Your Custom Quiz

In García 2025 et al., on TIAS shunt confirmation, what was the outcome in dogs with microbubbles still visible after initial occlusion?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Two dogs had microbubbles after occlusion due to secondary vessels and required additional ligation.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Required ligation of second vessel.
Two dogs had microbubbles after occlusion due to secondary vessels and required additional ligation.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 40 dogs with congenital EHPSS were surgically treated using intraoperative transsplenic injection of agitated saline (TIAS) to assess full temporary occlusion.
  • TIAS was successful in 38/40 dogs; the remaining 2 had additional shunting vessels not originally seen and required further identification/ligation.
  • No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred.
  • TIAS allowed real-time confirmation of attenuation success using ultrasound-visible microbubbles.
  • Median postoperative bile acids were 5 μmol/L (preprandial) and 25 μmol/L (postprandial).
  • Long-term outcomes: 29/39 dogs had excellent, 10/39 had good outcomes; 3 dogs died unrelated to EHPSS.
  • Technique is presented as a safe, quick, low-cost, accessible intraoperative assessment alternative to IOMP or SP.

Garcia

Veterinary Surgery

2

2025

Use of intraoperative transsplenic injection of agitated saline to confirm temporary full attenuation of congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunts in dogs

2025-2-VS-garcia-2

Article Title: Use of intraoperative transsplenic injection of agitated saline to confirm temporary full attenuation of congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunts in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Longo 2025 et al., on MITA, which of the following was *not* observed in any case?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. No dogs developed plantar necrosis, a known risk in open arthrodesis.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Plantar necrosis.
No dogs developed plantar necrosis, a known risk in open arthrodesis.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 15 dogs underwent minimally invasive tarsal arthrodesis (MITA); 10 partial, 5 pantarsal.
  • Mean time to radiographic union: 1.8 ± 0.5 months.
  • Mean time to clinical union: 3.7 ± 0.8 months.
  • Complete osseous union: 46%; the rest achieved ≥50% with functional weightbearing.
  • Complication rate: 26% major (mostly implant-related); no catastrophic complications or plantar necrosis.
  • Functional outcomes: 6 full, 8 acceptable, 1 unacceptable (not due to MITA).
  • MITA may lower soft tissue complications vs open approaches and enable faster healing.

Longo

Veterinary Surgery

1

2025

Minimally invasive tarsal arthrodesis in 15 dogs

2025-1-VS-longo-4

Article Title: Minimally invasive tarsal arthrodesis in 15 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Chen 2024 et al., on pressure-measurement tools, how much does the risk of poor outcome increase per 1 mm Hg rise in portal pressure during complete PSS occlusion?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. A 1 mm Hg rise increases odds of failure by 9%, highlighting the need for precise monitoring.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 9%.
A 1 mm Hg rise increases odds of failure by 9%, highlighting the need for precise monitoring.

🔍 Key Findings

  • WMg (water manometer with gauge) was the most accurate and precise pressure measurement device.
  • APT (arterial pressure transducer) was less accurate than WMg but still precise; it differed significantly from the gold standard (WMr).
  • CCT (Compass CT) was the least accurate and precise and differed significantly from the set pressure.
  • Mean differences from set pressure were smallest for WMg (−0.020 cm H2O), moderate for APT (−0.390 cm H2O), and largest for CCT (−1.267 cm H2O).
  • All devices showed excellent interobserver (ICC = 1.000) and intraobserver agreement (ICC range 0.985–0.998).
  • Even though the CCT performed least well, all devices had mean errors ≤1.3 cm H2O, indicating potential clinical utility.
  • WMg or WMr should be preferred in surgical settings due to superior accuracy and precision.
  • Measurement precision is more critical than accuracy during PSS surgery, as a 1 mm Hg (~1.3 cm H2O) increase in portal pressure raises odds of poor outcomes by 9%.

Chen

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Accuracy, precision, and interobserver and intraobserver agreements related to pressure-measurement devices

2024-4-VS-chen-5

Article Title: Accuracy, precision, and interobserver and intraobserver agreements related to pressure-measurement devices

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Adair 2023 et al., on PCCLm vs. open cystotomy, what factor was associated with an increased risk of residual uroliths postoperatively in both groups?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. "Uroliths too numerous to count" was significantly associated with incomplete removal in both groups.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Uroliths too numerous to count.
"Uroliths too numerous to count" was significantly associated with incomplete removal in both groups.

🔍 Key Findings

  • PCCLm resulted in significantly fewer postoperative lower urinary tract signs compared to OC (13.0% vs 60.9%, p <.001).
  • Incomplete urolith removal was not significantly different between PCCLm and OC (11.4% vs 20%, p = .112).
  • PCCLm had significantly shorter anesthesia times than OC when no concurrent procedures were performed (97.5 vs 120 min, p < .001).
  • Surgical site infection/inflammation (SSII) rates were low and not significantly different between groups (4.5% PCCLm vs 1.8% OC).
  • Dogs undergoing PCCLm were more frequently discharged same-day (84.7% vs 0% in OC), reflecting faster recovery.
  • PCCLm had higher intraoperative complication rates (22.1% vs 3.4%), mostly due to incision extension or conversions.
  • Time to additional surgery for urolith recurrence was longer in PCCLm dogs (24 vs 11.5 months, p = .004).
  • Calcium oxalate uroliths were more prevalent in PCCLm cases, while OC had more struvite or mixed types.

Adair

Veterinary Surgery

6

2023

Retrospective comparison of modified percutaneous cystolithotomy (PCCLm) and traditional open cystotomy (OC) in dogs: 218 cases (2010–2019)

2023-7-VS-adair-3

Article Title: Retrospective comparison of modified percutaneous cystolithotomy (PCCLm) and traditional open cystotomy (OC) in dogs: 218 cases (2010–2019)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Low 2025 et al., on gonadectomy and CrCLD, what was the quality of evidence rated using the GRADE framework?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The authors rated the overall certainty in the evidence as "moderate" due to risks of bias and inconsistency, despite large sample size and robust statistics.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Moderate.
The authors rated the overall certainty in the evidence as "moderate" due to risks of bias and inconsistency, despite large sample size and robust statistics.

🔍 Key Findings

Increased risk with gonadectomy:

  • Pooled OR for CrCLD:
    • Females: 2.29 (95% CI: 1.77–2.95)
    • Males: 2.12 (95% CI: 1.67–2.69)

Early gonadectomy (≤1 year) further increased risk:

  • OR vs >1 year:
    • Females: 3.39
    • Males: 3.13

Late gonadectomy (>1 year) had no significant difference vs intact dogs.

Breed-specific findings:

  • Female Labradors: No increased CrCLD risk from gonadectomy (OR = 1.19; 95% CI: 0.54–2.64)
  • Male Labradors: Increased risk persisted (OR = 2.13; 95% CI: 1.53–2.98)

Study type: Systematic review + meta-analysis of 24 observational studies (n = 1.85 million dogs)

Low

Veterinary Surgery

2

2025

The association between gonadectomy and timing of gonadectomy, and the risk of canine cranial cruciate ligament disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2025-2-VS-low-4

Article Title: The association between gonadectomy and timing of gonadectomy, and the risk of canine cranial cruciate ligament disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Williams 2024 et al., on adrenaline use in maxillary nerve blocks, what was the observed reduction in median intraoperative hemorrhage in the adrenaline group compared to the no-adrenaline group?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Adrenaline reduced median hemorrhage from 7.95 g to 1.82 g, a 77.1% reduction.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 77.1%.
Adrenaline reduced median hemorrhage from 7.95 g to 1.82 g, a 77.1% reduction.

🔍 Key Findings

  • The addition of adrenaline (0.00198%) to bilateral maxillary nerve blocks significantly reduced intraoperative hemorrhage in dogs undergoing sharp staphylectomy (median reduction: 77.1%).
  • Normalized hemorrhage (g/kg) and total hemorrhage (g) were significantly lower in the adrenaline group (p = .021 and p = .013, respectively).
  • Surgeon-assessed hemorrhage scores were also significantly lower in the adrenaline group (median 2 vs. 3; p = .029), indicating improved surgical visibility.
  • No adverse effects (e.g. tachycardia, arrhythmia, or hypertension) were observed with adrenaline administration.
  • A standardized intraoral approach to the maxillary nerve block was used with 0.5 mL per side regardless of dog size.
  • Breed effect observed: English Bulldogs had higher normalized hemorrhage, possibly due to anatomical variation or underdosing relative to size.
  • Adrenaline may also prolong local anesthetic action and reduce blood aspiration risks, though this was not directly measured.
  • The study supports the routine inclusion of adrenaline in maxillary nerve blocks for staphylectomy in BOAS patients to improve surgical field and reduce bleeding.

Williams

Veterinary Surgery

8

2024

Evaluation of the addition of adrenaline in a bilateral maxillary nerve block to reduce hemorrhage in dogs undergoing sharp staphylectomy for brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome. A prospective, randomized study

2024-8-VS-williams-1

Article Title: Evaluation of the addition of adrenaline in a bilateral maxillary nerve block to reduce hemorrhage in dogs undergoing sharp staphylectomy for brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome. A prospective, randomized study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Kershaw 2025 et al., on PSG vs AD, what was the most significant benefit of using a patient-specific guide (PSG) during transcondylar screw (TCS) placement in dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. PSGs significantly improved drill hole entry (p < 0.001) and exit (p = 0.044) accuracy over aiming devices.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Significantly improved entry and exit hole accuracy.
PSGs significantly improved drill hole entry (p < 0.001) and exit (p = 0.044) accuracy over aiming devices.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 3D-printed patient-specific guides (PSGs) significantly improved accuracy of drill hole entry (p < 0.001) and exit (p = 0.044) compared to commercial aiming devices (AD).
  • Zero joint penetrations occurred with PSGs, whereas 3 of 7 AD-guided screws were predicted to penetrate the joint (p = 0.19).
  • Variance in exit point and drill angle was significantly lower in PSG group, suggesting more consistent results.
  • One PSG case failed due to improper guide seating, but this was corrected with improved soft tissue clearance.
  • PSGs enabled safer trajectories despite use by novice surgeons, emphasizing their value in less experienced hands.
  • Drill holes placed with ADs deviated more cranially and distally, increasing the risk of articular violation.
  • Use of PSGs allowed for tighter clustering of drill trajectories, especially in the cranial–caudal axis.
  • Subjective feedback favored PSGs for ease of use and ergonomic design, despite requiring slightly larger incisions.

Kershaw

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

5

2025

Patient-specific Guides Improve the Accuracy and Safety of Transcondylar Screw Placement—A Cadaveric Study in the Canine Humerus

2025-5-VCOT-kershaw-1

Article Title: Patient-specific Guides Improve the Accuracy and Safety of Transcondylar Screw Placement—A Cadaveric Study in the Canine Humerus

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Walker 2022 et al., on TPLO mRUST scoring, which of the following was associated with **lower** mRUST scores?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Postoperative complications were associated with significantly lower TPLO mRUST scores (mean difference 1.4, P = .03).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Complications.
Postoperative complications were associated with significantly lower TPLO mRUST scores (mean difference 1.4, P = .03).

🔍 Key Findings

  • TPLO mRUST scoring showed improved inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.56) compared to subjective evaluation (Kappa = 0.33).
  • Intra-rater reliability was similar for both methods (TPLO mRUST: 0.73, subjective: 0.72).
  • TPLO mRUST scores ≥10/12 strongly correlated with radiographic union, as subjectively assessed (99% agreement).
  • No significant difference in healing between first and second TPLO sides (P = .09), countering assumptions about load-bearing impact.
  • Higher initial lameness scores and younger age were associated with higher TPLO mRUST scores, suggesting more robust healing in those groups.
  • Postoperative complications were linked to lower TPLO mRUST scores, indicating impaired healing.
  • Medial cortex was excluded from scoring due to plate obstruction, validating use of only 3 cortices for scoring.
  • The TPLO mRUST system may standardize healing assessment, reducing subjective bias across specialties.

Walker

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

Evaluation of a modified radiographic union scale for tibial fractures scoring system in staged bilateral tibial plateau leveling osteotomy procedures and comparison of first and second side radiographic bone healing

2022-8-VS-walker-5

Article Title: Evaluation of a modified radiographic union scale for tibial fractures scoring system in staged bilateral tibial plateau leveling osteotomy procedures and comparison of first and second side radiographic bone healing

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Miller 2024 et al., on surgical comparison of staphylectomy vs. FFP, which airway abnormality was more common in FFP dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Grade 1 collapse was significantly more common in FFP dogs (68%) than in staphylectomy dogs (32%).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Grade 1 laryngeal collapse.
Grade 1 collapse was significantly more common in FFP dogs (68%) than in staphylectomy dogs (32%).

🔍 Key Findings

  • FFP resulted in longer median surgery (75 min) and anesthesia (111 min) durations than S (51 min and 80 min, respectively).
  • No significant difference in anesthetic complications, regurgitation, aspiration pneumonia, or hospitalization time between S and FFP.
  • Major complications were rare (4%) and equally distributed between procedures; included tracheostomy and euthanasia due to severe airway disease.
  • Postoperative oxygen use was common (52% of dogs) but not significantly different between procedures.
  • FFP dogs more often had laryngeal collapse (especially Grade 1: 68% vs. 32% in S dogs).
  • Most dogs (85%) had concurrent nares surgery, with caudal wedge resection more frequent in FFP dogs.
  • Few dogs needed revision soft palate surgery (7/124 total); similar between groups.
  • Postoperative clinical signs improved across both procedures; regurgitation was the most persistent sign post-op.

Miller

Veterinary Surgery

8

2024

Complications and outcome following staphylectomy and folded flap palatoplasty in dogs with brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome

2024-8-VS-miller-5

Article Title: Complications and outcome following staphylectomy and folded flap palatoplasty in dogs with brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Antonakakis 2022 et al., on telovelar tumor resection, how long did the dog remain neurologically normal after surgery?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The dog remained neurologically normal 28 months after surgery with no recurrence.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 28 months.
The dog remained neurologically normal 28 months after surgery with no recurrence.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Telovelar approach enabled complete resection of a fourth ventricle choroid plexus tumor in a dog without postoperative complications.
  • Postoperative MRI confirmed gross total tumor removal, and the dog remained neurologically normal 28 months post-surgery.
  • The tela choroidea was used as a surgical landmark and incised to allow atraumatic access to the tumor.
  • Cerebellum was spared using this technique, minimizing risk of cerebellar injury (e.g., cerebellar mutism).
  • No hemorrhagic complications were noted during surgery due to dissection through avascular planes.
  • Histopathology favored choroid plexus carcinoma based on mitotic index (9/10 HPFs), though definitive diagnosis remained pending.
  • The case highlights the utility of telovelar over transvermian approach, given its minimally traumatic nature and improved exposure.
  • Survival beyond 2 years without adjunctive therapy suggests surgical excision alone may be curative in select cases.

Antonakakis

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

Use of a telovelar approach for complete resection of a choroid plexus tumor in a dog

2022-8-VS-antonakakis-5

Article Title: Use of a telovelar approach for complete resection of a choroid plexus tumor in a dog

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.