Quiz Question

In Chen 2024 et al., on pressure-measurement tools, why is high precision potentially more critical than accuracy when monitoring portal pressures during PSS ligation?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Consistent readings help guide decisions about safe occlusion levels despite small bias.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Precision allows reliable comparison of pre- and post-ligation values.
Consistent readings help guide decisions about safe occlusion levels despite small bias.

🔍 Key Findings

  • WMg (water manometer with gauge) was the most accurate and precise pressure measurement device.
  • APT (arterial pressure transducer) was less accurate than WMg but still precise; it differed significantly from the gold standard (WMr).
  • CCT (Compass CT) was the least accurate and precise and differed significantly from the set pressure.
  • Mean differences from set pressure were smallest for WMg (−0.020 cm H2O), moderate for APT (−0.390 cm H2O), and largest for CCT (−1.267 cm H2O).
  • All devices showed excellent interobserver (ICC = 1.000) and intraobserver agreement (ICC range 0.985–0.998).
  • Even though the CCT performed least well, all devices had mean errors ≤1.3 cm H2O, indicating potential clinical utility.
  • WMg or WMr should be preferred in surgical settings due to superior accuracy and precision.
  • Measurement precision is more critical than accuracy during PSS surgery, as a 1 mm Hg (~1.3 cm H2O) increase in portal pressure raises odds of poor outcomes by 9%.

Chen

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Accuracy, precision, and interobserver and intraobserver agreements related to pressure-measurement devices

2024-4-VS-chen-3

Article Title: Accuracy, precision, and interobserver and intraobserver agreements related to pressure-measurement devices

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Zann 2023 et al., In Long-term outcomes after proximal humeral OC debridement in dogs, what functional outcome was most frequently reported by owners at long-term follow-up?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Despite progression of OA, most owners described their dogs’ mobility as good or very good (median LOAD = 6).
Incorrect. The correct answer is God to very good mobility.
Despite progression of OA, most owners described their dogs’ mobility as good or very good (median LOAD = 6).

🔍 Key Findings

  • 20 dogs (26 shoulders) evaluated at mean 3.5 years post-surgery after arthroscopic or open debridement.
  • Ipsilateral muscle atrophy and decreased range of motion (↓ extension, ↓ flexion) in affected limbs compared to contralateral healthy shoulders.
  • All treated shoulders developed osteoarthritis, confirmed radiographically, by CT, and arthroscopically.
  • Moderate to severe synovitis was present in all shoulders; lesions showed patchy, incomplete cartilage infilling even up to 8.9 years post-op.
  • Kinetic gait analysis showed no significant differences in PVF/VI between affected and unaffected limbs, despite mild lameness clinically.
  • Owners reported good to very good mobility (median LOAD = 6), often underestimating clinical lameness.
  • CT detected larger lesion dimensions than radiographs (wider, deeper defects).
  • Despite progression of OA, surgical debridement was associated with satisfactory long-term function, though not prevention of degenerative changes.

Zann

Veterinary Surgery

7

2023

Long-term outcome of dogs treated by surgical debridement of proximal humeral osteochondrosis

2023-7-VS-zann-3

Article Title: Long-term outcome of dogs treated by surgical debridement of proximal humeral osteochondrosis

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Alvarez-Sanchez 2023 et al., on SLN mapping in canine MCT, what was the histologic metastasis rate (HN2 or HN3) in excised lymph nodes?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 27 of 41 excised lymph nodes were histologically metastatic, a high rate even though most tumors were low-to-intermediate grade.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 65.8%.
27 of 41 excised lymph nodes were histologically metastatic, a high rate even though most tumors were low-to-intermediate grade.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Combined ICTL and NIRF detected the same SLN in 80% of cases; each method alone missed sentinel lymph nodes in some dogs.
  • ICLT failed in 5% of dogs, while NIRF failed in 20%; combined use resulted in only 5% failure in SLN detection.
  • Metastatic lymph nodes were detected in 95% of dogs, despite most tumors being low or intermediate grade (95%).
  • 27 of 41 nodes (65.8%) were histologically metastatic (HN2 or HN3), many of which would have been missed using ALN alone.
  • ALN matched the SLN in only 45% of cases with ICTL and 30% with NIRF, supporting the need for SLN mapping.
  • ICLT and NIRF were complementary, often identifying different SLN, with some only fluorescent or enhanced in one modality.
  • Subcutaneous MCT had higher metastatic rates (7/8 dogs) than previously reported, challenging older assumptions about benign behavior.
  • Removing both ALN and SLN (from both methods) improved detection of metastasis to 85–95%, reducing risk of understaging.

Alvarez-Sanchez

Veterinary Surgery

3

2023

Comparison of indirect computed tomographic lymphography and near-infrared fluorescence sentinel lymph node mapping for integumentary canine mast cell tumors

2023-3-VS-alvarez-sanchez-4

Article Title: Comparison of indirect computed tomographic lymphography and near-infrared fluorescence sentinel lymph node mapping for integumentary canine mast cell tumors

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Cortez 2024 et al., on feline ectopic ureters, what was the most common postoperative complication following surgical correction of ectopic ureters?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Although most cats improved, transient urinary incontinence was the most frequent complication noted.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Urinary incontinence.
Although most cats improved, transient urinary incontinence was the most frequent complication noted.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Ectopic ureters in cats are rare, but most are extramural and bilateral.
  • Surgical techniques used included ureteroneocystostomy (UNC), neoureterostomy (NU), nephroureterectomy, and cystoscopic laser ablation (CLA).
  • All cats showed improvement in urinary continence postoperatively, with 11/12 achieving complete resolution.
  • Major complications were rare; one cat developed uroabdomen requiring revision surgery.
  • Diagnostic imaging was effective, with abdominal ultrasound diagnosing 8/10 and CT 3/3 cases.
  • Short- and long-term complications included urethral spasms, UTIs, stranguria, and rectal prolapse; all were manageable.
  • CLA was successful in 2 cats and is noted as a first-time described technique in feline ectopic ureter cases.
  • Median postoperative follow-up was 340 days, supporting good long-term outcomes.

Cortez

Veterinary Surgery

6

2024

Presentation, diagnosis, and outcomes of cats undergoing surgical treatment of ectopic ureters

2024-6-VS-cortez-4

Article Title: Presentation, diagnosis, and outcomes of cats undergoing surgical treatment of ectopic ureters

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Glenn 2024 et al., on client-based SSI surveillance, what proportion of SSIs were identified *only* via active surveillance?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Active surveillance alone detected 12 of 62 SSIs (19.4%) not found through passive methods.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 19.4%.
Active surveillance alone detected 12 of 62 SSIs (19.4%) not found through passive methods.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Algorithm 3 had the highest overall accuracy (95.5%) in diagnosing SSIs from client questionnaires.
  • Active surveillance identified 19.4% more SSIs compared to passive surveillance alone.
  • SSI rate was 8.22% across 754 surgeries; 33.9% of SSIs required revision surgery.
  • Client-based responses were 37.9% more frequent than those from referring veterinarians.
  • Deep/implant SSIs could be missed if not associated with visible wound healing problems.
  • Two late SSIs (after 90 days) occurred, both linked to implant surgeries.
  • Algorithm 1 was the most sensitive (87.1%) but less specific; useful for screening.
  • Algorithm 2 had the highest specificity (97.9%); useful as a “rule-in” diagnostic method.

Glenn

Veterinary Surgery

8

2024

Evaluation of a client questionnaire at diagnosing surgical site infections in an active surveillance system

2024-8-VS-glenn-2

Article Title: Evaluation of a client questionnaire at diagnosing surgical site infections in an active surveillance system

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Marchionatti 2022 et al., on antiseptic efficacy comparison, what methodological limitation was common across studies?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Most studies lacked detail in randomization and blinding methods, leading to unclear risk of bias in multiple domains:contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Unclear risk of bias due to insufficient reporting.
Most studies lacked detail in randomization and blinding methods, leading to unclear risk of bias in multiple domains:contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}

🔍 Key Findings

  • Chlorhexidine-based asepsis protocols were comparable to povidone-iodine for reducing surgical site infection (SSI) rates in veterinary surgery.
  • No significant difference in skin bacterial colonization was observed between the two antiseptics, at both immediate and delayed timepoints.
  • Chlorhexidine-alcohol protocols showed a non-significant trend toward improved bacterial reduction in some studies, though inconsistent across all studies.
  • Use of neutralizing agents was inconsistent, which may have led to overestimation of antiseptic efficacy in several studies.
  • Formulations and concentrations varied widely (e.g., chlorhexidine 0.5–4%, povidone-iodine 0.7–1%), contributing to heterogeneity and limiting definitive conclusions.
  • Only a minority of studies reported using CDC criteria for SSI diagnosis, affecting the reliability of infection outcomes.
  • Risk of bias was high or unclear in multiple domains across all included studies, limiting overall confidence in conclusions.
  • Meta-analysis confirmed no statistically significant superiority of either protocol for SSI prevention or skin bacterial reduction.

Marchionatti

Veterinary Surgery

5

2022

Preoperative skin asepsis protocols using chlorhexidine versus povidone‐iodine in veterinary surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2022-5-VS-marchionatti-3

Article Title: Preoperative skin asepsis protocols using chlorhexidine versus povidone‐iodine in veterinary surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Veytsman 2023 et al., on feline insulinoma outcomes, which of the following was NOT a negative prognostic factor?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Method of surgical excision was not associated with outcome.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Method of surgical resection.
Method of surgical excision was not associated with outcome.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Surgical excision of insulinomas resulted in euglycemia or hyperglycemia in 90% of cats immediately post-op.
  • 18/20 cats (90%) survived to hospital discharge, with a median survival time of 863 days.
  • Younger age, metastasis at surgery, tumor invasion, and lower glucose levels were negative prognostic factors.
  • Two cats had stage III disease with metastasis; one lived 413 days post-op, suggesting some benefit to surgery even in advanced disease.
  • Postoperative hypoglycemia and seizure activity were associated with poorer outcomes; one cat euthanized due to seizures despite euglycemia.
  • Median disease-free interval (DFI) was 1052 days; for cats with metastasis, DFI dropped to 93 days.
  • Partial pancreatectomy was performed in 11 cats, nodulectomy in 10, and enucleation in 1; method of resection not linked to outcome.
  • Postoperative complications occurred in 25% of cats; most were manageable with supportive care.

Veytsman

Veterinary Surgery

1

2023

Retrospective study of 20 cats surgically treated for insulinoma

2023-1-VS-veytsman-2

Article Title: Retrospective study of 20 cats surgically treated for insulinoma

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Kang 2022 et al., on 3D scaffold reconstruction, what was the primary diagnosis confirmed after tumor excision?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Histopathology confirmed a well-differentiated variant of parosteal osteosarcoma.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Parosteal osteosarcoma.
Histopathology confirmed a well-differentiated variant of parosteal osteosarcoma.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Patient-specific 3D-printed PCL/β-TCP scaffold enabled successful zygomatic arch reconstruction in a dog.
  • Complete surgical resection of a zygomatic parosteal osteosarcoma was achieved, with a 0.3 mm histologically clean margin.
  • Post-op imaging showed progressive tissue ingrowth into the scaffold, with Hounsfield Units increasing from 20.4 to 97.8 over 10 months.
  • No complications (e.g., infection, displacement) or tumor recurrence were noted at 16-month follow-up.
  • Use of a patient-specific osteotomy guide improved anatomical fit and facilitated precise excision and implant placement.
  • Facial symmetry and orbital stability were maintained throughout follow-up.
  • The scaffold remained structurally stable despite limited bone regeneration, suggesting connective tissue filled the defect.
  • Topical mitomycin C was applied intraoperatively for possible anti-neoplastic effect, but efficacy remains unclear.

Kang

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

Zygomatic arch reconstruction with a patient-specific polycaprolactone beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold after parosteal osteosarcoma resection in a dog

2022-8-VS-kang-2

Article Title: Zygomatic arch reconstruction with a patient-specific polycaprolactone beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold after parosteal osteosarcoma resection in a dog

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Dobberstein 2022 et al., on NSAID ulcer repair, what clinical parameter was associated with a trend toward increased risk of death?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Each 1 mmol/L increase in serum lactate doubled the risk of postoperative mortality.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Hyperlactatemia.
Each 1 mmol/L increase in serum lactate doubled the risk of postoperative mortality.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Primary repair of NSAID-associated full-thickness gastroduodenal ulcers was successful in 73% (8/11) of cases.
  • NSAID overdose, concurrent corticosteroid use, or extended duration were identified in 9/11 dogs and were major contributors to ulceration.
  • All perforations were in the pylorus or proximal duodenum, locations suitable for primary closure.
  • No significant association between ulcer size or location and postoperative survival.
  • Preoperative hyperlactatemia trended toward increased mortality (P = .0544; OR 2.045).
  • Postoperative vasopressor use was linked with a 9-fold increased risk of mortality (P = .0545).
  • Dehiscence was rare, suspected in only 1 of 11 cases, indicating that primary repair is structurally sound in selected cases.
  • Median follow-up of 444 days showed long-term survival was achievable post-primary repair.

Dobberstein

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Primary repair of nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drug‐associated full thickness gastrointestinal ulcers in 11 dogs

2022-7-VS-dobberstein-5

Article Title: Primary repair of nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drug‐associated full thickness gastrointestinal ulcers in 11 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Zann 2023 et al., on proximal humeral OC, what conclusion was drawn about the progression of osteoarthritis (OA)?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. OA was present in all cases, but owner-reported outcomes were generally positive.
Incorrect. The correct answer is OA progression was consistent but not clinically relevant in most cases.
OA was present in all cases, but owner-reported outcomes were generally positive.

🔍 Key Findings

  • All dogs developed progressive osteoarthritis (OA) after surgical debridement of proximal humeral OC.
  • Ipsilateral muscle atrophy and reduced shoulder range of motion were common, particularly in unilaterally affected dogs.
  • Arthroscopically, lesions showed incomplete cartilage infilling even years after surgery, averaging only ~37% infilling.
  • Synovitis was present in all joints, with moderate-to-severe hypertrophy and vascularity scores.
  • CT identified OC lesions as deeper and wider than radiography, and all affected joints had more advanced OA than contralateral limbs (P = .001 radiograph, P = .005 CT).
  • Kinetic gait analysis showed no significant differences in peak vertical force or impulse, but a subtle 4.4% asymmetric load reduction on the operated limb.
  • Median LOAD score was 6, indicating mild owner-perceived disability despite measurable clinical and imaging abnormalities.
  • Cartilage infilling was incomplete in all cases, with no lesion exceeding 60% restoration, raising questions about the healing potential of debridement alone.

Zann

Veterinary Surgery

6

2023

Long-term outcome of dogs treated by surgical debridement of proximal humeral osteochondrosis

2023-6-VS-zann-5-f2454

Article Title: Long-term outcome of dogs treated by surgical debridement of proximal humeral osteochondrosis

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Healing & Complications
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.