Your Custom Quiz

In Quitzan 2022 et al., on staple line configuration, which FEESA variation did *not* significantly increase ILP compared to 2V/2T?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 3V/2T did not show a statistically significant increase in ILP vs. 2V/2T, unlike 2V/3T and 3V/3T.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 3V/2T.
3V/2T did not show a statistically significant increase in ILP vs. 2V/2T, unlike 2V/3T and 3V/3T.

🔍 Key Findings

  • All FEESA configurations leaked at lower pressures than intact segments, confirming reduced integrity vs. native tissue.
  • FEESA with 3-row transverse staples (3V/3T or 2V/3T) had significantly higher leak pressures than 2-row configurations.
  • 3V/3T configuration had the highest ILP (69.88 ± 21.23 mmHg) among all groups, significantly greater than 2V/2T and 3V/2T (P < .001).
  • Leakage consistently occurred at the transverse staple line (not vertical), regardless of configuration.
  • No significant difference in maximum intraluminal pressure (MIP) between FEESA groups.
  • All FEESA constructs withstood intraluminal pressures >25 mmHg, exceeding normal physiological jejunal pressure in dogs.
  • No leaks occurred from the vertical staple line, highlighting it as a more robust closure site.
  • Third staple row in transverse line may be a viable alternative to suture oversew, pending further clinical evaluation.

Quitzan

Veterinary Surgery

5

2022

Influence of staple line number and configuration on the leakage of small intestinal functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis: An ex vivo study

2022-5-VS-quitzan-4

Article Title: Influence of staple line number and configuration on the leakage of small intestinal functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis: An ex vivo study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Galliano 2022 et al., on vascular access ports, what was the most frequent minor complication observed?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Temporary loss of patency occurred in 5 cases and was the most common minor complication.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Temporary loss of catheter patency.
Temporary loss of patency occurred in 5 cases and was the most common minor complication.

🔍 Key Findings

  • SVAPs placed in axillary (aSVAP) or femoral/external iliac veins (fSVAP) during limb amputation remained functional in 92.3% and 100% of cases, respectively.
  • Complication rates were lower in aSVAP (23.1%) and fSVAP (0%) compared to jSVAP (47.4%), although not statistically significant (P = .12).
  • No catastrophic complications occurred with aSVAP or fSVAP; 2 deaths occurred with jSVAP due to port-related issues.
  • Infection-related port removal was needed in 1 aSVAP (7.7%) and 2 jSVAPs (10.5%) — no removals were required in fSVAPs.
  • Tip placement of the catheter (e.g., right atrium vs. vena cava) did not correlate with complications (P = .66).
  • Shorter surgical time likely with aSVAP/fSVAP as they use the same surgical field as the limb amputation.
  • Survival time median was similar across groups (jSVAP: 177 days, aSVAP: 125 days, fSVAP: 122 days).
  • SVAP implantation during limb amputation offers a practical and safe alternative to separate jugular placement.

Galliano

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Subcutaneous vascular access port implantation in the axillary or femoral/external iliac vein at the time of full limb amputation in dogs

2022-7-VS-galliano-3

Article Title: Subcutaneous vascular access port implantation in the axillary or femoral/external iliac vein at the time of full limb amputation in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Schneider 2025 et al., on axillary LN extirpation, which anatomical landmark was critical for reliably locating the axillary lymph node?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. This landmark served as a consistent reference point in all cases for locating the LN during lateral approach.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Costochondral junction of the first rib.
This landmark served as a consistent reference point in all cases for locating the LN during lateral approach.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Lateral approach to ALN extirpation was successful in 100% of cases (44 dogs, 48 ALNs) with consistent anatomical landmarks (costochondral junction of rib 1 and caudal scapular edge).
  • Median time for ALN removal was 16.6 minutes, highlighting a fast and efficient dissection method.
  • No intraoperative complications were recorded (e.g., hemorrhage or inability to find the lymph node).
  • Postoperative complications occurred in 18% of cases, including seromas (n=2), wound dehiscence (n=4), lameness (n=1), and discomfort (n=1).
  • Histopathology revealed 56% of ALNs had tumor-related pathology, including overt metastases, early metastasis (HN2), or premetastatic changes (HN1).
  • Normal-sized ALNs (<2 cm) still harbored metastases in 22% of cases, emphasizing the unreliability of size as a staging criterion.
  • False negatives in cytology occurred in 4 cases, underlining the limitations of cytologic evaluation for staging.
  • The technique was reproducible without specialized tools, suggesting wide applicability in general and referral practice.

Schneider

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Axillary lymph node removal for staging cancer; description of a lateral approach and application in 44 tumor-bearing dogs

2025-6-VS-schneider-1

Article Title: Axillary lymph node removal for staging cancer; description of a lateral approach and application in 44 tumor-bearing dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Clough 2022 et al., on CBLO-TTT construct testing, what is the clinical implication of combining CBLO and TTT?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The study supports the feasibility of combined CBLO-TTT to address both stifle instability and patellar luxation.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It offers a viable option for concurrent MPL and CCL treatment..
The study supports the feasibility of combined CBLO-TTT to address both stifle instability and patellar luxation.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Combined CBLO-TTT did not reduce load to failure compared to CBLO or TTT alone (P = .81 and P = .12, respectively).
  • CBLO-TTT maintains construct strength without significant compromise compared to individual procedures.
  • Most common failure mode in CBLO-TTT was displacement of the tibial crest segment with k-wire pullout and tension band untwisting.
  • No fulcrum effect was seen in CBLO-TTT, unlike TPLO-TTT combinations, likely due to preservation of buttress effect.
  • Patellar ligament avulsion occurred in both CBLO and CBLO-TTT, but not as a clinical concern — possibly artifact from cadaver model.
  • Load-to-failure testing was static and unidirectional, not accounting for cyclic fatigue or in vivo healing.
  • Plate size and saw blade variation were based on clinical realism, introducing potential variability but not affecting outcomes.
  • Study suggests feasibility of simultaneous surgical correction of CCL rupture and MPL using CBLO-TTT in dogs.

Clough

Veterinary Surgery

3

2022

Combined center of rotation of angulation‐based leveling osteotomy and tibial tuberosity transposition: An ex vivo mechanical study

2022-3-VS-clough-5

Article Title: Combined center of rotation of angulation‐based leveling osteotomy and tibial tuberosity transposition: An ex vivo mechanical study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Eskelinen 2025 et al., on Plate–Pin fixation for MPL, what suggestion was made to reduce future complications?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Authors suggest using pin only for alignment, then removing before final fixation.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Use of temporary pin fixation.
Authors suggest using pin only for alignment, then removing before final fixation.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Plate–Pin TTT fixation resolved MPL in 64/65 stifles with low recurrence (1.5%) and good lameness outcomes postoperatively.
  • Complication rate was 21.5% (14/65 stifles), mostly minor (57%); major issues included pin migration, fracture, or capsular failure.
  • Pin-related issues accounted for 8 of 20 total complications, highlighting implant refinement is needed.
  • No avulsions, TT fixation failures, or luxation recurrence occurred in cases where surgical technique was followed precisely.
  • Surgical deviations increased complication risk 11.3× (p < 0.05), suggesting adherence to protocol is critical.
  • Single-session bilateral MPL surgery had comparable complication rate (3/20) to unilateral surgery (11/45).
  • Screw breakage occurred in 3 cases, suggesting at least 3 screws may be needed for secure TT fixation.
  • Authors suggest temporary pin fixation and later removal may reduce complications, though prospective studies are needed.

Eskelinen

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

4

2025

Outcome and Complications Following Medial Patellar Luxation Corrective Surgery with Tibial Tuberosity Transposition Using a Locking Plate and a Pin Fixation: 45 Unilateral and 20 Single-Session Bilateral Procedures

2025-4-VCOT-eskelinen-4

Article Title: Outcome and Complications Following Medial Patellar Luxation Corrective Surgery with Tibial Tuberosity Transposition Using a Locking Plate and a Pin Fixation: 45 Unilateral and 20 Single-Session Bilateral Procedures

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Bondonny 2024 et al., which complication was NOT reported following the surgical technique?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. No implant migration or removal occurred in any of the 33 fractures:contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Implant migration.
No implant migration or removal occurred in any of the 33 fractures:contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Retrospective study of 33 fractures in 31 cats with Salter–Harris I or II distal femoral fractures
  • Used 1 intramedullary Steinmann pin + 1 laterally placed antirotational pin
  • 96.9% achieved full functional outcome at mid-term follow-up
  • No implant migration or removal required
  • Minor complications: 2 seromas; Major: 3 (patellar luxation [2], osteomyelitis [1])
  • Growth plate remained open in 27.3% of cases at 6–8 weeks post-op

Bondonny

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

2

2024

Use of a Modified Intramedullary Pinning Technique for Distal Femoral Physeal Salter–Harris Type I and II Fracture Management

2024-2-VCOT-bondonny-2

Article Title: Use of a Modified Intramedullary Pinning Technique for Distal Femoral Physeal Salter–Harris Type I and II Fracture Management

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Song 2024 et al., on CT vs cystoscopy for ectopic ureters in dogs, what proportion of dogs were misclassified for CLA candidacy based on CT findings alone?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 26% of cases were misclassified for CLA based on CT, underlining its limitations for treatment planning.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 26%.
26% of cases were misclassified for CLA based on CT, underlining its limitations for treatment planning.

🔍 Key Findings

  • CT correctly identified ectopic ureters in 91% of dogs, but missed 50% of normal ureters, limiting its negative predictive value.
  • Sensitivity for intramural ectopic ureters was 65%, while specificity was 71%, indicating moderate diagnostic performance.
  • Sensitivity for extramural ectopic ureters was only 29%, despite a high specificity of 97%.
  • CT was inaccurate in predicting ureteral orifice location, with sensitivity ranging from 0% to 76% depending on the site.
  • 26% of dogs were misclassified for cystoscopic laser ablation (CLA) eligibility based on CT findings alone.
  • Overall CT accuracy for CLA candidacy was 74%, but a significant minority would have been inappropriately treated.
  • Multivariate analysis found no predictive factors (e.g., colon distension, body weight) for when CT would be incorrect.
  • Authors recommend confirmatory cystoscopy to verify CT findings prior to treatment planning.

Song

Veterinary Surgery

3

2024

Receiver operating characteristics of computed tomography (CT) compared to cystoscopy in diagnosis of canine ectopic ureters: Thirty-five cases

2024-3-VS-song-4

Article Title: Receiver operating characteristics of computed tomography (CT) compared to cystoscopy in diagnosis of canine ectopic ureters: Thirty-five cases

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Caiazzo 2025 et al., on suture material comparison, what was the study’s conclusion regarding PDS versus Monocryl use?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The study found no statistically significant difference in dehiscence rates between groups using PDS or Monocryl for skin closure.
Incorrect. The correct answer is PDS and Monocryl had equivalent outcomes.
The study found no statistically significant difference in dehiscence rates between groups using PDS or Monocryl for skin closure.

🔍 Key Findings

  • No significant difference in non-infected incisional dehiscence rates among groups using PDS vs. Monocryl for subcutaneous and skin closure.
  • Overall dehiscence rate: 9.48% (22/232 dogs).
  • Postoperative antibiotic use and signs of inflammation were significantly associated with dehiscence (p = .023 and p < .001, respectively).
  • Dogs not receiving postoperative antibiotics had a higher dehiscence rate (14.74%) than those that did (5.84%).
  • Most dehiscence cases were superficial (85.7%), and the average length of dehiscence was 1.71 cm.
  • No statistically significant impact of weight, BCS, incision length, procedure type, surgeon experience, closure direction, or barrier use on dehiscence rate.

Caiazzo

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Impact of suture materials polydioxanone and poliglecaprone 25 on non-infected clean orthopedic stifle procedure incisional dehiscence rates

2025-3-VS-caiazzo-3

Article Title: Impact of suture materials polydioxanone and poliglecaprone 25 on non-infected clean orthopedic stifle procedure incisional dehiscence rates

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Dobberstein 2024 et al., on liver biopsy forceps, what was the mean number of hepatic lobules retrieved with 5 mm forceps?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The mean number of lobules with 5 mm forceps was 12.4, significantly higher than 4.9 from 3 mm forceps.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 12.4.
The mean number of lobules with 5 mm forceps was 12.4, significantly higher than 4.9 from 3 mm forceps.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Subjects: 12 healthy colony cats, 68 total liver samples collected via laparoscopy
  • Biopsy instruments: 3 mm vs 5 mm Storz Blakesley cup forceps
  • Techniques: Twist (T), Pull (P), Twist + Pull (TP)
  • Results:
    • 5 mm forceps yielded significantly more hepatic lobules (mean 12.4 vs 4.9), portal triads (29.6 vs 19.0), weight, and histologic area (p < .01)
    • T and P techniques yielded more portal triads and lobules than TP (p = .003 and p = .015)
    • TP technique resulted in greater tissue crush vs T (p = .01)
    • Good diagnostic agreement between 3 mm and 5 mm samples only with TP (κ = 0.75)
    • All samples were of sufficient diagnostic quality, despite size or technique
  • Clinical implication: Both 3 mm and 5 mm forceps are viable; further studies are needed to confirm diagnostic accuracy of 3 mm samples

Dobberstein

Veterinary Surgery

2

2024

Comparison of the diagnostic yield of 3 and 5 mm laparoscopic liver biopsy forceps in cats

2024-2-VS-dobberstein-4

Article Title: Comparison of the diagnostic yield of 3 and 5 mm laparoscopic liver biopsy forceps in cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Espinel Rupérez 2023 et al., on feline hip stabilization, how many surgical technique deviations were reported across the 14 joints?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Thirteen total deviations were reported in 7 joints, including major and minor deviations.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 13.
Thirteen total deviations were reported in 7 joints, including major and minor deviations.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Arthroscopic-assisted hip toggle stabilization (AA-HTS) was successfully completed in all 14 feline cadaver joints.
  • Femoral and acetabular tunnel creation was feasible in all cases, though femoral tunnel placement had a higher rate of deviations.
  • Intraoperative complications occurred in 5/14 joints, mostly related to femoral tunnel creation and toggle lodging.
  • Minor articular cartilage injury (<10% total cartilage area) occurred in 10/14 joints, but no injury to neurovascular or intrapelvic structures.
  • Thirteen surgical technique deviations (8 major, 5 minor) were identified in 7 joints, all involving the femoral tunnel.
  • Toggle passage through the femoral tunnel was the most challenging step, being mildly difficult in 6 joints.
  • Postoperative CT and gross dissection confirmed all toggles and buttons were in correct position, without damage to major surrounding structures.
  • No deviations, complications, or cartilage injuries occurred in the last 4 joints, suggesting a learning curve effect.

Espinel Rupérez

Veterinary Surgery

6

2023

Arthroscopic-assisted hip toggle stabilization in cats: An ex vivo feasibility study

2023-6-VS-espinel-3

Article Title: Arthroscopic-assisted hip toggle stabilization in cats: An ex vivo feasibility study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.