Quiz Question

In Eskelinen 2025 et al., on Plate–Pin fixation for MPL, what was the rate of patellar luxation recurrence?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Only 1 of 65 stifles had recurrence, indicating 98.5% success.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 1.5%.
Only 1 of 65 stifles had recurrence, indicating 98.5% success.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Plate–Pin TTT fixation resolved MPL in 64/65 stifles with low recurrence (1.5%) and good lameness outcomes postoperatively.
  • Complication rate was 21.5% (14/65 stifles), mostly minor (57%); major issues included pin migration, fracture, or capsular failure.
  • Pin-related issues accounted for 8 of 20 total complications, highlighting implant refinement is needed.
  • No avulsions, TT fixation failures, or luxation recurrence occurred in cases where surgical technique was followed precisely.
  • Surgical deviations increased complication risk 11.3× (p < 0.05), suggesting adherence to protocol is critical.
  • Single-session bilateral MPL surgery had comparable complication rate (3/20) to unilateral surgery (11/45).
  • Screw breakage occurred in 3 cases, suggesting at least 3 screws may be needed for secure TT fixation.
  • Authors suggest temporary pin fixation and later removal may reduce complications, though prospective studies are needed.

Eskelinen

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

4

2025

Outcome and Complications Following Medial Patellar Luxation Corrective Surgery with Tibial Tuberosity Transposition Using a Locking Plate and a Pin Fixation: 45 Unilateral and 20 Single-Session Bilateral Procedures

2025-4-VCOT-eskelinen-1

Article Title: Outcome and Complications Following Medial Patellar Luxation Corrective Surgery with Tibial Tuberosity Transposition Using a Locking Plate and a Pin Fixation: 45 Unilateral and 20 Single-Session Bilateral Procedures

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Wylie 2025 et al., on femoral implant accuracy, what was the effect of inaccurate isometric placement on postoperative stifle stability?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Inaccurate femoral implant positioning was significantly associated with increased internal tibial rotation at follow-up (p = .009), indicating possible implant failure.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It was significantly associated with increased internal tibial rotation.
Inaccurate femoral implant positioning was significantly associated with increased internal tibial rotation at follow-up (p = .009), indicating possible implant failure.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Accurate femoral isometric placement was achieved in 63% of cases, significantly more with SwiveLock (78.6%) than FASTak (38.9%).
  • Inaccurate placement was associated with increased internal tibial rotation at follow-up (p = .009), suggesting potential implant failure.
  • Pivot shift grade improved in 90.9% of stifles postoperatively, regardless of implant positioning accuracy.
  • SwiveLock implants had a faster learning curve and higher placement accuracy than FASTak.
  • Higher patient weight was linked to more accurate implant placement (p = .012), likely due to easier anatomical landmark identification.
  • No correlation found between implant type or positioning accuracy and final pivot shift grade at 6 weeks.
  • Minor and major complications were low and not significantly different between implant types.
  • A simplified 2-grade pivot shift system was proposed for clinical use (Grade 1: glide, Grade 2: clunk), aiding intraoperative decision-making.

Wylie

Veterinary Surgery

7

2025

Evaluation of femoral isometric placement accuracy of internal brace implants and its impact on stifle stability in the management of pivot shift phenomenon following TPLO

2025-7-VS-wylie-1

Article Title: Evaluation of femoral isometric placement accuracy of internal brace implants and its impact on stifle stability in the management of pivot shift phenomenon following TPLO

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Longo 2023 et al., on CT trochlear measurements, what difference in FTGA was observed between small and medium/large breed dogs without MPL?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Small breed dogs without MPL had significantly greater (shallower) FTGA than medium/large breeds, suggesting breed-specific anatomy.
Incorrect. The correct answer is FTGA was greater (shallower) in SB dogs.
Small breed dogs without MPL had significantly greater (shallower) FTGA than medium/large breeds, suggesting breed-specific anatomy.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Dogs with MPL had significantly shallower femoral trochlear grooves compared to controls, based on CT-measured femoral trochlear groove angle (FTGA).
  • FTGA >134° in small breeds (SB) and >128° in medium/large breeds (MLB) were associated with MPL and can serve as surgical thresholds for considering trochleoplasty.
  • FTA and FTRIA measurements were less reliable, showing lower sensitivity/specificity than FTGA.
  • Inter-rater reliability for FTGA was excellent (ICC > 0.9), supporting its use in clinical decision-making.
  • FTGA differed significantly between SB and MLB dogs, suggesting anatomical variation influences MPL predisposition.
  • Dogs with MPL but with FTGA below threshold may not benefit from trochleoplasty, supporting individualized surgical planning.
  • CT provides more precise and reproducible evaluation of trochlear morphology than radiography or ultrasound.
  • The study introduces a CT protocol using P25 and P50 reference points for consistent FTGA measurement.

Longo

Veterinary Surgery

3

2023

Computed tomographic measurements of the femoral trochlea in dogs with and without medial patellar luxation

2023-3-VS-longo-4

Article Title: Computed tomographic measurements of the femoral trochlea in dogs with and without medial patellar luxation

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Lee 2022 et al., on TPLO accuracy, what was observed regarding postoperative TPA in both groups?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Despite improved technical metrics, postoperative TPA did not differ significantly between groups.
Incorrect. The correct answer is There was no significant difference in postoperative TPA.
Despite improved technical metrics, postoperative TPA did not differ significantly between groups.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 3D-printed TPLO guides significantly reduced osteotomy inclination angle in both bone models and cadaver limbs compared to jig alone (P < .001).
  • Torsional deformities were lower when the 3D-printed guide was used in bone models (P < .001), but not significantly different in cadavers.
  • Angular deformities were significantly reduced in cadavers using 3D-printed guides (P < .001).
  • Proximal jig pin angulation was more accurate with the guide in cadavers (P < .001); not significant in bone models.
  • Medial cortex damage was substantially reduced in bone models when the 3D-printed guide was used (P < .001).
  • Postoperative tibial plateau angle (TPA) did not differ significantly between groups, suggesting that clinical alignment can still be achieved without the guide.
  • Clinical significance of improved metrics is uncertain, but improved precision may reduce surgical complications.
  • 3D guide design allowed direct placement of jig and bone plate, potentially improving workflow and safety.

Lee

Veterinary Surgery

6

2022

Evaluation of a customized 3D‐printed saw guide for tibial plateau leveling osteotomy: An ex vivo study

2022-6-VS-lee-3

Article Title: Evaluation of a customized 3D‐printed saw guide for tibial plateau leveling osteotomy: An ex vivo study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Lemmon 2025 et al., on synovitis severity scoring, what clinical implication was proposed based on the findings?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Higher synovitis scores were tied to worse cartilage lesions, supporting early treatment.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Earlier intervention may help reduce synovitis.
Higher synovitis scores were tied to worse cartilage lesions, supporting early treatment.

🔍 Key Findings

Synovitis was present in 100% of canine stifles with CCL disease (n = 163).

The most frequent severity score was 3/5 (55.2%), followed by 4/5 (24.5%).

Higher synovitis scores were significantly associated with:

  • Higher median cartilage scores (p = .042, OR = 2.1 per unit increase)
  • Longer duration of clinical signs (p < .001, OR = 1.27 per month)

Bodyweight (p = .083) and sex (p = .17) were not statistically significant in multivariable analysis.

Bucket handle meniscal tears were not associated with synovitis severity.

Clinical implication: Earlier intervention may help reduce synovitis and slow OA progression.

Lemmon

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Arthroscopic synovitis severity scoring in canine stifles with cranial cruciate ligament disease

2025-3-VS-lemmon-5

Article Title: Arthroscopic synovitis severity scoring in canine stifles with cranial cruciate ligament disease

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Jeong 2025 et al., on contoured saw guide vs jig, what was a key outcome in terms of osteotomy *inclination* on cadaver limbs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The contoured guide significantly reduced osteotomy inclination deviation, improving perpendicularity (p = .008).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Contoured guide showed more accurate inclination angle (1.2° vs. 4.3°)..
The contoured guide significantly reduced osteotomy inclination deviation, improving perpendicularity (p = .008).

🔍 Key Findings

  • TPLO with the contoured saw guide achieved more accurate osteotomy angles for both inclination and torsion in bone models and cadaveric limbs (p < .05).
  • Medial cortical damage was significantly lower with the contoured guide (247 vs. 1866 pixels in bone models; p < .001).
  • No significant difference in eccentricity (distance between actual and intended osteotomy center) was found between groups.
  • Postoperative tibial plateau angle (TPA) was similar between groups (6.4° vs. 7.6°; p = .15), though both were slightly higher than the target of 6°.
  • Deviation in medial mechanical proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) showed no significant group difference; valgus deformity occurred in both.
  • Osteotomy and device application times were similar between the contoured guide and jig-assisted TPLO.
  • The contoured guide eliminated the need for proximal jig pin, potentially reducing intra-articular pin risk.
  • The guide's multiple pin fixation system improved stability and alignment, supporting safer osteotomy on curved tibial surfaces.

Jeong

Veterinary Surgery

7

2025

Evaluation of a contoured saw guide for tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs

2025-7-VS-jeong-1

Article Title: Evaluation of a contoured saw guide for tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Curuci 2024 et al., which complication occurred most commonly after DCTPLO?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Observed in 16/18 stifles postoperatively, though no clinical impact was noted:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Patellar ligament thickening.
Observed in 16/18 stifles postoperatively, though no clinical impact was noted:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 16 dogs (18 stifles) with CrCL rupture and TPA >34° were treated using the DCTPLO
  • Mean TPA correction: from 39.4° to 6.3°
  • Bone union at 60 days in 17/18 stifles; remaining healed by 90 days
  • Minor complications (e.g., small wedge gaps) in 2/18 stifles — no major complications
  • Patellar ligament thickening seen in 16/18 stifles but no clinical signs noted
  • The technique enabled safer reduction with less risk of tibial crest fracture vs. conventional TPLO

Curuci

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

6

2024

Double-Cut Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy for the Management of Cranial Cruciate Ligament Insufficiency in Dogs with an Excessive Plateau Angle: Early Clinical Results in 16 Dogs

2024-6-VCOT-curuci-3

Article Title: Double-Cut Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy for the Management of Cranial Cruciate Ligament Insufficiency in Dogs with an Excessive Plateau Angle: Early Clinical Results in 16 Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Longo 2022 et al., on CT-guided osteotomies, what percentage of dogs had physiological patellar tracking restored following surgery?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All 22/22 cases had restored physiological patellar tracking at follow-up.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 100%.
All 22/22 cases had restored physiological patellar tracking at follow-up.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 3D CT volume rendering and CAL measurement successfully guided correction of femoral and tibial torsion in dogs with patellar luxation (PL).
  • Physiological patellar tracking was restored in 100% (22/22) of cases after detorsional osteotomy.
  • 94% of dogs (17/18) had either full or acceptable functional outcomes post-surgery.
  • CAL-based correction was accurate in 19/22 cases, confirming reliability of the measurement technique.
  • Complication rate was 45%, with major complications in 2/22 cases—both involved combined femoral and tibial osteotomies.
  • Combined femoral and tibial osteotomies in the same limb were linked to a higher risk of complications and poorer outcomes.
  • Diaphyseal osteotomies offered more implant space, but metaphyseal locations were associated with faster bone healing.
  • Use of a TPLO jig or goniometer was not essential—CAL-based bone marking was sufficient in most cases.

Longo

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Three‐dimensional volume rendering planning, surgical treatment, and clinical outcomes for femoral and tibial detorsional osteotomies in dogs

2022-7-VS-longo-2

Article Title: Three‐dimensional volume rendering planning, surgical treatment, and clinical outcomes for femoral and tibial detorsional osteotomies in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Hoenecke 2025 et al., on radiographic opacity in patella luxation, which variable was found to significantly increase the likelihood of radiographic soft tissue opacity in the stifle?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Weight was significantly associated with increased opacity, with each 1 kg increase raising odds by 10%.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Weight.
Weight was significantly associated with increased opacity, with each 1 kg increase raising odds by 10%.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 65% of stifles with patella luxation and intact CCLs had increased radiographic soft tissue opacity
  • Weight and radiographic OA were significantly associated with increased opacity (p = .0029 and p = .0143)
  • Each 1 kg increase in weight increased the odds of opacity by 10%
  • Grade of patella luxation, age, and muscle atrophy were not significantly associated with increased opacity
  • 19% of dogs with long-term follow-up developed a CCL rupture post-patella surgery, 50% of those had opacity at initial presentation
  • Radiographic opacity alone should not be interpreted as CCL disease in dogs with patella luxation
  • Radiographic findings likely represent effusion or synovial hyperplasia, not CCL pathology
  • Arthrotomy was used to confirm CCL integrity at surgery, but arthroscopy could provide better sensitivity

Hoenecke

Veterinary Surgery

7

2025

Increased radiographic stifle soft tissue opacity in dogs with patella luxation

2025-7-VS-hoenecke-1

Article Title: Increased radiographic stifle soft tissue opacity in dogs with patella luxation

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Story 2024 et al., on surgical correction of excessive tibial plateau angle (eTPA), which procedure consistently under-corrected the tibial plateau angle despite a target TPA of 0°?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Group C (mCCWO) aimed for 0° TPA but achieved a mean of 4.76°, reflecting consistent under-correction.
Incorrect. The correct answer is mCCWO.
Group C (mCCWO) aimed for 0° TPA but achieved a mean of 4.76°, reflecting consistent under-correction.

🔍 Key Findings

  • All four techniques achieved TPA <14°, meeting the threshold for acceptable surgical correction in eTPA cases.
  • Group A (CBLO + CCWO) and Group D (PTNWO) showed highest accuracy in achieving target TPA values.
  • Group B (TPLO + CCWO) resulted in significant tibial shortening compared to other techniques.
  • Group A caused the greatest cranial mechanical axis shift, while Group B caused the least.
  • Group C (mCCWO) resulted in consistent under-correction of TPA, despite aiming for 0°.
  • Modified or neutral wedge osteotomies (Groups C and D) had minimal effect on tibial length, making them suitable when preservation is important.
  • All techniques involved mechanical axis shifts, highlighting the importance of preoperative planning to minimize morphologic disruption.
  • Supplemental fixation was standard for all procedures to reduce risks such as tibial tuberosity fracture and plateau leveling loss.

Story

Veterinary Surgery

8

2024

Morphologic impact of four surgical techniques to correct excessive tibial plateau angle in dogs: A theoretical radiographic analysis

2024-8-VS-story-4

Article Title: Morphologic impact of four surgical techniques to correct excessive tibial plateau angle in dogs: A theoretical radiographic analysis

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Stifle Joint
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.