Your Custom Quiz

In Sherman 2023 et al., on minimally invasive ESF, what was the most common minor complication?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 82% of complications were minor; pin-tract morbidity was most common.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Pin-tract morbidity.
82% of complications were minor; pin-tract morbidity was most common.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 55 cases (49 dogs, 6 cats) with nonarticular tibial fractures were treated using linear ESF with a minimally invasive approach
  • All fractures achieved radiographic union; no unacceptable outcomes were reported
  • 40% complication rate, mostly minor (82%), primarily pin-tract morbidity; major complications (7%) included osteomyelitis and refracture
  • Open fractures had significantly more major complications than closed ones (P = .019)
  • Use of intraoperative imaging (72% cases) reduced surgery time but did not improve alignment (P > .05)
  • Median surgery time: 74 min with imaging vs. 100 min without (P = .046)
  • TPA was lower than normal in both dogs and cats, but did not correlate with poor outcomes
  • 62% had full clinical recovery, and 38% had acceptable outcomes at fixator removal

Sherman

Veterinary Surgery

2

2023

Linear external skeletal fixation applied in minimally invasive fashion for stabilization of nonarticular tibial fractures in dogs and cats

2023-2-VS-sherman-4

Article Title: Linear external skeletal fixation applied in minimally invasive fashion for stabilization of nonarticular tibial fractures in dogs and cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Haine 2022 et al., on outcomes in canine limb tumors, which lateral surgical margin width significantly reduced R1 margin rates?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Only 7% had R1 margins with 6–10 mm margins versus 55% for 0–5 mm.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 6–10 mm.
Only 7% had R1 margins with 6–10 mm margins versus 55% for 0–5 mm.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Fewer R1 margins (tumor on ink) were achieved in mast cell tumors (MCTs) when using 6–10 mm lateral margins versus 0–5 mm (7% vs. 55%; _P_ = .049).
  • For soft tissue sarcomas (STSs), no benefit was seen in margin completeness between 0–5 mm vs. 6–10 mm lateral margins (41% vs. 43% R1).
  • Overall R1 rates were 26% for MCTs and 42% for STSs following PNE.
  • R scheme (“tumor on ink” = R1) had better interobserver agreement (83%) compared to ≤1 mm margin criteria (68% agreement).
  • Complication rate was moderate (26%), but no surgeries required revision.
  • Local recurrence/metastasis occurred in 14% of dogs, with 60% of those having R1 margins.
  • Adjunctive therapy was considered clinically indicated in 46% of 0–5 mm margin cases vs. 24% of 6–10 mm cases.
  • Histologic grade and tumor size were not predictive of margin completeness.

Haine

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Incomplete histological margins following planned narrow excision of canine appendicular soft tissue sarcomas and mast cell tumors, using the residual tumor classification scheme

2022-7-VS-haine-2

Article Title: Incomplete histological margins following planned narrow excision of canine appendicular soft tissue sarcomas and mast cell tumors, using the residual tumor classification scheme

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Allaith 2023 et al., on THR outcomes, which implant types were associated with increased complications following femoral head and neck excision?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Multivariable analysis showed significantly increased complications using BFX and Helica implants for revision after femoral head and neck excision.
Incorrect. The correct answer is BioMedtrix BFX and Helica.
Multivariable analysis showed significantly increased complications using BFX and Helica implants for revision after femoral head and neck excision.

🔍 Key Findings

From Allaith et al., 2023 – Outcomes from a multiuser canine hip replacement registry

  • 2375 total hip replacements were analyzed across 1852 dogs, making this the largest multiuser canine THR dataset to date.
  • Most common indications for THR were hip dysplasia (51%) and osteoarthritis (34%).
  • Implants used included Kyon (46%), BioMedtrix CFX (22%), Hybrid (11%), BFX (9%), and Helica (4.5%).
  • Veterinary-reported complication rate was 8.5%, while owner-reported was 23%, with moderate agreement (k=0.44).
  • Most common complications: Luxation, femoral fracture, and aseptic loosening.
  • BioMedtrix BFX and Helica implants had a higher risk of complications when used after femoral head and neck excision (P = .031).
  • Postoperative LOAD scores significantly improved vs preoperative (21 → 11; P < .0001), supporting improved mobility.
  • Owner satisfaction was high, with 88% rating outcome as very good or good.

Allaith

Veterinary Surgery

2

2023

Outcomes and complications reported from a multiuser canine hip replacement registry over a 10-year period

2023-2-VS-allaith-2

Article Title: Outcomes and complications reported from a multiuser canine hip replacement registry over a 10-year period

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Mazdarani 2025 et al., on simulated muscle loading, which model showed the lowest muscle force ratios (quadriceps:gastrocnemius)?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Model 2 consistently showed lower ratios compared to others (p = .007).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Model 2 (rigid femoral fixation).
Model 2 consistently showed lower ratios compared to others (p = .007).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Simulated quadriceps and gastrocnemius forces increased proportionally with axial load in all three femoral fixation models.
  • Model 2 (rigid fixation) resulted in subphysiologic quadriceps forces and abnormally high gastrocnemius forces, reducing model fidelity.
  • Models 1 and 3 (with hip mobility) produced more physiologic quadriceps and force ratios, especially under 30–40% bodyweight loads.
  • Force ratios were significantly lower in rigid fixation (Model 2) compared to hip-mobile models (p = .007), suggesting model design affects simulated muscle coordination.
  • Joint angles (stifle and hock) remained within acceptable limits, though slight flexion occurred with increasing load.
  • Relative foot position differed by ~3.9 mm between models 2 and 3, with model 2 showing a more caudal position.
  • Model 3 preserved benefits of hip mobility while allowing radiographic documentation, making it a preferred setup for future studies.
  • The study suggests that models used in feline stifle stabilization research may underestimate physiologic forces, especially with rigid fixation designs.

Mazdarani

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Proximal femoral fixation method and axial load affect simulated muscle forces in an ex vivo feline limb press

2025-5-VS-mazdarani-2

Article Title: Proximal femoral fixation method and axial load affect simulated muscle forces in an ex vivo feline limb press

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Parlier 2024 et al., on insufflation effects on portal pressure in dogs, what insufflation pressure was predicted to induce portal hypertension (>15 mmHg)?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Portal hypertension was predicted to occur at 6.4 mmHg based on the exponential model.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 6.4 mmHg.
Portal hypertension was predicted to occur at 6.4 mmHg based on the exponential model.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Portal pressure increased proportionally with insufflation pressure: 38% at 6 mmHg, 95% at 10 mmHg, and 175% at 14 mmHg.
  • Exponential model: average increase of 7.45% per mmHg of insufflation pressure (CI: 4.7–10.2%).
  • No systemic hemodynamic adverse effects were observed; MAP remained >60 mmHg throughout.
  • Portal hypertension threshold (15 mmHg) predicted at ~6.4 mmHg insufflation pressure.
  • No statistical impact from patient weight, pressure-to-weight ratio, or order of insufflation rounds.
  • Measurement technique was feasible and safe, with only minor challenges (e.g., catheter kinking).
  • The study supports use of the lowest insufflation pressure needed for visualization to avoid portal hypertension.
  • Baseline portal pressures returned after desufflation, supporting comparison pre- and post-attenuation.

Parlier

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Prospective, randomized, clinical trial on the effects of laparoscopic insufflation pressures on portal pressures in dogs

2024-4-VS-parlier-2

Article Title: Prospective, randomized, clinical trial on the effects of laparoscopic insufflation pressures on portal pressures in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Fink 2025 et al., on Roux-en-Y outcomes, which anastomosis type was preferred when the common bile duct was severely dilated?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Choledochojejunostomy was favored due to favorable size match with the intestinal lumen when the CBD was dilated.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Choledochojejunostomy.
Choledochojejunostomy was favored due to favorable size match with the intestinal lumen when the CBD was dilated.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Roux-en-Y procedures were successfully completed in all 11 cases (6 dogs, 5 cats), despite case complexity and disease severity.
  • Median survival post-discharge was longer in cats (365 days) vs. dogs (82 days), with better outcomes in non-neoplastic vs. neoplastic disease (192 vs. 5 days).
  • Complication rate was high, with septic peritonitis, dehiscence, and cardiac arrest as leading causes of postoperative death; mortality rate = 36%.
  • Dehiscence rate was 8.6% (2 of 23 anastomoses), considered lower than typical rates for GI anastomoses in high-risk patients.
  • Feeding tubes (gastrostomy/jejunostomy) were used in all cases, enabling early nutritional support and stomach decompression.
  • Postoperative nausea and vomiting were common but mostly self-limiting; managed with metoclopramide, cisapride, and antiemetics.
  • Choledochojejunostomy was preferred when common bile duct was dilated, offering a favorable size match and potentially reducing bile leakage.
  • Roux-en-Y reduced typical Billroth II complications (e.g., bile reflux, afferent loop syndrome, dumping syndrome), with none observed in discharged patients.

Fink

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Roux‐en‐Y procedure to reconstruct the upper gastrointestinal tract in six dogs and five cats: A descriptive case series

2025-5-VS-fink-2

Article Title: Roux‐en‐Y procedure to reconstruct the upper gastrointestinal tract in six dogs and five cats: A descriptive case series

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Downey 2023 et al., on thoracoscopic lung lobectomy, what technical challenge was more frequently encountered in brachycephalic dogs during OLV?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Brachycephalic dogs had more difficulty achieving successful OLV, likely due to airway conformation.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Failure to achieve one-lung ventilation.
Brachycephalic dogs had more difficulty achieving successful OLV, likely due to airway conformation.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Thoracoscopic (TL) and thoracoscopic-assisted (TAL) lobectomy were performed in 12 dogs with non-neoplastic pulmonary consolidation.
  • 44% (4/9) of TL cases required conversion, most often due to pleural adhesions or poor visualization — a higher rate than for neoplastic lobectomies.
  • Surgical mortality was 8.3% (1/12 dogs), with death attributed to unaddressed BOAS, not surgical complications.
  • All 11 surviving dogs had no recurrence of clinical signs at a median 24-month follow-up.
  • Perioperative complications occurred in 58% (7/12): pneumothorax (2), hemorrhage (3), wound dehiscence (1), progressive pneumonia (1).
  • One-lung ventilation (OLV) was successful in 78% of TL dogs but may be harder to achieve in brachycephalic breeds.
  • Most dogs had infectious pneumonia (10/12), with bacterial causes identified in 8; fungal and viral etiologies were less common.
  • Hospitalization was short, with median stays of 3–4 days depending on approach and conversion status.

Downey

Veterinary Surgery

6

2023

Evaluation of long‐term outcome after lung lobectomy for canine non‐neoplastic pulmonary consolidation via thoracoscopic or thoracoscopic‐assisted surgery in 12 dogs

2023-6-VS-downey-5-31ae7

Article Title: Evaluation of long‐term outcome after lung lobectomy for canine non‐neoplastic pulmonary consolidation via thoracoscopic or thoracoscopic‐assisted surgery in 12 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Walker 2025 et al., on ventral slot guides, which surgeon experience level performed all procedures?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All ventral slots were performed by a single novice resident to assess usability of the guide.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Novice surgery resident.
All ventral slots were performed by a single novice resident to assess usability of the guide.

🔍 Key Findings

Design: Ex vivo cadaver study (n=8 dogs, 24 sites)
Comparison: Freehand vs. 3D-printed drill guide-assisted ventral slot (GAVS vs FHVS)
Findings:

  • GAVS produced slots not significantly different from planned dimensions (p = .722–.875)
  • FHVS produced significantly shorter slots than intended (p < .01)
  • No difference in surgical time (p = .071)
  • Shape ratio and slot divergence from midline were similar between groups (p > .4)
  • Use of guide significantly reduced variability in slot position (63% → 29%), shape (65% → 24%), and divergence (54% → 50%)

Conclusion: 3D-printed guides improved accuracy and consistency of ventral slot creation by novice surgeons; supports future evaluation in live dogs and small breeds

Walker

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Evaluation of a patient‐specific 3D‐printed guide for ventral slot surgery in dogs: An ex vivo study

2025-3-VS-walker-3

Article Title: Evaluation of a patient‐specific 3D‐printed guide for ventral slot surgery in dogs: An ex vivo study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Katz 2022 et al., on meniscal flounce sign, which of the following was recommended despite the flounce sign's diagnostic value?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Authors emphasized flounce should complement, not replace, probing for full evaluation.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Probing of the meniscus.
Authors emphasized flounce should complement, not replace, probing for full evaluation.

🔍 Key Findings

  • A positive meniscal flounce sign was associated with normal menisci in 95.5% of cases, demonstrating strong predictive value.
  • Absence of the meniscal flounce sign was associated with meniscal tears in 92.7% of cases.
  • Overall diagnostic accuracy of the flounce sign was 94.6%, with 96.6% sensitivity and 90.5% specificity.
  • Most tears in flounce-negative stifles were bucket-handle tears (73.8%), while radial tears were present in some flounce-positive stifles.
  • Radial tears did not consistently eliminate the flounce sign, suggesting they may not disrupt meniscal fiber tension sufficiently.
  • All procedures were arthroscopically performed, with probing and visualization of the medial meniscus' caudal pole.
  • Flounce sign should complement, not replace, probing—especially as some tear types (e.g., radial) may not abolish the sign.
  • Limb positioning and joint distraction may affect flounce visibility, introducing minor observer variability.

Katz

Veterinary Surgery

2

2022

The significance of the meniscal flounce sign in canine stifle arthroscopy

2022-2-VS-katz-5

Article Title: The significance of the meniscal flounce sign in canine stifle arthroscopy

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Stoneburner 2024 et al., on MIS survey results, what was the most cited reason for performing MIS techniques?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Respondents ranked reduced pain and faster recovery as top motivators (mean 4.0/5).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Patient benefit.
Respondents ranked reduced pain and faster recovery as top motivators (mean 4.0/5).

🔍 Key Findings

  • The survey included 111 practicing surgeons and 28 residents from ACVS, ECVS, and ANZCVS. 98.2% had performed soft tissue minimally invasive surgery (MIS).
  • In the past year, surgeons reported a median caseload of 90% basic laparoscopy, 0% advanced laparoscopy, and 10% thoracoscopy; for residents: 100% basic laparoscopy, 0% advanced, 0% thoracoscopy.
  • Laparoscopic ovariectomy and OHE were the most commonly performed MIS procedures, with most respondents proficient in basic laparoscopy, but few performing advanced laparoscopy or thoracoscopy.
  • Top barriers to MIS adoption were: lack of consistent caseload, lack of training, difficult learning curve, equipment limitations, and cost.
  • 76.6% of surgeons and 92.9% of residents received MIS training during residency. Those trained had completed residency median 6 years ago, compared to 22 years ago for those without MIS training (p < .001). Perceived adequate training correlated with higher proficiency.
  • MIS was recognized as having a steep learning curve, but patient benefits (mean score 4.0/5) were the top motivation — less pain, faster recovery, improved visualization.
  • The authors conclude basic laparoscopy is widely adopted, but advanced and thoracoscopic MIS remain underutilized. Training and access are key to future growth.
  • Expanded training and improved access to equipment are necessary to promote broader integration of MIS into veterinary soft-tissue surgery.

Stoneburner

Veterinary Surgery

5

2024

Laparoscopy and thoracoscopy in small animal surgery: A 2020 survey of small animal surgical diplomates and residents

2024-5-VS-stoneburner-5

Article Title: Laparoscopy and thoracoscopy in small animal surgery: A 2020 survey of small animal surgical diplomates and residents

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.