Quiz Question

In McCarthy 2022 et al., on 3D drill guide accuracy, what was the primary finding regarding drill angle deviation in the 3D-GDT group versus FHDT?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 3D-GDT significantly reduced deviation in both planes, supporting increased accuracy.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Craniocaudal and dorsoventral angles were significantly lower with 3D-GDT.
3D-GDT significantly reduced deviation in both planes, supporting increased accuracy.

šŸ” Key Findings

  • 3D-printed drill guides (3D-GDT) significantly reduced craniocaudal and dorsoventral drilling angle deviation compared to free-hand drilling technique (FHDT), with statistical significance (p < .0001 and p = .01 respectively).
  • No sacral corridor breaches occurred with 3D-GDT, whereas FHDT resulted in 20% drill exit incidences (3/15 cases).
  • 3D-GDT had lower deviation from optimal drill trajectory at end points in all axes: craniocaudal (1.84 ± 1.6 mm vs. 4.18 ± 2.4 mm), dorsoventral (1.11 ± 1.0 mm vs. 2.4 ± 1.5 mm), and 3D linear (2.47 ± 1.4 mm vs. 5.35 ± 2.2 mm), all statistically significant.
  • Strong correlation (r = 0.77) between CT and 3D software measurements validated method reliability.
  • 3D guide trajectories showed consistent proximity to the optimal trajectory, especially at drill endpoints, indicating reduced variability in execution.
  • 3D-GDT was developed using open-source software and inexpensive materials, supporting future clinical application.
  • Major errors in FHDT occurred primarily at the drill endpoint, underscoring the challenge of maintaining optimal angulation during free-hand drilling.
  • The sacral corridor was recharacterized as pyramidal (not quadrilateral), with implications for safer implant placement.

McCarthy

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Accuracy of a drilling with a custom 3D printed guide or free‐hand technique in canine experimental sacroiliac luxations

2022-1-VS-mccarthy-1

Article Title: Accuracy of a drilling with a custom 3D printed guide or free‐hand technique in canine experimental sacroiliac luxations

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

šŸ”„100% would expect this on the real thing

šŸ¤”Useful, but not core exam material

šŸ—‘ļøNot relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
ā€
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
ā€
Mind trying that again?

In Banks 2024 et al., on CCWO planning accuracy, which **group based on preoperative TPA** was closest to the 5° TPA target postoperatively?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Dogs with preoperative TPA >35° (eTPA) were closest to achieving the 5° goal.
Incorrect. The correct answer is >35°.
Dogs with preoperative TPA >35° (eTPA) were closest to achieving the 5° goal.

šŸ” Key Findings

  • Oxley's modified CCWO did not achieve the target TPA of 5° in most cases, even with planning.
  • Mean planned TPA was 7.6°, higher than target, and consistent across dog sizes.
  • Postoperative TPAs were significantly higher in small dogs (median 7°) than in large dogs (median 4.5°).
  • Distalization >7.5 mm of the osteotomy from the patellar tendon led to increased under-correction of TPA.
  • Only dogs with preoperative TPA >35° achieved post-planning TPAs close to the 5° target.
  • Postoperative osteotomy positions were generally more distal than recommended (8.6 mm median).
  • Virtual plate fit was appropriate for all dogs at 5 mm or 7.5 mm positions, suggesting no need for excessive distalization.
  • Excessive correction leading to negative TPAs occurred in some cases, risking caudal cruciate ligament strain.

Banks

Veterinary Surgery

8

2024

A mismatch of planning and achieved tibial plateau angle in cranial closing wedge surgery: An in silico and clinical evaluation of 100 cases

2024-8-VS-banks-2

Article Title: A mismatch of planning and achieved tibial plateau angle in cranial closing wedge surgery: An in silico and clinical evaluation of 100 cases

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

šŸ”„100% would expect this on the real thing

šŸ¤”Useful, but not core exam material

šŸ—‘ļøNot relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
ā€
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
ā€
Mind trying that again?

In Danielski 2022 et al., on humero-anconeal incongruity, what was the proposed mechanism by which HIF may develop in spaniel breeds?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Study findings supported mechanical impingement leading to stress fissures in the medial humeral condyle.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Humero-anconeal incongruity causing focal stress.
Study findings supported mechanical impingement leading to stress fissures in the medial humeral condyle.

šŸ” Key Findings

  • A novel caudo-medial arthroscopic portal allowed visualization of previously undescribed cartilage lesions on the caudal medial humeral condyle.
  • A consistent focal cartilage lesion (HA lesion) was observed in 100% of elbows with HIF (21/21), but in none of the 31 elbows without HIF.
  • Lesions varied from indentations to full-thickness cartilage loss, typically elliptical and located just medial to the humeral condyle isthmus.
  • A clunk-like sensation and dynamic engagement of the anconeal process into the lesion were observed in 16/21 elbows with HIF during elbow manipulation.
  • In 5/21 elbows, engagement of the anconeal process led to observable widening of the HIF line, suggesting dynamic instability.
  • Findings support a novel concept of humero-anconeal incongruity as a contributor to the pathogenesis of HIF.
  • Spaniel breed was not a confounder—the lesion was only present in elbows with HIF, regardless of breed.
  • The study suggests potential for using arthroscopy as a screening tool for early detection of humero-anconeal incongruity and HIF risk.

Danielski

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Humero-anconeal elbow incongruity in spaniel breed dogs with humeral intracondylar fissure: Arthroscopic findings

2022-1-VS-danielski2-4

Article Title: Humero-anconeal elbow incongruity in spaniel breed dogs with humeral intracondylar fissure: Arthroscopic findings

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

šŸ”„100% would expect this on the real thing

šŸ¤”Useful, but not core exam material

šŸ—‘ļøNot relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
ā€
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
ā€
Mind trying that again?

In Pilot 2022 et al., on closure methods in sternotomy, what was concluded regarding closure technique choice in large dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Dog size increased risk of complications, but closure method did not alter this risk.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Closure material choice does not affect risk in large dogs.
Dog size increased risk of complications, but closure method did not alter this risk.

šŸ” Key Findings

  • Overall closure-related complication rate was 14.1%, lower than previously reported (17–78%).
  • No clinically meaningful difference in complication rate between orthopedic wire (17.4%) and suture (11.5%) closure methods.
  • Dog size (≄20 kg) was the only significant risk factor associated with increased closure-related complications (p = .01).
  • Type of closure (wire vs. suture) did not affect risk, even in larger dogs.
  • Suture closure showed a non-significant trend toward fewer complications (mean reduction 2.3%, 95% CI: –9.1% to +4.5%).
  • Most complications were mild (62%), with only 10 severe cases requiring surgical revision.
  • Infection rate was low (2.7%), and not significantly different between wire and suture.
  • Suture closure is a valid alternative to wire, including in large dogs, based on this large, multi-institutional study.

Pilot

Veterinary Surgery

6

2022

Comparison of median sternotomy closure‐related complication rates using orthopedic wire or suture in dogs: A multi-institutional observational treatment effect analysis

2022-6-VS-pilot-5

Article Title: Comparison of median sternotomy closure‐related complication rates using orthopedic wire or suture in dogs: A multi-institutional observational treatment effect analysis

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

šŸ”„100% would expect this on the real thing

šŸ¤”Useful, but not core exam material

šŸ—‘ļøNot relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
ā€
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
ā€
Mind trying that again?

In Longo 2022 et al., on CT-guided osteotomies, what was associated with a significantly increased risk of postoperative complications?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 80% of complications occurred in cases receiving both FDO and TDO in the same limb.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Concurrent femoral and tibial osteotomies.
80% of complications occurred in cases receiving both FDO and TDO in the same limb.

šŸ” Key Findings

  • 3D CT volume rendering and CAL measurement successfully guided correction of femoral and tibial torsion in dogs with patellar luxation (PL).
  • Physiological patellar tracking was restored in 100% (22/22) of cases after detorsional osteotomy.
  • 94% of dogs (17/18) had either full or acceptable functional outcomes post-surgery.
  • CAL-based correction was accurate in 19/22 cases, confirming reliability of the measurement technique.
  • Complication rate was 45%, with major complications in 2/22 cases—both involved combined femoral and tibial osteotomies.
  • Combined femoral and tibial osteotomies in the same limb were linked to a higher risk of complications and poorer outcomes.
  • Diaphyseal osteotomies offered more implant space, but metaphyseal locations were associated with faster bone healing.
  • Use of a TPLO jig or goniometer was not essential—CAL-based bone marking was sufficient in most cases.

Longo

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Three‐dimensional volume rendering planning, surgical treatment, and clinical outcomes for femoral and tibial detorsional osteotomies in dogs

2022-7-VS-longo-3

Article Title: Three‐dimensional volume rendering planning, surgical treatment, and clinical outcomes for femoral and tibial detorsional osteotomies in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

šŸ”„100% would expect this on the real thing

šŸ¤”Useful, but not core exam material

šŸ—‘ļøNot relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
ā€
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
ā€
Mind trying that again?

In Low 2025 et al., on machine-learning prediction, which factor was shown to have a significant impact on the model’s predictions and may represent a modifiable risk?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The study emphasized that surgeon-related variables heavily influenced complication prediction.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Surgeon identity.
The study emphasized that surgeon-related variables heavily influenced complication prediction.

šŸ” Key Findings

  • Postoperative complications occurred in 20% of stifles, including 7.5% minor, 10.3% surgical, and 3.4% medical complications.
  • The PROSPECT machine-learning model achieved high predictive accuracy: 92.3% for surgical complications, 91.9% for minor, and 94.3% for medical.
  • Top predictive features included surgical technique, implant type, patient age, and surgeon identity.
  • Surgeon-specific variables influenced predictions, indicating operator experience and technique matter.
  • Engineered interaction features (e.g., breed Ɨ implant) were more predictive than raw clinical data alone.
  • Rottweiler, intact male status, and higher bodyweight were associated with increased complication risk; Labradors had decreased risk.
  • Model calibration was strong, especially for high and low probability predictions; midrange predictions were less reliable.
  • The model supports individualized, probabilistic risk assessment, which could inform client counseling and tailored postoperative care.

PROSPECT = Predicting Risk Of Surgical compliĀ­cations aftEr CCWO and TPLO

Low

Veterinary Surgery

7

2025

Machine‐learning prediction of postoperative complications after high tibial osteotomy for canine cranial cruciate ligament disease

2025-7-VS-low-5

Article Title: Machine‐learning prediction of postoperative complications after high tibial osteotomy for canine cranial cruciate ligament disease

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

šŸ”„100% would expect this on the real thing

šŸ¤”Useful, but not core exam material

šŸ—‘ļøNot relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
ā€
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
ā€
Mind trying that again?

In Johnson 2022 et al., on PET implant outcomes, what was the most common site of failure identified in torn implants?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Midbody tears were identified arthroscopically in all failed implants, suggesting fatigue failure.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Midbody of the implant.
Midbody tears were identified arthroscopically in all failed implants, suggesting fatigue failure.

šŸ” Key Findings

  • Only 2 of 10 PET implants were fully intact and functional at 6 months post-op.
  • Owner-reported function (LOAD scores) improved by 51.7% (p = .008) over 6 months.
  • Gait asymmetry improved by 86% (p = .002) postoperatively.
  • Implant failure occurred in the midbody of the PET device, suggesting fatigue as a failure mechanism.
  • One dog (10%) developed implant infection, necessitating implant removal.
  • Implant fixation method (screws + washers + interference screw) was mechanically adequate and technically simple.
  • Partially intact implants (4/10) still showed improved clinical outcomes, despite structural compromise.
  • Midbody tearing and lack of long-term integrity prohibit continued use of this PET implant in CCL repair.

Johnson

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

Outcome of cranial cruciate ligament replacement with an enhanced polyethylene terephthalate implant in the dog: A pilot clinical trial

2022-8-VS-johnson-2

Article Title: Outcome of cranial cruciate ligament replacement with an enhanced polyethylene terephthalate implant in the dog: A pilot clinical trial

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

šŸ”„100% would expect this on the real thing

šŸ¤”Useful, but not core exam material

šŸ—‘ļøNot relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
ā€
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
ā€
Mind trying that again?

In Shetler 2022 et al., on radial head OCD, what feature characterized the OCD lesions arthroscopically?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. This classic appearance described a partially detached OCD flap.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Discoid elevation of cartilage with a cleft.
This classic appearance described a partially detached OCD flap.

šŸ” Key Findings

  • Bilateral radial head OCD lesions were identified in a 6-month-old English Bulldog with elbow lameness.
  • Medial arthroscopic portals allowed only partial visualization of radial head lesions, insufficient for treatment.
  • Lateral arthroscopy portals provided excellent access for fragment removal and abrasion arthroplasty.
  • Histopathology confirmed OCD, showing cartilage degeneration and retained cartilaginous cores.
  • Dog showed complete resolution of lameness and no elbow pain at 5 months post-op.
  • Lesions were caudolateral on the radial head, with discoid elevation of cartilage and clefts.
  • Lateral approach avoids major neurovascular structures, reducing iatrogenic risk.
  • The authors suggest lateral elbow arthroscopy may have broader indications, including for medial compartment disease or synovial biopsies.

Shetler

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

The use of lateral arthroscopy portals for the management of bilateral osteochondritis dissecans of the radial head in an English bulldog

2022-8-VS-shetler-3

Article Title: The use of lateral arthroscopy portals for the management of bilateral osteochondritis dissecans of the radial head in an English bulldog

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

šŸ”„100% would expect this on the real thing

šŸ¤”Useful, but not core exam material

šŸ—‘ļøNot relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
ā€
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
ā€
Mind trying that again?

In Thibault 2023 et al., on DPO for THR luxation, which of the following statements is TRUE regarding the effectiveness of DPO in preventing reluxation?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Reluxation occurred in 5 of 11 dogs, indicating that DPO alone was not reliably effective.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Reluxation occurred in nearly half of the dogs despite DPO.
Reluxation occurred in 5 of 11 dogs, indicating that DPO alone was not reliably effective.

2023-8-VS-thibault-4

Article Title:

Journal:

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

šŸ”„100% would expect this on the real thing

šŸ¤”Useful, but not core exam material

šŸ—‘ļøNot relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
ā€
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
ā€
Mind trying that again?

In Jenkins 2022 et al., on medial epicondylar fissure fracture, what proportion of elbows developed MEFF after transcondylar screw placement?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. MEFF was documented in 10 out of 88 elbows, or 11.4%.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 11.4%.
MEFF was documented in 10 out of 88 elbows, or 11.4%.

šŸ” Key Findings

  • MEFF occurred in 11.4% (10/88 elbows) following medial-to-lateral transcondylar screw placement in dogs with HIF.
  • Screw size to condylar height ratio >41% significantly increased MEFF risk (P = .004, OR 1.52).
  • MEFF was not recognized intraoperatively in 60% of cases and was only seen on follow-up or retrospective imaging review.
  • Screw loosening was the most common complication (11.2%), observed both with and without MEFF.
  • MEFF tended to increase the risk of screw loosening (P = .06), but was not statistically significant.
  • Most MEFFs did not require treatment and healed radiographically by 14–17 weeks in monitored cases.
  • Shaft screws were used in all MEFF cases, but shaft vs cortical design was not significantly associated with MEFF.
  • The clinical impact of MEFF was minor in most cases, although long-term significance is unknown.

Jenkins

Veterinary Surgery

4

2022

Medial epicondylar fissure fracture as a complication of transcondylar screw placement for the treatment of humeral intracondylar fissure

2022-4-VS-jenkins-2

Article Title: Medial epicondylar fissure fracture as a complication of transcondylar screw placement for the treatment of humeral intracondylar fissure

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

šŸ”„100% would expect this on the real thing

šŸ¤”Useful, but not core exam material

šŸ—‘ļøNot relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
ā€
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
ā€
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Orthopedic Complications
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

āŒ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

āœ… Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.