Your Custom Quiz

In Glenn 2024 et al., on algorithm performance, which algorithm had the highest sensitivity for identifying SSIs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Algorithm 1 had the highest sensitivity (87.1%), making it the best for screening or ruling out SSIs.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Algorithm 1.
Algorithm 1 had the highest sensitivity (87.1%), making it the best for screening or ruling out SSIs.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Population: 754 soft tissue or orthopedic procedures in dogs and cats
  • SSI Rate: 62/754 (8.2%)
  • Algorithms Evaluated:
    • Algorithm 1: Highest sensitivity (87.1%) → best for "rule-out"
    • Algorithm 2: Highest specificity (97.9%) → best for "rule-in"
    • Algorithm 3: Highest overall accuracy (95.5%)
  • Active vs. Passive Surveillance:
    • Active surveillance detected 12 additional SSIs (19.4%) missed by passive
    • Active surveillance increased detection rate by 24%
  • Timing: Most SSIs occurred within 30 days; late infections (after 90 days) were rare and implant-related
  • Conclusion: Client questionnaires are a valid and scalable tool for SSI detection; active surveillance improves outcomes

Glenn

Veterinary Surgery

1

2024

Evaluation of a client questionnaire at diagnosing surgical site infections in an active surveillance system

2024-1-VS-glenn-1

Article Title: Evaluation of a client questionnaire at diagnosing surgical site infections in an active surveillance system

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Latifi 2024 et al., on fascial mapping in the canine hindlimb, which major nerve was highlighted as at risk during dissection in the medial thigh region?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The obturator nerve was located superficial to adductors and could be damaged in fascial dissection.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Obturator nerve.
The obturator nerve was located superficial to adductors and could be damaged in fascial dissection.

🔍 Key Findings

  • This anatomical study mapped fascial planes of the canine hindlimb and pelvis to aid superficial tumor resection.
  • Type I fascia (discrete sheets) was suitable for deep margins in fascia lata, lateral crus, and gluteal regions.
  • Areas with poor or absent fascia included the ischiorectal fossa, femoral triangle, stifle extensor mechanism, and pes.
  • Type IV fascia associated with periosteum (e.g., patella, tibial tuberosity) required partial ostectomy for inclusion in surgical margins.
  • Nerves at risk during deep dissection included obturator, superficial peroneal, and tibial nerves, particularly in regions with weak fascia.
  • In males, bulbospongiosus muscle could act as a fascial plane but dissection was challenging and potentially hemorrhagic.
  • In females, constrictor vulvae/vestibulae muscles were tightly associated with mucosa, limiting clean resection options.
  • Distal hindlimb resections often lacked a usable fascial plane, suggesting that amputation or adjuvant therapy may be more appropriate.

Latifi

Veterinary Surgery

3

2024

Fascial plane mapping for superficial tumor resection in dogs: Part III – Hindlimb and pelvis

2024-3-VS-latifi-3

Article Title: Fascial plane mapping for superficial tumor resection in dogs: Part III – Hindlimb and pelvis

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Smith 2025 et al., on ergonomic injury risk, which laparoscopic instrument maneuver was most significantly associated with difficulty in WRMD-affected surgeons?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Surgeons with WRMDs reported significantly more difficulty using cup biopsy forceps (p < .001).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Rotating cup biopsy forceps.
Surgeons with WRMDs reported significantly more difficulty using cup biopsy forceps (p < .001).

🔍 Key Findings

140 laparoscopic surgeons surveyed; 37% reported at least one musculoskeletal disorder.
Women had significantly higher odds of reporting WRMD (OR = 2.59, p = .011).
Smaller glove size significantly associated with WRMD (p = .001), shoulder tendonitis (p = .01), and neck strain (p = .001).
Most common injuries: Neck strain (35%), shoulder tendonitis (31%).
WRMD was associated with greater difficulty using:

  • Rotating cup biopsy forceps (p < .001)
  • Vessel sealing device and endo stapler (especially in those with shoulder injuries)

No significant association with surgeon age, dominant hand, height, weight, or case volume.

Smith

Veterinary Surgery

2

2025

Variables associated with the prevalence of self-reported work-related musculoskeletal disorders in veterinary laparoscopic surgeons

2025-2-VS-smith-4

Article Title: Variables associated with the prevalence of self-reported work-related musculoskeletal disorders in veterinary laparoscopic surgeons

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Lederer 2025 et al., on MIPO vs ORPS, which outcome measure significantly differed between groups?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Time to clinical union was significantly longer in MIPO (85 days) vs ORPS (57 days), p = .010.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Time to clinical union.
Time to clinical union was significantly longer in MIPO (85 days) vs ORPS (57 days), p = .010.

🔍 Key Findings

Study size: 105 dogs (73 ORPS; 32 MIPO)

MIPO vs ORPS differences:

  • Surgical time: MIPO median 130 min vs ORPS 85 min (p < .001)
  • Explant rate: MIPO 25% vs ORPS 4.1% (p = .003)
  • Time to clinical union: MIPO 85 days vs ORPS 57 days (p = .010)
  • Frontal alignment deviation: MIPO 3.5° vs ORPS 2.0° (p = .047)
  • Comminution more frequent in MIPO (41% vs 16%; p = .012)

Significant predictors for MIPO use: More proximal fracture margin (p = .004), surgeon identity (p < .001)

No significant difference: Sagittal alignment, radial length, union rate, or complication rate by surgeon

Implant preference: Fixin plates used in 84% of MIPO; locking plates more common in ORPS

Lederer

Veterinary Surgery

4

2025

Retrospective comparison of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and open reduction and plate stabilization of antebrachial fractures in 105 dogs (2017–2022)

2025-4-VS-lederer-1

Article Title: Retrospective comparison of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and open reduction and plate stabilization of antebrachial fractures in 105 dogs (2017–2022)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Carwardine 2024 et al., on screw placement in HIF, which placement direction was associated with a significantly higher complication rate?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 62.2% of lateral-to-medial placements developed complications, compared to only 19.4% for medial-to-lateral (p = .001).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Lateral to medial.
62.2% of lateral-to-medial placements developed complications, compared to only 19.4% for medial-to-lateral (p = .001).

🔍 Key Findings

  • 73 elbows (52 dogs) underwent randomized medial or lateral transcondylar screw placement for HIF.
  • Lateral-to-medial placement resulted in a significantly higher rate of complications (62.2%) vs medial-to-lateral (19.4%) (p = .001).
  • Odds ratio for complications: 6.11 (95% CI: 2.13–17.52).
  • Most common complications: seromas (n = 13), surgical site infections (n = 16).
  • Implants with lower AMI/bodyweight were significantly associated with major complications (p = .037).
  • Only 4 procedures (5%) required revision surgery (major type I complications), with no difference by screw direction.
  • NNT = 2.3 for medial placement to prevent one complication.

Carwardine

Veterinary Surgery

2

2024

Medial versus lateral transcondylar screw placement for canine humeral intracondylar fissures: A randomized clinical trial

2024-2-VS-carwardine-1

Article Title: Medial versus lateral transcondylar screw placement for canine humeral intracondylar fissures: A randomized clinical trial

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Schneider 2025 et al., on axillary LN extirpation, which anatomical landmark was critical for reliably locating the axillary lymph node?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. This landmark served as a consistent reference point in all cases for locating the LN during lateral approach.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Costochondral junction of the first rib.
This landmark served as a consistent reference point in all cases for locating the LN during lateral approach.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Lateral approach to ALN extirpation was successful in 100% of cases (44 dogs, 48 ALNs) with consistent anatomical landmarks (costochondral junction of rib 1 and caudal scapular edge).
  • Median time for ALN removal was 16.6 minutes, highlighting a fast and efficient dissection method.
  • No intraoperative complications were recorded (e.g., hemorrhage or inability to find the lymph node).
  • Postoperative complications occurred in 18% of cases, including seromas (n=2), wound dehiscence (n=4), lameness (n=1), and discomfort (n=1).
  • Histopathology revealed 56% of ALNs had tumor-related pathology, including overt metastases, early metastasis (HN2), or premetastatic changes (HN1).
  • Normal-sized ALNs (<2 cm) still harbored metastases in 22% of cases, emphasizing the unreliability of size as a staging criterion.
  • False negatives in cytology occurred in 4 cases, underlining the limitations of cytologic evaluation for staging.
  • The technique was reproducible without specialized tools, suggesting wide applicability in general and referral practice.

Schneider

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Axillary lymph node removal for staging cancer; description of a lateral approach and application in 44 tumor-bearing dogs

2025-6-VS-schneider-1

Article Title: Axillary lymph node removal for staging cancer; description of a lateral approach and application in 44 tumor-bearing dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Huerta 2025 et al., on leakage in canine lung lobectomy, what was the odds ratio of leakage for PL-30 compared to TL-30 at 30 cm H₂O?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The odds of leakage for PL-30 vs TL-30 at 30 cm H₂O was 437 (p = .003).
Incorrect. The correct answer is 437.
The odds of leakage for PL-30 vs TL-30 at 30 cm H₂O was 437 (p = .003).

🔍 Key Findings

PL-30 group (partial, TA30-V3 wedge):

  • 100% leaked
  • Median leakage pressure: 10 cm H₂O
  • Most failures from periphery of staple line

PL-60 group (partial, TA60-3.5):

  • 100% leaked
  • Median leakage pressure: 18 cm H₂O
  • Better than PL-30 (p = .006)

TL-30 group (total, TA30-V3):

  • Only 1 of 11 leaked (at 22 cm H₂O)
  • All others resisted pressures >50–65 cm H₂O
  • Significantly higher leakage pressure than both PL groups (p < .001)

Odds ratios (leakage vs TL-30):

  • PL-30: OR 437 at both 20 and 30 cm H₂O (p = .003)
  • PL-60: OR 437 at 20 cm H₂O and 133 at 30 cm H₂O (p = .003)

Recommendation: Prefer TL-30 when possible. If partial needed, PL-60 superior to PL-30, but all partials leaked at physiologic pressures.

Huerta

Veterinary Surgery

4

2025

Leakage pressures of partial and total lung lobectomies performed with thoracoabdominal staplers in cadaveric dogs

2025-4-VS-huerta-5

Article Title: Leakage pressures of partial and total lung lobectomies performed with thoracoabdominal staplers in cadaveric dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Poggi 2025 et al., on laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cats, what was the most commonly reported indication for surgery?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Cholelithiasis was identified in 9 of the 22 cats, making it the most common indication for LC.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Cholelithiasis.
Cholelithiasis was identified in 9 of the 22 cats, making it the most common indication for LC.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was successfully performed in all 22 cats without conversion to open surgery.
  • Complication rate was low: 3 cats had postoperative complications (1 seroma, 1 vomiting, 1 EHBDO and death).
  • Median operating time was 41 minutes; median hospitalization was 3 days.
  • No cases required conversion to open laparotomy, even in cats as small as 2.5 kg.
  • Common devices used: Hemoclips or Hem-o-lok for cystic duct ligation; Ligasure, harmonic scalpel, or j-hook for dissection.
  • Most common indications: cholelithiasis (9/22) and cholecystitis (10/22), with one biliary mucocele and one adenoma.
  • Histopathology confirmed diagnosis in all cases; concurrent liver or intestinal biopsies were performed in some cats.
  • Postoperative AUS and bloodwork were routine and important for detecting early signs of EHBDO.

Poggi

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 22 cats (2018–2024)

2025-5-VS-poggi-1

Article Title: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 22 cats (2018–2024)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Chik 2025 et al., on abdominal wall prestretching, what type of complications were most commonly encountered during the study?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Gas leakage occurred in 34% of dogs, but was mild and easily resolved; no major anesthetic or surgical complications occurred.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Gas leakage at port sites.
Gas leakage occurred in 34% of dogs, but was mild and easily resolved; no major anesthetic or surgical complications occurred.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Prestretching (PS) at 10 mmHg for 3 minutes significantly increased working space at 6 mmHg IAP — IWL +4.4%, IWS +6.9%.
  • PS provided ≈63% of the IWL and ≈66% of the IWS gains achieved with sustained 10 mmHg IAP.
  • All laparoscopic procedures were completed at 6 mmHg after PS; no conversions or pressure increases were needed.
  • Working space benefits persisted throughout surgery — end-of-procedure measurements were unchanged from post-PS baseline.
  • Transverse expansion (RLAT/LLAT) was greater than sagittal (CRA/CAU), consistent with adult abdominal wall compliance.
  • No adverse anesthetic events occurred; mild complications (e.g., gas leakage) were easily managed.
  • Large breed dogs were overrepresented, but all dogs served as their own controls, normalizing size effects.
  • Prestretching is a simple, effective technique to maximize working space without increasing insufflation pressure.

Chik

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Prestretching increases working space at the same insufflation pressure in dogs undergoing laparoscopic procedures

2025-5-VS-chik-5

Article Title: Prestretching increases working space at the same insufflation pressure in dogs undergoing laparoscopic procedures

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Deveci 2025 et al., on 3D drill guides, what was the median time for screw guide placement and drilling?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The full guide-assisted screw placement process took a median of 7.2 minutes.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 7.2 minutes.
The full guide-assisted screw placement process took a median of 7.2 minutes.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Objective: Evaluate feasibility and accuracy of 3D-printed patient-specific drill guides for iliosacral screw placement in cadaver dogs.
  • N = 10 canine cadavers (20 hemipelves); screw placement done using fluoroscopic-assisted patient-specific guides (PSG).
  • Median cortical breach grade: 0 (IQR 0–1) for all screws.
    19/20 screws breached sacral canal wall (all ≤ grade 2), but no screws breached canal contents (grade 3).
  • Median trajectory deviation: 0.88° transverse, 0.72° dorsal.
  • Procedure time: Median 7.2 minutes for guide placement and drilling.
  • Conclusions: PSG-assisted screw placement was safe, accurate, and fast, offering clinical potential in pelvic trauma.

Deveci

Veterinary Surgery

2

2025

Evaluation of 3D‐printed patient‐specific guides to facilitate fluoroscopic‐assisted iliosacral screw placement in dogs

2025-2-VS-deveci-4

Article Title: Evaluation of 3D‐printed patient‐specific guides to facilitate fluoroscopic‐assisted iliosacral screw placement in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.