Your Custom Quiz

In Larose 2024 et al., on laparoscopic liver biopsies in dogs, what was the key clinical implication of using a 3 mm CBF in small dogs for liver biopsy?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Despite smaller samples, the 3 mm CBF yielded adequate tissue for diagnosis in most dogs.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It was sufficient for histologic diagnosis.
Despite smaller samples, the 3 mm CBF yielded adequate tissue for diagnosis in most dogs.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Histologic agreement between 3 mm and 5 mm biopsies was 90%, with a Gwet's AC1 of 0.81 (p < .0001).
  • 5 mm biopsies yielded significantly more portal triads and lobules than 3 mm samples (p = .0003 and p < .0001).
  • Crush artifacts were significantly higher in 3 mm samples (p = .035), though fragmentation scores were similar (p = .935).
  • Both forceps produced adequate samples for histopathology, copper quantification, and bacterial culture.
  • No hemorrhage requiring intervention occurred, and both sizes were deemed safe and minimally invasive.
  • Surface area ≥40 mm² strongly predicted ≥11 portal triads, a desirable threshold for reliable histopathology.
  • Use of 3 mm instruments was easier in small dogs (<12 kg), but more challenging in larger dogs due to shaft length.
  • Clinical diagnoses were unaffected by forceps size, even in the one discordant histologic pair.

Larose

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Comparing 3 mm and 5 mm laparoscopic liver biopsy samples in dogs

2024-4-VS-larose1-4

Article Title: Comparing 3 mm and 5 mm laparoscopic liver biopsy samples in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Muroi 2024 et al., on radius plate stress effects, what FEA result was consistent in both LP 1 mm and 3 mm groups?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Maximum principal stress decreased significantly at cranial cortex in both LP groups.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Reduced tensile stress on cranial aspect.
Maximum principal stress decreased significantly at cranial cortex in both LP groups.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Finite element analysis compared intact radii vs. locking plates placed 1 mm or 3 mm above the bone
  • LP placement significantly reduced tensile (maximum principal) stress on cranial cortex, potentially causing implant-induced osteoporosis
  • Shell element findings:
    • Max principal stress significantly lower in both LP groups vs. intact (p < 0.05)
  • Solid element findings:
    • Equivalent stress higher and max principal stress lower in LP groups
  • Implication: Tension reduction may impair bone remodeling; implant design and placement height affect stress environment

Muroi

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

3

2024

Stress Changes in the Canine Radius after Locking Plate Fixation Using Finite Element Analysis

2024-3-VCOT-muroi-4

Article Title: Stress Changes in the Canine Radius after Locking Plate Fixation Using Finite Element Analysis

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Whitney 2022 et al., on CBLO fixation strength, which CBLO construct demonstrated significantly **higher yield load** than all other configurations tested?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The HCSTB construct had the highest yield load (1212 N), superior to all other methods.
Incorrect. The correct answer is CBLO plate with HCS and TB.
The HCSTB construct had the highest yield load (1212 N), superior to all other methods.

🔍 Key Findings

  • CBLO fixation with both a headless compression screw (HCS) and tension band (TB) showed the highest yield and ultimate loads compared to other configurations
  • HCSTB constructs had significantly higher yield load (1212 N) and ultimate load (1388 N) than Plate alone (788 N, 774 N), HCS alone (907 N, 927 N), or TB alone (1016 N, 1076 N)
  • No difference in construct stiffness was detected among the four fixation methods tested
  • All constructs ultimately failed by bone fracture—location of failure differed by construct type (e.g., through HCS hole or cranial screw hole)
  • TB and HCSTB groups showed failure via progressive TB stretching and cranial osteotomy widening, while Plate and HCS failed more abruptly
  • All constructs withstood forces exceeding expected quadriceps load in vivo (170–325 N), suggesting all methods can resist physiological loading, but HCSTB provides greater safety margin
  • HCS alone was not significantly stronger than Plate or TB alone, questioning its standalone superiority
  • Study supports using TB and HCS together for optimal construct strength, but clinical studies are needed to validate implant fatigue, healing, and failure rates

Whitney

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Ex vivo biomechanical comparison of four Center of Rotation Angulation Based Leveling Osteotomy fixation methods

2022-1-VS-whitney-3

Article Title: Ex vivo biomechanical comparison of four Center of Rotation Angulation Based Leveling Osteotomy fixation methods

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Nicetto 2024 et al., what was the success rate of patellar luxation correction using TRP?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. TRP corrected patellar luxation in 59 out of 60 treated stifles, a 98.3% success rate.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 98.3%.
TRP corrected patellar luxation in 59 out of 60 treated stifles, a 98.3% success rate.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 48 dogs (60 stifles) underwent custom 3D-printed TRP implantation for patellar luxation
  • 24 treated with TRP alone; 36 with additional procedures (e.g., DFO, TTT)
  • Success rate: 59/60 corrected patellar tracking
  • Functional outcome: 57/60 full function, 2 acceptable, 1 unacceptable
  • Complication rate: 3 total (2 minor, 1 major recurrence)
  • TRP spares cartilage unlike trochleoplasty, offering implant-based ridge augmentation
  • No implant loosening or infection observed

Nicetto

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

2

2024

Trochlear Ridge Prostheses for Reshaping Femoral Trochlear Ridges in Dogs with Patellar Luxation

2024-2-VCOT-nicetto-1

Article Title: Trochlear Ridge Prostheses for Reshaping Femoral Trochlear Ridges in Dogs with Patellar Luxation

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Walker 2025 et al., on ventral slot guides, what slot dimension was significantly more accurate with guide use?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Guided slots were significantly closer to the intended length compared to freehand (p < .01 vs p = .722).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Slot length.
Guided slots were significantly closer to the intended length compared to freehand (p < .01 vs p = .722).

🔍 Key Findings

Design: Ex vivo cadaver study (n=8 dogs, 24 sites)
Comparison: Freehand vs. 3D-printed drill guide-assisted ventral slot (GAVS vs FHVS)
Findings:

  • GAVS produced slots not significantly different from planned dimensions (p = .722–.875)
  • FHVS produced significantly shorter slots than intended (p < .01)
  • No difference in surgical time (p = .071)
  • Shape ratio and slot divergence from midline were similar between groups (p > .4)
  • Use of guide significantly reduced variability in slot position (63% → 29%), shape (65% → 24%), and divergence (54% → 50%)

Conclusion: 3D-printed guides improved accuracy and consistency of ventral slot creation by novice surgeons; supports future evaluation in live dogs and small breeds

Walker

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Evaluation of a patient‐specific 3D‐printed guide for ventral slot surgery in dogs: An ex vivo study

2025-3-VS-walker-1

Article Title: Evaluation of a patient‐specific 3D‐printed guide for ventral slot surgery in dogs: An ex vivo study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Mullen 2024 et al., on NIRF for GDV, what best describes the NIRF findings in stapled partial gastrectomy sites?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The stapled edge showed fluorescence intensity comparable to viable tissue, suggesting preserved perfusion.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Fluorescence similar to viable tissue.
The stapled edge showed fluorescence intensity comparable to viable tissue, suggesting preserved perfusion.

🔍 Key Findings

  • NIRF altered surgical strategy in 3 of 20 GDV dogs, identifying necrosis not appreciated subjectively.
  • Fundic fluorescence <10% indicated histologically confirmed gastric necrosis.
  • In 1 dog, NIRF revealed nonviability despite the surgeon’s impression of viability.
  • Staple line fluorescence resembled viable tissue in the only stapled gastrectomy, suggesting preservation of perfusion.
  • GDV dogs (even “viable”) showed lower fluorescence vs. healthy controls, indicating subclinical vascular compromise.
  • Histology confirmed full-thickness necrosis in all 4 dogs with NIRF-defined nonviability.
  • Pre-op lactate was significantly higher in nonviable GDV dogs (8.55 vs 4.89 mmol/L, p=0.03).
  • No complications were reported from ICG use; imaging was safe and repeatable.

Mullen

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Use of real-time near-infrared fluorescence to assess gastric viability in dogs with gastric dilatation volvulus: A case-control study

2024-4-VS-mullen-4

Article Title: Use of real-time near-infrared fluorescence to assess gastric viability in dogs with gastric dilatation volvulus: A case-control study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Lederer 2025 et al., on MIPO vs ORPS, which fracture type was more common in dogs treated with MIPO?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. MIPO was used in 41% of comminuted fractures vs 16% in ORPS (p = .012).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Comminuted fractures.
MIPO was used in 41% of comminuted fractures vs 16% in ORPS (p = .012).

🔍 Key Findings

Study size: 105 dogs (73 ORPS; 32 MIPO)

MIPO vs ORPS differences:

  • Surgical time: MIPO median 130 min vs ORPS 85 min (p < .001)
  • Explant rate: MIPO 25% vs ORPS 4.1% (p = .003)
  • Time to clinical union: MIPO 85 days vs ORPS 57 days (p = .010)
  • Frontal alignment deviation: MIPO 3.5° vs ORPS 2.0° (p = .047)
  • Comminution more frequent in MIPO (41% vs 16%; p = .012)

Significant predictors for MIPO use: More proximal fracture margin (p = .004), surgeon identity (p < .001)

No significant difference: Sagittal alignment, radial length, union rate, or complication rate by surgeon

Implant preference: Fixin plates used in 84% of MIPO; locking plates more common in ORPS

Lederer

Veterinary Surgery

4

2025

Retrospective comparison of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and open reduction and plate stabilization of antebrachial fractures in 105 dogs (2017–2022)

2025-4-VS-lederer-2

Article Title: Retrospective comparison of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and open reduction and plate stabilization of antebrachial fractures in 105 dogs (2017–2022)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In İnal 2025 et al., on feline high-rise trauma, what was the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for ATTS in predicting mortality?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The AUC was 0.857, indicating good predictive performance for ATTS
Incorrect. The correct answer is 0.86.
The AUC was 0.857, indicating good predictive performance for ATTS

🔍 Key Findings

Sample: 373 cats with high-rise syndrome (HRS) from 2017–2020.
ATTS was the only significant predictor of survival (p < 0.001); each point increase decreased survival odds (OR = 0.46).
AUC for ATTS ROC curve: 0.857 (95% CI: 0.788–0.926).
Floor height, lesion type, and ground surface were not significantly associated with survival.
Odds of injury were 7.98× higher when landing on hard vs. soft surface (p < 0.001).
16.96× increased injury risk from the fourth vs. third floor (p = 0.008).
Cats with ATTS ≥7 had 62% mortality; median ATTS increased with floor height (r = 0.244, p < 0.001).
Thoracic and vertebral trauma were most common causes of death.
Only 32% of cats had the “classic” HRS triad (pneumothorax, epistaxis, hard palate fracture).

Inal

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

1

2025

Survival Rate of High-Rise Syndrome Cases Using Animal Trauma Triage Score in Cats

2025-1-VC-inal-2

Article Title: Survival Rate of High-Rise Syndrome Cases Using Animal Trauma Triage Score in Cats

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Aldrich 2023 et al., on liposomal bupivacaine in TPLO, which metric showed no significant difference between treatment and placebo groups?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. CMPS-SF scores did not differ significantly between liposomal bupivacaine and placebo groups at any time point.
Incorrect. The correct answer is CMPS-SF pain scores.
CMPS-SF scores did not differ significantly between liposomal bupivacaine and placebo groups at any time point.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) infiltration did not reduce the need for rescue analgesia compared with placebo in dogs undergoing TPLO.
  • CMPS-SF pain scores were not significantly different between LB and placebo groups at any postoperative time point.
  • % body weight distribution (%BWdist) to the operated limb did not differ significantly between treatment groups across all time points.
  • No correlation was found between CMPS-SF scores and %BWdist, suggesting these metrics assess different aspects of postoperative pain.
  • Postoperative carprofen administration was standardized, and LB did not provide additional detectable analgesic benefit.
  • Three-layer infiltration technique (joint capsule, fascia, subcutis) was used consistently across all cases.
  • Adverse events were minor and comparable between LB and placebo groups.
  • Post hoc analysis suggested a much larger sample size (58–436 dogs) would be needed to detect significant differences in %BWdist.

Aldrich

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of bupivacaine liposomal suspension using static bodyweight distribution and subjective pain scoring in dogs after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy surgery

2023-5-VS-aldrich-1

Article Title: Blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of bupivacaine liposomal suspension using static bodyweight distribution and subjective pain scoring in dogs after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy surgery

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Sabol 2024 et al., what was the general distribution pattern of corridor widths across T1–T13?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Wider widths at T1 and T13 with narrowest values mid-thoracic created a U-shaped distribution:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}
Incorrect. The correct answer is U-shaped.
Wider widths at T1 and T13 with narrowest values mid-thoracic created a U-shaped distribution:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Evaluated ideal dorsolateral implant trajectories in T1–T13 using CT in 30 dogs across five weight classes.
  • Corridor widths were narrowest in the mid-thoracic vertebrae (as little as 1.8 mm) and increased cranially and caudally.
  • Allowable deviation angles (ADA) were often very small (as little as ), indicating high risk for canal or thoracic structure breach.
  • Distances to critical structures (lungs, aorta, subclavian artery, azygos vein) were often <1 mm, even in large dogs.
  • Data suggest extreme caution and precision are needed for thoracic vertebral implant placement and support use of navigation or 3D-printed guides.

Sabol

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

2

2024

Implantation Corridors in Canine Thoracic Vertebrae: A Morphometric Study in Dogs of Varying Sizes

2024-2-VCOT-sabol-4

Article Title: Implantation Corridors in Canine Thoracic Vertebrae: A Morphometric Study in Dogs of Varying Sizes

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.