Your Custom Quiz

In Duvieusart 2025 et al., on lung lobectomy approaches, what was a key advantage of the TDCM technique?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. TDCM approach enabled better access and visibility of the accessory lung lobe.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Superior exposure for stapling.
TDCM approach enabled better access and visibility of the accessory lung lobe.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Study Design: Canine cadaveric study comparing intercostal thoracotomy (ICT), median sternotomy (MS), and transdiaphragmatic with caudal median sternotomy (TDCM) for accessory lung lobectomy (ALL).
  • Main Outcomes:
    • Exposure Area: TDCM (193.5 cm²) > MS (106.5 cm²) > ICT (73.5 cm²) (p = .01).
    • TDCM provided significantly greater exposure than MS (p = .02) and ICT (p = .02); MS > ICT (p = .04).
    • Surgical Time: No significant difference (p = .06).
    • Lobe Excision (% by weight/surface area): No significant difference between groups (p = .4).
    • Staple Line Leak: Leak at ≤40 cmH₂O in 2/4 ICT, 0/4 MS, 0/4 TDCM (p = .09).
  • Complications:
    • 1/4 MS cases had iatrogenic damage to an adjacent lobe.
  • Technical Insights:
    • TDCM approach allowed immediate visualization of all three parts of the right pulmonary ligament.
    • The TDCM approach offers improved access without requiring en bloc removal with the right caudal lobe.
  • Conclusion: The TDCM approach provides improved exposure for ALL lobectomy with no increase in surgical time or complications relative to other approaches.

Duvieusart

Veterinary Surgery

1

2025

Comparison of three approaches for accessory lung lobectomy in the canine cadaveric model: Intercostal thoracotomy, median sternotomy, and a transdiaphragmatic approach combined with caudal median sternotomy

2025-1-VS-duvieusart-5

Article Title: Comparison of three approaches for accessory lung lobectomy in the canine cadaveric model: Intercostal thoracotomy, median sternotomy, and a transdiaphragmatic approach combined with caudal median sternotomy

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Downey 2023 et al., on lung lobectomy for pulmonary consolidation, what was the most common perioperative complication in dogs undergoing lung lobectomy?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Mild, self-limiting hemorrhage occurred in 3 of 12 dogs — the most common complication.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Mild hemorrhage.
Mild, self-limiting hemorrhage occurred in 3 of 12 dogs — the most common complication.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Thoracoscopic (TL) and thoracoscopic-assisted (TAL) lobectomy were performed in 12 dogs with non-neoplastic pulmonary consolidation.
  • 44% (4/9) of TL cases required conversion, most often due to pleural adhesions or poor visualization — a higher rate than for neoplastic lobectomies.
  • Surgical mortality was 8.3% (1/12 dogs), with death attributed to unaddressed BOAS, not surgical complications.
  • All 11 surviving dogs had no recurrence of clinical signs at a median 24-month follow-up.
  • Perioperative complications occurred in 58% (7/12): pneumothorax (2), hemorrhage (3), wound dehiscence (1), progressive pneumonia (1).
  • One-lung ventilation (OLV) was successful in 78% of TL dogs but may be harder to achieve in brachycephalic breeds.
  • Most dogs had infectious pneumonia (10/12), with bacterial causes identified in 8; fungal and viral etiologies were less common.
  • Hospitalization was short, with median stays of 3–4 days depending on approach and conversion status.

Downey

Veterinary Surgery

6

2023

Evaluation of long‐term outcome after lung lobectomy for canine non‐neoplastic pulmonary consolidation via thoracoscopic or thoracoscopic‐assisted surgery in 12 dogs

2023-6-VS-downey-5

Article Title: Evaluation of long‐term outcome after lung lobectomy for canine non‐neoplastic pulmonary consolidation via thoracoscopic or thoracoscopic‐assisted surgery in 12 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Jourdain 2024 et al., on fluoroscopic fixation of feline SIL, what was the median postoperative reduction immediately after surgery?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The median sacroiliac reduction immediately after surgery was 94.1%, with 11 of 17 procedures achieving ≥90%.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 94.1%.
The median sacroiliac reduction immediately after surgery was 94.1%, with 11 of 17 procedures achieving ≥90%.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Minimally invasive fluoroscopic technique yielded median reduction of 94.1% immediately postoperative.
  • Screw purchase ≥60% in sacral body achieved in 82% of cases, with median purchase of 73.3%.
  • One screw exited caudally; no dorsal, ventral, or cranial exits reported.
  • At 7-week follow-up, reduction and purchase slightly declined but remained effective (p = .008 and p = .013).
  • No screw loosening observed, even in suboptimal reductions or purchases.
  • Pelvic canal width and symmetry (PCDR and HCWR) were restored and maintained.
  • Excellent long-term function: FMPI ≥0.98 in 9 of 10 cats; owners reported 10/10 satisfaction.
  • Fluoroscopy enabled accurate screw placement and minimized tissue trauma, contributing to rapid recovery.

Jourdain

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Fluoroscopically-assisted closed reduction and percutaneous fixation of sacroiliac luxations in cats using 2.4 mm headless cannulated compression screws: Description, evaluation and clinical outcome

2024-4-VS-jourdain-1

Article Title: Fluoroscopically-assisted closed reduction and percutaneous fixation of sacroiliac luxations in cats using 2.4 mm headless cannulated compression screws: Description, evaluation and clinical outcome

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Sisk 2024 et al., what is a theoretical advantage of expandable intramedullary nails?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Expandable IMNs are designed to better contact the endosteum with less intraoperative imaging:contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Minimized need for fluoroscopy.
Expandable IMNs are designed to better contact the endosteum with less intraoperative imaging:contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • IMN provides relative stability, resists bending/torsion due to central axis alignment
  • Larger diameter nails = exponentially greater stiffness (∝ D⁴)
  • Trade-off: Larger interlocking holes weaken fatigue strength of the nail
  • Reaming increases contact/stability but has pros/cons:
    • Improves outcomes in closed fractures
    • May reduce endosteal blood flow in thin-walled bones (e.g., cats)
  • Design advances:
    • Angle-stable IMN reduce rotational slack
    • Expandable nails simplify insertion but may compromise removal or compressive load resistance
    • Precontoured nails match bone curvature but lack consistent clinical superiority
  • Material debates continue (e.g., titanium vs. stainless steel vs. magnesium)

Sisk

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

6

2024

Biomechanical Principles of Intramedullary Nails in Veterinary and Human Medicine

2024-6-VCOT-sisk-3

Article Title: Biomechanical Principles of Intramedullary Nails in Veterinary and Human Medicine

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Farrell 2022 et al., on checklist reliability in OVH simulation, how many OSATS GRS items met the content validity criteria?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Only “respect for tissue” met content validity criteria; the other 5 OSATS GRS items were excluded.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 1.
Only “respect for tissue” met content validity criteria; the other 5 OSATS GRS items were excluded.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 39 of 40 checklist items for simulated OVH surgical assessment had good content validity (CVI = 0.81)
  • Only 1 of 6 items from the OSATS GRS (respect for tissue) met inclusion criteria (CVI = 0.80)
  • Checklist showed strong reliability (G-coefficient = 0.85) for moderate-stakes exams
  • Modified OSATS GRS showed acceptable reliability (G-coefficient = 0.79)
  • Two raters needed for acceptable reliability in high-stakes exams when using the checklist
  • Minimal interrater bias found; variance largely due to interaction among student, rater, and item
  • Digital recordings were a reliable method of evaluating surgical performance
  • Study supports using checklist over OSATS GRS for assessing preclinical students on simulated models

Farrell

Veterinary Surgery

5

2022

Evaluating validity evidence for 2 instruments developed to assess students' surgical skills in a simulated environment

2022-5-VS-farrell-2

Article Title: Evaluating validity evidence for 2 instruments developed to assess students' surgical skills in a simulated environment

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Sunlight 2022 et al., on Protein C monitoring, which variable was **not** significantly associated with ultimate clinical status?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Only postoperative PC correlated with clinical status; preoperative PC was not predictive.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Preoperative PC.
Only postoperative PC correlated with clinical status; preoperative PC was not predictive.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Postoperative Protein C (PC) activity increased in 78.7% of dogs, and was significantly higher in dogs with excellent clinical outcomes.
  • Complete acute shunt occlusion resulted in higher postoperative PC activity (96.3%) and better ultimate clinical outcomes than incomplete occlusion.
  • Preoperative PC was not predictive of clinical status, but postoperative PC was associated with improved outcomes.
  • Standard biochemical markers (HCT, MCV, ALB, BUN) also improved postoperatively, especially in dogs with excellent clinical outcomes.
  • Dogs requiring a second procedure had significantly lower postoperative PC (43.5%) than those not requiring further intervention (78.5%).
  • Repeat procedures improved PC and BUN values, with PC increasing significantly after second intervention (to 69.8%).
  • PC normalization (within reference interval) occurred in 87.5% of dogs with excellent clinical status, compared to only 12.5% in those with poor status.
  • Clinical outcome classification (excellent/fair/poor) correlated with biochemical normalization and lack of need for diet/medications.

Sunlight

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Protein C and comparative biochemical changes in dogs treated with percutaneous transvenous coil embolization of congenital intrahepatic portosystemic shunts

2022-1-VS-sunlight-2

Article Title: Protein C and comparative biochemical changes in dogs treated with percutaneous transvenous coil embolization of congenital intrahepatic portosystemic shunts

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Kalmukov 2022 et al., on cell salvage efficacy, what was the mean percentage of red blood cell mass (rbcM) recovered using direct suction?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Direct suction recovered a mean of 88.43% of the red blood cell mass.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 88.4%.
Direct suction recovered a mean of 88.43% of the red blood cell mass.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Direct suction salvaged more red blood cell mass (rbcM) than swab washing: 88.43% vs 84.74% (p = .015)
  • Swab washing still achieved high recovery (84.74%), making it a viable adjunct when suction is not possible
  • No significant difference in post-salvage PCV between methods (~34% for Su and ~33.9% for Sw)
  • Total salvaged blood volume was significantly higher using direct suction (143 mL vs 139.8 mL; p < .001)
  • Leukocytes are removed during salvage, potentially lowering risk of cytokine-mediated transfusion reactions
  • Expired pRBCs were used, but device still achieved high RBC recovery, supporting clinical utility
  • Swab washing via manual agitation may cause more RBC destruction than direct suction
  • Cell salvage may avoid complications of allogeneic transfusions, like storage lesions and immunologic reactions

Kalmukov

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

Ex vivo evaluation of a novel cell salvage device to recover canine erythrocytes

2022-8-VS-kalmukov-1

Article Title: Ex vivo evaluation of a novel cell salvage device to recover canine erythrocytes

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Cortina 2023 et al., on modified TTT outcomes for MPL in dogs, what was the most common major complication observed?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Patellar reluxation occurred in 4.3% of cases, making it the most frequent major complication.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Patellar reluxation.
Patellar reluxation occurred in 4.3% of cases, making it the most frequent major complication.

🔍 Key Findings

  • m-TTT yielded a low overall major complication rate (4.3%) and minor complication rate of 15%, consistent with or better than previous techniques.
  • Patellar reluxation occurred in only 4.3% of stifles, with high-grade reluxation seen in just 0.6% of cases—lower than the 12.4–21% range reported for other techniques.
  • Implant migration rate was 3.7%, lower than previously reported for smooth pin fixation (7.7–24.6%).
  • Use of a tension band with single Steinmann and Kirschner wire reduced stress risers and fixation failure, supporting better stability.
  • Tibial tuberosity fracture occurred in only 1.3% of cases, lower than the 1–6% seen in other reports.
  • All long-term major complications (1.3%) were related to pin migration, but were easily resolved.
  • Radiographic follow-up confirmed complete bone healing in all examined cases, even up to 9 years postoperatively.
  • Owner satisfaction was 100%, and 95% rated quality of life as good to excellent based on CBPI surveys.

Cortina

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Outcomes and complications of a modified tibial tuberosity transposition technique in the treatment of medial patellar luxation in dogs

2023-5-VS-cortina-1

Article Title: Outcomes and complications of a modified tibial tuberosity transposition technique in the treatment of medial patellar luxation in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Hildebrandt 2023 et al., on Buccal Transposition Flap for Maxillary Lip Reconstruction in Dogs, what aspect of the buccal transposition flap allowed improved mobility compared to a rotation flap?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Releasing this margin allowed tension-free repositioning and improved flap mobility.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Release of ventrocaudal commissure.
Releasing this margin allowed tension-free repositioning and improved flap mobility.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Buccal transposition flap provided successful closure of large maxillary lip defects in all 5 dogs
  • All flaps survived, with 3 dogs experiencing minor complications (e.g., fistulas, dehiscence) that resolved
  • Flap vascularization originated from the angularis oris and superior labial arteries, as confirmed via CT angiography
  • Excellent cosmetic and functional outcomes were achieved in all cases
  • Ex vivo cadaver study validated flap perfusion, showing consistent contrast filling of key arteries
  • Oronasal fistulas occurred in 2 dogs at the palatal incision site, likely due to contact with the mandibular canine tooth
  • Mandibular canine coronectomy was performed in 2/5 dogs to prevent flap trauma
  • Flap design and commissure positioning were customizable, aiding tension relief and improving outcomes

Hildebrandt

Veterinary Surgery

2

2023

Buccal transposition flap for closure of maxillary lip defects in 5 dogs

2023-2-VS-hildebrandt-4

Article Title: Buccal transposition flap for closure of maxillary lip defects in 5 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Mullen 2023 et al., on microvascular perfusion, which of the following statements best reflects the accuracy of subjective assessment of intestinal viability?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Surgeon’s subjective assessment was shown to be unreliable, with no difference in microvascular density between subjectively viable and nonviable intestines.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It poorly predicted viability and often led to unnecessary resections.
Surgeon’s subjective assessment was shown to be unreliable, with no difference in microvascular density between subjectively viable and nonviable intestines.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Microvascular density at the site of foreign body obstruction was significantly lower in obstructed dogs compared to healthy controls.
  • PBR (perfused boundary region) was paradoxically lower in obstructed dogs, indicating that PBR may not reliably correlate with tissue viability in this context.
  • No significant difference in microvascular perfusion between subjectively viable vs nonviable intestines, suggesting subjective assessment is unreliable.
  • No difference in perfusion parameters between handsewn and stapled enterectomies, indicating both techniques preserve vascular health equally.
  • Stapled enterectomy using green TA staples is safe and did not impair intestinal perfusion at the anastomosis site.
  • SDF videomicroscopy is feasible intraoperatively and can differentiate healthy from diseased intestine in dogs.
  • Surgeons' subjective evaluations led to potentially unnecessary enterectomies, as microvascular parameters did not differ.
  • No cases of dehiscence or mortality, suggesting both surgical approaches are effective when applied properly.

Mullen

Veterinary Surgery

4

2023

A quantitative evaluation of the effect of foreign body obstruction and enterectomy technique on canine small intestinal microvascular health

2023-4-VS-mullen-4

Article Title: A quantitative evaluation of the effect of foreign body obstruction and enterectomy technique on canine small intestinal microvascular health

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.