Quiz Question

In Loh 2024 et al., on treatment outcomes for CvHL in dogs, which nonsurgical method had the highest success rate?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Hobbles achieved a 61.8% success rate, the highest among nonsurgical treatments.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Hobbles.
Hobbles achieved a 61.8% success rate, the highest among nonsurgical treatments.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Low-trauma events caused 82.9% of CvHL cases; Poodles and poodle-crosses represented 49.4% of cases.
  • Success rate of hobbles (61.8%) was significantly higher than closed reduction alone (10.3%) or Ehmer sling (18.5%).
  • Multivariate analysis found hobbles 7.62x more likely to succeed vs. closed reduction (p = .001).
  • Specialist surgeons had higher success with nonsurgical management (OR: 2.68; p = .047).
  • Older age associated with better outcomes (OR: 1.15 per year; p < .0005).
  • Ehmer sling is not recommended due to high failure and complication rates (60.6%).
  • Toggle rod stabilization had a high surgical success rate (88.2%) with low complication.
  • No link was found between CvHL and hip dysplasia or OA in most cases (only 2/108 showed OA).

Loh

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Caudoventral hip luxation in 160 dogs (2003–2023): A multicenter retrospective case series

2024-4-VS-loh-1

Article Title: Caudoventral hip luxation in 160 dogs (2003–2023): A multicenter retrospective case series

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Enright 2022 et al., on adrenalectomy outcomes, what was the observed effect of preoperative alpha-blocker therapy on long-term survival?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Preoperative alpha-blocker therapy was not associated with increased survival (P > .05).
Incorrect. The correct answer is No significant effect.
Preoperative alpha-blocker therapy was not associated with increased survival (P > .05).

🔍 Key Findings

  • 83% of dogs survived to discharge after adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma.
  • Median survival time post-discharge was 1169 days (3.2 years).
  • Preoperative alpha-blocker therapy (e.g., phenoxybenzamine) was not associated with improved survival.
  • Dogs receiving alpha-blockers had higher intraoperative systolic BP, with median values 170 mmHg vs. 142 mmHg in non-treated dogs (P = .01).
  • Intraoperative arrhythmias occurred in 30% of cases, with no difference between dogs receiving alpha-blockers and those not.
  • Histologic vascular invasion occurred in ~70% of tumors.
  • Tumor recurrence was suspected in 3 dogs, and metastasis in 8 dogs, though not histologically confirmed in most cases.
  • Postoperative complications included refractory hypotension, acute kidney injury, and hypertension persisting >48 hours in 10 dogs.

Enright

Veterinary Surgery

3

2022

Short‐ and long‐term survival after adrenalectomy in 53 dogs with pheochromocytomas with or without alpha‐blocker therapy

2022-3-VS-enright-2

Article Title: Short‐ and long‐term survival after adrenalectomy in 53 dogs with pheochromocytomas with or without alpha‐blocker therapy

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Winston 2023 et al., on LES-AS surgery outcomes, which preoperative treatment was discontinued postoperatively in all dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Oral sildenafil was stopped after surgery, supporting the idea that surgical treatment alone was effective in maintaining clinical improvement.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Sildenafil.
Oral sildenafil was stopped after surgery, supporting the idea that surgical treatment alone was effective in maintaining clinical improvement.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Modified Heller myotomy with Dor fundoplication improved vomiting/regurgitation scores by 180%, QoL by 100%, and owner-perceived body weight by 63% (P < .05).
  • 6 of 9 dogs with postoperative VFSS showed objective improvement in gastric filling scores; others remained stable.
  • Oral sildenafil was discontinued postoperatively in all dogs, indicating surgical success comparable to medical management.
  • 12 of 13 dogs survived to discharge; one dog was euthanized due to aspiration pneumonia postoperatively.
  • 50% of dogs experienced gastrostomy tube complications, higher than reported in previous literature.
  • Most complications were gastrostomy-tube related, with some requiring surgical correction (e.g., tube migration, leakage).
  • Feeding strategies (Bailey chair, elevated bowls) and food consistency (gruel/liquid) remained essential postoperatively to control regurgitation.
  • 9 of 11 owners would opt for the surgery again; those who wouldn’t cited risk or lack of efficacy.

Winston

Veterinary Surgery

2

2023

Management and outcomes of 13 dogs treated with a modified Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication for lower esophageal sphincter achalasia-like syndrome

2023-2-VS-winston-4

Article Title: Management and outcomes of 13 dogs treated with a modified Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication for lower esophageal sphincter achalasia-like syndrome

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Healy 2025 et al., on incidental PBBs, what recommendation is made regarding prophylactic lung resection?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. With no SP observed, authors do not recommend prophylactic lung removal for incidental PBBs.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Not justified based on study data.
With no SP observed, authors do not recommend prophylactic lung removal for incidental PBBs.

🔍 Key Findings

Population: 2,178 canine CTs reviewed retrospectively.
Prevalence: Incidental PBBs found in 1.37% (30/2178).
Outcome: None of the dogs with incidental PBBs developed clinical spontaneous pneumothorax (SP) over a median follow-up of 1255 days.
Significant Associations:

  • Age: Dogs with PBBs were significantly older (median 10.5 yrs vs. 8.2 yrs, p = .001).
  • CT indication: PBBs more likely during neoplastic staging (p = .006).

PBB Characteristics:

  • Total = 60 PBBs (median 1/dog; range 1–7).
  • Location: 35% in left caudal, 31.6% right caudal, only 13.3% in right cranial lobe.
  • Size-based: 25 bullae (>10 mm), 35 blebs (≤10 mm).

Conclusion: Prophylactic resection of incidental PBBs not justified given no observed SP risk in this population.

Healy

Veterinary Surgery

1

2025

Significance of incidentally identified bullae and blebs on thoracic computed tomography and prevalence of subsequent pneumothorax in dogs

2025-1-VS-healy-3

Article Title: Significance of incidentally identified bullae and blebs on thoracic computed tomography and prevalence of subsequent pneumothorax in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Chik 2025 et al., on abdominal wall prestretching, what was the effect of prestretching on the need for increased insufflation or conversion to open surgery?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All 50 dogs completed laparoscopic procedures at 6 mmHg after PS, without conversion or pressure increase.
Incorrect. The correct answer is No dogs required increased insufflation or conversion to open.
All 50 dogs completed laparoscopic procedures at 6 mmHg after PS, without conversion or pressure increase.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Prestretching (PS) at 10 mmHg for 3 minutes significantly increased working space at 6 mmHg IAP — IWL +4.4%, IWS +6.9%.
  • PS provided ≈63% of the IWL and ≈66% of the IWS gains achieved with sustained 10 mmHg IAP.
  • All laparoscopic procedures were completed at 6 mmHg after PS; no conversions or pressure increases were needed.
  • Working space benefits persisted throughout surgery — end-of-procedure measurements were unchanged from post-PS baseline.
  • Transverse expansion (RLAT/LLAT) was greater than sagittal (CRA/CAU), consistent with adult abdominal wall compliance.
  • No adverse anesthetic events occurred; mild complications (e.g., gas leakage) were easily managed.
  • Large breed dogs were overrepresented, but all dogs served as their own controls, normalizing size effects.
  • Prestretching is a simple, effective technique to maximize working space without increasing insufflation pressure.

Chik

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Prestretching increases working space at the same insufflation pressure in dogs undergoing laparoscopic procedures

2025-5-VS-chik-4

Article Title: Prestretching increases working space at the same insufflation pressure in dogs undergoing laparoscopic procedures

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Cola 2024 et al., on laparotomy-assisted endoscopy, what was the primary factor associated with the need to convert to enterotomy?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Intestinal wall damage was significantly associated with surgical conversion (p = .043).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Intestinal wall damage.
Intestinal wall damage was significantly associated with surgical conversion (p = .043).

🔍 Key Findings

  • LAER was effective (partial or complete) in 35/40 cases, regardless of FB location or type.
  • Intestinal wall damage significantly increased the likelihood of conversion to enterotomy (p = .043).
  • LAER led to significantly shorter hospitalization (median 48 h vs 72 h; p = .006).
  • Patients in the LAER group required less postoperative analgesia (median 36 h vs 48 h; p < .001).
  • Faster return to spontaneous feeding was seen in LAER group (median 24 h vs 36 h; p = .012).
  • No significant difference in complication rate or postoperative ileus between LAER and enterotomy groups.
  • Sharp, linear, or multiple FBs did not significantly affect LAER effectiveness.
  • Conversion to surgery was required in 5/40 LAER attempts, mostly due to immovable FBs or intestinal damage.

Cola

Veterinary Surgery

7

2024

Laparotomy‐assisted endoscopic removal of gastrointestinal foreign bodies: Evaluation of this technique and postoperative recovery in dogs and cats

2024-7-VS-cola-1

Article Title: Laparotomy‐assisted endoscopic removal of gastrointestinal foreign bodies: Evaluation of this technique and postoperative recovery in dogs and cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In You 2025 et al., on barbed sutures for lung lobectomy, what conclusion was made regarding their clinical use?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The authors conclude that barbed sutures may offer a viable alternative to staplers when cost or anatomy limits stapler use.
Incorrect. The correct answer is They may be a practical alternative to staplers.
The authors conclude that barbed sutures may offer a viable alternative to staplers when cost or anatomy limits stapler use.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Barbed sutures showed comparable leakage pressure to traditional sutures and stapling devices (p = .36).
  • No bronchial leaks occurred at physiological pressure (<20 cmH₂O) in any group.
  • Leakage at supraphysiologic pressure (20–80 cmH₂O) occurred in 90% of stapler, 80% of traditional, and 60% of barbed suture closures.
  • Barbed sutures reduced ligation time significantly compared to traditional sutures (10.7 vs. 14.1 minutes, p < .01).
  • Staplers remained fastest, with mean ligation time of 2.4 minutes.
  • No knot failure or suture breakage was observed in barbed or traditional suture groups.
  • Leakage in barbed sutures occurred mostly at the loop effector zone, but remained within acceptable limits.
  • Barbed sutures may offer an effective alternative when staplers are unavailable, impractical, or cost-prohibitive.

You

Veterinary Surgery

7

2025

Evaluation of a knotless barbed suture for canine total lung lobectomy: An ex vivo study

2025-7-VS-you-5

Article Title: Evaluation of a knotless barbed suture for canine total lung lobectomy: An ex vivo study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Power 2022 et al., on liposomal bupivacaine use, what was concluded about its use in off-label orthopedic procedures?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The study found no significant difference in complication rates between labeled and off-label orthopedic uses.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It appeared safe.
The study found no significant difference in complication rates between labeled and off-label orthopedic uses.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Overall complication rate was 19.7% (43/218), with most being mild (CSS 1).
  • Soft tissue procedures had higher complication rates (26%) than orthopedic procedures (11.6%) (P < 0.01).
  • No difference in complication rates between clean, clean-contaminated, and contaminated wounds (P = 0.55).
  • No difference in complication rates between labeled use (CCL surgery) and off-label orthopedic procedures (P = 0.21).
  • Majority of complications (63%) were mild, resolving without intervention or with topical therapy.
  • Severe complications requiring revision surgery were rare (2.3%) and occurred mainly in soft-tissue surgeries.
  • Most common complications included SSI (25.6%), dehiscence (16.3%), and seroma (14%).
  • Liposomal bupivacaine appears safe for use in broader orthopedic procedures beyond current labeling.

Power

Veterinary Surgery

4

2022

Incidence and severity of short‐term incisional complications after intraoperative local infiltration of liposomal bupivacaine in dogs

2022-4-VS-power-3

Article Title: Incidence and severity of short‐term incisional complications after intraoperative local infiltration of liposomal bupivacaine in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Lhuillery 2022 et al., on GDV stabilization timing, which preoperative intervention was key to enabling delayed surgery without compromising outcomes?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. These methods effectively decompressed the stomach and prevented redilatation during delay.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Trocarization and nasogastric tube placement.
These methods effectively decompressed the stomach and prevented redilatation during delay.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Survival rates did not differ between immediate (90 min) and delayed (≥5 h) surgical stabilization groups at discharge or 1-month post-op (approx. 80% survival in both).
  • Hyperlactatemia at 24 hours post-fluid therapy was significantly associated with in-hospital and 1-month mortality (P = .01 and P = .02).
  • Persistent tachycardia during hospitalization was linked to increased 1-month mortality (P = .015).
  • Partial gastrectomy was required in ~6–10% of cases, with high associated mortality.
  • Preoperative stabilization protocols (trocarization, nasogastric tube) allowed safe surgical delays up to 13.7 hours without impacting survival.
  • Degree of gastric torsion differed between groups; more 0° torsions in delayed cases, potentially due to decompression-induced derotation.
  • No difference in post-op complications such as arrhythmias, hypotension, or AKI between groups.
  • More intra-anesthetic deaths occurred in immediate surgery group, highlighting importance of adequate pre-op stabilization.

Lhuillery

Veterinary Surgery

5

2022

Outcomes of dogs undergoing surgery for gastric dilatation volvulus after rapid versus prolonged medical stabilization

2022-5-VS-lhuillery-3

Article Title: Outcomes of dogs undergoing surgery for gastric dilatation volvulus after rapid versus prolonged medical stabilization

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Ibrahim 2022 et al., on scrotal arterial supply, what was concluded regarding the use of scrotal flaps in neutered dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Neutered or cryptorchid dogs may have insufficient scrotal tissue for reliable flap design.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Scrotum may be too small or absent.
Neutered or cryptorchid dogs may have insufficient scrotal tissue for reliable flap design.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Dorsal scrotal arteries, branching from the ventral perineal arteries, are the dominant arterial supply to the scrotum in dogs.
  • The ventral scrotal arteries, arising from the external pudendal arteries, perfused only the cranial scrotal border and were inconsistently present or absent in some dogs.
  • A scrotal flap based on the dorsal scrotal arteries showed strong perfusion and may be a viable axial pattern flap.
  • Perfusion was consistent across fresh and frozen cadavers, showing no difference due to preservation method.
  • Poor flap survival (27%) occurred when based on cranial supply alone (i.e., ventral scrotal arteries), confirming importance of preserving caudal supply.
  • There are anastomoses between dorsal and ventral scrotal arteries, offering collateral flow but insufficient alone for complete perfusion.
  • Scrotal flaps based on the caudal pedicle may be applicable for reconstruction of proximal medial/lateral thigh wounds.
  • Proposed flap requires careful preservation of ventral perineal arteries, ideally designed 2.5–3 cm lateral to midline in large dogs.

Ibrahim

Veterinary Surgery

4

2022

Arterial supply to the scrotum: A cadaveric angiographic study

2022-4-VS-ibrahim-4

Article Title: Arterial supply to the scrotum: A cadaveric angiographic study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Conservative vs Surgical
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.