Quiz Question

In Miller 2024 et al., on intestinal obstruction and catheter technique in cats, what was the overall success rate of the red rubber catheter technique (RRCT) for removing linear foreign bodies?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The RRCT successfully removed LFBOs in 20 out of 24 cases, representing 83% success.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 83%.
The RRCT successfully removed LFBOs in 20 out of 24 cases, representing 83% success.

šŸ” Key Findings

  • Cats with linear (LFBO) and discrete (DFBO) small intestinal obstructions had similar survival (98.2% vs. 97%, p = 1.0).
  • Postoperative complications were not significantly different between LFBO and DFBO cases (p = .1386).
  • Intestinal dehiscence was rare (only 2 cats), both in DFBOs, with no statistical difference between groups.
  • Red rubber catheter technique (RRCT) successfully removed LFBOs in 83% (20/24) of attempts.
  • All failed RRCTs occurred in cats with perforations or tissue nonviability.
  • Cats with failed RRCTs had longer clinical signs pre-surgery (median 6.5 vs. 2.0 days).
  • Surgical time was longer in LFBO cats (median 77 min vs. 58 min, p = .0018).
  • Preoperative septic peritonitis was rare (4/169 cats), but occurred only in linear or mixed FBO cases.

Miller

Veterinary Surgery

7

2024

Linear and discrete foreign body small intestinal obstruction outcomes, complication risk factors, and single incision red rubber catheter technique success in cats

2024-7-VS-miller-1

Article Title: Linear and discrete foreign body small intestinal obstruction outcomes, complication risk factors, and single incision red rubber catheter technique success in cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

šŸ”„100% would expect this on the real thing

šŸ¤”Useful, but not core exam material

šŸ—‘ļøNot relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
ā€
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
ā€
Mind trying that again?

In Song 2024 et al., on CT vs cystoscopy for ectopic ureters in dogs, what did the authors conclude regarding CT's role in surgical planning?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. CT misclassified too many dogs to serve as the sole diagnostic tool; cystoscopy is recommended for confirmation.
Incorrect. The correct answer is CT should be confirmed with cystoscopy.
CT misclassified too many dogs to serve as the sole diagnostic tool; cystoscopy is recommended for confirmation.

šŸ” Key Findings

  • CT correctly identified ectopic ureters in 91% of dogs, but missed 50% of normal ureters, limiting its negative predictive value.
  • Sensitivity for intramural ectopic ureters was 65%, while specificity was 71%, indicating moderate diagnostic performance.
  • Sensitivity for extramural ectopic ureters was only 29%, despite a high specificity of 97%.
  • CT was inaccurate in predicting ureteral orifice location, with sensitivity ranging from 0% to 76% depending on the site.
  • 26% of dogs were misclassified for cystoscopic laser ablation (CLA) eligibility based on CT findings alone.
  • Overall CT accuracy for CLA candidacy was 74%, but a significant minority would have been inappropriately treated.
  • Multivariate analysis found no predictive factors (e.g., colon distension, body weight) for when CT would be incorrect.
  • Authors recommend confirmatory cystoscopy to verify CT findings prior to treatment planning.

Song

Veterinary Surgery

3

2024

Receiver operating characteristics of computed tomography (CT) compared to cystoscopy in diagnosis of canine ectopic ureters: Thirty-five cases

2024-3-VS-song-5

Article Title: Receiver operating characteristics of computed tomography (CT) compared to cystoscopy in diagnosis of canine ectopic ureters: Thirty-five cases

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

šŸ”„100% would expect this on the real thing

šŸ¤”Useful, but not core exam material

šŸ—‘ļøNot relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
ā€
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
ā€
Mind trying that again?

In Power 2022 et al., on liposomal bupivacaine use, what was concluded about its use in off-label orthopedic procedures?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The study found no significant difference in complication rates between labeled and off-label orthopedic uses.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It appeared safe.
The study found no significant difference in complication rates between labeled and off-label orthopedic uses.

šŸ” Key Findings

  • Overall complication rate was 19.7% (43/218), with most being mild (CSS 1).
  • Soft tissue procedures had higher complication rates (26%) than orthopedic procedures (11.6%) (P < 0.01).
  • No difference in complication rates between clean, clean-contaminated, and contaminated wounds (P = 0.55).
  • No difference in complication rates between labeled use (CCL surgery) and off-label orthopedic procedures (P = 0.21).
  • Majority of complications (63%) were mild, resolving without intervention or with topical therapy.
  • Severe complications requiring revision surgery were rare (2.3%) and occurred mainly in soft-tissue surgeries.
  • Most common complications included SSI (25.6%), dehiscence (16.3%), and seroma (14%).
  • Liposomal bupivacaine appears safe for use in broader orthopedic procedures beyond current labeling.

Power

Veterinary Surgery

4

2022

Incidence and severity of short‐term incisional complications after intraoperative local infiltration of liposomal bupivacaine in dogs

2022-4-VS-power-3

Article Title: Incidence and severity of short‐term incisional complications after intraoperative local infiltration of liposomal bupivacaine in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

šŸ”„100% would expect this on the real thing

šŸ¤”Useful, but not core exam material

šŸ—‘ļøNot relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
ā€
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
ā€
Mind trying that again?

In Lhuillery 2022 et al., on GDV stabilization timing, which preoperative intervention was key to enabling delayed surgery without compromising outcomes?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. These methods effectively decompressed the stomach and prevented redilatation during delay.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Trocarization and nasogastric tube placement.
These methods effectively decompressed the stomach and prevented redilatation during delay.

šŸ” Key Findings

  • Survival rates did not differ between immediate (90 min) and delayed (≄5 h) surgical stabilization groups at discharge or 1-month post-op (approx. 80% survival in both).
  • Hyperlactatemia at 24 hours post-fluid therapy was significantly associated with in-hospital and 1-month mortality (P = .01 and P = .02).
  • Persistent tachycardia during hospitalization was linked to increased 1-month mortality (P = .015).
  • Partial gastrectomy was required in ~6–10% of cases, with high associated mortality.
  • Preoperative stabilization protocols (trocarization, nasogastric tube) allowed safe surgical delays up to 13.7 hours without impacting survival.
  • Degree of gastric torsion differed between groups; more 0° torsions in delayed cases, potentially due to decompression-induced derotation.
  • No difference in post-op complications such as arrhythmias, hypotension, or AKI between groups.
  • More intra-anesthetic deaths occurred in immediate surgery group, highlighting importance of adequate pre-op stabilization.

Lhuillery

Veterinary Surgery

5

2022

Outcomes of dogs undergoing surgery for gastric dilatation volvulus after rapid versus prolonged medical stabilization

2022-5-VS-lhuillery-3

Article Title: Outcomes of dogs undergoing surgery for gastric dilatation volvulus after rapid versus prolonged medical stabilization

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

šŸ”„100% would expect this on the real thing

šŸ¤”Useful, but not core exam material

šŸ—‘ļøNot relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
ā€
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
ā€
Mind trying that again?

In Chik 2025 et al., on abdominal wall prestretching, what was the effect of prestretching on the need for increased insufflation or conversion to open surgery?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All 50 dogs completed laparoscopic procedures at 6 mmHg after PS, without conversion or pressure increase.
Incorrect. The correct answer is No dogs required increased insufflation or conversion to open.
All 50 dogs completed laparoscopic procedures at 6 mmHg after PS, without conversion or pressure increase.

šŸ” Key Findings

  • Prestretching (PS) at 10 mmHg for 3 minutes significantly increased working space at 6 mmHg IAP — IWL +4.4%, IWS +6.9%.
  • PS provided ā‰ˆ63% of the IWL and ā‰ˆ66% of the IWS gains achieved with sustained 10 mmHg IAP.
  • All laparoscopic procedures were completed at 6 mmHg after PS; no conversions or pressure increases were needed.
  • Working space benefits persisted throughout surgery — end-of-procedure measurements were unchanged from post-PS baseline.
  • Transverse expansion (RLAT/LLAT) was greater than sagittal (CRA/CAU), consistent with adult abdominal wall compliance.
  • No adverse anesthetic events occurred; mild complications (e.g., gas leakage) were easily managed.
  • Large breed dogs were overrepresented, but all dogs served as their own controls, normalizing size effects.
  • Prestretching is a simple, effective technique to maximize working space without increasing insufflation pressure.

Chik

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Prestretching increases working space at the same insufflation pressure in dogs undergoing laparoscopic procedures

2025-5-VS-chik-4

Article Title: Prestretching increases working space at the same insufflation pressure in dogs undergoing laparoscopic procedures

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

šŸ”„100% would expect this on the real thing

šŸ¤”Useful, but not core exam material

šŸ—‘ļøNot relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
ā€
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
ā€
Mind trying that again?

In GonzƔlez MontaƱo 2023 et al., on traumatic pulmonary pseudocysts (TPP), which management strategy was used in the majority of TPP cases?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Most (7/10) cases were managed conservatively with full recovery.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Conservative management with monitoring.
Most (7/10) cases were managed conservatively with full recovery.

šŸ” Key Findings

  • Traumatic pulmonary pseudocysts (TPP) were diagnosed in 11 patients (9 dogs, 2 cats) using CT after blunt trauma.
  • TPPs were identified on radiographs in 64% of cases that were CT-confirmed, highlighting the superior sensitivity of CT.
  • Most cases (7/10) were managed conservatively, with complete recovery and no TPP-related mortality.
  • Thoracic surgery (lung lobectomy) was performed in 3 dogs, due to persistent pneumothorax or large TPP with perceived risk of complications.
  • All pneumothorax cases were managed with thoracostomy tubes, and chest drains were used in 73% of cases.
  • Pneumothorax was present in 100% of patients, often bilateral, and pulmonary contusions were reported in 73%.
  • One cat was euthanized due to unrelated maxillofacial trauma; no deaths were attributed to TPP itself.
  • Long-term follow-up (median 768 days) revealed only 1 case with possible TPP-related pneumonia; others had no complications.

GonzƔlez MontaƱo

Veterinary Surgery

4

2023

Traumatic pulmonary pseudocysts in nine dogs and two cats

2023-4-VS-gonzalezmontano-3

Article Title: Traumatic pulmonary pseudocysts in nine dogs and two cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

šŸ”„100% would expect this on the real thing

šŸ¤”Useful, but not core exam material

šŸ—‘ļøNot relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
ā€
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
ā€
Mind trying that again?

In Buote 2023 et al., on laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (LVSG), on LVSG, what was the outcome of the live feline procedures at 3-month follow-up?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. No GI complications were observed, and both cats lost weight and returned to normal BCS over 3 months.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Both cats returned to pre-surgical BCS with no complications.
No GI complications were observed, and both cats lost weight and returned to normal BCS over 3 months.

šŸ” Key Findings

  • LVSG was successfully performed in 9/10 cadavers and both live cats, demonstrating procedural feasibility.
  • Mean stomach resected was 27.6% of total weight in cadavers, with no leaks in 8/8 tested or either live patient.
  • Mean surgical time: 110.4 min (cadavers) and 115 min (live cats); no intra- or postoperative complications observed.
  • Stenosis near the incisura occurred in 2 cadavers; attributed to staple placement too close to the lesser curvature.
  • 3D printed cannulas (3DPCs) improved ergonomics and were used in 6/10 cadavers and both live procedures.
  • Live cats lost 21–24% body weight over 3 months, with full return to pre-surgical BCS and no GI complications.
  • Orogastric tube and proper tensioning were critical in preventing gastric stenosis during staple placement.
  • No reinforcement or oversew was used on the staple line; TriStaple cartridges provided reliable closure.

Buote

Veterinary Surgery

7

2023

Laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy in felines: A cadaveric feasibility study and experimental case series in two cats

2023-7-VS-buote2-5

Article Title: Laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy in felines: A cadaveric feasibility study and experimental case series in two cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

šŸ”„100% would expect this on the real thing

šŸ¤”Useful, but not core exam material

šŸ—‘ļøNot relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
ā€
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
ā€
Mind trying that again?

In de Moya 2023 et al., on FGPP of femoral capital physeal/neck fractures, what was the most common preoperative fracture displacement classification?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 10 of 13 fractures were mildly displaced preoperatively, making them good candidates for FGPP.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Mild in majority of cases.
10 of 13 fractures were mildly displaced preoperatively, making them good candidates for FGPP.

šŸ” Key Findings

  • 11 dogs, 13 fractures (mostly Salter-Harris type I) were repaired with FGPP using Kirschner wires.
  • 10/13 fractures achieved satisfactory healing with good limb function at ~43 days median follow-up.
  • Major complications occurred in 5 dogs: intra-articular pin placement, implant migration (2), implant failure with nonunion, and malunion.
  • 2 dogs presenting >15 days post-injury with radiographic remodeling were poor candidates → higher risk of nonunion/malunion.
  • Preoperative displacement was mostly mild (10/13 fractures); these had better outcomes than chronic or severely displaced cases.
  • Median surgical time: 60 minutes (range 45–75), all performed percutaneously without conversion to open.
  • Elective pin removal was performed in 5 cases; migration occurred with both short and long cut wires.
  • Femoral neck resorption (ā€œapple-coringā€) was rare (2/10 healed cases) and thought to be less frequent than after ORIF due to reduced vascular disruption.

de Moya

Veterinary Surgery

7

2023

Closed reduction and fluoroscopic-guided percutaneous pinning of femoral capital physeal or neck fractures: Thirteen fractures in 11 dogs

2023-7-VS-demoya-3

Article Title: Closed reduction and fluoroscopic-guided percutaneous pinning of femoral capital physeal or neck fractures: Thirteen fractures in 11 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

šŸ”„100% would expect this on the real thing

šŸ¤”Useful, but not core exam material

šŸ—‘ļøNot relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
ā€
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
ā€
Mind trying that again?

In Winston 2023 et al., on LES-AS surgery outcomes, which preoperative treatment was discontinued postoperatively in all dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Oral sildenafil was stopped after surgery, supporting the idea that surgical treatment alone was effective in maintaining clinical improvement.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Sildenafil.
Oral sildenafil was stopped after surgery, supporting the idea that surgical treatment alone was effective in maintaining clinical improvement.

šŸ” Key Findings

  • Modified Heller myotomy with Dor fundoplication improved vomiting/regurgitation scores by 180%, QoL by 100%, and owner-perceived body weight by 63% (P < .05).
  • 6 of 9 dogs with postoperative VFSS showed objective improvement in gastric filling scores; others remained stable.
  • Oral sildenafil was discontinued postoperatively in all dogs, indicating surgical success comparable to medical management.
  • 12 of 13 dogs survived to discharge; one dog was euthanized due to aspiration pneumonia postoperatively.
  • 50% of dogs experienced gastrostomy tube complications, higher than reported in previous literature.
  • Most complications were gastrostomy-tube related, with some requiring surgical correction (e.g., tube migration, leakage).
  • Feeding strategies (Bailey chair, elevated bowls) and food consistency (gruel/liquid) remained essential postoperatively to control regurgitation.
  • 9 of 11 owners would opt for the surgery again; those who wouldn’t cited risk or lack of efficacy.

Winston

Veterinary Surgery

2

2023

Management and outcomes of 13 dogs treated with a modified Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication for lower esophageal sphincter achalasia-like syndrome

2023-2-VS-winston-4

Article Title: Management and outcomes of 13 dogs treated with a modified Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication for lower esophageal sphincter achalasia-like syndrome

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

šŸ”„100% would expect this on the real thing

šŸ¤”Useful, but not core exam material

šŸ—‘ļøNot relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
ā€
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
ā€
Mind trying that again?

In Marti 2024 et al., on surgical outcomes in feline sialoceles, what conclusion was drawn about marsupialization alone as a treatment?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. No recurrence was reported in cats treated with marsupialization alone, although long-term follow-up was limited.
Incorrect. The correct answer is May be a viable first-line approach.
No recurrence was reported in cats treated with marsupialization alone, although long-term follow-up was limited.

šŸ” Key Findings

  • Mandibular and sublingual glands were the most commonly involved salivary glands in feline sialoceles.
  • Left-sided lesions were more prevalent (71%) among affected cats.
  • Ranulae were present in over half (57%) of cases, highlighting the importance of thorough oral exams.
  • Surgical approaches included lateral, ventral, intraoral, or combinations thereof, with no recurrences reported.
  • Marsupialization alone (without gland removal) resolved clinical signs in 4/21 cats, with no short-term recurrence noted.
  • Complications occurred in 5/21 cats (24%), including incisional swelling and one case of feline oral pain syndrome.
  • One cat experienced iatrogenic injury from misidentification of the mandibular lymph node as the gland.
  • Median follow-up time beyond 30 days was 822 days (range: 90–1205), with no long-term recurrences or contralateral lesions observed.

Marti

Veterinary Surgery

7

2024

Outcomes of surgically treated sialoceles in 21 cats: A multi‐institutional retrospective study (2010–2021)

2024-7-VS-marti-5

Article Title: Outcomes of surgically treated sialoceles in 21 cats: A multi‐institutional retrospective study (2010–2021)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

šŸ”„100% would expect this on the real thing

šŸ¤”Useful, but not core exam material

šŸ—‘ļøNot relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
ā€
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
ā€
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Conservative vs Surgical
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

āŒ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

āœ… Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.