Your Custom Quiz

In Miller 2024 et al., on SOP-LC mechanical testing, what torque value may help reduce clamp slippage during use?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The study suggests that increasing torque from 2.5 to 3.0 Nm may improve clamp stability and reduce slippage.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 3.0 Nm.
The study suggests that increasing torque from 2.5 to 3.0 Nm may improve clamp stability and reduce slippage.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • No significant difference in mechanical properties between contoured vs non-contoured SOP-LC rods
  • Clamp configuration significantly influenced mechanical performance:
    • Single-side clamps → ↑ yield load, ↑ displacement, ↑ bending strength (p < 0.05)
    • Alternating-side clamps → ↑ initial torsional stiffness (p = 0.029)
  • Clamp slippage was evident only in torsional tests; screw loosening may be torque-dependent
  • Mild screw bending and construct offset suggest subtle instability
  • Recommends clamp configuration choice based on loading scenario
  • Suggests 3.0 Nm torque may be more effective than 2.5 Nm to prevent clamp slippage

Miller

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

4

2024

Mechanical Testing of Sliding on Pivot-Locking Clamp (SOP-LC) Fracture Repair System in Four-Point Bending and Torsion

2024-4-VCOT-miller-5

Article Title: Mechanical Testing of Sliding on Pivot-Locking Clamp (SOP-LC) Fracture Repair System in Four-Point Bending and Torsion

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Zann 2023 et al., on proximal humeral OC, what was the median LOAD score reported by owners during follow-up?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Median aggregate LOAD score was 6, indicating mild disability.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 6.
Median aggregate LOAD score was 6, indicating mild disability.

🔍 Key Findings

  • All dogs developed progressive osteoarthritis (OA) after surgical debridement of proximal humeral OC.
  • Ipsilateral muscle atrophy and reduced shoulder range of motion were common, particularly in unilaterally affected dogs.
  • Arthroscopically, lesions showed incomplete cartilage infilling even years after surgery, averaging only ~37% infilling.
  • Synovitis was present in all joints, with moderate-to-severe hypertrophy and vascularity scores.
  • CT identified OC lesions as deeper and wider than radiography, and all affected joints had more advanced OA than contralateral limbs (P = .001 radiograph, P = .005 CT).
  • Kinetic gait analysis showed no significant differences in peak vertical force or impulse, but a subtle 4.4% asymmetric load reduction on the operated limb.
  • Median LOAD score was 6, indicating mild owner-perceived disability despite measurable clinical and imaging abnormalities.
  • Cartilage infilling was incomplete in all cases, with no lesion exceeding 60% restoration, raising questions about the healing potential of debridement alone.

Zann

Veterinary Surgery

6

2023

Long-term outcome of dogs treated by surgical debridement of proximal humeral osteochondrosis

2023-6-VS-zann-4-aada3

Article Title: Long-term outcome of dogs treated by surgical debridement of proximal humeral osteochondrosis

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Sisk 2024 et al., which IMN design improvement addresses rotational slack?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Angle-stable designs reduce mediolateral “slack” and enhance torsional stability:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Angle-stable interlocking threads.
Angle-stable designs reduce mediolateral “slack” and enhance torsional stability:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • IMN provides relative stability, resists bending/torsion due to central axis alignment
  • Larger diameter nails = exponentially greater stiffness (∝ D⁴)
  • Trade-off: Larger interlocking holes weaken fatigue strength of the nail
  • Reaming increases contact/stability but has pros/cons:
    • Improves outcomes in closed fractures
    • May reduce endosteal blood flow in thin-walled bones (e.g., cats)
  • Design advances:
    • Angle-stable IMN reduce rotational slack
    • Expandable nails simplify insertion but may compromise removal or compressive load resistance
    • Precontoured nails match bone curvature but lack consistent clinical superiority
  • Material debates continue (e.g., titanium vs. stainless steel vs. magnesium)

Sisk

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

6

2024

Biomechanical Principles of Intramedullary Nails in Veterinary and Human Medicine

2024-6-VCOT-sisk-4

Article Title: Biomechanical Principles of Intramedullary Nails in Veterinary and Human Medicine

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Chitty 2025 et al., on tibial fracture fixation in immature dogs, what was the major complication rate observed in the external fixation group?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Major complications occurred in 52.8% of dogs treated with external skeletal fixation.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 52.8%.
Major complications occurred in 52.8% of dogs treated with external skeletal fixation.

🔍 Key Findings

Internal fixation (IF) group (n=59):

  • Complication rate: 20.3%
  • Major complications: 15.3%
  • Longer time to discharge if complications occurred (median: 12.5 weeks)

External skeletal fixation (ESF) group (n=36):

  • Complication rate: 55.6% (p < .001 vs IF)
  • Major complications: 52.8%
  • Most common issue: pin tract morbidity

Multivariable analysis:

  • Use of IF significantly reduced odds of complications (OR 0.23, p = .004)
  • Use of post-op antibiotics associated with increased odds of complications (OR 3.53, p = .028)

Fixation choice influenced by age:

  • Older puppies more likely to receive IF (OR 1.25 per week increase in age, p < .001)

Breed & fracture distribution:

  • Common breeds: Labrador, Border Collie, Whippet
  • Common fracture sites: middle and proximal third of tibia

Chitty

Veterinary Surgery

4

2025

Short‐term complications of internal versus external fixation of closed diaphyseal tibial fractures in 95 skeletally immature dogs

2025-4-VS-chitty-1

Article Title: Short‐term complications of internal versus external fixation of closed diaphyseal tibial fractures in 95 skeletally immature dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In İnal 2025 et al., on supracutaneous locking plates, what was one key advantage of SLPs over external skeletal fixation in bilateral fractures?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The SLP design prevented interference in bilateral applications, unlike bulky external fixators.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Reduced bulk, no entanglement.
The SLP design prevented interference in bilateral applications, unlike bulky external fixators.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Supracutaneous locking plates (SLPs) were successfully used to manage 33 diaphyseal fractures (radial–ulnar and tibial) in 30 cats and dogs.
  • Median fracture healing time was 50.5 days (range: 27–88), with most patients regaining limb use within days postoperatively.
  • CT-based metrics (callus area, HU, and 3D bone volume) increased significantly during healing (p < 0.05), validating CT as a quantitative tool for assessing healing.
  • Complications were minimal: minor in 15/33 (e.g., screw tract discharge, edema), and major in 3/33 (e.g., implant failure, delayed union, nonunion).
  • Minimally invasive osteosynthesis required longer surgery times than closed reduction (p < 0.05), but both techniques were viable.
  • SLPs enabled successful bilateral fracture management without inter-plate interference due to their compact design.
  • Screw orientation challenges were noted in cats, especially with cranial application to the radius due to narrow anatomy.
  • Polyaxial locking screws were used safely and did not dislodge, allowing for angular insertion (≤10°) to avoid neurovascular structures.

İnal

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

5

2025

Minimally Invasive Radial–Ulnar and Tibial Fracture Management with Supracutaneous Locking Plates in Dogs and Cats

2025-5-VCOT-inal-5

Article Title: Minimally Invasive Radial–Ulnar and Tibial Fracture Management with Supracutaneous Locking Plates in Dogs and Cats

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Wang 2025 et al., on TPLO osteotomy alignment, what was a potential **advantage of using intraoperative fluoroscopy** in challenging cases?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Intraoperative fluoroscopy allowed dynamic limb repositioning and real-time targeting of the intercondylar eminence to improve alignment.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Provides real-time adjustment for precise osteotomy alignment.
Intraoperative fluoroscopy allowed dynamic limb repositioning and real-time targeting of the intercondylar eminence to improve alignment.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Fluoroscopy-guided osteotomy placement achieved a median postoperative TPA of (range: 0–4.5°), showing excellent accuracy.
  • The D1 measurement (from patellar ligament insertion to osteotomy exit) was more reproducible and accurate intraoperatively than D2.
  • Median R1 value (D1-based) matched the intended 21 mm radius with only 0.5 mm deviation, while R2 deviated by 2.5 mm.
  • Real-time fluoroscopy allowed dynamic limb positioning and reduced osteotomy placement variability.
  • Intraoperative fluoroscopy reduced reliance on preoperative planning, especially in cases with difficult anatomy or positioning.
  • Radiation exposure was minimal (avg. 3 images per case) and within safe limits using standard protection protocols.
  • Study standardized to 21 mm blades and excluded dogs with developmental orthopedic conditions to reduce confounders.
  • Targeting a lower postoperative TPA (3°) may reduce meniscal load and cranio-caudal instability, though long-term outcomes require further study.

Wang

Veterinary Surgery

7

2025

Accuracy of fluoroscopy-guided osteotomy placement in TPLO: Postoperative tibial plateau angle and preoperative planning evaluation

2025-7-VS-wang-4

Article Title: Accuracy of fluoroscopy-guided osteotomy placement in TPLO: Postoperative tibial plateau angle and preoperative planning evaluation

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Parker 2023 et al., on Locoregional analgesia in TPLO, which locoregional technique was rated as having the fewest adverse effects?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. PNB was selected by 75% of respondents as having the lowest rate of adverse effects compared to LE and PI.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Peripheral nerve block.
PNB was selected by 75% of respondents as having the lowest rate of adverse effects compared to LE and PI.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Peripheral nerve block (PNB) was preferred by 79% of anesthesiologists; lumbosacral epidural (LE) by 21%; PI <1%.
  • Time since board-certification significantly influenced preference: PNB favored by newer diplomates, LE favored by more senior ones (p < .001).
  • Employment sector mattered: PNB was preferred more in private practice, LE more in academia (p = .003).
  • PNB perceived as more effective, with 78% reporting 81–100% effectiveness; compared to 55% for LE.
  • PNB associated with fewer adverse effects (75%) than LE (4%) and PI (21%).
  • PNB required less rescue analgesia intraoperatively (57%) and postoperatively (54%) than LE or PI.
  • LE preferred for bilateral TPLOs and in smaller dogs; PNB for larger dogs, due to motor function preservation.
  • Dexmedetomidine was the most common additive to PNB; bupivacaine-only was most used for PNB.

Parker

Veterinary Surgery

4

2023

Pelvic limb anesthesia and analgesia in dogs undergoing tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO): A survey of board-certified anesthesiologists

2023-4-VS-parker-5

Article Title: Pelvic limb anesthesia and analgesia in dogs undergoing tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO): A survey of board-certified anesthesiologists

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In De Moya 2023 et al., on femoral physeal/neck fracture repair, which surgical advantage is most associated with FGPP over ORIF?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. FGPP is a minimally invasive technique that may reduce trauma and preserve femoral neck blood flow.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Limits surgical trauma and preserves vascular supply.
FGPP is a minimally invasive technique that may reduce trauma and preserve femoral neck blood flow.

🔍 Key Findings

  • FGPP (fluoroscopic-guided percutaneous pinning) resulted in successful healing in 10/13 fractures, with good limb function.
  • Complications occurred in 5 of 11 cases, including intra-articular implants, malunion, implant failure/nonunion, and implant migration.
  • Cases with delayed surgery (>15 days) or radiographic remodeling were more likely to experience major complications.
  • Most fractures (10/13) were classified as Salter-Harris type I with mild displacement.
  • Median surgical time was 60 minutes, and no conversions to open surgery were needed.
  • Postoperative femoral neck resorption was minimal, suggesting possible benefits of the minimally invasive approach for preserving vascular supply.
  • One intra-articular pin led to progressive joint disease and required femoral head ostectomy.
  • FGPP appears best suited for acute, minimally displaced fractures in young dogs (<8 months) with planned elective explant to avoid growth disturbance.

De Moya

Veterinary Surgery

6

2023

Closed reduction and fluoroscopic‐guided percutaneous pinning of femoral capital physeal or neck fractures: Thirteen fractures in 11 dogs

2023-6-VS-demoya-4

Article Title: Closed reduction and fluoroscopic‐guided percutaneous pinning of femoral capital physeal or neck fractures: Thirteen fractures in 11 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In De Moya 2025 et al., on antebrachial deformity correction, which of the following was a **major complication** reported?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. One major complication was a permanent carpal flexor contracture; minor complications included synostosis, pin tract drainage, and carpal stiffness.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Carpal flexor contracture.
One major complication was a permanent carpal flexor contracture; minor complications included synostosis, pin tract drainage, and carpal stiffness.

🔍 Key Findings

  • CESF with distraction osteogenesis restored elbow congruity and normalized aLDRA in skeletally immature dogs with PCDRP.
  • Radial head subluxation was eliminated in all dogs, and elbow incongruity reduced significantly (from 6.1 mm to 0.3 mm, p <.01).
  • Mean radial lengthening of 22.6 mm (∼11% of normal length) was achieved, but only 80% of recorded distraction translated to length gain.
  • Major complications occurred in 2/12 dogs: one with permanent carpal contracture, one with radial fracture at wire tract.
  • Minor complications (e.g., carpal pain, restricted extension, synostosis, pin tract issues) were noted in 10/12 dogs but generally resolved.
  • Owner surveys (8/12 dogs) reported good to excellent long-term function, even up to 6 years post-op.
  • Radial valgus deformities were moderate (mean 15°) and less severe than deformities from ulnar physeal closure.
  • Surgical strategy included staged distraction, with radial or combined radius/ulna distraction guided by fluoroscopy and adjusted per case.

De Moya

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Treatment of antebrachial deformities secondary to premature closure of the distal radial physis using circular external skeletal fixation and distraction osteogenesis in skeletally immature dogs

2025-6-VS-demoya-3

Article Title: Treatment of antebrachial deformities secondary to premature closure of the distal radial physis using circular external skeletal fixation and distraction osteogenesis in skeletally immature dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Walker 2025 et al., on ventral slot guides, what was the impact on slot position variability when using the 3D guide?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Use of the guide cut variability in slot position by more than half.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Reduced from 63% to 29%.
Use of the guide cut variability in slot position by more than half.

🔍 Key Findings

Design: Ex vivo cadaver study (n=8 dogs, 24 sites)
Comparison: Freehand vs. 3D-printed drill guide-assisted ventral slot (GAVS vs FHVS)
Findings:

  • GAVS produced slots not significantly different from planned dimensions (p = .722–.875)
  • FHVS produced significantly shorter slots than intended (p < .01)
  • No difference in surgical time (p = .071)
  • Shape ratio and slot divergence from midline were similar between groups (p > .4)
  • Use of guide significantly reduced variability in slot position (63% → 29%), shape (65% → 24%), and divergence (54% → 50%)

Conclusion: 3D-printed guides improved accuracy and consistency of ventral slot creation by novice surgeons; supports future evaluation in live dogs and small breeds

Walker

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Evaluation of a patient‐specific 3D‐printed guide for ventral slot surgery in dogs: An ex vivo study

2025-3-VS-walker-2

Article Title: Evaluation of a patient‐specific 3D‐printed guide for ventral slot surgery in dogs: An ex vivo study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.