Your Custom Quiz

In Duffy 2022 et al., on crotch suture techniques, which statement best describes leakage location outcomes with SCCS?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. No leakage was observed at the crotch with SCCS; all leakage occurred at the longitudinal staple line.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Leakage occurred only at the longitudinal staple line.
No leakage was observed at the crotch with SCCS; all leakage occurred at the longitudinal staple line.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Augmenting FEESA with two simple interrupted crotch sutures (TCS) or simple continuous crotch suture (SCCS) significantly increased initial leakage pressure (ILP) compared to no suture or a single suture (NCS, SICS).
  • SCCS had the highest ILP (47.6 mm Hg), followed by TCS (37.8 mm Hg), SICS (33.0 mm Hg), and NCS (27.1 mm Hg).
  • All crotch suture types increased maximal leakage pressure (MLP) compared to no crotch suture.
  • Leakage from the crotch occurred most commonly in NCS (67%) and SICS (50%), but only 8% with TCS and 0% with SCCS.
  • SCCS was the only technique where leakage never occurred at the crotch site.
  • SCCS had the highest MLP (100.6 mm Hg), supporting its use in clinical settings with high-risk patients.
  • Intraluminal pressures during leakage in NCS constructs were sometimes below normal physiologic pressures, emphasizing risk of leakage without crotch suture.
  • The transverse staple line never leaked in any group, indicating the crotch is the primary weak point.

Duffy

Veterinary Surgery

4

2022

Influence of crotch suture augmentation on leakage pressure and leakage location during functional end-to-end stapled anastomoses in dogs

2022-4-VS-duffy-2

Article Title: Influence of crotch suture augmentation on leakage pressure and leakage location during functional end-to-end stapled anastomoses in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Pilot 2022 et al., on closure methods in sternotomy, what was the observed difference in complication rates between wire and suture groups?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Treatment effect analysis showed a mean 2.3% lower complication rate with suture, though not statistically significant.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Suture was associated with a 2.3% lower complication rate.
Treatment effect analysis showed a mean 2.3% lower complication rate with suture, though not statistically significant.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Overall closure-related complication rate was 14.1%, lower than previously reported (17–78%).
  • No clinically meaningful difference in complication rate between orthopedic wire (17.4%) and suture (11.5%) closure methods.
  • Dog size (≥20 kg) was the only significant risk factor associated with increased closure-related complications (p = .01).
  • Type of closure (wire vs. suture) did not affect risk, even in larger dogs.
  • Suture closure showed a non-significant trend toward fewer complications (mean reduction 2.3%, 95% CI: –9.1% to +4.5%).
  • Most complications were mild (62%), with only 10 severe cases requiring surgical revision.
  • Infection rate was low (2.7%), and not significantly different between wire and suture.
  • Suture closure is a valid alternative to wire, including in large dogs, based on this large, multi-institutional study.

Pilot

Veterinary Surgery

6

2022

Comparison of median sternotomy closure‐related complication rates using orthopedic wire or suture in dogs: A multi-institutional observational treatment effect analysis

2022-6-VS-pilot-3

Article Title: Comparison of median sternotomy closure‐related complication rates using orthopedic wire or suture in dogs: A multi-institutional observational treatment effect analysis

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Aertsens 2025 et al., on thoracic lift technique, what was the primary physiologic improvement observed in Cat 1 following lift device application?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. PaO₂ improved from 179.4 mmHg to 306.3 mmHg after thoracic lift was applied in Cat 1.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Improved oxygenation (PaO₂ increase).
PaO₂ improved from 179.4 mmHg to 306.3 mmHg after thoracic lift was applied in Cat 1.

🔍 Key Findings

Case 1: Chest wall lift improved oxygenation (PaO₂ increased from 179.4 to 306.3 mmHg) and enabled thoracoscopic-assisted lobectomy in a cat with pleural effusion and pulmonary carcinoma.
Case 2: Chest wall lift using a Steinmann pin allowed 3-port thoracoscopic lobectomy for a bronchial foreign body; no complications observed.
Both cats: Lift increased working space and eliminated need for thoracotomy; no device-related complications.
Pretied ligating loops (PLL) were effective for hilar vessel ligation—preferred over staplers or self-locking ligatures in feline thorax.
Conclusion: Thoracic lift is a novel, minimally invasive method enhancing thoracoscopic procedures in small patients, particularly cats.

Aertsens

Veterinary Surgery

4

2025

Chest wall lift for thoracoscopic lung lobectomy: Technique and results in two cats

2025-4-VS-aertsens-1

Article Title: Chest wall lift for thoracoscopic lung lobectomy: Technique and results in two cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Pfeil 2024 et al., on fluoroscopic pinning, what was a key advantage of the technique?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The minimally invasive technique spares soft tissue, enabling better recovery.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Preserves soft tissue via MIO approach.
The minimally invasive technique spares soft tissue, enabling better recovery.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Fluoroscopically guided normograde metabone pinning (FGNMP) was used to treat 17 animals (15 dogs and 2 cats) with 57 metabone fractures, including various fracture configurations (short-oblique body, physeal, and comminuted).
  • All 57 fractures were stabilized using intramedullary pins via FGNMP. The study exclusively focused on pin fixation and did not include screws or combined fixation techniques.
  • Median surgical time was 54 minutes (range 26–99 min), indicating efficient procedural execution.
  • Radiographic bone union was achieved in all fractures, with a median time to union of 6 weeks (range 4–12 weeks). Union was confirmed in all initially non-united fractures on follow-up.
  • No major complications were reported. A single pressure sore at the olecranon resolved uneventfully, and no pin migration or osteomyelitis was observed.
  • Pin extensions were noted radiographically (e.g., 42% distal subchondral overextension), but were not associated with clinical problems.
  • Fluoroscopic guidance improved implant accuracy and preserved soft tissue, enabling effective fracture alignment and stabilization using this minimally invasive osteosynthesis (MIO) approach.
  • The authors concluded that FGNMP is an effective, safe, and minimally invasive method for a variety of metabone fracture types, yielding quick recovery, fast healing, and good to excellent long-term functional outcomes in all 17 cases.

Pfeil

Veterinary Surgery

5

2024

Outcomes of 15 dogs and two cats with metabone fractures treated with fluoroscopically guided normograde metabone pinning

2024-5-VS-pfeil-4

Article Title: Outcomes of 15 dogs and two cats with metabone fractures treated with fluoroscopically guided normograde metabone pinning

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Tani 2022 et al., on FCU tendon reconstruction, what was the long-term outcome for both dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. At 36-month follow-up, both dogs had full function with no recurrence of hyperextension.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Normal gait and joint motion.
At 36-month follow-up, both dogs had full function with no recurrence of hyperextension.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Fascia lata autograft reconstruction of the FCU tendon successfully treated carpal hyperextension in both dogs.
  • Primary repair was not possible in one dog due to complete rupture; a fascia lata graft bridged the tendon gap.
  • In the second case, elongated tendon was corrected and reinforced with fascia lata to prevent recurrence.
  • Type I external skeletal fixation was used for 6 weeks to support tendon healing in both dogs.
  • Postoperative gait and range of motion returned to normal, with no recurrence at 36-month follow-up.
  • Ultrasonography aided diagnosis, revealing thinning and echogenic changes in the FCU tendon.
  • Histologic findings showed mild, nonspecific muscle changes, suggesting injury rather than a systemic disease.
  • No complications occurred, and fascia lata showed potential for biological integration and remodeling into tendon-like structure.

Tani

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

Reconstruction of the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon with a fascia lata autograft in two dogs with carpal hyperextension

2022-8-VS-tani-4

Article Title: Reconstruction of the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon with a fascia lata autograft in two dogs with carpal hyperextension

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Murphy 2024 et al., what was the median time from first-side CCLR to contralateral rupture?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Median time to contralateral CCLR was 12.9 months (25th–75th percentile: 6.5–24.3 months).
Incorrect. The correct answer is 12.9 months.
Median time to contralateral CCLR was 12.9 months (25th–75th percentile: 6.5–24.3 months).

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Prevalence of contralateral CCLR in dogs ≥8 years and ≥15kg was 19.1%, notably lower than previous studies (33–50%).
  • Median time to contralateral CCLR was 12.9 months.
  • Older age reduced risk — 2% decrease per month of age (p=0.003).
  • Golden Retrievers and Labradors had significantly lower risk (p=0.028 and p=0.007, respectively).
  • No effect found from TPA, meniscal injury, or comorbidities (e.g., hip dysplasia, hypothyroidism).

Murphy

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

1

2024

The Prevalence and Risk Factors of Contralateral Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture in Medium-to-Large (≥15kg) Breed Dogs 8 Years of Age or Older

2024-1-VCOT-murphy-2

Article Title: The Prevalence and Risk Factors of Contralateral Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture in Medium-to-Large (≥15kg) Breed Dogs 8 Years of Age or Older

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Danielski 2024 et al., on PUO effect on HIF, what percentage of elbows demonstrated subjective partial or complete healing on follow-up CT?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Subjective healing was observed in 41 out of 51 elbows, amounting to 80.3% of the cases.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 80.3%.
Subjective healing was observed in 41 out of 51 elbows, amounting to 80.3% of the cases.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Sample: 51 elbows from 35 spaniel dogs
  • Healing Rate: Subjective healing (complete or partial) in 80.3% of elbows; complete in 54.9%
  • Objective HU analysis: Mean HU increased from 640 (pre-op) to 835 (follow-up) (p = .001)
  • Age Effect: Dogs <14 months showed the greatest HU increase (+384 HU) and had wider fissures with less sclerosis
  • Complications:
    • Major: 5 dogs (6 limbs); 4 related to fissure healing (7.8%), 2 related to PUO healing (3.9%)
    • Minor: 3 cases (5.8%) due to IM pin migration
  • Sclerosis: Older dogs had more humeral condyle sclerosis, possibly limiting healing
  • PUO Effectiveness: Confirmed cranio-proximal displacement of anconeal process; aimed to relieve humero-anconeal incongruity
  • Control Comparison: Avoids complications associated with transcondylar screw (infection, breakage)

Danielski

Veterinary Surgery

2

2024

Influence of oblique proximal ulnar osteotomy on humeral intracondylar fissures in 35 spaniel breed dogs

2024-2-VS-danielski-1

Article Title: Influence of oblique proximal ulnar osteotomy on humeral intracondylar fissures in 35 spaniel breed dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Silveira 2022 et al., on GTO in canine THR, what was the cause of the one reported post-operative complication?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Luxation occurred in one dog due to undersized cup/head and soft tissue laxity, not GTO failure.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Post-operative luxation related to soft tissue tension loss.
Luxation occurred in one dog due to undersized cup/head and soft tissue laxity, not GTO failure.

🔍 Key Findings

  • GTO enabled successful cementless THR in dogs with severe medialization of the greater trochanter or chronic craniodorsal hip luxation.
  • All 5 hips had acceptable long-term outcomes (median follow-up: 48 months) with full function and no persistent complications.
  • Only one major complication occurred—a luxation unrelated to the GTO and successfully corrected with cup revision.
  • GTO facilitated femoral canal access and gluteal preservation, reducing risk of iatrogenic injury during broaching.
  • All GTOs healed radiographically (4 by 6 weeks, 1 by 12 weeks), with no cases of nonunion or implant migration.
  • No complications related to GTO or PTBW fixation (pins + tension band) were observed in any dog.
  • Surgical planning included templating both THR and GTO to ensure ideal alignment and reduce fracture risk.
  • GTO may be especially valuable in luxoid hip dysplasia phenotypes or chronically fixed luxations.

Silveira

Veterinary Surgery

2

2022

Greater trochanter osteotomy as a component of cementless total hip replacement: Five cases in four dogs

2022-2-VS-silveira-5

Article Title: Greater trochanter osteotomy as a component of cementless total hip replacement: Five cases in four dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In McKay 2023 et al., on patellar tendon augmentation, which of the following was **only observed** in the combined TBW augmentation group?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Patellar fractures were only reported in the combined group (11%), likely due to dual transosseous tunnels.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Patellar fracture.
Patellar fractures were only reported in the combined group (11%), likely due to dual transosseous tunnels.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Combined transpatellar + suprapatellar TBW technique yielded higher yield, peak, and failure loads than either technique alone.
  • Construct stiffness was significantly higher in the combined group (61.2 N/mm) vs transpatellar (46.8 N/mm) and suprapatellar (28.5 N/mm).
  • Lower incidence of gap formation in the combined group: only 22% had 1 mm gap vs 61% (transpatellar) and 39% (suprapatellar).
  • Load to 3 mm gap was significantly higher in the combined group (p = .036), suggesting superior early repair site stability.
  • Failure modes varied: suprapatellar most often failed via wire unraveling (67%), transpatellar via suture pull-through (67%); combined group had lower incidence of both.
  • Patella fractures were observed only in the combined group (11%), likely due to transosseous tunnel stress.
  • Wire unraveling was a predominant failure mode in suprapatellar (67%) and combined (39%) groups, but core suture pull-through was more common in the transpatellar group (67%); failure occurred by unraveling, not cyclic breakage.
  • Study supports TBW augmentation to reduce load on primary repair and improve biomechanical durability of patellar tendon repairs.

McKay

Veterinary Surgery

8

2023

Biomechanical evaluation of three adjunctive methods of orthopedic tension band-wire fixation to augment simulated patella tendon repairs in dogs

2023-8-VS-mckay-4

Article Title: Biomechanical evaluation of three adjunctive methods of orthopedic tension band-wire fixation to augment simulated patella tendon repairs in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Clough 2022 et al., on CBLO-TTT construct testing, what was the most common mode of failure in the CBLO-TTT specimens?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. This mode occurred in most CBLO-TTT specimens, indicating a weakness at the tension band/k-wire interface.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Displacement of the tibial crest with untwisting of tension band.
This mode occurred in most CBLO-TTT specimens, indicating a weakness at the tension band/k-wire interface.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Combined CBLO-TTT did not reduce load to failure compared to CBLO or TTT alone (P = .81 and P = .12, respectively).
  • CBLO-TTT maintains construct strength without significant compromise compared to individual procedures.
  • Most common failure mode in CBLO-TTT was displacement of the tibial crest segment with k-wire pullout and tension band untwisting.
  • No fulcrum effect was seen in CBLO-TTT, unlike TPLO-TTT combinations, likely due to preservation of buttress effect.
  • Patellar ligament avulsion occurred in both CBLO and CBLO-TTT, but not as a clinical concern — possibly artifact from cadaver model.
  • Load-to-failure testing was static and unidirectional, not accounting for cyclic fatigue or in vivo healing.
  • Plate size and saw blade variation were based on clinical realism, introducing potential variability but not affecting outcomes.
  • Study suggests feasibility of simultaneous surgical correction of CCL rupture and MPL using CBLO-TTT in dogs.

Clough

Veterinary Surgery

3

2022

Combined center of rotation of angulation‐based leveling osteotomy and tibial tuberosity transposition: An ex vivo mechanical study

2022-3-VS-clough-2

Article Title: Combined center of rotation of angulation‐based leveling osteotomy and tibial tuberosity transposition: An ex vivo mechanical study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.