Quiz Question

In Carvajal 2025 et al., on femoral stem breakage, what was the most common radiographic finding among failed implants?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Varus malalignment was present in 10 of 14 failed cases, with a median angle of 3.9°.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Varus alignment of femoral stem.
Varus malalignment was present in 10 of 14 failed cases, with a median angle of 3.9°.

🔍 Key Findings

Incidence of BFX lateral bolt stem breakage: 2.95% (13 dogs, 14 stems)

Implant factors:

  • 13/14 were BFX lateral bolt stems (sizes #5–7)
  • +9 necks used in 5/11 of 17 mm heads
  • 10/14 stems undersized based on radiographs
  • 10/13 dogs exceeded weight limits for implanted stem size

Malalignment:

  • 10/14 had varus alignment (median 3.9°)
  • 8/14 had insufficient proximodistal seating

Breakage site: Proximolateral shoulder in all cases

Revision outcomes:

  • 11 revised (7 CFX, 3 larger BFX, 1 collared)
  • 9/10 revised dogs regained full function
  • Complications: 1 rebreakage, 1 periprosthetic fracture, 1 fixation failure

Histopathology:

  • Electron microscopy showed fatigue striations and incomplete bead fusion

Conclusion: Avoid small BFX lateral bolt stems if undersized or if long necks required; use weight guidelines to prevent fatigue failure.

Carvajal

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Breakage of cementless press‐fit femoral stems following total hip arthroplasty in dogs: 14 cases (2013–2023)

2025-3-VS-carvajal-1

Article Title: Breakage of cementless press‐fit femoral stems following total hip arthroplasty in dogs: 14 cases (2013–2023)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Gomes 2025 et al., on subdural shunting for TL-AD, which breed was overrepresented among cases that recurred?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 5 of 7 recurrence cases were Pugs, consistent with prior literature showing breed predisposition.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Pug.
5 of 7 recurrence cases were Pugs, consistent with prior literature showing breed predisposition.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Modified subdural shunt (SDS) placement was adapted from prior techniques using a hemilaminectomy approach and no suturing of the dura or shunt.
  • Dogs receiving SDS had significantly better long-term outcomes (85.7% improved) compared to those with durotomy alone (41.7%).
  • Recurrence rate was lower in the SDS group (14.3%) than control (41.7%), though not statistically significant.
  • Most recurrences occurred in Pugs (5/7), suggesting a breed predisposition.
  • Shunt size was limited to 25% of spinal cord diameter, typically 3–3.5 Fr.
  • CSF flow through the shunt was confirmed intraoperatively, supporting the role of SDS in maintaining flow and possibly preventing recurrence.
  • Immediate postoperative outcomes were not different between groups (≈42% deteriorated), but long-term recovery was better with SDS.
  • Steroid use pre-surgery did not correlate with improved outcome; fewer SDS dogs received steroids pre-op.

Gomes

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Post‐surgical outcome and recurrence rates in thoracolumbar arachnoid diverticula undergoing durotomy alone or alongside a modified technique of subdural shunt-placement in dogs

2025-5-VS-gomes-5

Article Title: Post‐surgical outcome and recurrence rates in thoracolumbar arachnoid diverticula undergoing durotomy alone or alongside a modified technique of subdural shunt-placement in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Dalton 2023 et al., In Minimally invasive acetabular fracture repair in dogs, which intraoperative complication was observed in cadaveric specimens?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. One cadaver had mild sciatic nerve indentation; others had no gross nerve injury.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Sciatic nerve indentation.
One cadaver had mild sciatic nerve indentation; others had no gross nerve injury.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Feasibility study in 5 canine cadavers plus 1 clinical case (Chihuahua, 5.5 kg).
  • Technique used two small approaches (caudal and craniolateral) connected with an epiperiosteal tunnel.
  • Plates were precontoured on mirrored 3D-printed hemipelves to improve fit and reduce intraoperative bending.
  • Cadaver outcomes: fracture gap <2 mm, step defect <1 mm, pelvic angulation <5°.
  • Sciatic nerve injury was minimal: 1/5 cadavers had a mild indentation; others had no gross injury.
  • Median total surgical time: ~46 minutes in cadavers; incisions ~5 cm.
  • Clinical Chihuahua case: weight-bearing within 24 hrs, radiographic union at 3 months; one screw fractured but no adverse effect.
  • Authors conclude: MIAF with 3D printing is feasible and accurate, but requires further evaluation before routine use.

Dalton

Veterinary Surgery

7

2023

Minimally invasive repair of acetabular fractures in dogs: Ex vivo feasibility study and case report

2023-7-VS-dalton-3

Article Title: Minimally invasive repair of acetabular fractures in dogs: Ex vivo feasibility study and case report

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Marshall 2022 et al., on delayed and non-union risk, what was the **strongest predictor** of delayed or non-union in canine fractures?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Implant failure had an OR of 12.94 — the strongest risk factor identified.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Implant failure.
Implant failure had an OR of 12.94 — the strongest risk factor identified.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Delayed union occurred in 13.9% of fractures; non-union in 4.6%; mal-union in 0.7%
  • Major implant failure increased odds of delayed or non-union by 12.9×
  • Surgical site infection increased risk 3.2×; bone grafting (any type) was also associated (OR 3.3)
  • Comminuted fractures had 4.2× greater odds of delayed or non-union
  • Older age increased risk, with odds increasing by 21% per year
  • Radius and ulna fractures in toy breeds were not high risk, contrary to historical belief
  • Most non-unions required revision surgery with rhBMP-2 or autograft to achieve union
  • Ilium fractures showed 0% delayed/non-union — possibly due to robust muscle envelope

Marshall

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Delayed union, non-union and mal-union in 442 dogs

2022-7-VS-marshall-1

Article Title: Delayed union, non-union and mal-union in 442 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Jeong 2025 et al., on contoured saw guide vs jig, which statement is correct regarding *osteotomy torsion*?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Contoured guide improved torsional precision (e.g., 257 vs 2573 pixels in bone models; p < .001).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Contoured guide reduced torsion significantly in both bone models and cadavers..
Contoured guide improved torsional precision (e.g., 257 vs 2573 pixels in bone models; p < .001).

🔍 Key Findings

  • TPLO with the contoured saw guide achieved more accurate osteotomy angles for both inclination and torsion in bone models and cadaveric limbs (p < .05).
  • Medial cortical damage was significantly lower with the contoured guide (247 vs. 1866 pixels in bone models; p < .001).
  • No significant difference in eccentricity (distance between actual and intended osteotomy center) was found between groups.
  • Postoperative tibial plateau angle (TPA) was similar between groups (6.4° vs. 7.6°; p = .15), though both were slightly higher than the target of 6°.
  • Deviation in medial mechanical proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) showed no significant group difference; valgus deformity occurred in both.
  • Osteotomy and device application times were similar between the contoured guide and jig-assisted TPLO.
  • The contoured guide eliminated the need for proximal jig pin, potentially reducing intra-articular pin risk.
  • The guide's multiple pin fixation system improved stability and alignment, supporting safer osteotomy on curved tibial surfaces.

Jeong

Veterinary Surgery

7

2025

Evaluation of a contoured saw guide for tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs

2025-7-VS-jeong-4

Article Title: Evaluation of a contoured saw guide for tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Whyte 2025 et al., on cannulated screw fixation, what factor was significantly associated with an increased risk of screw breakage?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Heavier dogs (>20 kg) had a statistically significant association with screw breakage.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Body weight over 20 kg.
Heavier dogs (>20 kg) had a statistically significant association with screw breakage.

🔍 Key Findings

Study focus: Outcomes of cannulated screw fixation in unicondylar humeral condylar fractures (UHCF) in dogs.
Clinical union rate: 89%
Overall complication rate: 36%

  • Major complication: Most common was screw breakage

Significant risk factor for screw breakage:

  • Body weight >20 kg (statistically significant)

Breed distribution:

  • Spaniels, especially English Springer Spaniels, were most common

No mention of plate augmentation as standard in this cohort

Whyte

Veterinary Surgery

2

2025

Use of cannulated screws in the treatment of unicondylar humeral condylar fractures in dogs

2025-2-VS-whyte-4

Article Title: Use of cannulated screws in the treatment of unicondylar humeral condylar fractures in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Kennedy 2024 et al., which portal had the highest rate of articular cartilage injury?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 60% of shoulders had IACI at the caudal instrument portal vs 25% at the middle portal:contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Caudal instrument portal.
60% of shoulders had IACI at the caudal instrument portal vs 25% at the middle portal:contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 20 shoulders from 11 medium-to-large breed dogs evaluated
  • Lateral portals used: middle arthroscopic, caudal instrument, cranial egress
  • Musculotendinous lesions unavoidable, but small (18G needle); seen in deltoideus (90%), infraspinatus, teres minor, etc.
  • Neurovascular safety:
    • Caudal portal was closest to axillary artery/nerve branches (as close as 7 mm)
    • Only 2/20 shoulders (10%) had omobrachial vein penetrated
  • Cartilage injuries (IACI) occurred in 65%, primarily minor linear defects; use of guarded cannulas and distractors suggested for minimization
  • Supports overall safety of lateral shoulder arthroscopy with portal placement awareness

Kennedy

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

4

2024

Evaluation of Canine Shoulder Arthroscopy for Anatomical and Safety Considerations

2024-4-VCOT-kennedy-2

Article Title: Evaluation of Canine Shoulder Arthroscopy for Anatomical and Safety Considerations

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Nicetto 2024 et al., what was the most common complication after TRP implantation?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Minor complications included grade 1 lameness from periarticular fibrosis; only one case had luxation recurrence.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Periarticular fibrosis.
Minor complications included grade 1 lameness from periarticular fibrosis; only one case had luxation recurrence.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 48 dogs (60 stifles) underwent custom 3D-printed TRP implantation for patellar luxation
  • 24 treated with TRP alone; 36 with additional procedures (e.g., DFO, TTT)
  • Success rate: 59/60 corrected patellar tracking
  • Functional outcome: 57/60 full function, 2 acceptable, 1 unacceptable
  • Complication rate: 3 total (2 minor, 1 major recurrence)
  • TRP spares cartilage unlike trochleoplasty, offering implant-based ridge augmentation
  • No implant loosening or infection observed

Nicetto

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

2

2024

Trochlear Ridge Prostheses for Reshaping Femoral Trochlear Ridges in Dogs with Patellar Luxation

2024-2-VCOT-nicetto-2

Article Title: Trochlear Ridge Prostheses for Reshaping Femoral Trochlear Ridges in Dogs with Patellar Luxation

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Espinel Rupérez 2023 et al., on feline hip stabilization, what was the most frequent intraoperative complication during AA-HTS?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. This complication occurred in 1 of the 5 reported intraoperative events and was the only step rated as "most difficult".
Incorrect. The correct answer is Toggle lodging in the femoral tunnel.
This complication occurred in 1 of the 5 reported intraoperative events and was the only step rated as "most difficult".

🔍 Key Findings

  • Arthroscopic-assisted hip toggle stabilization (AA-HTS) was successfully completed in all 14 feline cadaver joints.
  • Femoral and acetabular tunnel creation was feasible in all cases, though femoral tunnel placement had a higher rate of deviations.
  • Intraoperative complications occurred in 5/14 joints, mostly related to femoral tunnel creation and toggle lodging.
  • Minor articular cartilage injury (<10% total cartilage area) occurred in 10/14 joints, but no injury to neurovascular or intrapelvic structures.
  • Thirteen surgical technique deviations (8 major, 5 minor) were identified in 7 joints, all involving the femoral tunnel.
  • Toggle passage through the femoral tunnel was the most challenging step, being mildly difficult in 6 joints.
  • Postoperative CT and gross dissection confirmed all toggles and buttons were in correct position, without damage to major surrounding structures.
  • No deviations, complications, or cartilage injuries occurred in the last 4 joints, suggesting a learning curve effect.

Espinel Rupérez

Veterinary Surgery

6

2023

Arthroscopic-assisted hip toggle stabilization in cats: An ex vivo feasibility study

2023-6-VS-espinel-2

Article Title: Arthroscopic-assisted hip toggle stabilization in cats: An ex vivo feasibility study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Scott 2025 et al., on acetabular cup revision, what was a notable complication observed postoperatively in some cases?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. One case had low-grade infection and osteolysis potentially linked to metal debris.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Osteolysis possibly associated with metallic debris.
One case had low-grade infection and osteolysis potentially linked to metal debris.

🔍 Key Findings

Population: 9 dogs underwent revision of osteointegrated acetabular cups after total hip arthroplasty (THA)

Revision Indications:

  • 7 luxations (5 ventral, 2 craniodorsal)
  • 1 femoral stem fracture
  • 1 aseptic stem loosening

Implants:

  • 8 BFX cups, 1 Helica; all revised to BFX
  • 7/9 required a larger cup than original

Cup removal: Required sectioning with a high-speed burr and modular osteotome; removal fragments extracted

Complications:

  • 1 recurrent luxation
  • 1 low-grade infection with possible metallic debris-associated osteolysis
  • 2 femoral fissures managed intraoperatively

Outcomes:

  • Good to excellent function in 6/6 dogs available at median 621 days
  • Minimal complications with success in re-osteointegration of new cup

Clinical takeaway: Revision of stable, ingrown cups is feasible and offers an alternative to pelvic osteotomies; typically requires upsizing

Scott

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Revision of osteointegrated acetabular cup prostheses in nine dogs

2025-3-VS-scott-4

Article Title: Revision of osteointegrated acetabular cup prostheses in nine dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Orthopedic Complications
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.