • Negative Likelihood Ratio: As low as 0.08
    • Accuracy: 90%+ for all in Reading 2
  • Observer Effect: Significant improvement between first and second reading for less experienced observers (p < 0.05); learning curve evident.
  • Meniscal lesions found:
    • 9/12 in suspected late meniscal injury cases
    • 19/40 in newly diagnosed CCL cases
    • Most common = bucket handle tears
  • Conclusion: Multidetector CTA is a clinically useful, non-invasive tool for identifying medial meniscal lesions in dogs with CCL disease.

Knudsen

Veterinary Surgery

1

2024

Diagnosis of medial meniscal lesions in the canine stifle using multidetector computed tomographic positive-contrast arthrography

2024-1-VS-knudsen-3

Article Title: Diagnosis of medial meniscal lesions in the canine stifle using multidetector computed tomographic positive-contrast arthrography

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Isono 2025 et al., on tibial malalignment in MPL, which of the following was TRUE regarding the correlation findings?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. PTMTA had a strong positive correlation with TTA (r = 0.733) and CRA (r = 0.643).
Incorrect. The correct answer is PTMTA had a correlation coefficient of 0.733 with TTA.
PTMTA had a strong positive correlation with TTA (r = 0.733) and CRA (r = 0.643).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Proximal Tibia Metatarsal Angle (PTMTA) was significantly increased in dogs with grade 3 and 4 MPL, making it a useful marker for severity.
  • PTMTA strongly correlated with Tibial Torsion Angle (TTA) (r = 0.733) and Crural Rotation Angle (CRA) (r = 0.643), integrating multiple morphological deformities.
  • Grade 4 MPL cases showed significant internal tibial torsion, increased mMPTA, and decreased MDTT/PTW—indicating both rotation and medial displacement.
  • DTMTA was significantly more negative in grade 4, indicating a consistent pattern of internal foot rotation with disease severity.
  • PTMTA can be visually assessed during palpation, offering preoperative utility without CT.
  • Among toy poodles, PTMTA showed significant differences even between grades 3 and normal, suggesting breed-specific severity patterns.
  • Corrective osteotomy may need to address tibial as well as femoral deformities in severe MPL cases with high PTMTA.
  • Younger dogs with grade 4 MPL had more severe deformities, possibly due to early onset or developmental progression.

Isono

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

4

2025

Tibial Torsion Malalignment in Small Dogs with Medial Patellar Luxation

2025-4-VCOT-isono-5

Article Title: Tibial Torsion Malalignment in Small Dogs with Medial Patellar Luxation

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Rocheleau 2024 et al., on arthroscopic meniscal suturing, what was the overall complication rate?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The overall complication rate reported was 34.1%.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 34%.
The overall complication rate reported was 34.1%.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Arthroscopic meniscal suturing was performed in 43 client-owned dogs, involving 44 meniscal repairs (one dog was bilateral). All injuries involved the caudal horn of the medial meniscus and were associated with cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL) disease.
  • All dogs underwent simultaneous TPLO, with some also receiving an internal brace (IB). Most repairs used simple vertical mattress sutures.
  • The overall complication rate was 34.1% (15/44). Most complications were attributed to the TPLO/TPLO+IB and did not compromise the meniscal repair outcome.
  • No median time to “acceptable” or “full” function was reported, but most dogs showed improvement in lameness and LOAD scores (p < .001), indicating good to excellent outcomes.
  • Meniscal repair success rate was 88% (38/44), with TPLO + IB outperforming TPLO-only (93.3% vs 71.4%). Follow-up was performed at 8 weeks (40 dogs) and 6 months (16 dogs).
  • Six failures occurred, all managed with arthroscopic meniscectomy, leading to normal activity in those dogs. Two IB-associated failures led to CrCL instability.
  • The authors concluded the technique was safe, practical, and effective, with a reasonable complication rate.
  • The findings support arthroscopic suturing as a feasible alternative to meniscectomy or meniscal release, offering long-term benefits for preserving the meniscus.

Rocheleau

Veterinary Surgery

5

2024

Short‐term outcomes of 43 dogs treated with arthroscopic suturing for meniscal tears

2024-5-VS-rocheleau-2

Article Title: Short‐term outcomes of 43 dogs treated with arthroscopic suturing for meniscal tears

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Santos 2025 et al., on feline MPL morphology, which patellar metric was significantly greater in MPL III compared to controls?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Patellar length was significantly longer in MPL III group vs control (14.3 mm vs 13.95 mm; p = 0.01).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Patellar length (fPL).
Patellar length was significantly longer in MPL III group vs control (14.3 mm vs 13.95 mm; p = 0.01).

🔍 Key Findings

Sample: 21 cats (10 control, 11 affected); 14 normal limbs vs 18 with MPL (MPL II: 7, MPL III: 11).

Significantly different CT measurements in MPL vs control:

  • aLDFA: MPL II > control and MPL III (p = 0.014)
  • FTW: MPL III > control (p = 0.021)
  • FTD: control > MPL II and III (p < 0.001)
  • TTA: MPL II and III had increased external tibial torsion vs control (p < 0.001)
  • fPL and PV: MPL III cats had longer and more voluminous patellae

No significant differences in AA, mMPTA, TTD, fPW, aPH.
Patella width exceeded trochlear width in all groups.
Authors suggest femoral and tibial angular correction may not be indicated in most feline MPL II–III cases.
Soft tissue techniques and trochleoplasty warrant further investigation.
CT method: Intraobserver ICC good in 64%, interobserver poor in 36% of metrics.

Santos

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

1

2025

Computed Tomographic Measurement Method for Morphoanatomical Comparison of Femur, Tibia, and Patella in Cats with and without Medial Patellar Luxation

2025-1-VC-santos-4

Article Title: Computed Tomographic Measurement Method for Morphoanatomical Comparison of Femur, Tibia, and Patella in Cats with and without Medial Patellar Luxation

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Isono 2025 et al., on tibial malalignment in MPL, which statistical trend was observed in toy poodles with grade 3 MPL?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Toy poodles with grade 3 MPL had higher PTMTA than normals, indicating breed-specific severity.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Significantly higher PTMTA compared to normals.
Toy poodles with grade 3 MPL had higher PTMTA than normals, indicating breed-specific severity.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Proximal Tibia Metatarsal Angle (PTMTA) was significantly increased in dogs with grade 3 and 4 MPL, making it a useful marker for severity.
  • PTMTA strongly correlated with Tibial Torsion Angle (TTA) (r = 0.733) and Crural Rotation Angle (CRA) (r = 0.643), integrating multiple morphological deformities.
  • Grade 4 MPL cases showed significant internal tibial torsion, increased mMPTA, and decreased MDTT/PTW—indicating both rotation and medial displacement.
  • DTMTA was significantly more negative in grade 4, indicating a consistent pattern of internal foot rotation with disease severity.
  • PTMTA can be visually assessed during palpation, offering preoperative utility without CT.
  • Among toy poodles, PTMTA showed significant differences even between grades 3 and normal, suggesting breed-specific severity patterns.
  • Corrective osteotomy may need to address tibial as well as femoral deformities in severe MPL cases with high PTMTA.
  • Younger dogs with grade 4 MPL had more severe deformities, possibly due to early onset or developmental progression.

Isono

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

4

2025

Tibial Torsion Malalignment in Small Dogs with Medial Patellar Luxation

2025-4-VCOT-isono-4

Article Title: Tibial Torsion Malalignment in Small Dogs with Medial Patellar Luxation

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Lotsikas 2025 et al., on stifle distraction portal, what was the most frequently affected cartilage zone in terms of iatrogenic damage?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Zone 4 had significantly more IACI compared to zones 1–3 in both groups (p < .05).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Zone 4: Lateral femoral condyle.
Zone 4 had significantly more IACI compared to zones 1–3 in both groups (p < .05).

🔍 Key Findings

Study type: Cadaveric stifle arthroscopy in large breed dogs (n=12 joints from 6 dogs)
Goal: Describe and assess the proximal lateral portal for insertion of a Ventura stifle thrust lever (VSTL)
Main results:

  • No damage to the long digital extensor tendon (LDE) with this portal
  • VSTL could be placed without removing the arthroscope
  • Portal creation time ~37 seconds (faster than previously reported)

Cartilage impact:

  • Superficial iatrogenic articular cartilage injury (IACI) present in all specimens
  • No difference in IACI between 5- and 10-minute lever durations
  • Zone 4 (lateral femoral condyle) had significantly more damage than zones 1–3 (p < .05)

Conclusion: Portal was safe, repeatable, minimally invasive, and did not increase cartilage damage with up to 10-minute lever use

Lotsikas

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Proximal lateral insertion portal of an intra-articular arthroscopic stifle lever: A cadaveric study

2025-3-VS-lotsikas-2

Article Title: Proximal lateral insertion portal of an intra-articular arthroscopic stifle lever: A cadaveric study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Banks 2024 et al., on CCWO complications, what is a potential **consequence of negative TPA** resulting from overcorrection?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Negative TPA shifts load to the caudal cruciate ligament, risking injury.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Caudal cruciate ligament strain.
Negative TPA shifts load to the caudal cruciate ligament, risking injury.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Oxley's modified CCWO did not achieve the target TPA of 5° in most cases, even with planning.
  • Mean planned TPA was 7.6°, higher than target, and consistent across dog sizes.
  • Postoperative TPAs were significantly higher in small dogs (median 7°) than in large dogs (median 4.5°).
  • Distalization >7.5 mm of the osteotomy from the patellar tendon led to increased under-correction of TPA.
  • Only dogs with preoperative TPA >35° achieved post-planning TPAs close to the 5° target.
  • Postoperative osteotomy positions were generally more distal than recommended (8.6 mm median).
  • Virtual plate fit was appropriate for all dogs at 5 mm or 7.5 mm positions, suggesting no need for excessive distalization.
  • Excessive correction leading to negative TPAs occurred in some cases, risking caudal cruciate ligament strain.

Banks

Veterinary Surgery

8

2024

A mismatch of planning and achieved tibial plateau angle in cranial closing wedge surgery: An in silico and clinical evaluation of 100 cases

2024-8-VS-banks-5

Article Title: A mismatch of planning and achieved tibial plateau angle in cranial closing wedge surgery: An in silico and clinical evaluation of 100 cases

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Stifle Joint
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.