Your Custom Quiz

In Woelfel 2022 et al., on cervical locked facets, what was the most common inciting cause?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 9 out of 10 cases were due to external trauma from dog attacks.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Attacks by larger dogs.
9 out of 10 cases were due to external trauma from dog attacks.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Locked facet injuries in dogs involved unilateral dorsal displacement of the cranial articular process of the caudal vertebra, most commonly at C5/6 or C6/7.
  • All affected dogs were small/toy breeds, typically following trauma (most often attacks by larger dogs).
  • Neurologic severity ranged from ambulatory tetraparesis to tetraplegia, often with thoracic limb deficits more severe than pelvic limbs — suggesting a central cord syndrome-like pattern.
  • CT and MRI revealed axial rotation, subluxation, and articular process displacement; MRI showed T2 hyperintensity, nerve root impingement, and soft tissue changes.
  • Surgical treatment included ventral fixation with screws, pins, and PMMA, and one case required dorsal facetectomy for reduction.
  • Medical management, including external coaptation or rest, also resulted in functional recovery in select cases.
  • All dogs with follow-up data (8/8) had functional recovery, with nonambulatory dogs regaining ambulation in a median of 4 weeks.
  • No consistent differences in outcome were observed between surgical and nonsurgical management, suggesting locked facets may be biomechanically stable.

Woelfel

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Subaxial cervical articular process subluxation and dislocation: Cervical locked facet injuries in dogs

2022-1-VS-woelfel-3

Article Title: Subaxial cervical articular process subluxation and dislocation: Cervical locked facet injuries in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Tobias 2025 et al., on frontal sinus mucoceles, what was the most common presumed etiology in affected dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Trauma was reported in 7 of 8 dogs, making it the most common suspected etiology.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Skull trauma during puppyhood.
Trauma was reported in 7 of 8 dogs, making it the most common suspected etiology.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Frontal sinus mucoceles occurred in young dogs, often linked to prior skull trauma by 10 months of age.
  • All dogs presented with expansile, fluid-filled lesions causing facial swelling; CT showed multicentric bone erosion, including the frontal bone and cribriform plate.
  • Surgical options included frontal sinusotomy with either sinus lining ablation or re-establishment of nasofrontal drainage, with or without stenting.
  • Nasofrontal stenting led to long-term resolution in most dogs, although recurrence occurred in 4/8 dogs, requiring revision surgery in 3.
  • Complications were minor and included swelling or nasal discharge; no intraoperative complications were reported.
  • Histology confirmed sterile mucoceles with neutrophilic inflammation and mucin, and cultures were negative in all cases.
  • Guaifenesin was used postoperatively in several cases to reduce mucus viscosity; its benefit is unproven in dogs but may support drainage.

Tobias

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Clinical findings and outcomes of eight dogs with surgically treated frontal sinus mucoceles

2025-6-VS-tobias-1

Article Title: Clinical findings and outcomes of eight dogs with surgically treated frontal sinus mucoceles

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Cruciani 2025 et al., on portal placement, what was the most common complication following surgery?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Synovial cysts occurred in 4 of 13 dogs with follow-up data; all were considered minor complications.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Synovial cyst formation.
Synovial cysts occurred in 4 of 13 dogs with follow-up data; all were considered minor complications.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Study Design: Retrospective case series of 15 dogs (19 tarsi) with talar OCD.
  • Technique: Modified arthroscopic approach with both scope and instrument portals on the same side as the lesion.
  • Outcomes:
    • Good to excellent mid-to-long-term outcomes in 11/14 dogs.
    • Statistically significant improvement in CBPI (p < .05) and VAS scores (p < .05).
    • Minor postoperative complications (synovial cysts) in 4/13 tarsi, all resolved spontaneously.
    • No major intraoperative complications; 1/19 required mini-arthrotomy due to fragment size.
  • Degenerative Joint Disease (DJD): Progression noted in 10/14 cases, despite good functional outcomes.
  • Fragment Characteristics: Multiple osteochondral fragments were present in most cases, with 17/19 lesions on the medial talar ridge.
  • Technical Advantage: Lower conversion rate to arthrotomy (1/19) compared to previous studies (Gielen et al. and Miller & Beale).

Cruciani

Veterinary Surgery

1

2025

A modified approach to portal placement for arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the tarsocrural joint in 15 dogs (19 tarsi)

2025-1-VS-cruciani-1

Article Title: A modified approach to portal placement for arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the tarsocrural joint in 15 dogs (19 tarsi)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Aldrich 2023 et al., on liposomal bupivacaine in TPLO, how was analgesic success defined?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Success was defined as not requiring rescue opioids within 48h post-op.
Incorrect. The correct answer is No need for rescue analgesia over 48 hours.
Success was defined as not requiring rescue opioids within 48h post-op.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) infiltration did not reduce the need for rescue analgesia compared with placebo in dogs undergoing TPLO.
  • CMPS-SF pain scores were not significantly different between LB and placebo groups at any postoperative time point.
  • % body weight distribution (%BWdist) to the operated limb did not differ significantly between treatment groups across all time points.
  • No correlation was found between CMPS-SF scores and %BWdist, suggesting these metrics assess different aspects of postoperative pain.
  • Postoperative carprofen administration was standardized, and LB did not provide additional detectable analgesic benefit.
  • Three-layer infiltration technique (joint capsule, fascia, subcutis) was used consistently across all cases.
  • Adverse events were minor and comparable between LB and placebo groups.
  • Post hoc analysis suggested a much larger sample size (58–436 dogs) would be needed to detect significant differences in %BWdist.

Aldrich

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of bupivacaine liposomal suspension using static bodyweight distribution and subjective pain scoring in dogs after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy surgery

2023-5-VS-aldrich-2

Article Title: Blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of bupivacaine liposomal suspension using static bodyweight distribution and subjective pain scoring in dogs after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy surgery

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Galliano 2022 et al., on vascular access ports, what was the reported functionality rate of ports placed in the femoral/external iliac vein (fSVAP)?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All 4 dogs with fSVAP had fully functional ports during follow-up.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 100%.
All 4 dogs with fSVAP had fully functional ports during follow-up.

🔍 Key Findings

  • SVAPs placed in axillary (aSVAP) or femoral/external iliac veins (fSVAP) during limb amputation remained functional in 92.3% and 100% of cases, respectively.
  • Complication rates were lower in aSVAP (23.1%) and fSVAP (0%) compared to jSVAP (47.4%), although not statistically significant (P = .12).
  • No catastrophic complications occurred with aSVAP or fSVAP; 2 deaths occurred with jSVAP due to port-related issues.
  • Infection-related port removal was needed in 1 aSVAP (7.7%) and 2 jSVAPs (10.5%) — no removals were required in fSVAPs.
  • Tip placement of the catheter (e.g., right atrium vs. vena cava) did not correlate with complications (P = .66).
  • Shorter surgical time likely with aSVAP/fSVAP as they use the same surgical field as the limb amputation.
  • Survival time median was similar across groups (jSVAP: 177 days, aSVAP: 125 days, fSVAP: 122 days).
  • SVAP implantation during limb amputation offers a practical and safe alternative to separate jugular placement.

Galliano

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Subcutaneous vascular access port implantation in the axillary or femoral/external iliac vein at the time of full limb amputation in dogs

2022-7-VS-galliano-1

Article Title: Subcutaneous vascular access port implantation in the axillary or femoral/external iliac vein at the time of full limb amputation in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Longo 2025 et al., on MITA, how many dogs had an unacceptable outcome due to the MITA procedure?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Only one unacceptable outcome was reported, but it was unrelated to MITA.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 0.
Only one unacceptable outcome was reported, but it was unrelated to MITA.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 15 dogs underwent minimally invasive tarsal arthrodesis (MITA); 10 partial, 5 pantarsal.
  • Mean time to radiographic union: 1.8 ± 0.5 months.
  • Mean time to clinical union: 3.7 ± 0.8 months.
  • Complete osseous union: 46%; the rest achieved ≥50% with functional weightbearing.
  • Complication rate: 26% major (mostly implant-related); no catastrophic complications or plantar necrosis.
  • Functional outcomes: 6 full, 8 acceptable, 1 unacceptable (not due to MITA).
  • MITA may lower soft tissue complications vs open approaches and enable faster healing.

Longo

Veterinary Surgery

1

2025

Minimally invasive tarsal arthrodesis in 15 dogs

2025-1-VS-longo-5

Article Title: Minimally invasive tarsal arthrodesis in 15 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Schroeder 2022 et al., on fascial anatomy mapping, what surgical approach may be required for tumors near the 13th rib?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The fascia near the 13th rib is thin and prone to tearing; subperiosteal elevation or rib removal is needed to preserve margins.
Incorrect. The correct answer is C. Subperiosteal elevation or partial rib ostectomy.
The fascia near the 13th rib is thin and prone to tearing; subperiosteal elevation or rib removal is needed to preserve margins.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Fascial planes in dogs were consistently classifiable into four surgical types:
  • Type I (discrete sheets), Type II (tightly adhered to thin muscle), Type III (tightly adhered to thick muscle), and Type IV (periosteum-associated).
  • Two junction types were identified: Type A (easily elevated) and Type B (higher risk of disruption).
  • Disruption-prone areas include the scapular spine (type IV fascia) and lateral thorax near the 13th rib, where rib resection may be needed to preserve margins.
  • The latissimus dorsi transition zones and fascial areas near the thoracic inlet and scapulohumeral joint were prone to fascial thinning or disruption.
  • Partial muscle resections or periosteal elevations may be required in areas with fragile fascia to maintain oncologic margins.
  • Dorsal spinous processes (T6–L6) showed type IV fascia; however, osteotomy may be needed in some dogs for clear margins.
  • Blended fascial transitions (e.g., rectus abdominis: type II cranially, type I caudally) necessitate intraoperative judgment on resection depth.
  • Cutaneous trunci may suffice as a deep margin for small, low-grade tumors in well-muscled dogs, but not reliably for high-grade or larger masses.

Schroeder

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Fascial plane mapping for superficial tumor resection in dogs. Part I: Neck and trunk

2022-1-VS-schroeder-3

Article Title: Fascial plane mapping for superficial tumor resection in dogs. Part I: Neck and trunk

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Monnet 2023 et al., on barbed vs conventional suture in vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA), what was the median suturing time for the unidirectional barbed suture group (UBS)?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The UBS group had a significantly shorter median suturing time than the conventional group (p < .0002).
Incorrect. The correct answer is 12.7 minutes.
The UBS group had a significantly shorter median suturing time than the conventional group (p < .0002).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Leakage pressure was not significantly different between unidirectional barbed suture (UBS) and conventional (C) suture groups (p = .236).
  • UBS group had a 28% lower median leakage pressure than the C group (8.6 mmHg vs. 11.7 mmHg), suggesting higher biological risk of leakage.
  • UBS significantly reduced suturing time (median 12.7 vs. 17.3 minutes; p < .0002).
  • Fewer suture bites were needed in the UBS group (median 14 vs. 19; p = .012).
  • No suture breakage or urethral narrowing occurred in either group.
  • Leakage site distribution (ventral vs lateral) was similar between groups; no dorsal leaks noted.
  • Leakage occurred as low as 5 mmHg in UBS group, indicating potential for postoperative extravasation.
  • UBS may aid intracorporeal suturing in minimally invasive prostatectomy, but catheterization remains necessary postoperatively.

Monnet

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Influence of conventional versus unidirectional barbed suture on leakage pressures in canine vesicourethral anastomosis: An ex-vivo study

2023-5-VS-monnet-2

Article Title: Influence of conventional versus unidirectional barbed suture on leakage pressures in canine vesicourethral anastomosis: An ex-vivo study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Aldrich 2023 et al., on liposomal bupivacaine in TPLO, what limitation did the authors note regarding their ability to detect a treatment effect?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Post hoc power analysis revealed the sample was likely too small to detect a true difference.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Underpowered sample size.
Post hoc power analysis revealed the sample was likely too small to detect a true difference.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) infiltration did not reduce the need for rescue analgesia compared with placebo in dogs undergoing TPLO.
  • CMPS-SF pain scores were not significantly different between LB and placebo groups at any postoperative time point.
  • % body weight distribution (%BWdist) to the operated limb did not differ significantly between treatment groups across all time points.
  • No correlation was found between CMPS-SF scores and %BWdist, suggesting these metrics assess different aspects of postoperative pain.
  • Postoperative carprofen administration was standardized, and LB did not provide additional detectable analgesic benefit.
  • Three-layer infiltration technique (joint capsule, fascia, subcutis) was used consistently across all cases.
  • Adverse events were minor and comparable between LB and placebo groups.
  • Post hoc analysis suggested a much larger sample size (58–436 dogs) would be needed to detect significant differences in %BWdist.

Aldrich

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of bupivacaine liposomal suspension using static bodyweight distribution and subjective pain scoring in dogs after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy surgery

2023-5-VS-aldrich-5

Article Title: Blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of bupivacaine liposomal suspension using static bodyweight distribution and subjective pain scoring in dogs after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy surgery

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Redolfi 2024 et al., what implant configuration was most commonly used to stabilize the tibial tuberosity?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 21/24 stifles had pin and tension band wire fixation of the tibial tuberosity
Incorrect. The correct answer is Pins and tension band wire.
21/24 stifles had pin and tension band wire fixation of the tibial tuberosity

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Study of 24 stifles in 22 dogs with concurrent CCLR and grade III–IV MPL treated via TPLO-TTT
  • Major complications: 4/24 (3 surgical site infections, 1 MPL reluxation); minor complications: 5/24
  • Long-term follow-up (median 27 months): 21/22 dogs sound, 23/24 stifles resolved
  • Patellar ligament thickening observed post-op in 4 cases, resolved with rehab
  • The only case of MPL reluxation involved untreated tibial torsion, suggesting case selection is critical

Redolfi

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

1

2024

Complications and Long-Term Outcomes after Combined Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy and Tibial Tuberosity Transposition for Treatment of Concurrent Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture and Grade III or IV Medial Patellar Luxation

2024-1-VCOT-redolfi-5

Article Title: Complications and Long-Term Outcomes after Combined Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy and Tibial Tuberosity Transposition for Treatment of Concurrent Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture and Grade III or IV Medial Patellar Luxation

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.