Your Custom Quiz

In Adrian 2024 et al., on feline pelvic fracture stabilization, what was a suggested strategy to reduce screw pullout in SOP constructs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Failure occurred in short plate cases; longer plates improved outcomes.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Use longer plates with more bicortical screws.
Failure occurred in short plate cases; longer plates improved outcomes.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 20 cats with pelvic fractures treated with SOP plates and cortical screws
  • Full function reported in all patients per FMPI follow-up
  • Screw loosening in 3/20 SOP cases; implant removal in 3 cats
  • Median sacral index decrease at follow-up: 5.7%; mostly mild narrowing
  • Complications: 5 major (3 SOP removals, 2 trochanter osteotomy issues); 20 minor
  • SOP plate shown feasible even in challenging configurations; good functional outcomes

Adrian

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

1

2024

Use of Locking Plates Fixed with Cortical Screws for Pelvic Fracture Repair in 20 Cats

2024-1-VCOT-adrian-4

Article Title: Use of Locking Plates Fixed with Cortical Screws for Pelvic Fracture Repair in 20 Cats

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Alvarez 2024 et al., which method combination led to increased craniolateral compression without enhancing caudal pressure?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. K + F significantly improved craniolateral pressure, but caudal compression remained low:contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Kern + Pointed forceps (K + F).
K + F significantly improved craniolateral pressure, but caudal compression remained low:contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • F + P (forceps + plate compression) achieved the most uniform, high-pressure distribution across all quadrants.
  • Kern forceps alone concentrated force in craniomedial quadrant, reducing caudal compression.
  • Combining Kern + F improved craniolateral compression but did not restore caudal compression.
  • Plate compression alone yielded caudal bias, not uniform pressure.
  • Significant inter-method variation in quadrant-specific compression confirmed via ANOVA (p < 0.001 for all quadrants).

Alvarez

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

2

2024

In Vitro Assessment of Compression Patterns Using Different Methods to Achieve Interfragmentary Compression during Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomy

2024-2-VCOT-alvarez-3

Article Title: In Vitro Assessment of Compression Patterns Using Different Methods to Achieve Interfragmentary Compression during Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomy

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Takagi 2022 et al., on hepatic venous anatomy, what major advantage does computed tomography angiography (CTA) offer compared to plastination or cadaveric methods?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. CTA with contrast identifies small vessels not visualized using plastination or cadaveric studies.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Identification of small intrahepatic venous variations.
CTA with contrast identifies small vessels not visualized using plastination or cadaveric studies.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Hepatic venous drainage patterns vary widely across all lobes, especially the left lateral lobe.
  • Right lateral lobe had a median of 2 vessels draining directly into the caudal vena cava (CVC); range: 1–4.
  • Caudate process of caudate lobe had the most variability: 1–5 vessels draining into the CVC; 2 vessels was most common (54.5%).
  • Left lateral lobe drained via 2–8 veins into the left hepatic vein (LHV), with 3 veins most common (31.2%).
  • Left medial lobe typically had 1 vein draining into the LHV (61% of dogs).
  • Papillary process drained into the LHV in 93.5% of cases; 6.5% drained directly to the CVC.
  • Quadrate lobe always had 1 vessel draining either directly to the CVC or via the LHV.
  • CTA revealed more variations than previously described in plastinated or cadaveric studies, highlighting its superior value in surgical planning.

Takagi

Veterinary Surgery

4

2022

Computed angiographic variations in hepatic venous vasculature in dogs

2022-4-VS-takagi-5

Article Title: Computed angiographic variations in hepatic venous vasculature in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Espinel Rupérez 2023 et al., in Arthroscopic-assisted hip toggle stabilization in cats, what percentage of joints experienced intraoperative complications?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 5 out of 14 joints had complications, mainly related to femoral tunnel creation and toggle lodging.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 36%.
5 out of 14 joints had complications, mainly related to femoral tunnel creation and toggle lodging.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 14 joints from 7 cat cadavers underwent AA-HTS successfully.
  • Median surgical time: 46.5 min (29–144), including 7 min for arthroscopy and 40 min for toggle placement.
  • Intraoperative complications in 5/14 joints: 4 related to femoral tunnel creation, 1 toggle lodging.
  • Toggle passage through femoral tunnel was the most challenging step, mildly difficult in 6 joints.
  • Cartilage injury occurred in 10 joints, but all were minor (<10% of cartilage area).
  • 13 deviations from planned technique were identified (8 major, 5 minor), all involving femoral tunnel placement.
  • No neurovascular, intrapelvic, or major periarticular injuries occurred.
  • Authors conclude: AA-HTS is feasible in cats, but associated with high rates of minor iatrogenic cartilage damage, intra-op complications, and technique deviations.

Espinel Rupérez

Veterinary Surgery

7

2023

Arthroscopic-assisted hip toggle stabilization in cats: An ex vivo feasibility study

2023-7-VS-espinel-2

Article Title: Arthroscopic-assisted hip toggle stabilization in cats: An ex vivo feasibility study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Low 2025 et al., on machine-learning outcomes in IVDE, what was the performance of the XGBoost model when using only preoperative variables?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The preoperative-only XGBoost model had AUC 0.8271 and accuracy 71.9%.
Incorrect. The correct answer is AUC 0.8271, Accuracy 71.9%.
The preoperative-only XGBoost model had AUC 0.8271 and accuracy 71.9%.

🔍 Key Findings

The study included 162 deep-pain-negative dogs undergoing decompressive surgery (hemilaminectomy) for acute thoracolumbar intervertebral disc extrusion (IVDE).

Ambulatory recovery occurred in 53.1% of dogs (86/162).

The best performing machine-learning model was XGBoost, with an AUC of 0.9502 and accuracy of 89.1%, outperforming Ridge, AdaBoost, and Naive Bayes models.

Preoperative-only XGBoost models were less accurate, with AUC dropping to 0.8271 and accuracy to 71.9%.

Top predictive features (by SHAP analysis) included:

  1. T2-weighted to L2 spinal cord signal ratio (lower values predicted better outcome)
  2. Use of fenestration (presence associated with better recovery)
  3. Hospitalization duration
  4. Imaging modality used
  5. Duration of nonambulatory status

Machine learning provided better insight into prognostic factors than traditional statistical methods.

Low

Veterinary Surgery

4

2025

Machine-learning-based prediction of functional recovery in deep-pain-negative dogs after decompressive thoracolumbar hemilaminectomy for acute intervertebral disc extrusion

2025-4-VS-low-5

Article Title: Machine-learning-based prediction of functional recovery in deep-pain-negative dogs after decompressive thoracolumbar hemilaminectomy for acute intervertebral disc extrusion

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Buote 2023 et al., on laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in cats, which of the following was true regarding live patient outcomes after LVSG?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Live cats had no GI or healing complications; staple lines were not oversewn.
Incorrect. The correct answer is No complications were reported.
Live cats had no GI or healing complications; staple lines were not oversewn.

🔍 Key Findings

  • LVSG was feasible in 9/10 feline cadavers and both live cats, with no intra- or postoperative complications in live cases.
  • Two cadavers developed suspected stenosis due to staple lines too close to the lesser curvature; avoided with orogastric tube placement in later cases.
  • No evidence of gastric leakage in any cadavers (8/10 tested) or live patients after methylene blue leak tests.
  • Mean surgical time was ~110 min cadavers / 115 min live, and 27.6% of stomach mass was resected.
  • Both live cats recovered uneventfully, lost 21–24% body weight over 3 months, and had no GI complications at 6-month follow-up.
  • Orogastric tube and tension on the greater curvature were critical to avoid staple line misplacement or stenosis.
  • No oversew of the staple line was needed, and unreinforced staples showed no leakage in live patients.
  • Future studies needed to assess metabolic outcomes and ideal staple sizing and closure techniques.

Buote

Veterinary Surgery

6

2023

Laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy in felines: A cadaveric feasibility study and experimental case series in two cats

2023-6-VS-buote2-5

Article Title: Laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy in felines: A cadaveric feasibility study and experimental case series in two cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Perez Neto 2025 et al., on hip resurfacing arthroplasty, implantation of the prosthesis reduced maximum load by approximately what percentage compared to controls?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Maximum load was 22% lower in prosthetic femurs versus intact controls.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 22%.
Maximum load was 22% lower in prosthetic femurs versus intact controls.

🔍 Key Findings

  • In an ex vivo study of 20 canine femur pairs, implantation of a novel hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) prosthesis reduced maximum load (ML) by 22% and load at collapse (LC) by 27% vs. intact controls (p ≤ 0.05).
  • Displacement at maximum load (DML), displacement at collapse (DC), and stiffness (k) were not significantly different between prosthesis and control groups.
  • Both groups showed similar failure patterns, with 92% failing at the femoral neck.
  • All prosthetic femurs still withstood ~6.2× body weight — exceeding estimated in vivo peak loads (~1.64× BW).
  • Prosthesis positioning (neutral vs valgus) had no significant effect on biomechanical outcomes.
  • Implant design preserved more metaphyseal bone stock than total hip replacement, possibly explaining the smaller load reduction compared to other short-stem prostheses.
  • The press-fit cobalt–chromium design with conical stem allowed full contact and stress distribution over the femoral head/neck.
  • Authors conclude the device has adequate immediate biomechanical strength for clinical use, though long-term in vivo studies are needed.

Perez Neto

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

4

2025

Biomechanical Evaluation of a Femoral Implant for Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty in Dogs: An Ex Vivo Study

2025-4-VCOT-perezneto-1

Article Title: Biomechanical Evaluation of a Femoral Implant for Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty in Dogs: An Ex Vivo Study

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Lopez Barroso 2026 et al., on sacroiliac screw accuracy, which factor most likely contributed to caudal screw angulation in some cases?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The study noted caudal angulation in many cases and attributed it to minor malalignment of the pelvis.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Imperfect pelvic positioning.
The study noted caudal angulation in many cases and attributed it to minor malalignment of the pelvis.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Mean SI joint reduction was 94.25%, exceeding the 90% target considered important to reduce screw loosening
  • Mean sacral width purchase was 82.52%, with all screws achieving >60%—a threshold for reducing implant loosening risk
  • All 20 screws were accurately placed within the sacral body, confirmed via CT or radiographs
  • A 3D-printed drill guide and table-bound system facilitated consistent screw placement via minimally invasive technique
  • Craniocaudal and dorsoventral angles were well controlled (mean CCA = –1.22°, DVA = 0.71°), demonstrating accurate trajectory
  • No intraoperative complications were reported; all pilot holes drilled on first attempt
  • Use of fluoroscopy and orthogonal imaging enhanced surgical accuracy and reduced malposition risk
  • The system permitted screw placement through a sleeve that doubled as a muscle retractor, allowing implant delivery without disruption

Lopez Barroso

Veterinary Surgery

1

2026

Accuracy of a table‐bound reduction and drill guide system for minimally invasive sacroiliac screw placement in cats

2026-1-VS-lopezbarroso-5

Article Title: Accuracy of a table‐bound reduction and drill guide system for minimally invasive sacroiliac screw placement in cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Moreira 2024 et al., what was the approximate mean prediction error for the proximal-centered wedge technique?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The proximal-centered wedge showed the least accurate results, with mean TPA error of –2.9° (SD 1.2°).
Incorrect. The correct answer is –2.9°.
The proximal-centered wedge showed the least accurate results, with mean TPA error of –2.9° (SD 1.2°).

2024-1-VS-moreira-2

Article Title:

Journal:

In Duffy 2022 et al., on crotch suture techniques, which technique resulted in the highest **initial leakage pressure** during FEESA in dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. SCCS produced the highest ILP at 47.6 mm Hg, significantly higher than all other techniques.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Simple continuous crotch suture (SCCS).
SCCS produced the highest ILP at 47.6 mm Hg, significantly higher than all other techniques.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Augmenting FEESA with two simple interrupted crotch sutures (TCS) or simple continuous crotch suture (SCCS) significantly increased initial leakage pressure (ILP) compared to no suture or a single suture (NCS, SICS).
  • SCCS had the highest ILP (47.6 mm Hg), followed by TCS (37.8 mm Hg), SICS (33.0 mm Hg), and NCS (27.1 mm Hg).
  • All crotch suture types increased maximal leakage pressure (MLP) compared to no crotch suture.
  • Leakage from the crotch occurred most commonly in NCS (67%) and SICS (50%), but only 8% with TCS and 0% with SCCS.
  • SCCS was the only technique where leakage never occurred at the crotch site.
  • SCCS had the highest MLP (100.6 mm Hg), supporting its use in clinical settings with high-risk patients.
  • Intraluminal pressures during leakage in NCS constructs were sometimes below normal physiologic pressures, emphasizing risk of leakage without crotch suture.
  • The transverse staple line never leaked in any group, indicating the crotch is the primary weak point.

Duffy

Veterinary Surgery

4

2022

Influence of crotch suture augmentation on leakage pressure and leakage location during functional end-to-end stapled anastomoses in dogs

2022-4-VS-duffy-1

Article Title: Influence of crotch suture augmentation on leakage pressure and leakage location during functional end-to-end stapled anastomoses in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.