Quiz Question

In Zann 2023 et al., on proximal humeral OC surgery, how did peak vertical force and vertical impulse compare between limbs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Despite asymmetric loading, there were no statistical differences in peak vertical force or impulse in unilaterally affected dogs.
Incorrect. The correct answer is No significant difference between limbs.
Despite asymmetric loading, there were no statistical differences in peak vertical force or impulse in unilaterally affected dogs.

🔍 Key Findings

  • All dogs developed progressive osteoarthritis (OA) after surgical debridement of proximal humeral OC.
  • Ipsilateral muscle atrophy and reduced shoulder range of motion were common, particularly in unilaterally affected dogs.
  • Arthroscopically, lesions showed incomplete cartilage infilling even years after surgery, averaging only ~37% infilling.
  • Synovitis was present in all joints, with moderate-to-severe hypertrophy and vascularity scores.
  • CT identified OC lesions as deeper and wider than radiography, and all affected joints had more advanced OA than contralateral limbs (P = .001 radiograph, P = .005 CT).
  • Kinetic gait analysis showed no significant differences in peak vertical force or impulse, but a subtle 4.4% asymmetric load reduction on the operated limb.
  • Median LOAD score was 6, indicating mild owner-perceived disability despite measurable clinical and imaging abnormalities.
  • Cartilage infilling was incomplete in all cases, with no lesion exceeding 60% restoration, raising questions about the healing potential of debridement alone.

Zann

Veterinary Surgery

6

2023

Long-term outcome of dogs treated by surgical debridement of proximal humeral osteochondrosis

2023-6-VS-zann-5

Article Title: Long-term outcome of dogs treated by surgical debridement of proximal humeral osteochondrosis

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Chan 2025 et al., on partial cuneiformectomy in BOAS dogs, what was the effect of cuneiformectomy on postoperative complication rates compared to multilevel airway surgery alone?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Complication rates were similar between PC and non-PC groups (16.3% vs. 19.4%, p = .758).
Incorrect. The correct answer is It did not significantly affect complication rates.
Complication rates were similar between PC and non-PC groups (16.3% vs. 19.4%, p = .758).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Partial cuneiformectomy (PC) did not increase complication rates compared to multilevel surgery alone (overall complications: PC = 16.3%, non-PC = 19.4%; p = .758).
  • Major complication rates were not significantly different (PC = 11.6%, non-PC = 7.4%; p = .482).
  • Significant improvement in BOAS grade was observed in dogs undergoing PC (p < .0001).
  • BOAS index improved significantly in both groups, with greater median reduction in the PC group (28.5%) than non-PC (20.7%) (p < .0001).
  • Low body condition score (BCS <4) was significantly associated with higher complication rates (odds ratio = 0.452; p = .004).
  • Hospitalization duration did not differ between groups (median = 1 day; p = .743).
  • Mortality was low (3.5%) in the PC group despite more severe airway disease, suggesting the technique is safe even in advanced collapse.
  • The technique widened the rima glottidis without damaging surrounding structures, reducing airflow resistance and preserving laryngeal function.

Chan

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Complication rate and outcomes of laryngeal cuneiformectomy in dogs with advanced laryngeal collapse

2025-6-VS-chan-1

Article Title: Complication rate and outcomes of laryngeal cuneiformectomy in dogs with advanced laryngeal collapse

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Turner 2025 et al., on TPA changes after SH-1/2 fracture repair, what does the study suggest regarding further surgery when TPA remains high immediately postoperatively?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The study supports avoiding further surgery despite high TPA if reduction is imperfect but stable.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Monitor, as TPA may reduce without intervention.
The study supports avoiding further surgery despite high TPA if reduction is imperfect but stable.

🔍 Key Findings

  • TPA decreased significantly from preoperative to follow-up (mean 5.89°; p < 0.001), and from immediate postoperative to follow-up (mean 2.2°; p = 0.018)
  • Use of tension band in addition to K-wires did not significantly improve TPA reduction compared to K-wires alone
  • Cranial K-wire positioning may attenuate growth at the cranial tibial physis, allowing relative caudal growth to reduce TPA over time
  • Dynamic TPA reduction may reduce risk of cranial cruciate ligament rupture even when initial TPA is high
  • Small breeds (e.g., French Bulldogs) were overrepresented; further research is needed in larger breeds with more growth potential
  • Surgical reduction is difficult, but perfect alignment may not be essential if TPA reduces postoperatively
  • Radiographic TPA measurement was reliably performed with low interobserver variability
  • K-wire removal at 3–8 weeks may facilitate continued growth in growing dogs

Turner

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

5

2025

Tibial Plateau Angle Changes following Repair of Salter–Harris Type 1 and 2 Fractures in Dogs

2025-5-VCOT-turner-4

Article Title: Tibial Plateau Angle Changes following Repair of Salter–Harris Type 1 and 2 Fractures in Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Simpson 2022 et al., on feline cholecystectomy outcomes, what was the survival rate to hospital discharge?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 18 of 23 cats survived to discharge, equating to a 78.3% survival rate.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 78.3%.
18 of 23 cats survived to discharge, equating to a 78.3% survival rate.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Cholelithiasis was the most common indication for cholecystectomy in cats.
  • Perioperative complications were frequent, with intraoperative hypotension in all recorded cases and postoperative anemia in 14 cats.
  • Perioperative mortality was 21.7%, lower than historical rates for feline biliary surgery.
  • 78.3% of cats survived to discharge, and 83.3% of those lived >6 months; 44.4% survived >3 years.
  • Vomiting was the most common short- and long-term complication, though most cats were medically managed.
  • Concurrent EHBDO was not a contraindication provided CBD patency was restored.
  • Positive bacterial cultures were found in 15 cats, with E. coli and Enterococcus faecalis most common.
  • Owner-reported outcomes were excellent in all cats that survived long-term.

Simpson

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Cholecystectomy in 23 cats (2005‐2021)

2022-1-VS-simpson-4

Article Title: Cholecystectomy in 23 cats (2005‐2021)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Buote 2023 et al., on 3D printed cannulas, what issue occurred during live case 1 involving insufflation?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The insufflation connection broke in case 1 but was resolved in case 2 by using a male luer lock connector.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Breakage of the insufflation port.
The insufflation connection broke in case 1 but was resolved in case 2 by using a male luer lock connector.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Customized 3D printed cannulas (3DPCs) significantly reduced surgical time in feline cadaver models (125.6 vs. 95.2 min, p = 0.03).
  • Use of 3DPCs resulted in a reduction in instrument collisions (6.8 vs. 2.6, p = 0.03).
  • Cannula pullout complications decreased with 3DPCs (10 vs. 2.2 per procedure, p = 0.03).
  • 3DPCs were designed at shorter lengths (3 cm), improving intra-abdominal working space in cats.
  • No incisional or postoperative complications occurred in the two live feline cases.
  • One 3DPC insufflation port broke intraoperatively; resolved by using a male luer lock connector in the next case.
  • CO₂ leakage occurred from re-used silicone valves in 2 ports; emphasizing the need for durable valve design.
  • Estimated cost per 3DPC was <$5.00, suggesting cost-effective customization for feline laparoscopy.

Buote

Veterinary Surgery

7

2023

3D printed cannulas for use in laparoscopic surgery in feline patients: A cadaveric study and case series

2023-7-VS-buote-3

Article Title: 3D printed cannulas for use in laparoscopic surgery in feline patients: A cadaveric study and case series

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Veytsman 2023 et al., on feline insulinoma outcomes, what percentage of cats survived to hospital discharge?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 18 of 20 cats (90%) survived to discharge after surgery.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 90%.
18 of 20 cats (90%) survived to discharge after surgery.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Surgical excision of insulinomas resulted in euglycemia or hyperglycemia in 90% of cats immediately post-op.
  • 18/20 cats (90%) survived to hospital discharge, with a median survival time of 863 days.
  • Younger age, metastasis at surgery, tumor invasion, and lower glucose levels were negative prognostic factors.
  • Two cats had stage III disease with metastasis; one lived 413 days post-op, suggesting some benefit to surgery even in advanced disease.
  • Postoperative hypoglycemia and seizure activity were associated with poorer outcomes; one cat euthanized due to seizures despite euglycemia.
  • Median disease-free interval (DFI) was 1052 days; for cats with metastasis, DFI dropped to 93 days.
  • Partial pancreatectomy was performed in 11 cats, nodulectomy in 10, and enucleation in 1; method of resection not linked to outcome.
  • Postoperative complications occurred in 25% of cats; most were manageable with supportive care.

Veytsman

Veterinary Surgery

1

2023

Retrospective study of 20 cats surgically treated for insulinoma

2023-1-VS-veytsman-4

Article Title: Retrospective study of 20 cats surgically treated for insulinoma

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Rocheleau 2023 et al., on shoulder stabilization, which stabilization technique showed a statistically significant reduction in abduction angle postoperatively?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Postoperative abduction angles were slightly lower than baseline in the suture-toggle group, suggesting some overtightening.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Suture-toggle.
Postoperative abduction angles were slightly lower than baseline in the suture-toggle group, suggesting some overtightening.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Arthroscopically assisted stabilization with an IAD was feasible in cadaveric canine shoulders using both bone anchor and suture-toggle techniques.
  • Suture-toggle repair was successfully performed in all specimens, while bone anchors could not be deployed in 3/10 shoulders, indicating lower feasibility.
  • Median surgical time was shorter for the suture-toggle group (25.5 min) compared to the anchor group (37.3 min).
  • Postoperative abduction angles returned to baseline in the anchor group, while the suture-toggle group had slightly reduced angles, suggesting possible overtightening.
  • Violation of the articular surface occurred in 2 anchor specimens and 1 suture-toggle specimen, but none were considered likely to be clinically significant.
  • Overall targeting accuracy using the IAD was 88%, supporting its utility in guiding tunnel/anchor placement.
  • CT measurements showed acceptable bone stock and insertion angles, but anchor insertion angles were lower than optimal for mechanical pullout strength.
  • Suture-toggle technique was considered simpler and more consistent, with fewer complications and faster execution than anchor placement.

Rocheleau

Veterinary Surgery

4

2023

Ex vivo evaluation of arthroscopically assisted shoulder stabilization in dogs using an intra-articular aiming device

2023-4-VS-rocheleau-3

Article Title: Ex vivo evaluation of arthroscopically assisted shoulder stabilization in dogs using an intra-articular aiming device

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Walker 2022 et al., on TPLO mRUST scoring, which of the following was associated with **lower** mRUST scores?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Postoperative complications were associated with significantly lower TPLO mRUST scores (mean difference 1.4, P = .03).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Complications.
Postoperative complications were associated with significantly lower TPLO mRUST scores (mean difference 1.4, P = .03).

🔍 Key Findings

  • TPLO mRUST scoring showed improved inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.56) compared to subjective evaluation (Kappa = 0.33).
  • Intra-rater reliability was similar for both methods (TPLO mRUST: 0.73, subjective: 0.72).
  • TPLO mRUST scores ≥10/12 strongly correlated with radiographic union, as subjectively assessed (99% agreement).
  • No significant difference in healing between first and second TPLO sides (P = .09), countering assumptions about load-bearing impact.
  • Higher initial lameness scores and younger age were associated with higher TPLO mRUST scores, suggesting more robust healing in those groups.
  • Postoperative complications were linked to lower TPLO mRUST scores, indicating impaired healing.
  • Medial cortex was excluded from scoring due to plate obstruction, validating use of only 3 cortices for scoring.
  • The TPLO mRUST system may standardize healing assessment, reducing subjective bias across specialties.

Walker

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

Evaluation of a modified radiographic union scale for tibial fractures scoring system in staged bilateral tibial plateau leveling osteotomy procedures and comparison of first and second side radiographic bone healing

2022-8-VS-walker-5

Article Title: Evaluation of a modified radiographic union scale for tibial fractures scoring system in staged bilateral tibial plateau leveling osteotomy procedures and comparison of first and second side radiographic bone healing

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Rocheleau 2024 et al., on arthroscopic meniscal suturing, which group had the highest meniscal repair success rate?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. TPLO + IB had a 93.3% success rate vs 71.4% for TPLO-only.
Incorrect. The correct answer is TPLO with internal brace.
TPLO + IB had a 93.3% success rate vs 71.4% for TPLO-only.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Arthroscopic meniscal suturing was performed in 43 client-owned dogs, involving 44 meniscal repairs (one dog was bilateral). All injuries involved the caudal horn of the medial meniscus and were associated with cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL) disease.
  • All dogs underwent simultaneous TPLO, with some also receiving an internal brace (IB). Most repairs used simple vertical mattress sutures.
  • The overall complication rate was 34.1% (15/44). Most complications were attributed to the TPLO/TPLO+IB and did not compromise the meniscal repair outcome.
  • No median time to “acceptable” or “full” function was reported, but most dogs showed improvement in lameness and LOAD scores (p < .001), indicating good to excellent outcomes.
  • Meniscal repair success rate was 88% (38/44), with TPLO + IB outperforming TPLO-only (93.3% vs 71.4%). Follow-up was performed at 8 weeks (40 dogs) and 6 months (16 dogs).
  • Six failures occurred, all managed with arthroscopic meniscectomy, leading to normal activity in those dogs. Two IB-associated failures led to CrCL instability.
  • The authors concluded the technique was safe, practical, and effective, with a reasonable complication rate.
  • The findings support arthroscopic suturing as a feasible alternative to meniscectomy or meniscal release, offering long-term benefits for preserving the meniscus.

Rocheleau

Veterinary Surgery

5

2024

Short‐term outcomes of 43 dogs treated with arthroscopic suturing for meniscal tears

2024-5-VS-rocheleau-3

Article Title: Short‐term outcomes of 43 dogs treated with arthroscopic suturing for meniscal tears

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Sadowitz 2023 et al., on screw angle & speed, what clinical recommendation is supported to reduce TCF risk?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The authors recommend slow, coaxial screw insertion to minimize the risk of transcortical fractures.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Insert screws slowly and coaxially to the pilot hole.
The authors recommend slow, coaxial screw insertion to minimize the risk of transcortical fractures.

🔍 Key Findings

  • TCF risk increased significantly with 10° insertion angle at both 650 rpm (12.5%) and 1350 rpm (17.5%), compared to 0% in the control group (0° at 650 rpm).
  • Hand insertion at 10° angle resulted in only 3.75% TCF rate, suggesting lower insertion speed reduces risk.
  • No TCFs occurred when screws were inserted coaxially (0°) at either 650 or 1350 rpm, indicating angle is a critical factor.
  • Screw speed alone did not increase TCF risk unless combined with off-axis insertion.
  • Radiographically detectable TCFs were only considered; actual rates may be higher with direct bone inspection.
  • Cutting flutes engaging undrilled bone during off-axis insertion likely contribute to TCF formation.
  • Clinical implication: Ensure screws are inserted coaxially and at lower speeds to reduce TCF risk during procedures like TPLO.
  • Statistically significant differences were found between control and high-angle insertion groups: Group C (p = .001), Group E (p < .001).

Sadowitz

Veterinary Surgery

8

2023

Effect of screw insertion angle and speed on the incidence of transcortical fracture development in a canine tibial diaphyseal model

2023-8-VS-sadowitz-5

Article Title: Effect of screw insertion angle and speed on the incidence of transcortical fracture development in a canine tibial diaphyseal model

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Postoperative Care & Outcomes
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.