Quiz Question

In Devriendt 2022 et al., on EHPSS blood testing, which statement about postoperative SBA values is most accurate?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Normal SBA values do not guarantee shunt closure; persistent shunting may still be present.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Postoperative SBA values have limited utility in ruling out persistent shunting.
Normal SBA values do not guarantee shunt closure; persistent shunting may still be present.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Fasting ammonia (FA) was the most specific test (100%) for confirming EHPSS closure postoperatively.
  • Serum hyaluronic acid (SHA) and MEGX at 15 minutes post-lidocaine were the most sensitive tests (96.9% and 96.2%, respectively).
  • SHA combined with MEGX T15, or with FA or postprandial serum bile acids (SBA), provided 100% sensitivity with good specificity (72.4–82.8%).
  • SHA levels remained elevated in all dogs with persistent shunting, even when other tests were normal.
  • Paired SBA had moderate sensitivity (90%) and variable specificity (89%).
  • The L/MEGX test at 30 min was less useful than at 15 min for assessing closure.
  • Traditional SBA testing showed reduced utility postoperatively; normal values did not rule out persistent shunting.
  • Blood tests improved when combined, but imaging remains essential to definitively confirm EHPSS closure.

Devriendt

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Evaluation of different blood tests in dogs with extrahepatic portosystemic shunts to assess shunt closure after surgical treatment

2022-7-VS-devriendt-4

Article Title: Evaluation of different blood tests in dogs with extrahepatic portosystemic shunts to assess shunt closure after surgical treatment

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Miller 2024 et al., on surgical comparison of staphylectomy vs. FFP, what was the most common postoperative complication overall?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Regurgitation occurred in 27 dogs postoperatively and was the most commonly reported minor complication.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Regurgitation.
Regurgitation occurred in 27 dogs postoperatively and was the most commonly reported minor complication.

🔍 Key Findings

  • FFP resulted in longer median surgery (75 min) and anesthesia (111 min) durations than S (51 min and 80 min, respectively).
  • No significant difference in anesthetic complications, regurgitation, aspiration pneumonia, or hospitalization time between S and FFP.
  • Major complications were rare (4%) and equally distributed between procedures; included tracheostomy and euthanasia due to severe airway disease.
  • Postoperative oxygen use was common (52% of dogs) but not significantly different between procedures.
  • FFP dogs more often had laryngeal collapse (especially Grade 1: 68% vs. 32% in S dogs).
  • Most dogs (85%) had concurrent nares surgery, with caudal wedge resection more frequent in FFP dogs.
  • Few dogs needed revision soft palate surgery (7/124 total); similar between groups.
  • Postoperative clinical signs improved across both procedures; regurgitation was the most persistent sign post-op.

Miller

Veterinary Surgery

8

2024

Complications and outcome following staphylectomy and folded flap palatoplasty in dogs with brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome

2024-8-VS-miller-2

Article Title: Complications and outcome following staphylectomy and folded flap palatoplasty in dogs with brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Veytsman 2023 et al., on feline insulinoma outcomes, what percentage of cats were euglycemic or hyperglycemic immediately after surgery?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 90% of cats achieved immediate euglycemia or hyperglycemia postoperatively.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 90%.
90% of cats achieved immediate euglycemia or hyperglycemia postoperatively.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Surgical excision of insulinomas resulted in euglycemia or hyperglycemia in 90% of cats immediately post-op.
  • 18/20 cats (90%) survived to hospital discharge, with a median survival time of 863 days.
  • Younger age, metastasis at surgery, tumor invasion, and lower glucose levels were negative prognostic factors.
  • Two cats had stage III disease with metastasis; one lived 413 days post-op, suggesting some benefit to surgery even in advanced disease.
  • Postoperative hypoglycemia and seizure activity were associated with poorer outcomes; one cat euthanized due to seizures despite euglycemia.
  • Median disease-free interval (DFI) was 1052 days; for cats with metastasis, DFI dropped to 93 days.
  • Partial pancreatectomy was performed in 11 cats, nodulectomy in 10, and enucleation in 1; method of resection not linked to outcome.
  • Postoperative complications occurred in 25% of cats; most were manageable with supportive care.

Veytsman

Veterinary Surgery

1

2023

Retrospective study of 20 cats surgically treated for insulinoma

2023-1-VS-veytsman-1

Article Title: Retrospective study of 20 cats surgically treated for insulinoma

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Banks 2023 et al., on TECA-LBO in brachycephalic dogs, which diagnostic imaging findings were significantly more common in EBBs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Otitis interna (46.3% vs. 8.5%) and brainstem changes (17.5% vs. 3%) were significantly more common in EBBs.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Brainstem changes and otitis interna.
Otitis interna (46.3% vs. 8.5%) and brainstem changes (17.5% vs. 3%) were significantly more common in EBBs.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Extreme brachycephalic breeds (EBBs) presented more acutely and at younger ages, most often with neurological signs compared to other breeds.
  • Preoperative signs such as facial nerve paresis, vestibular syndrome, and Horner’s syndrome were significantly more common in EBBs.
  • EBBs showed more severe imaging findings, including higher rates of otitis interna (46.3% vs. 8.5%) and brainstem changes (17.5% vs. 3%).
  • Intraoperative complications were more frequent in EBBs (11.1% vs. 5.3%), but this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = .078).
  • Perioperative complication rates did not differ significantly between EBBs and other breeds (23.5% vs. 29.3%).
  • Surgical time was significantly longer in EBBs (median 115 vs. 95 minutes; p = .011).
  • MRI or combined CT/MRI were more frequently used in EBBs, likely due to the higher prevalence of neurological signs.
  • Despite anatomical challenges, complication rates in EBBs were comparable, supporting TECA-LBO safety in these breeds.

Banks

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Influence of extreme brachycephalic conformation on perioperative complications associated with total ear canal ablation and lateral bulla osteotomy in 242 dogs (2010–2020)

2023-5-VS-banks-4

Article Title: Influence of extreme brachycephalic conformation on perioperative complications associated with total ear canal ablation and lateral bulla osteotomy in 242 dogs (2010–2020)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Alvarez-Sanchez 2023 et al., on SLN mapping in canine MCT, which tumor type showed unexpectedly high rates of lymph node metastasis?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 7 of 8 dogs with subcutaneous MCT had metastatic nodes, challenging assumptions of benign behavior in this tumor subtype.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Subcutaneous mast cell tumor.
7 of 8 dogs with subcutaneous MCT had metastatic nodes, challenging assumptions of benign behavior in this tumor subtype.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Combined ICTL and NIRF detected the same SLN in 80% of cases; each method alone missed sentinel lymph nodes in some dogs.
  • ICLT failed in 5% of dogs, while NIRF failed in 20%; combined use resulted in only 5% failure in SLN detection.
  • Metastatic lymph nodes were detected in 95% of dogs, despite most tumors being low or intermediate grade (95%).
  • 27 of 41 nodes (65.8%) were histologically metastatic (HN2 or HN3), many of which would have been missed using ALN alone.
  • ALN matched the SLN in only 45% of cases with ICTL and 30% with NIRF, supporting the need for SLN mapping.
  • ICLT and NIRF were complementary, often identifying different SLN, with some only fluorescent or enhanced in one modality.
  • Subcutaneous MCT had higher metastatic rates (7/8 dogs) than previously reported, challenging older assumptions about benign behavior.
  • Removing both ALN and SLN (from both methods) improved detection of metastasis to 85–95%, reducing risk of understaging.

Alvarez-Sanchez

Veterinary Surgery

3

2023

Comparison of indirect computed tomographic lymphography and near-infrared fluorescence sentinel lymph node mapping for integumentary canine mast cell tumors

2023-3-VS-alvarez-sanchez-5

Article Title: Comparison of indirect computed tomographic lymphography and near-infrared fluorescence sentinel lymph node mapping for integumentary canine mast cell tumors

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Banse 2022 et al., on skill retention methods, which component of cognitive load was significantly higher in massed instruction (MI) students at LMU?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. LMU MI students reported higher mental, physical, and time demands, indicating elevated cognitive load.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Mental demand.
LMU MI students reported higher mental, physical, and time demands, indicating elevated cognitive load.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Spaced instruction (SI) improved immediate performance on the first learned skill compared to massed instruction (MI) in both LSU and LMU cohorts.
  • Cognitive load was higher in MI students at LMU, particularly in physical demand, effort, and frustration, while LSU showed no significant cognitive load differences.
  • Skill performance differences disappeared after 2 weeks of supervised practice, regardless of instructional format.
  • Time to complete skills improved over time, but this did not always correlate with improved checklist or global rating scores.
  • Intrinsic cognitive load increased when teaching more complex or related surgical tasks in the same session.
  • Initial skill complexity and prior exposure may influence effectiveness of spaced vs massed instruction.
  • Supervised practice sessions are critical to eliminate initial skill disparities between instructional methods.
  • Massed instruction may still be acceptable if followed by scheduled practice opportunities.

Banse

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Teaching veterinary surgical skills: Comparison of massed versus spaced instruction

2022-7-VS-banse-2

Article Title: Teaching veterinary surgical skills: Comparison of massed versus spaced instruction

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Buote 2023 et al., on laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (LVSG), on LVSG, what was the primary method used for leak testing after stapling?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. A methylene blue saline solution was injected via orogastric tube to assess for leaks.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Methylene blue injection.
A methylene blue saline solution was injected via orogastric tube to assess for leaks.

🔍 Key Findings

  • LVSG was successfully performed in 9/10 cadavers and both live cats, demonstrating procedural feasibility.
  • Mean stomach resected was 27.6% of total weight in cadavers, with no leaks in 8/8 tested or either live patient.
  • Mean surgical time: 110.4 min (cadavers) and 115 min (live cats); no intra- or postoperative complications observed.
  • Stenosis near the incisura occurred in 2 cadavers; attributed to staple placement too close to the lesser curvature.
  • 3D printed cannulas (3DPCs) improved ergonomics and were used in 6/10 cadavers and both live procedures.
  • Live cats lost 21–24% body weight over 3 months, with full return to pre-surgical BCS and no GI complications.
  • Orogastric tube and proper tensioning were critical in preventing gastric stenosis during staple placement.
  • No reinforcement or oversew was used on the staple line; TriStaple cartridges provided reliable closure.

Buote

Veterinary Surgery

7

2023

Laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy in felines: A cadaveric feasibility study and experimental case series in two cats

2023-7-VS-buote2-3

Article Title: Laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy in felines: A cadaveric feasibility study and experimental case series in two cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Young 2023 et al., on minimally invasive parathyroidectomy, which complication led to the only reported postoperative death?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. One dog died postoperatively from clinical hypocalcemia due to non-compliance with prescribed calcitriol.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Clinical hypocalcemia.
One dog died postoperatively from clinical hypocalcemia due to non-compliance with prescribed calcitriol.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Short-term resolution of hypercalcemia occurred in 97.8% (44/45) of dogs.
  • Long-term cure rate was 93.3%, comparable to traditional bilateral neck exploration.
  • Postoperative hypocalcemia was observed in only 15.6%, which is lower than traditional approaches (36–63.8%).
  • Permanent hypocalcemia occurred in 4.4%, requiring lifelong calcitriol supplementation.
  • Minimally invasive approach had median surgical times of 26 min (unilateral) and 45.5 min (bilateral).
  • Most lesions were adenomas (54.8%), followed by hyperplasia (27.4%) and carcinomas (3.2%).
  • Ultrasound identified 98.4% (61/62) of abnormal glands, supporting it as the preferred imaging modality.
  • One death due to non-compliance with calcitriol, emphasizing importance of postoperative management.

Young

Veterinary Surgery

1

2023

Surgical description and outcome of ultrasound‐guided minimally invasive parathyroidectomy in 50 dogs with primary hyperparathyroidism

2023-1-VS-young-4

Article Title: Surgical description and outcome of ultrasound‐guided minimally invasive parathyroidectomy in 50 dogs with primary hyperparathyroidism

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Billas 2022 et al., on SSI risk after limb amputation, which variable was **not** associated with increased SSI risk?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Only bipolar sealing device, trauma, infection, and non-clean wounds were significant predictors.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Use of sharp dissection.
Only bipolar sealing device, trauma, infection, and non-clean wounds were significant predictors.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 12.5% overall incidence of SSI after limb amputation, and 10.9% for clean procedures.
  • Bipolar vessel sealing device use for muscle transection significantly increased SSI risk (OR 2.5; P = .023).
  • Monopolar electrosurgery and sharp transection were not associated with increased SSI risk.
  • Non-clean wound classification increased SSI odds (OR 8.2; P = .003).
  • Amputation for infection (OR 5.7) or trauma (OR 4.5) significantly increased SSI risk compared to neoplasia.
  • Preoperative infections at distant sites did not significantly increase SSI risk.
  • Neither surgery/anesthesia duration, hypothermia, hypotension, nor skin closure method significantly affected SSI risk.
  • Study supports avoiding bipolar sealing devices for muscle transection in limb amputations to reduce SSI risk.

Billas

Veterinary Surgery

3

2022

Incidence of and risk factors for surgical site infection following canine limb amputation

2022-3-VS-billas-4

Article Title: Incidence of and risk factors for surgical site infection following canine limb amputation

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Smith 2025 et al., on bacterial cultures in TECA dehiscence, what percentage of dogs had the same single bacterial species cultured at both time points?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Only 1 out of 12 dogs (8.3%) had the same single bacteria (Staph schleiferi) at both TECA and dehiscence.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 8.3%.
Only 1 out of 12 dogs (8.3%) had the same single bacteria (Staph schleiferi) at both TECA and dehiscence.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Only 1 of 12 dogs (8.3%) cultured the same single organism (Staphylococcus schleiferi) at TECA and dehiscence sites.
  • In 58.3% (7/12), none of the bacteria from TECA cultures were found at dehiscence.
  • Staphylococcus spp. were isolated in 83.3% of dehiscence samples.
  • Methicillin resistance was high among Staphylococcus isolates: 80% at dehiscence.
  • Antibiotic susceptibility differed in 57% (4/7) of cases where the same bacteria were cultured at both time points.
  • TECA cultures were not predictive of bacteria at incisional dehiscence.
  • 75% of dogs healed with either medical or surgical management.

Recommendation: Repeat cultures at dehiscence to guide antibiotic therapy.

Smith

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Comparison of bacteria cultured during a total ear canal ablation and subsequent incisional dehiscence in 12 dogs

2025-3-VS-smith-1

Article Title: Comparison of bacteria cultured during a total ear canal ablation and subsequent incisional dehiscence in 12 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Infection
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.