Your Custom Quiz

In Sullivan 2025 et al., on TTT stabilization methods, what was the most common mode of failure across all groups?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Rupture of the patellar ligament occurred in most samples in all groups.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Patellar ligament rupture.
Rupture of the patellar ligament occurred in most samples in all groups.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Spacer pin fixation showed no difference in failure force or stiffness compared to tension band wire (TBW) or 2-pin techniques.
  • All constructs failed under loads >1000 N, exceeding estimated peak quadriceps force in dogs during walking (~240 N).
  • Patellar ligament failure was the most common mode of failure across all groups (5–8 samples per group).
  • Distal tibial crest fractures were seen only in 2-pin and spacer pin groups, not in TBW group, suggesting TBW may protect against crest failure.
  • No failures occurred at pin tracts, possibly due to pin placement within patellar ligament footprint.
  • Spacer pin technique avoids placing pins through the tuberosity, potentially reducing risks of soft tissue complications like tendinopathy or irritation.
  • Use of partial osteotomy with robust distal crest may substitute for TBW without compromising initial mechanical strength.
  • Further in vivo or cyclic loading studies are required, as this cadaveric study tested only acute tensile failure.

Sullivan

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

3

2025

Biomechanical Comparison of Spacer Pin Fixation to Two Established Methods of Tibial Tuberosity Transposition Stabilization in Dogs

2025-3-VCOT-sullivan-2

Article Title: Biomechanical Comparison of Spacer Pin Fixation to Two Established Methods of Tibial Tuberosity Transposition Stabilization in Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Adair 2023 et al., on urolith removal techniques, which intraoperative factor was significantly associated with increased SSII in PCCLm dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Incision extension to improve exposure in PCCLm was associated with increased risk of SSII (OR = 18.76, p = .027).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Incision extension.
Incision extension to improve exposure in PCCLm was associated with increased risk of SSII (OR = 18.76, p = .027).

🔍 Key Findings

  • PCCLm resulted in significantly fewer postoperative lower urinary tract signs compared to OC (13.0% vs 60.9%, p < .001)
  • Incomplete urolith removal was similar between PCCLm (11.4%) and OC (20.0%), not statistically significant
  • Anesthesia time was significantly shorter in PCCLm (p < .001), although surgery time was not
  • PCCLm had shorter hospitalization time than OC (median 0 vs 18 hours, p < .001)
  • PCCLm patients were more likely to be discharged the same day (84.7% vs 0%)
  • Surgical site infection/inflammation (SSII) was low in both, with no significant difference (PCCLm: 4.5%, OC: 1.8%)
  • Incision extension in PCCLm significantly increased SSII risk (OR = 18.76, p = .027)
  • More intraoperative complications occurred with PCCLm, though most were minor (22.1% vs 3.4%, p = .021)

Adair

Veterinary Surgery

6

2023

Retrospective comparison of modified percutaneous cystolithotomy (PCCLm) and traditional open cystotomy (OC) in dogs: 218 cases (2010–2019)

2023-6-VS-adair-3-5e399

Article Title: Retrospective comparison of modified percutaneous cystolithotomy (PCCLm) and traditional open cystotomy (OC) in dogs: 218 cases (2010–2019)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Almeida 2025 et al., on TPLO and partial CCL rupture, what effect did CCL remnant transection have on postoperative patellar ligament thickness?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Transection of the CCL remnant did not reduce PLT at any measured location.
Incorrect. The correct answer is No significant difference vs control.
Transection of the CCL remnant did not reduce PLT at any measured location.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Transecting the CCL remnant during TPLO did not reduce patellar ligament thickening (PLT) at any measured point (proximal, mid, distal).
  • Transection also failed to reduce postoperative patellar ligament shortening (PLL) at 6 weeks.
  • Both groups (transected vs non-transected) showed significant thickening and shortening, with greatest PLT increase at the midpoint.
  • Increased PLT was positively correlated with tibial plateau rotation (p = 0.02) and postoperative TPA (p = 0.04).
  • No correlation between TT-O (tibial tuberosity width index) and PLT, suggesting narrow osteotomies did not influence PLT in this population.
  • Partial CCL rupture was not significantly protective; dogs with partial tears still developed ligament thickening.
  • Post-TPLO mid-patellar ligament thickening may relate to Gelpi retractor placement and osteotomy mechanics rather than CCL status.
  • Authors do not recommend CCL transection during TPLO to prevent desmitis, citing possible increased instability and degeneration.

Almeida

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

4

2025

Effect of Cranial Cruciate Ligament Transection during TPLO on Patellar Desmitis in Dogs with Partial Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture

2025-4-VCOT-almeida-1

Article Title: Effect of Cranial Cruciate Ligament Transection during TPLO on Patellar Desmitis in Dogs with Partial Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Jones 2024 et al., on elbow OA cysts, what effect did female sex have on SBC size?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Female dogs had smaller SBCs than males (OR = 0.931, p = .002).
Incorrect. The correct answer is SBCs were smaller.
Female dogs had smaller SBCs than males (OR = 0.931, p = .002).

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Sample: 38 Labrador Retrievers (76 elbows)
  • SBCs (subchondral bone cysts):
    • Not found in elbows without OA
  • Increased number and size with OA severity:
    • Grade 1: median 3 SBCs
    • Grade 2: 9 SBCs
    • Grade 3: 20 SBCs (p < .001)
    • Larger SBCs in more severe OA (OR = 1.056, p = .012)
  • Locations: 62% humerus, 28% ulna, 10% radius
  • Sex and Age Effects:
    • Older dogs had larger SBCs (p = .013)
    • Female dogs had smaller SBCs (p = .002)
    • SBC number unrelated to age or sex

Jones

Veterinary Surgery

2

2024

Evaluation of subchondral bone cysts in canine elbows with radiographic osteoarthritis secondary to elbow dysplasia

2024-2-VS-jones-5

Article Title: Evaluation of subchondral bone cysts in canine elbows with radiographic osteoarthritis secondary to elbow dysplasia

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Evers 2023 et al., on needle arthroscopy for meniscal tears, what was the reported sensitivity for diagnosing medial meniscal tears?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Needle arthroscopy showed 95% sensitivity and 100% specificity for medial meniscal tear diagnosis.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 95%.
Needle arthroscopy showed 95% sensitivity and 100% specificity for medial meniscal tear diagnosis.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Needle arthroscopy (NA) had 95% sensitivity and 100% specificity for diagnosing medial meniscal tears in dogs with CCLR.
  • NA missed 1 medial and 1 lateral meniscal tear, both nondisplaced and stable.
  • Visibility of all meniscal horns was significantly lower with NA compared to standard arthroscopy (SA) (P < .005 for all horns).
  • Probing the caudal horn of the lateral meniscus was significantly more difficult with NA (P = .0017), though medial horn probing was similar.
  • Mean NA procedure time was 8 ± 3 minutes, significantly shorter than SA (15 ± 9 min, P = .0041).
  • No increase in lameness observed after NA, indicating minimal procedural morbidity.
  • NA was performed under sedation in most dogs, though 10/26 required additional chemical restraint or short anesthesia.
  • NA was most accurate for displaced vertical longitudinal tears, with all 14 correctly identified; one stable tear and a lateral tear were missed.

Evers

Veterinary Surgery

6

2023

Accuracy of needle arthroscopy for the diagnosis of medial meniscal tears in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture

2023-6-VS-evers-1

Article Title: Accuracy of needle arthroscopy for the diagnosis of medial meniscal tears in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Miller 2025 et al., on spinal drill guide accuracy, what was a reported technical benefit of the SOP plate when used with the 3D-printed guides?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The plate helped realign vertebrae during screw placement, effectively serving as a reduction aid.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Acted as a reduction guide.
The plate helped realign vertebrae during screw placement, effectively serving as a reduction aid.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 3D-printed, SOP plate-specific guides enabled safe screw placement from T12–L5 in canine cadavers and models.
  • All 140 screw trajectories were classified as Zdichavski Grade 1, indicating optimal placement without vertebral canal breach.
  • Screw angles (cranial-caudal and transverse) matched preoperative planning, with no significant deviation.
  • Entry/exit point deviations were <1 mm on average, deemed clinically negligible.
  • Drill guides were quick to place (<30 sec per vertebra) and improved ease of surgery.
  • Plates acted as effective reduction tools, guiding alignment during screw placement in mobile spines.
  • Minor technical challenges arose from cadaveric spine mobility, mitigated by sequential screw insertion.
  • Technique may enable future use in fracture/luxation reduction, pending further cadaveric and clinical trials.

Miller

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Development and testing of an animal-specific and string-of-pearls (SOP) plate specific, three-dimensionally (3D) printed drilling guide: A proof of concept study for canine thoracolumbar spinal stabilization

2025-6-VS-miller-3

Article Title: Development and testing of an animal-specific and string-of-pearls (SOP) plate specific, three-dimensionally (3D) printed drilling guide: A proof of concept study for canine thoracolumbar spinal stabilization

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Evers 2023 et al., on needle arthroscopy, what was the average time for needle arthroscopy compared to standard arthroscopy?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Needle arthroscopy averaged 8 ± 3 minutes vs. 15 ± 9 for standard arthroscopy (*P = .0041*).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Needle: 8 min, Standard: 15 min.
Needle arthroscopy averaged 8 ± 3 minutes vs. 15 ± 9 for standard arthroscopy (*P = .0041*).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Needle arthroscopy (NA) had 95% sensitivity and 100% specificity for detecting medial meniscal tears using standard arthroscopy (SA) as the reference.
  • NA correctly identified meniscal status in 25/26 dogs, missing only one stable nondisplaced tear.
  • NA took less time than SA: 8 ± 3 min vs. 15 ± 9 min (P = .0041).
  • Visibility scores were significantly lower with NA than SA for all meniscal horns (medial and lateral) .
  • Probing difficulty was greater with NA, especially for the lateral meniscus (P = .0017).
  • NA caused no measurable morbidity: lameness scores were unchanged before and after the procedure (P = .25).
  • NA was possible in sedated dogs, though 10/26 required additional anesthesia due to delays.
  • NA missed 1 lateral tear, likely due to reduced access and lack of shaving compared to SA.

Evers

Veterinary Surgery

7

2023

Accuracy of needle arthroscopy for the diagnosis of medial meniscal tears in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture

2023-7-VS-evers-3

Article Title: Accuracy of needle arthroscopy for the diagnosis of medial meniscal tears in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Duvieusart 2025 et al., on lung lobectomy approaches, which technique provided the greatest surgical exposure?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. TDCM had the largest median exposure area (193.5 cm²), significantly more than ICT and MS.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Transdiaphragmatic with caudal sternotomy (TDCM).
TDCM had the largest median exposure area (193.5 cm²), significantly more than ICT and MS.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Study Design: Canine cadaveric study comparing intercostal thoracotomy (ICT), median sternotomy (MS), and transdiaphragmatic with caudal median sternotomy (TDCM) for accessory lung lobectomy (ALL).
  • Main Outcomes:
    • Exposure Area: TDCM (193.5 cm²) > MS (106.5 cm²) > ICT (73.5 cm²) (p = .01).
    • TDCM provided significantly greater exposure than MS (p = .02) and ICT (p = .02); MS > ICT (p = .04).
    • Surgical Time: No significant difference (p = .06).
    • Lobe Excision (% by weight/surface area): No significant difference between groups (p = .4).
    • Staple Line Leak: Leak at ≤40 cmH₂O in 2/4 ICT, 0/4 MS, 0/4 TDCM (p = .09).
  • Complications:
    • 1/4 MS cases had iatrogenic damage to an adjacent lobe.
  • Technical Insights:
    • TDCM approach allowed immediate visualization of all three parts of the right pulmonary ligament.
    • The TDCM approach offers improved access without requiring en bloc removal with the right caudal lobe.
  • Conclusion: The TDCM approach provides improved exposure for ALL lobectomy with no increase in surgical time or complications relative to other approaches.

Duvieusart

Veterinary Surgery

1

2025

Comparison of three approaches for accessory lung lobectomy in the canine cadaveric model: Intercostal thoracotomy, median sternotomy, and a transdiaphragmatic approach combined with caudal median sternotomy

2025-1-VS-duvieusart-1

Article Title: Comparison of three approaches for accessory lung lobectomy in the canine cadaveric model: Intercostal thoracotomy, median sternotomy, and a transdiaphragmatic approach combined with caudal median sternotomy

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Thomsen 2024 et al., on CT accuracy for liver tumors, which phase of contrast-enhanced CT was most helpful in localization?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Both were reported as useful in roughly 30–38% of cases.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Both portal and hepatic venous.
Both were reported as useful in roughly 30–38% of cases.

🔍 Key Findings

  • CT localization of liver masses was more accurate by division (88%) than by lobe (74.3%)
  • Inter-radiologist agreement was excellent for division (kappa up to 0.885) and only moderate–good for lobe
  • Quadrate and right lateral lobes had significantly lower localization accuracy compared to left lateral or medial lobes
  • CT localization of the left division was most accurate (90.1%) compared to central (77.1%) and right (88.3%)
  • Portal and hepatic venous phases were equally helpful for localization (each ~30–38% usefulness)
  • No significant associations found between histopathologic diagnosis and localization accuracy
  • Lobe-level CT localization should be interpreted with caution, especially for the quadrate and right lateral lobes
  • Radiologist experience likely influenced accuracy, with the most experienced radiologist performing best

Thomsen

Veterinary Surgery

7

2024

Computed tomography scan accuracy for the prediction of lobe and division of liver tumors by four board-certified radiologists

2024-7-VS-thomsen-3

Article Title: Computed tomography scan accuracy for the prediction of lobe and division of liver tumors by four board-certified radiologists

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Moreira 2024 et al., on predictive equations for TPA correction, which CCWO technique produced the **greatest** tibial shortening at high wedge angles?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Slocum and Devine CCWO had up to 40.9% mTL reduction, the highest among all.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Slocum and Devine.
Slocum and Devine CCWO had up to 40.9% mTL reduction, the highest among all.

🔍 Key Findings

  • A linear relationship was observed between wedge angle and tibial plateau angle (TPA) correction across all four CCWO techniques.
  • All techniques produced predictable TPA corrections using linear regression-derived equations, allowing wedge angle extrapolation to achieve a target postoperative TPA of 5°.
  • TLA shift (tibial long axis) increased with wedge angle and influenced final TPA; greatest in Frederick & Cross method.
  • Tibial shortening (mTL%) varied by technique, being most severe (up to 40.9%) in traditional Slocum & Devine CCWO and least in newer techniques (7.5–12%).
  • The Oxley mCCWO technique showed lower TLA shift compared to the Frederick & Cross and Christ techniques, though similar to Slocum & Devine; tibial shortening was more pronounced than other modified techniques at wedge angles ≤40°.
  • Techniques varied in craniocaudal translation and wedge apex positioning, influencing planning accuracy and mechanical axis alignment.
  • The corrective wedge angle equations reliably predicted TPA within 4–6° across varied tibial conformations.
  • The study supports equation-based planning over static TPA–5° subtraction to reduce risk of under- or over-correction.

Moreira

Veterinary Surgery

8

2024

Predicting tibial plateau angles following four different types of cranial closing wedge ostectomy

2024-8-VS-moreira-2

Article Title: Predicting tibial plateau angles following four different types of cranial closing wedge ostectomy

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.