Quiz Question

In Logothetou 2024 et al., on SPF complications, which anatomic site for SPF reconstruction was associated with the fewest complications?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Flaps on the head had significantly fewer complications compared to other regions.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Head.
Flaps on the head had significantly fewer complications compared to other regions.

šŸ” Key Findings

  • Complication rate for subdermal plexus flaps (SPFs) in dogs was 53.6%.
  • Skin staples had a numerically higher complication rate (72.2%) than sutures (49.3%), but not statistically significant due to small sample size.
  • Most common complication was wound dehiscence (35%), followed by seroma (14%) and wound discharge (14%).
  • Increased body weight was significantly associated with higher complication risk (OR = 1.056 per kg; p = .029).
  • Advancement flaps were associated with a lower incidence of complications on univariable analysis (p < .001).
  • Head region flap closures had fewer complications, while proximal pelvic limb closures had the highest complication rate.
  • Age was a risk factor—each additional year increased odds of complications (OR = 1.019; p = .004).
  • Closure technique did not significantly influence complication severity, though staple use was numerically worse.

Logothetou

Veterinary Surgery

3

2024

Complications and influence of cutaneous closure technique on subdermal plexus flaps in 97 dogs (2006–2022)

2024-3-VS-logothetou-3

Article Title: Complications and influence of cutaneous closure technique on subdermal plexus flaps in 97 dogs (2006–2022)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

šŸ”„100% would expect this on the real thing

šŸ¤”Useful, but not core exam material

šŸ—‘ļøNot relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
ā€
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
ā€
Mind trying that again?

In Nash 2024 et al., on esophageal pH monitoring, what percentage of dogs experienced proximal GER events during the recording period?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Only 12 of 31 dogs with dual sensors had proximal GER, corresponding to 39%.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 39%.
Only 12 of 31 dogs with dual sensors had proximal GER, corresponding to 39%.

šŸ” Key Findings

  • Esophageal pH-monitoring was well tolerated in all 35 nonbrachycephalic dogs, with no major adverse events reported.
  • Distal GER occurred in 80% of dogs, but events were typically brief and non-productive; proximal GER occurred in only 39%.
  • Upper reference limits for GER were 2.4 events/hour (distal) and 0.4 events/hour (proximal).
  • Cumulative acid exposure was minimal: upper limits were 2.3% (distal) and 0% (proximal).
  • Comparison with brachycephalic dogs shows significantly higher GER frequency and duration, validating the diagnostic utility of pH monitoring.
  • Transnasal probe placement under light anesthesia was safe and less morbid compared to percutaneous or conscious techniques.
  • No expelled or productive regurgitation occurred, despite some GER events, indicating efficient esophageal clearance in healthy dogs.
  • Diet and fasting duration may affect GER, but these were not controlled variables in this study.

Nash

Veterinary Surgery

8

2024

Esophageal pH‐monitoring in nonbrachycephalic dogs: A reference

2024-8-VS-nash-4

Article Title: Esophageal pH‐monitoring in nonbrachycephalic dogs: A reference

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

šŸ”„100% would expect this on the real thing

šŸ¤”Useful, but not core exam material

šŸ—‘ļøNot relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
ā€
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
ā€
Mind trying that again?

In GonzƔlez MontaƱo 2023 et al., on traumatic pulmonary pseudocysts (TPP), what was the most common concurrent thoracic injury in patients with traumatic pulmonary pseudocysts?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Pneumothorax was present in 100% of cases and was often bilateral.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Pneumothorax.
Pneumothorax was present in 100% of cases and was often bilateral.

šŸ” Key Findings

  • Traumatic pulmonary pseudocysts (TPP) were diagnosed in 11 patients (9 dogs, 2 cats) using CT after blunt trauma.
  • TPPs were identified on radiographs in 64% of cases that were CT-confirmed, highlighting the superior sensitivity of CT.
  • Most cases (7/10) were managed conservatively, with complete recovery and no TPP-related mortality.
  • Thoracic surgery (lung lobectomy) was performed in 3 dogs, due to persistent pneumothorax or large TPP with perceived risk of complications.
  • All pneumothorax cases were managed with thoracostomy tubes, and chest drains were used in 73% of cases.
  • Pneumothorax was present in 100% of patients, often bilateral, and pulmonary contusions were reported in 73%.
  • One cat was euthanized due to unrelated maxillofacial trauma; no deaths were attributed to TPP itself.
  • Long-term follow-up (median 768 days) revealed only 1 case with possible TPP-related pneumonia; others had no complications.

GonzƔlez MontaƱo

Veterinary Surgery

4

2023

Traumatic pulmonary pseudocysts in nine dogs and two cats

2023-4-VS-gonzalezmontano-2

Article Title: Traumatic pulmonary pseudocysts in nine dogs and two cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

šŸ”„100% would expect this on the real thing

šŸ¤”Useful, but not core exam material

šŸ—‘ļøNot relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
ā€
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
ā€
Mind trying that again?

In Dobberstein 2022 et al., on NSAID ulcer repair, what was a common factor among most dogs that developed gastrointestinal perforations?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 9 of 11 dogs had NSAID misuse, such as overdose, prolonged use, or concurrent steroid administration.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Concurrent corticosteroid or NSAID overdose.
9 of 11 dogs had NSAID misuse, such as overdose, prolonged use, or concurrent steroid administration.

šŸ” Key Findings

  • Primary repair of NSAID-associated full-thickness gastroduodenal ulcers was successful in 73% (8/11) of cases.
  • NSAID overdose, concurrent corticosteroid use, or extended duration were identified in 9/11 dogs and were major contributors to ulceration.
  • All perforations were in the pylorus or proximal duodenum, locations suitable for primary closure.
  • No significant association between ulcer size or location and postoperative survival.
  • Preoperative hyperlactatemia trended toward increased mortality (P = .0544; OR 2.045).
  • Postoperative vasopressor use was linked with a 9-fold increased risk of mortality (P = .0545).
  • Dehiscence was rare, suspected in only 1 of 11 cases, indicating that primary repair is structurally sound in selected cases.
  • Median follow-up of 444 days showed long-term survival was achievable post-primary repair.

Dobberstein

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Primary repair of nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drug‐associated full thickness gastrointestinal ulcers in 11 dogs

2022-7-VS-dobberstein-2

Article Title: Primary repair of nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drug‐associated full thickness gastrointestinal ulcers in 11 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

šŸ”„100% would expect this on the real thing

šŸ¤”Useful, but not core exam material

šŸ—‘ļøNot relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
ā€
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
ā€
Mind trying that again?

In Veytsman 2023 et al., on feline insulinoma outcomes, which of the following was NOT a negative prognostic factor?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Method of surgical excision was not associated with outcome.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Method of surgical resection.
Method of surgical excision was not associated with outcome.

šŸ” Key Findings

  • Surgical excision of insulinomas resulted in euglycemia or hyperglycemia in 90% of cats immediately post-op.
  • 18/20 cats (90%) survived to hospital discharge, with a median survival time of 863 days.
  • Younger age, metastasis at surgery, tumor invasion, and lower glucose levels were negative prognostic factors.
  • Two cats had stage III disease with metastasis; one lived 413 days post-op, suggesting some benefit to surgery even in advanced disease.
  • Postoperative hypoglycemia and seizure activity were associated with poorer outcomes; one cat euthanized due to seizures despite euglycemia.
  • Median disease-free interval (DFI) was 1052 days; for cats with metastasis, DFI dropped to 93 days.
  • Partial pancreatectomy was performed in 11 cats, nodulectomy in 10, and enucleation in 1; method of resection not linked to outcome.
  • Postoperative complications occurred in 25% of cats; most were manageable with supportive care.

Veytsman

Veterinary Surgery

1

2023

Retrospective study of 20 cats surgically treated for insulinoma

2023-1-VS-veytsman-2

Article Title: Retrospective study of 20 cats surgically treated for insulinoma

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

šŸ”„100% would expect this on the real thing

šŸ¤”Useful, but not core exam material

šŸ—‘ļøNot relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
ā€
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
ā€
Mind trying that again?

In GonzƔlez MontaƱo 2023 et al., on traumatic pulmonary pseudocysts (TPP), what was the TPP-related mortality in the study cohort?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. No patient died due to TPP; one cat was euthanized due to unrelated trauma.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 0%.
No patient died due to TPP; one cat was euthanized due to unrelated trauma.

šŸ” Key Findings

  • Traumatic pulmonary pseudocysts (TPP) were diagnosed in 11 patients (9 dogs, 2 cats) using CT after blunt trauma.
  • TPPs were identified on radiographs in 64% of cases that were CT-confirmed, highlighting the superior sensitivity of CT.
  • Most cases (7/10) were managed conservatively, with complete recovery and no TPP-related mortality.
  • Thoracic surgery (lung lobectomy) was performed in 3 dogs, due to persistent pneumothorax or large TPP with perceived risk of complications.
  • All pneumothorax cases were managed with thoracostomy tubes, and chest drains were used in 73% of cases.
  • Pneumothorax was present in 100% of patients, often bilateral, and pulmonary contusions were reported in 73%.
  • One cat was euthanized due to unrelated maxillofacial trauma; no deaths were attributed to TPP itself.
  • Long-term follow-up (median 768 days) revealed only 1 case with possible TPP-related pneumonia; others had no complications.

GonzƔlez MontaƱo

Veterinary Surgery

4

2023

Traumatic pulmonary pseudocysts in nine dogs and two cats

2023-4-VS-gonzalezmontano-5

Article Title: Traumatic pulmonary pseudocysts in nine dogs and two cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

šŸ”„100% would expect this on the real thing

šŸ¤”Useful, but not core exam material

šŸ—‘ļøNot relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
ā€
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
ā€
Mind trying that again?

In Miller 2024 et al., on leak testing in cooled feline intestine, where did most leaks initiate in both groups?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Suture hole was the most common site of initial leakage in both groups.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Suture hole.
Suture hole was the most common site of initial leakage in both groups.

šŸ” Key Findings

  • No difference in initial leak pressure (ILP) or maximum intraluminal pressure (MIP) between cooled (17–29 h) and fresh enterotomy constructs.
  • Wall thickness of duodenum and jejunum did not differ between fresh and cooled samples.
  • Leak locations (suture holes vs clamp sites) were similar between groups; not statistically different.
  • Volume of infusion did not influence ILP or MIP outcomes.
  • Mean ILP values: Control = 600 mmHg (maxed), Fresh = 200 mmHg, Cooled = 131 mmHg; CE vs FE difference was not significant.
  • Intraluminal diameter was largest in the ileum, followed by jejunum and duodenum.
  • Cadaveric intestine cooled ≤29h may be reliably used in ex vivo feline leak pressure studies.
  • First report of gross small intestinal lengths by region in cats—useful for resection planning.

Miller

Veterinary Surgery

5

2024

Cooled feline intestine and fresh intestine did not differ in enterotomy leak pressure testing or in gross wall thickness measurement

2024-5-VS-miller-5

Article Title: Cooled feline intestine and fresh intestine did not differ in enterotomy leak pressure testing or in gross wall thickness measurement

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

šŸ”„100% would expect this on the real thing

šŸ¤”Useful, but not core exam material

šŸ—‘ļøNot relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
ā€
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
ā€
Mind trying that again?

In Marchionatti 2022 et al., on antiseptic efficacy comparison, which of the following best reflects the conclusion?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The study concluded both protocols were comparable for SSI prevention and bacterial reduction:contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine are both effective, with no clear superiority.
The study concluded both protocols were comparable for SSI prevention and bacterial reduction:contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}

šŸ” Key Findings

  • Chlorhexidine-based asepsis protocols were comparable to povidone-iodine for reducing surgical site infection (SSI) rates in veterinary surgery.
  • No significant difference in skin bacterial colonization was observed between the two antiseptics, at both immediate and delayed timepoints.
  • Chlorhexidine-alcohol protocols showed a non-significant trend toward improved bacterial reduction in some studies, though inconsistent across all studies.
  • Use of neutralizing agents was inconsistent, which may have led to overestimation of antiseptic efficacy in several studies.
  • Formulations and concentrations varied widely (e.g., chlorhexidine 0.5–4%, povidone-iodine 0.7–1%), contributing to heterogeneity and limiting definitive conclusions.
  • Only a minority of studies reported using CDC criteria for SSI diagnosis, affecting the reliability of infection outcomes.
  • Risk of bias was high or unclear in multiple domains across all included studies, limiting overall confidence in conclusions.
  • Meta-analysis confirmed no statistically significant superiority of either protocol for SSI prevention or skin bacterial reduction.

Marchionatti

Veterinary Surgery

5

2022

Preoperative skin asepsis protocols using chlorhexidine versus povidone‐iodine in veterinary surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2022-5-VS-marchionatti-5

Article Title: Preoperative skin asepsis protocols using chlorhexidine versus povidone‐iodine in veterinary surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

šŸ”„100% would expect this on the real thing

šŸ¤”Useful, but not core exam material

šŸ—‘ļøNot relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
ā€
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
ā€
Mind trying that again?

In Mullen 2024 et al., on NIRF for GDV, what was the typical NIRF finding in histologically confirmed necrotic gastric regions?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Necrotic tissue lacked defined blood vessels and had markedly reduced NIR fluorescence.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Low fluorescence with absent vessel pattern.
Necrotic tissue lacked defined blood vessels and had markedly reduced NIR fluorescence.

šŸ” Key Findings

  • NIRF altered surgical strategy in 3 of 20 GDV dogs, identifying necrosis not appreciated subjectively.
  • Fundic fluorescence <10% indicated histologically confirmed gastric necrosis.
  • In 1 dog, NIRF revealed nonviability despite the surgeon’s impression of viability.
  • Staple line fluorescence resembled viable tissue in the only stapled gastrectomy, suggesting preservation of perfusion.
  • GDV dogs (even ā€œviableā€) showed lower fluorescence vs. healthy controls, indicating subclinical vascular compromise.
  • Histology confirmed full-thickness necrosis in all 4 dogs with NIRF-defined nonviability.
  • Pre-op lactate was significantly higher in nonviable GDV dogs (8.55 vs 4.89 mmol/L, p=0.03).
  • No complications were reported from ICG use; imaging was safe and repeatable.

Mullen

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Use of real-time near-infrared fluorescence to assess gastric viability in dogs with gastric dilatation volvulus: A case-control study

2024-4-VS-mullen-3

Article Title: Use of real-time near-infrared fluorescence to assess gastric viability in dogs with gastric dilatation volvulus: A case-control study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

šŸ”„100% would expect this on the real thing

šŸ¤”Useful, but not core exam material

šŸ—‘ļøNot relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
ā€
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
ā€
Mind trying that again?

In Buote 2023 et al., on 3D printed cannulas, what issue occurred during live case 1 involving insufflation?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The insufflation connection broke in case 1 but was resolved in case 2 by using a male luer lock connector.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Breakage of the insufflation port.
The insufflation connection broke in case 1 but was resolved in case 2 by using a male luer lock connector.

šŸ” Key Findings

  • Customized 3D printed cannulas (3DPCs) significantly reduced surgical time in feline cadaver models (125.6 vs. 95.2 min, p = 0.03).
  • Use of 3DPCs resulted in a reduction in instrument collisions (6.8 vs. 2.6, p = 0.03).
  • Cannula pullout complications decreased with 3DPCs (10 vs. 2.2 per procedure, p = 0.03).
  • 3DPCs were designed at shorter lengths (3 cm), improving intra-abdominal working space in cats.
  • No incisional or postoperative complications occurred in the two live feline cases.
  • One 3DPC insufflation port broke intraoperatively; resolved by using a male luer lock connector in the next case.
  • COā‚‚ leakage occurred from re-used silicone valves in 2 ports; emphasizing the need for durable valve design.
  • Estimated cost per 3DPC was <$5.00, suggesting cost-effective customization for feline laparoscopy.

Buote

Veterinary Surgery

7

2023

3D printed cannulas for use in laparoscopic surgery in feline patients: A cadaveric study and case series

2023-7-VS-buote-3

Article Title: 3D printed cannulas for use in laparoscopic surgery in feline patients: A cadaveric study and case series

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

šŸ”„100% would expect this on the real thing

šŸ¤”Useful, but not core exam material

šŸ—‘ļøNot relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
ā€
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
ā€
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Infection
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

āŒ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

āœ… Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.