Your Custom Quiz

In Banks 2023 et al., on TECA-LBO in brachycephalic dogs, which diagnostic imaging findings were significantly more common in EBBs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Otitis interna (46.3% vs. 8.5%) and brainstem changes (17.5% vs. 3%) were significantly more common in EBBs.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Brainstem changes and otitis interna.
Otitis interna (46.3% vs. 8.5%) and brainstem changes (17.5% vs. 3%) were significantly more common in EBBs.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Extreme brachycephalic breeds (EBBs) presented more acutely and at younger ages, most often with neurological signs compared to other breeds.
  • Preoperative signs such as facial nerve paresis, vestibular syndrome, and Horner’s syndrome were significantly more common in EBBs.
  • EBBs showed more severe imaging findings, including higher rates of otitis interna (46.3% vs. 8.5%) and brainstem changes (17.5% vs. 3%).
  • Intraoperative complications were more frequent in EBBs (11.1% vs. 5.3%), but this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = .078).
  • Perioperative complication rates did not differ significantly between EBBs and other breeds (23.5% vs. 29.3%).
  • Surgical time was significantly longer in EBBs (median 115 vs. 95 minutes; p = .011).
  • MRI or combined CT/MRI were more frequently used in EBBs, likely due to the higher prevalence of neurological signs.
  • Despite anatomical challenges, complication rates in EBBs were comparable, supporting TECA-LBO safety in these breeds.

Banks

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Influence of extreme brachycephalic conformation on perioperative complications associated with total ear canal ablation and lateral bulla osteotomy in 242 dogs (2010–2020)

2023-5-VS-banks-4

Article Title: Influence of extreme brachycephalic conformation on perioperative complications associated with total ear canal ablation and lateral bulla osteotomy in 242 dogs (2010–2020)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Santos 2025 et al., on feline MPL morphology, which CT variable showed the greatest reduction in affected limbs compared to controls?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. FTD was significantly lower in MPL II and III cats compared to controls (p < 0.001).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Femoral trochlear depth (FTD).
FTD was significantly lower in MPL II and III cats compared to controls (p < 0.001).

🔍 Key Findings

Sample: 21 cats (10 control, 11 affected); 14 normal limbs vs 18 with MPL (MPL II: 7, MPL III: 11).

Significantly different CT measurements in MPL vs control:

  • aLDFA: MPL II > control and MPL III (p = 0.014)
  • FTW: MPL III > control (p = 0.021)
  • FTD: control > MPL II and III (p < 0.001)
  • TTA: MPL II and III had increased external tibial torsion vs control (p < 0.001)
  • fPL and PV: MPL III cats had longer and more voluminous patellae

No significant differences in AA, mMPTA, TTD, fPW, aPH.
Patella width exceeded trochlear width in all groups.
Authors suggest femoral and tibial angular correction may not be indicated in most feline MPL II–III cases.
Soft tissue techniques and trochleoplasty warrant further investigation.
CT method: Intraobserver ICC good in 64%, interobserver poor in 36% of metrics.

Santos

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

1

2025

Computed Tomographic Measurement Method for Morphoanatomical Comparison of Femur, Tibia, and Patella in Cats with and without Medial Patellar Luxation

2025-1-VC-santos-1

Article Title: Computed Tomographic Measurement Method for Morphoanatomical Comparison of Femur, Tibia, and Patella in Cats with and without Medial Patellar Luxation

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Silveira 2022 et al., on GTO in canine THR, what was the main surgical reason for performing a greater trochanter osteotomy (GTO) during total hip replacement?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. GTO improved broach alignment by preserving gluteal tendons and providing exposure to the femoral canal.
Incorrect. The correct answer is To access the trochanteric fossa and preserve gluteal musculature during broaching.
GTO improved broach alignment by preserving gluteal tendons and providing exposure to the femoral canal.

🔍 Key Findings

  • GTO enabled successful cementless THR in dogs with severe medialization of the greater trochanter or chronic craniodorsal hip luxation.
  • All 5 hips had acceptable long-term outcomes (median follow-up: 48 months) with full function and no persistent complications.
  • Only one major complication occurred—a luxation unrelated to the GTO and successfully corrected with cup revision.
  • GTO facilitated femoral canal access and gluteal preservation, reducing risk of iatrogenic injury during broaching.
  • All GTOs healed radiographically (4 by 6 weeks, 1 by 12 weeks), with no cases of nonunion or implant migration.
  • No complications related to GTO or PTBW fixation (pins + tension band) were observed in any dog.
  • Surgical planning included templating both THR and GTO to ensure ideal alignment and reduce fracture risk.
  • GTO may be especially valuable in luxoid hip dysplasia phenotypes or chronically fixed luxations.

Silveira

Veterinary Surgery

2

2022

Greater trochanter osteotomy as a component of cementless total hip replacement: Five cases in four dogs

2022-2-VS-silveira-1

Article Title: Greater trochanter osteotomy as a component of cementless total hip replacement: Five cases in four dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Scott 2025 et al., on acetabular cup revision, what was a notable complication observed postoperatively in some cases?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. One case had low-grade infection and osteolysis potentially linked to metal debris.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Osteolysis possibly associated with metallic debris.
One case had low-grade infection and osteolysis potentially linked to metal debris.

🔍 Key Findings

Population: 9 dogs underwent revision of osteointegrated acetabular cups after total hip arthroplasty (THA)

Revision Indications:

  • 7 luxations (5 ventral, 2 craniodorsal)
  • 1 femoral stem fracture
  • 1 aseptic stem loosening

Implants:

  • 8 BFX cups, 1 Helica; all revised to BFX
  • 7/9 required a larger cup than original

Cup removal: Required sectioning with a high-speed burr and modular osteotome; removal fragments extracted

Complications:

  • 1 recurrent luxation
  • 1 low-grade infection with possible metallic debris-associated osteolysis
  • 2 femoral fissures managed intraoperatively

Outcomes:

  • Good to excellent function in 6/6 dogs available at median 621 days
  • Minimal complications with success in re-osteointegration of new cup

Clinical takeaway: Revision of stable, ingrown cups is feasible and offers an alternative to pelvic osteotomies; typically requires upsizing

Scott

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Revision of osteointegrated acetabular cup prostheses in nine dogs

2025-3-VS-scott-4

Article Title: Revision of osteointegrated acetabular cup prostheses in nine dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Chan 2025 et al., on partial cuneiformectomy in BOAS dogs, what was the observed change in BOAS index after cuneiformectomy?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The PC group showed a significant median BOAS index reduction of 28.5% postoperatively.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Median reduction of 28.5%.
The PC group showed a significant median BOAS index reduction of 28.5% postoperatively.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Partial cuneiformectomy (PC) did not increase complication rates compared to multilevel surgery alone (overall complications: PC = 16.3%, non-PC = 19.4%; p = .758).
  • Major complication rates were not significantly different (PC = 11.6%, non-PC = 7.4%; p = .482).
  • Significant improvement in BOAS grade was observed in dogs undergoing PC (p < .0001).
  • BOAS index improved significantly in both groups, with greater median reduction in the PC group (28.5%) than non-PC (20.7%) (p < .0001).
  • Low body condition score (BCS <4) was significantly associated with higher complication rates (odds ratio = 0.452; p = .004).
  • Hospitalization duration did not differ between groups (median = 1 day; p = .743).
  • Mortality was low (3.5%) in the PC group despite more severe airway disease, suggesting the technique is safe even in advanced collapse.
  • The technique widened the rima glottidis without damaging surrounding structures, reducing airflow resistance and preserving laryngeal function.

Chan

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Complication rate and outcomes of laryngeal cuneiformectomy in dogs with advanced laryngeal collapse

2025-6-VS-chan-2

Article Title: Complication rate and outcomes of laryngeal cuneiformectomy in dogs with advanced laryngeal collapse

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Hawker 2025 et al., on locking head inserts, what was the impact of LHI on plate strain in a fracture-gap model?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. No statistically significant change in strain was observed with any LHI configuration.
Incorrect. The correct answer is No measurable effect.
No statistically significant change in strain was observed with any LHI configuration.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Adding Locking Head Inserts (LHI) to a 3.5-mm LCP had no effect on plate strain, stiffness, or deformation in an open fracture gap model.
  • Peak strain consistently occurred at the Combi-hole over the fracture gap, with values up to ~1837 µε.
  • No significant difference in strain was found across configurations with 0, 3, or 9 LHI (p = 0.847).
  • Construct stiffness and compressive displacement also remained unchanged regardless of LHI count (p = 0.311 and 0.069 respectively).
  • Study contradicted the hypothesis that LHI would reduce strain and increase stiffness under biologic loading.
  • Combi-hole design may limit the efficacy of LHI, as LHI only fill the locking portion, not the compression side where strain peaks.
  • Implant fatigue risk remains highest over unfilled screw holes, especially over fracture sites—confirming previous failure patterns.
  • Surgeons should consider alternative methods to reduce strain when facing high implant load scenarios.

Hawker

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

4

2025

The Effect of Locking Head Inserts on the Biomechanical Properties of a 3.5-mm Broad Locking Compression Plate When Used in an Open Fracture-Gap Model

2025-4-VCOT-hawker-1

Article Title: The Effect of Locking Head Inserts on the Biomechanical Properties of a 3.5-mm Broad Locking Compression Plate When Used in an Open Fracture-Gap Model

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Banks 2024 et al., on preoperative planning, what was the mean planned TPA in the in silico analysis?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Mean planned TPA based on virtual planning was 7.6°, which did not meet the target of 5° (p < .01).
Incorrect. The correct answer is 7.6°.
Mean planned TPA based on virtual planning was 7.6°, which did not meet the target of 5° (p < .01).

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Study Design: Retrospective study of 100 radiographs using in silico and clinical data
  • Mean preoperative TPA: 28.6°, higher in small dogs than large (p = .02)
  • Mean planned TPA (in silico): 7.6°, not achieving 5° target (p < .01)
  • Median postoperative TPA: 5.5° overall; higher in small dogs (7°) vs large (4.5°) (p = .06)
  • Postoperative ostectomy position: More distal than recommended; average = 8.6 mm
  • Increased distalizationgreater under-correction of TPA (p = .01)
  • Most accurate correction occurred when ostectomy was ≤7.5 mm from patellar tendon
  • Wedge angle categories (TPA-Pre minus 5–2°) were used based on pre-op TPA

Banks

Veterinary Surgery

1

2024

A mismatch of planning and achieved tibial plateau angle in cranial closing wedge surgery: An in silico and clinical evaluation of 100 cases

2024-1-VS-banks-2

Article Title: A mismatch of planning and achieved tibial plateau angle in cranial closing wedge surgery: An in silico and clinical evaluation of 100 cases

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Enright 2022 et al., on adrenalectomy outcomes, what was the median survival time of dogs that survived to discharge?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Dogs surviving to discharge had a median survival time of 1169 days (3.2 years).
Incorrect. The correct answer is 1169 days.
Dogs surviving to discharge had a median survival time of 1169 days (3.2 years).

🔍 Key Findings

  • 83% of dogs survived to discharge after adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma.
  • Median survival time post-discharge was 1169 days (3.2 years).
  • Preoperative alpha-blocker therapy (e.g., phenoxybenzamine) was not associated with improved survival.
  • Dogs receiving alpha-blockers had higher intraoperative systolic BP, with median values 170 mmHg vs. 142 mmHg in non-treated dogs (P = .01).
  • Intraoperative arrhythmias occurred in 30% of cases, with no difference between dogs receiving alpha-blockers and those not.
  • Histologic vascular invasion occurred in ~70% of tumors.
  • Tumor recurrence was suspected in 3 dogs, and metastasis in 8 dogs, though not histologically confirmed in most cases.
  • Postoperative complications included refractory hypotension, acute kidney injury, and hypertension persisting >48 hours in 10 dogs.

Enright

Veterinary Surgery

3

2022

Short‐ and long‐term survival after adrenalectomy in 53 dogs with pheochromocytomas with or without alpha‐blocker therapy

2022-3-VS-enright-4

Article Title: Short‐ and long‐term survival after adrenalectomy in 53 dogs with pheochromocytomas with or without alpha‐blocker therapy

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Miller 2024 et al., on leak testing in cooled feline intestine, what explanation was given for higher leak pressures compared to canine data?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Infusion at 100 mL/h allowed slower distension and higher pressures than previous canine studies.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Lower infusion rate allowed higher pressure before leak.
Infusion at 100 mL/h allowed slower distension and higher pressures than previous canine studies.

🔍 Key Findings

  • No difference in initial leak pressure (ILP) or maximum intraluminal pressure (MIP) between cooled (17–29 h) and fresh enterotomy constructs.
  • Wall thickness of duodenum and jejunum did not differ between fresh and cooled samples.
  • Leak locations (suture holes vs clamp sites) were similar between groups; not statistically different.
  • Volume of infusion did not influence ILP or MIP outcomes.
  • Mean ILP values: Control = 600 mmHg (maxed), Fresh = 200 mmHg, Cooled = 131 mmHg; CE vs FE difference was not significant.
  • Intraluminal diameter was largest in the ileum, followed by jejunum and duodenum.
  • Cadaveric intestine cooled ≤29h may be reliably used in ex vivo feline leak pressure studies.
  • First report of gross small intestinal lengths by region in cats—useful for resection planning.

Miller

Veterinary Surgery

5

2024

Cooled feline intestine and fresh intestine did not differ in enterotomy leak pressure testing or in gross wall thickness measurement

2024-5-VS-miller-4

Article Title: Cooled feline intestine and fresh intestine did not differ in enterotomy leak pressure testing or in gross wall thickness measurement

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Rocheleau 2023 et al., on shoulder stabilization, why were anchor insertion angles considered suboptimal in the study?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Suboptimal anchor insertion angles (<30°) could compromise mechanical pullout strength, per CT assessment.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Angles were <30°, reducing pullout strength.
Suboptimal anchor insertion angles (<30°) could compromise mechanical pullout strength, per CT assessment.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Arthroscopically assisted stabilization with an IAD was feasible in cadaveric canine shoulders using both bone anchor and suture-toggle techniques.
  • Suture-toggle repair was successfully performed in all specimens, while bone anchors could not be deployed in 3/10 shoulders, indicating lower feasibility.
  • Median surgical time was shorter for the suture-toggle group (25.5 min) compared to the anchor group (37.3 min).
  • Postoperative abduction angles returned to baseline in the anchor group, while the suture-toggle group had slightly reduced angles, suggesting possible overtightening.
  • Violation of the articular surface occurred in 2 anchor specimens and 1 suture-toggle specimen, but none were considered likely to be clinically significant.
  • Overall targeting accuracy using the IAD was 88%, supporting its utility in guiding tunnel/anchor placement.
  • CT measurements showed acceptable bone stock and insertion angles, but anchor insertion angles were lower than optimal for mechanical pullout strength.
  • Suture-toggle technique was considered simpler and more consistent, with fewer complications and faster execution than anchor placement.

Rocheleau

Veterinary Surgery

4

2023

Ex vivo evaluation of arthroscopically assisted shoulder stabilization in dogs using an intra-articular aiming device

2023-4-VS-rocheleau-5

Article Title: Ex vivo evaluation of arthroscopically assisted shoulder stabilization in dogs using an intra-articular aiming device

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.