Quiz Question

In Fracka 2023 et al., on patient-specific guides, which of the following was significantly improved in tibial alignment when using PSGs versus generic guides?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. PSGs significantly reduced frontal plane alignment error compared to generic guides (p = .036).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Frontal plane alignment.
PSGs significantly reduced frontal plane alignment error compared to generic guides (p = .036).

🔍 Key Findings

  • 3D-printed patient-specific guides (PSGs) improved tibial cut alignment in the frontal plane compared to generic guides (mean error 1.03° vs 2.41°, p = .036).
  • All tibial cuts using PSGs were within 3° of target alignment, while 2/8 of the generic group were outliers.
  • PSGs significantly improved sagittal alignment of both distal (p = .018) and cranial (p = .043) femoral cuts.
  • No significant difference was found in varus-valgus femoral alignment or closing angle between PSG and generic guide groups.
  • Tibial sagittal slope alignment was not significantly different between groups.
  • PSGs provided better intraoperative usability, including improved visibility, no loosening, and ease of use.
  • Femoral sizing and component fit were equivalent between PSGs and generic guides, ensuring proper prosthesis alignment.
  • PSGs may offer training advantages for novice surgeons, especially in anatomically complex or deformed joints.

Fracka

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

3D-printed, patient-specific cutting guides improve femoral and tibial cut alignment in canine total knee replacement

2023-5-VS-fracka-1

Article Title: 3D-printed, patient-specific cutting guides improve femoral and tibial cut alignment in canine total knee replacement

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Rocheleau 2024 et al., on arthroscopic meniscal suturing, which group had the highest meniscal repair success rate?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. TPLO + IB had a 93.3% success rate vs 71.4% for TPLO-only.
Incorrect. The correct answer is TPLO with internal brace.
TPLO + IB had a 93.3% success rate vs 71.4% for TPLO-only.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Arthroscopic meniscal suturing was performed in 43 client-owned dogs, involving 44 meniscal repairs (one dog was bilateral). All injuries involved the caudal horn of the medial meniscus and were associated with cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL) disease.
  • All dogs underwent simultaneous TPLO, with some also receiving an internal brace (IB). Most repairs used simple vertical mattress sutures.
  • The overall complication rate was 34.1% (15/44). Most complications were attributed to the TPLO/TPLO+IB and did not compromise the meniscal repair outcome.
  • No median time to “acceptable” or “full” function was reported, but most dogs showed improvement in lameness and LOAD scores (p < .001), indicating good to excellent outcomes.
  • Meniscal repair success rate was 88% (38/44), with TPLO + IB outperforming TPLO-only (93.3% vs 71.4%). Follow-up was performed at 8 weeks (40 dogs) and 6 months (16 dogs).
  • Six failures occurred, all managed with arthroscopic meniscectomy, leading to normal activity in those dogs. Two IB-associated failures led to CrCL instability.
  • The authors concluded the technique was safe, practical, and effective, with a reasonable complication rate.
  • The findings support arthroscopic suturing as a feasible alternative to meniscectomy or meniscal release, offering long-term benefits for preserving the meniscus.

Rocheleau

Veterinary Surgery

5

2024

Short‐term outcomes of 43 dogs treated with arthroscopic suturing for meniscal tears

2024-5-VS-rocheleau-3

Article Title: Short‐term outcomes of 43 dogs treated with arthroscopic suturing for meniscal tears

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Husi 2023 et al., on TPLO vs TPLO-IB biomechanics, how did the TPLO-IB construct affect rotational stability compared to TPLO alone?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. TPLO-IB reduced internal tibial rotation to levels similar to intact stifles without inducing external overconstraint.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Restored rotational motion to pre-CCLD levels.
TPLO-IB reduced internal tibial rotation to levels similar to intact stifles without inducing external overconstraint.

🔍 Key Findings

  • TPLO alone failed to neutralize rotational instability under tibial pivot compression (TPT), despite a negative TCT.
  • TPLO combined with lateral augmentation (TPLO-IB) restored both craniocaudal and rotational stability to near-intact levels.
  • Cranial tibial translation was 6× greater after TPLO vs intact stifles when tested with TPT (p < .001).
  • No significant difference in cranial tibial translation or internal rotation between intact stifles and TPLO-IB group during TCT, eTPT, or iTPT.
  • TPLO-IB did not overconstrain the stifle, avoiding excessive external rotation.
  • External tibial rotation (eTPT) was more sensitive than TCT in detecting persistent instability after TPLO.
  • Excellent intraobserver reliability for both eTPT and iTPT (ICC > 0.9).
  • Study supports intraoperative use of TPT to identify cases needing additional rotational stabilization.

Husi

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Comparative kinetic and kinematic evaluation of TPLO and TPLO combined with extra-articular lateral augmentation: A biomechanical study

2023-5-VS-husi-3

Article Title: Comparative kinetic and kinematic evaluation of TPLO and TPLO combined with extra-articular lateral augmentation: A biomechanical study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Aldrich 2023 et al., on liposomal bupivacaine in TPLO, how was analgesic success defined?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Success was defined as not requiring rescue opioids within 48h post-op.
Incorrect. The correct answer is No need for rescue analgesia over 48 hours.
Success was defined as not requiring rescue opioids within 48h post-op.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) infiltration did not reduce the need for rescue analgesia compared with placebo in dogs undergoing TPLO.
  • CMPS-SF pain scores were not significantly different between LB and placebo groups at any postoperative time point.
  • % body weight distribution (%BWdist) to the operated limb did not differ significantly between treatment groups across all time points.
  • No correlation was found between CMPS-SF scores and %BWdist, suggesting these metrics assess different aspects of postoperative pain.
  • Postoperative carprofen administration was standardized, and LB did not provide additional detectable analgesic benefit.
  • Three-layer infiltration technique (joint capsule, fascia, subcutis) was used consistently across all cases.
  • Adverse events were minor and comparable between LB and placebo groups.
  • Post hoc analysis suggested a much larger sample size (58–436 dogs) would be needed to detect significant differences in %BWdist.

Aldrich

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of bupivacaine liposomal suspension using static bodyweight distribution and subjective pain scoring in dogs after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy surgery

2023-5-VS-aldrich-2

Article Title: Blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of bupivacaine liposomal suspension using static bodyweight distribution and subjective pain scoring in dogs after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy surgery

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Knudsen 2024 et al., on CTA diagnosis, what was the maximum reported sensitivity of multidetector CTA for detecting meniscal lesions?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Sensitivity reached 100% in second readings by some observers.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 100%.
Sensitivity reached 100% in second readings by some observers.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Multidetector CTA had high sensitivity (up to 100%) and specificity (up to 96%) for detecting medial meniscal tears in dogs.
  • Observer experience significantly influenced diagnostic accuracy, with more experienced observers showing higher agreement and better performance.
  • Training effect was evident, as less experienced observers improved between first and second readings.
  • Positive likelihood ratios ≥4.6 and negative likelihood ratios ≤0.08 were observed, suggesting CTA is clinically useful for confirming or ruling out meniscal injury.
  • CTA allowed identification of full and partial thickness lesions, with good visualization in sagittal, transverse, and frontal reconstructions.
  • Approximately 90% of menisci were correctly classified in second readings.
  • No adverse reactions were noted from the contrast injection; sedation was used instead of general anesthesia.
  • CTA was less invasive and potentially more cost-effective compared to arthroscopy, especially in settings without MRI access.

Knudsen

Veterinary Surgery

8

2024

Diagnosis of medial meniscal lesions in the canine stifle using multidetector computed tomographic positive-contrast arthrography

2024-8-VS-knudsen-1

Article Title: Diagnosis of medial meniscal lesions in the canine stifle using multidetector computed tomographic positive-contrast arthrography

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Brincin 2023 et al., on radiographic follow-up post-MPL surgery, what percentage of asymptomatic dogs had isolated radiographic findings that altered management?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Only 3% of asymptomatic dogs had isolated radiographic changes that led to postoperative management changes.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 3%.
Only 3% of asymptomatic dogs had isolated radiographic changes that led to postoperative management changes.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Routine follow-up radiographs after MPL surgery influenced management in only 3% of asymptomatic cases.
  • Isolated radiographic abnormalities were rare (3.3%) and even less likely to alter treatment unless accompanied by clinical concerns.
  • Dogs with both radiographic changes and clinical/owner concerns had 32× higher odds of a management change (OR 32.16, P < .001).
  • Lameness, NSAID use, or prior unplanned visits significantly increased the odds of altered post-op plans.
  • Owner-reported concerns alone led to a change in only 1.6% of cases without corroborating clinical findings.
  • Radiographic follow-up was deemed unnecessary in dogs without owner concerns or abnormal physical findings.
  • Hands-on clinical exam remains critical, though video-based rechecks may aid triage in uncomplicated cases.
  • The study supports selective radiographic follow-up, reducing unnecessary imaging, stress, and clinician workload.

Brincin

Veterinary Surgery

3

2023

The value of routine radiographic follow up in the postoperative management of canine medial patellar luxation

2023-3-VS-brincin-1

Article Title: The value of routine radiographic follow up in the postoperative management of canine medial patellar luxation

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Longo 2023 et al., on CT trochlear measurements, what was the most reliable parameter for determining the need for trochleoplasty in dogs with MPL?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. FTGA had the highest sensitivity, specificity, and inter-rater agreement (ICC > 0.9).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Femoral trochlear groove angle (FTGA).
FTGA had the highest sensitivity, specificity, and inter-rater agreement (ICC > 0.9).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Dogs with MPL had significantly shallower femoral trochlear grooves compared to controls, based on CT-measured femoral trochlear groove angle (FTGA).
  • FTGA >134° in small breeds (SB) and >128° in medium/large breeds (MLB) were associated with MPL and can serve as surgical thresholds for considering trochleoplasty.
  • FTA and FTRIA measurements were less reliable, showing lower sensitivity/specificity than FTGA.
  • Inter-rater reliability for FTGA was excellent (ICC > 0.9), supporting its use in clinical decision-making.
  • FTGA differed significantly between SB and MLB dogs, suggesting anatomical variation influences MPL predisposition.
  • Dogs with MPL but with FTGA below threshold may not benefit from trochleoplasty, supporting individualized surgical planning.
  • CT provides more precise and reproducible evaluation of trochlear morphology than radiography or ultrasound.
  • The study introduces a CT protocol using P25 and P50 reference points for consistent FTGA measurement.

Longo

Veterinary Surgery

3

2023

Computed tomographic measurements of the femoral trochlea in dogs with and without medial patellar luxation

2023-3-VS-longo-1

Article Title: Computed tomographic measurements of the femoral trochlea in dogs with and without medial patellar luxation

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Rocheleau 2024 et al., on arthroscopic meniscal suturing, what was the overall complication rate?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The overall complication rate reported was 34.1%.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 34%.
The overall complication rate reported was 34.1%.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Arthroscopic meniscal suturing was performed in 43 client-owned dogs, involving 44 meniscal repairs (one dog was bilateral). All injuries involved the caudal horn of the medial meniscus and were associated with cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL) disease.
  • All dogs underwent simultaneous TPLO, with some also receiving an internal brace (IB). Most repairs used simple vertical mattress sutures.
  • The overall complication rate was 34.1% (15/44). Most complications were attributed to the TPLO/TPLO+IB and did not compromise the meniscal repair outcome.
  • No median time to “acceptable” or “full” function was reported, but most dogs showed improvement in lameness and LOAD scores (p < .001), indicating good to excellent outcomes.
  • Meniscal repair success rate was 88% (38/44), with TPLO + IB outperforming TPLO-only (93.3% vs 71.4%). Follow-up was performed at 8 weeks (40 dogs) and 6 months (16 dogs).
  • Six failures occurred, all managed with arthroscopic meniscectomy, leading to normal activity in those dogs. Two IB-associated failures led to CrCL instability.
  • The authors concluded the technique was safe, practical, and effective, with a reasonable complication rate.
  • The findings support arthroscopic suturing as a feasible alternative to meniscectomy or meniscal release, offering long-term benefits for preserving the meniscus.

Rocheleau

Veterinary Surgery

5

2024

Short‐term outcomes of 43 dogs treated with arthroscopic suturing for meniscal tears

2024-5-VS-rocheleau-2

Article Title: Short‐term outcomes of 43 dogs treated with arthroscopic suturing for meniscal tears

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Wylie 2025 et al., on femoral implant accuracy, what was the overall effect of internal brace augmentation on pivot shift grades at 6 weeks?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. At 6-week follow-up, 90.9% of stifles showed improvement in pivot shift grade, regardless of implant positioning accuracy.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Pivot shift grades improved in over 90% of stifles.
At 6-week follow-up, 90.9% of stifles showed improvement in pivot shift grade, regardless of implant positioning accuracy.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Accurate femoral isometric placement was achieved in 63% of cases, significantly more with SwiveLock (78.6%) than FASTak (38.9%).
  • Inaccurate placement was associated with increased internal tibial rotation at follow-up (p = .009), suggesting potential implant failure.
  • Pivot shift grade improved in 90.9% of stifles postoperatively, regardless of implant positioning accuracy.
  • SwiveLock implants had a faster learning curve and higher placement accuracy than FASTak.
  • Higher patient weight was linked to more accurate implant placement (p = .012), likely due to easier anatomical landmark identification.
  • No correlation found between implant type or positioning accuracy and final pivot shift grade at 6 weeks.
  • Minor and major complications were low and not significantly different between implant types.
  • A simplified 2-grade pivot shift system was proposed for clinical use (Grade 1: glide, Grade 2: clunk), aiding intraoperative decision-making.

Wylie

Veterinary Surgery

7

2025

Evaluation of femoral isometric placement accuracy of internal brace implants and its impact on stifle stability in the management of pivot shift phenomenon following TPLO

2025-7-VS-wylie-3

Article Title: Evaluation of femoral isometric placement accuracy of internal brace implants and its impact on stifle stability in the management of pivot shift phenomenon following TPLO

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Kikuchi 2025 et al., on arthroscopic MMI in toy breeds, which variable was **not** part of the final regression model predicting MMI?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The final model included body weight, lameness score, and CrCL status. Breed and age were excluded in multivariate analysis.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Age.
The final model included body weight, lameness score, and CrCL status. Breed and age were excluded in multivariate analysis.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Medial meniscus injury (MMI) occurred in 36.3% of stifles with CrCLR in toy breed dogs (<5 kg)
  • Complete CrCLR was significantly associated with MMI (15.3% of complete vs. 3.4% of partial)
  • Severe lameness (grade 3) increased the likelihood of MMI compared to mild lameness (grade 1)
  • Higher body weight, even within the toy breed range, was positively associated with MMI
  • Yorkshire Terriers had the highest MMI incidence (55.6%), but this was not a significant independent factor due to multicollinearity
  • Arthroscopy identified more meniscal damage (including small radial tears and bucket-handle lesions) than gross examination might detect
  • MMI was classified as mild (radial tear) or severe (bucket-handle or flap) with implications for partial meniscectomy
  • Arthroscopy was used in all cases, underscoring its utility in small-breed stifle assessment

Kikuchi

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

5

2025

Incidence of Medial Meniscus Injury Detected by Arthroscopy in Toy Breed Dogs

2025-5-VCOT-kikuchi-4

Article Title: Incidence of Medial Meniscus Injury Detected by Arthroscopy in Toy Breed Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Stifle Joint
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.