Quiz Question

In Chitty 2025 et al., on tibial fracture fixation in immature dogs, which complication was most common in the external fixation group?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Pin tract morbidity was the most common complication in dogs receiving external skeletal fixation.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Pin tract morbidity.
Pin tract morbidity was the most common complication in dogs receiving external skeletal fixation.

🔍 Key Findings

Internal fixation (IF) group (n=59):

  • Complication rate: 20.3%
  • Major complications: 15.3%
  • Longer time to discharge if complications occurred (median: 12.5 weeks)

External skeletal fixation (ESF) group (n=36):

  • Complication rate: 55.6% (p < .001 vs IF)
  • Major complications: 52.8%
  • Most common issue: pin tract morbidity

Multivariable analysis:

  • Use of IF significantly reduced odds of complications (OR 0.23, p = .004)
  • Use of post-op antibiotics associated with increased odds of complications (OR 3.53, p = .028)

Fixation choice influenced by age:

  • Older puppies more likely to receive IF (OR 1.25 per week increase in age, p < .001)

Breed & fracture distribution:

  • Common breeds: Labrador, Border Collie, Whippet
  • Common fracture sites: middle and proximal third of tibia

Chitty

Veterinary Surgery

4

2025

Short‐term complications of internal versus external fixation of closed diaphyseal tibial fractures in 95 skeletally immature dogs

2025-4-VS-chitty-2

Article Title: Short‐term complications of internal versus external fixation of closed diaphyseal tibial fractures in 95 skeletally immature dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In de la Oliva 2024 et al., which fixation method was most associated with complications?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Most complications occurred in dogs treated with K-wires, including implant migration and fracture displacement:contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Kirschner wires.
Most complications occurred in dogs treated with K-wires, including implant migration and fracture displacement:contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 89 French Bulldogs with HCF; 40.4% (36/89) had contralateral HIF
  • Prophylactic transcondylar screws placed in 20/36 HIF; no complications in these
  • Complication rate for HCF repair = 13.4% (6.7% minor, 6.7% major)
  • Most complications occurred with Kirschner wire fixation
  • Short-term outcome: Bone healing observed in all, but 14/45 had persistent intracondylar gap
  • Long-term outcomes (n=27):
    • Excellent = 66.7%
    • Good = 29.6%
    • Fair = 3.7%
  • Complication-free dogs significantly more likely to have excellent/good outcomes (p = 0.007)

Delaoliva

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

3

2024

Humeral Condylar Fractures in French Bulldogs: Prevalence of Contralateral Intracondylar Fissure, Treatment, and Outcome

2024-3-VCOT-delaoliva-3

Article Title: Humeral Condylar Fractures in French Bulldogs: Prevalence of Contralateral Intracondylar Fissure, Treatment, and Outcome

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Lederer 2025 et al., on MIPO vs ORPS, what factor was significantly associated with explantation?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Fracture comminution was significantly associated with implant explantation (p < .001).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Comminution of fracture.
Fracture comminution was significantly associated with implant explantation (p < .001).

🔍 Key Findings

Study size: 105 dogs (73 ORPS; 32 MIPO)

MIPO vs ORPS differences:

  • Surgical time: MIPO median 130 min vs ORPS 85 min (p < .001)
  • Explant rate: MIPO 25% vs ORPS 4.1% (p = .003)
  • Time to clinical union: MIPO 85 days vs ORPS 57 days (p = .010)
  • Frontal alignment deviation: MIPO 3.5° vs ORPS 2.0° (p = .047)
  • Comminution more frequent in MIPO (41% vs 16%; p = .012)

Significant predictors for MIPO use: More proximal fracture margin (p = .004), surgeon identity (p < .001)

No significant difference: Sagittal alignment, radial length, union rate, or complication rate by surgeon

Implant preference: Fixin plates used in 84% of MIPO; locking plates more common in ORPS

Lederer

Veterinary Surgery

4

2025

Retrospective comparison of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and open reduction and plate stabilization of antebrachial fractures in 105 dogs (2017–2022)

2025-4-VS-lederer-4

Article Title: Retrospective comparison of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and open reduction and plate stabilization of antebrachial fractures in 105 dogs (2017–2022)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Gollnick 2024 et al., on TCTF risk with Arthrex STS in TPLO, what percentage of dogs developed transcortical tibial fractures?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 42% (33/78) of dogs had radiographic evidence of TCTF following TPLO with Arthrex STS.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 42%.
42% (33/78) of dogs had radiographic evidence of TCTF following TPLO with Arthrex STS.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 42% of dogs (33/78) treated with Arthrex 3.5 mm STS during TPLO developed radiographic TCTF
  • TCTFs occurred exclusively distal to the osteotomy
  • 14% of screws (36/250) distal to the osteotomy were associated with TCTFs
  • 6% of dogs with TCTFs developed major complications (e.g., complete tibial fracture requiring surgical revision)
  • Angulation of cortical STS screws, especially in the distal plate holes, was a key contributor to complications
  • Locking screws were also involved, but cortical screws angled improperly were overrepresented in serious outcomes
  • Revision recommendations included preemptive fixation for large TCTFs or angulated screw placements
  • Use of non-self-tapping screws (NSTS) previously showed a <1% TCTF rate, supporting higher risk with STS

Gollnick

Veterinary Surgery

6

2024

Tibial fracture associated with use of Arthrex self‐tapping screws during tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs and development of transcortical tibial fracture

2024-6-VS-gollnick-1

Article Title: Tibial fracture associated with use of Arthrex self‐tapping screws during tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs and development of transcortical tibial fracture

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Sanders 2024 et al., on feline anastomosis techniques, where was leakage most commonly observed in skin-stapled constructs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. In skin-stapled constructs, 8/10 leaks originated at staple holes, with 2 additional from the cut edge.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Staple holes.
In skin-stapled constructs, 8/10 leaks originated at staple holes, with 2 additional from the cut edge.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • ILP and MIP: No significant differences in leak pressure between HSA, FEESA, and SS techniques (p > .05).
  • Construct Time:
    • FEESA (no oversew) fastest: 79 ± 30 s
    • HSA-SI slowest: 397 ± 70 s (p < .001)
  • Tissue Thickness:
    • Jejunum thickest: 2.28 ± 0.30 mm
    • Stomach thinnest: 1.66 ± 0.28 mm
  • Staple Malformation: Noted in 2 FEESA-O constructs, vertical staple line.
  • Leak Locations:
    • HSA: All leaked from suture bites
    • FEESA: Leaks from vertical and horizontal staple lines
    • SS: Mostly from staple holes

Sanders

Veterinary Surgery

2

2024

Gastrointestinal thickness, duration, and leak pressure of five intestinal anastomosis techniques in cats

2024-2-VS-sanders-4

Article Title: Gastrointestinal thickness, duration, and leak pressure of five intestinal anastomosis techniques in cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Sadowitz 2023 et al., on screw angle & speed, which factor **alone** was not associated with increased transcortical fracture (TCF) risk?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Increased screw speed alone did not raise TCF risk unless combined with off-axis insertion.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Coaxial insertion at 1350 rpm.
Increased screw speed alone did not raise TCF risk unless combined with off-axis insertion.

🔍 Key Findings

  • TCF risk increased significantly with 10° insertion angle at both 650 rpm (12.5%) and 1350 rpm (17.5%), compared to 0% in the control group (0° at 650 rpm).
  • Hand insertion at 10° angle resulted in only 3.75% TCF rate, suggesting lower insertion speed reduces risk.
  • No TCFs occurred when screws were inserted coaxially (0°) at either 650 or 1350 rpm, indicating angle is a critical factor.
  • Screw speed alone did not increase TCF risk unless combined with off-axis insertion.
  • Radiographically detectable TCFs were only considered; actual rates may be higher with direct bone inspection.
  • Cutting flutes engaging undrilled bone during off-axis insertion likely contribute to TCF formation.
  • Clinical implication: Ensure screws are inserted coaxially and at lower speeds to reduce TCF risk during procedures like TPLO.
  • Statistically significant differences were found between control and high-angle insertion groups: Group C (p = .001), Group E (p < .001).

Sadowitz

Veterinary Surgery

8

2023

Effect of screw insertion angle and speed on the incidence of transcortical fracture development in a canine tibial diaphyseal model

2023-8-VS-sadowitz-1

Article Title: Effect of screw insertion angle and speed on the incidence of transcortical fracture development in a canine tibial diaphyseal model

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Banks 2024 et al., on CCWO planning accuracy, which **group based on preoperative TPA** was closest to the 5° TPA target postoperatively?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Dogs with preoperative TPA >35° (eTPA) were closest to achieving the 5° goal.
Incorrect. The correct answer is >35°.
Dogs with preoperative TPA >35° (eTPA) were closest to achieving the 5° goal.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Oxley's modified CCWO did not achieve the target TPA of 5° in most cases, even with planning.
  • Mean planned TPA was 7.6°, higher than target, and consistent across dog sizes.
  • Postoperative TPAs were significantly higher in small dogs (median 7°) than in large dogs (median 4.5°).
  • Distalization >7.5 mm of the osteotomy from the patellar tendon led to increased under-correction of TPA.
  • Only dogs with preoperative TPA >35° achieved post-planning TPAs close to the 5° target.
  • Postoperative osteotomy positions were generally more distal than recommended (8.6 mm median).
  • Virtual plate fit was appropriate for all dogs at 5 mm or 7.5 mm positions, suggesting no need for excessive distalization.
  • Excessive correction leading to negative TPAs occurred in some cases, risking caudal cruciate ligament strain.

Banks

Veterinary Surgery

8

2024

A mismatch of planning and achieved tibial plateau angle in cranial closing wedge surgery: An in silico and clinical evaluation of 100 cases

2024-8-VS-banks-2

Article Title: A mismatch of planning and achieved tibial plateau angle in cranial closing wedge surgery: An in silico and clinical evaluation of 100 cases

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Gollnick 2024 et al., on TCTF risk with Arthrex STS in TPLO, which screw location was most commonly associated with TCTFs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 50% of TCTFs occurred at middle screws in the distal part of the TPLO plate.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Middle screws distal to osteotomy.
50% of TCTFs occurred at middle screws in the distal part of the TPLO plate.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 42% of dogs (33/78) treated with Arthrex 3.5 mm STS during TPLO developed radiographic TCTF
  • TCTFs occurred exclusively distal to the osteotomy
  • 14% of screws (36/250) distal to the osteotomy were associated with TCTFs
  • 6% of dogs with TCTFs developed major complications (e.g., complete tibial fracture requiring surgical revision)
  • Angulation of cortical STS screws, especially in the distal plate holes, was a key contributor to complications
  • Locking screws were also involved, but cortical screws angled improperly were overrepresented in serious outcomes
  • Revision recommendations included preemptive fixation for large TCTFs or angulated screw placements
  • Use of non-self-tapping screws (NSTS) previously showed a <1% TCTF rate, supporting higher risk with STS

Gollnick

Veterinary Surgery

6

2024

Tibial fracture associated with use of Arthrex self‐tapping screws during tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs and development of transcortical tibial fracture

2024-6-VS-gollnick-2

Article Title: Tibial fracture associated with use of Arthrex self‐tapping screws during tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs and development of transcortical tibial fracture

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Moreira 2024 et al., on predictive equations for TPA correction, which CCWO technique produced the **greatest** tibial shortening at high wedge angles?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Slocum and Devine CCWO had up to 40.9% mTL reduction, the highest among all.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Slocum and Devine.
Slocum and Devine CCWO had up to 40.9% mTL reduction, the highest among all.

🔍 Key Findings

  • A linear relationship was observed between wedge angle and tibial plateau angle (TPA) correction across all four CCWO techniques.
  • All techniques produced predictable TPA corrections using linear regression-derived equations, allowing wedge angle extrapolation to achieve a target postoperative TPA of 5°.
  • TLA shift (tibial long axis) increased with wedge angle and influenced final TPA; greatest in Frederick & Cross method.
  • Tibial shortening (mTL%) varied by technique, being most severe (up to 40.9%) in traditional Slocum & Devine CCWO and least in newer techniques (7.5–12%).
  • The Oxley mCCWO technique showed lower TLA shift compared to the Frederick & Cross and Christ techniques, though similar to Slocum & Devine; tibial shortening was more pronounced than other modified techniques at wedge angles ≤40°.
  • Techniques varied in craniocaudal translation and wedge apex positioning, influencing planning accuracy and mechanical axis alignment.
  • The corrective wedge angle equations reliably predicted TPA within 4–6° across varied tibial conformations.
  • The study supports equation-based planning over static TPA–5° subtraction to reduce risk of under- or over-correction.

Moreira

Veterinary Surgery

8

2024

Predicting tibial plateau angles following four different types of cranial closing wedge ostectomy

2024-8-VS-moreira-2

Article Title: Predicting tibial plateau angles following four different types of cranial closing wedge ostectomy

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Anderson 2024 et al., what radiographic feature was common among all cases of fibular nerve injury post-TPLO?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. In all 3 cases, either a radiolucent drill hole or a screw was present at the caudal cortex distal to the TPLO osteotomy:contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Drill hole or screw at caudal tibial cortex.
In all 3 cases, either a radiolucent drill hole or a screw was present at the caudal cortex distal to the TPLO osteotomy:contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 3 dogs developed permanent fibular nerve dysfunction following TPLO
  • Common findings:
    • Drill hole or screw in caudal tibial cortex just distal to osteotomy
    • Caudal malpositioning of TPLO plate (esp. right limb of case 3)
    • Post-op signs: cranial tibial atrophy, knuckling, exaggerated gait, no hock flexion
  • One case had confirmed deep/superficial fibular neuropathy via electrodiagnostics
  • Recommended prevention: avoid overly caudal drill paths; careful gait assessment at follow-up is key

Anderson

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

3

2024

Permanent Iatrogenic Fibular Nerve Injury following Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomy

2024-3-VCOT-anderson-1

Article Title: Permanent Iatrogenic Fibular Nerve Injury following Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomy

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Orthopedic Complications
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.