Your Custom Quiz

In Huerta 2025 et al., on leakage in canine lung lobectomy, which group had the lowest median leakage pressure?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The PL-30 group had the lowest median leakage pressure at 10 cm H₂O.
Incorrect. The correct answer is PL-30.
The PL-30 group had the lowest median leakage pressure at 10 cm H₂O.

🔍 Key Findings

PL-30 group (partial, TA30-V3 wedge):

  • 100% leaked
  • Median leakage pressure: 10 cm H₂O
  • Most failures from periphery of staple line

PL-60 group (partial, TA60-3.5):

  • 100% leaked
  • Median leakage pressure: 18 cm H₂O
  • Better than PL-30 (p = .006)

TL-30 group (total, TA30-V3):

  • Only 1 of 11 leaked (at 22 cm H₂O)
  • All others resisted pressures >50–65 cm H₂O
  • Significantly higher leakage pressure than both PL groups (p < .001)

Odds ratios (leakage vs TL-30):

  • PL-30: OR 437 at both 20 and 30 cm H₂O (p = .003)
  • PL-60: OR 437 at 20 cm H₂O and 133 at 30 cm H₂O (p = .003)

Recommendation: Prefer TL-30 when possible. If partial needed, PL-60 superior to PL-30, but all partials leaked at physiologic pressures.

Huerta

Veterinary Surgery

4

2025

Leakage pressures of partial and total lung lobectomies performed with thoracoabdominal staplers in cadaveric dogs

2025-4-VS-huerta-2

Article Title: Leakage pressures of partial and total lung lobectomies performed with thoracoabdominal staplers in cadaveric dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Latifi 2022 et al., on forelimb fascial mapping, which of the following structures was typically associated with type IV fascia?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Type IV fascia is defined as being periosteal, and was commonly observed at the scapular spine, olecranon, and accessory carpal bone.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Scapular spine.
Type IV fascia is defined as being periosteal, and was commonly observed at the scapular spine, olecranon, and accessory carpal bone.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Fascia was present over most of the canine forelimb, but key areas like the elbow, carpus, and manus lacked robust fascial planes for wide resection.
  • Type I fascia (discrete sheet) was primarily found in the antebrachium, with type IV (periosteal) fascia located at the olecranon, scapular spine, and accessory carpal bone.
  • Distal antebrachial fascia was thin and adherent, often blending with carpal structures and lacking reliable surgical planes.
  • Partial tenectomy or joint capsule resection was often required for wide excision in the distal limb, especially over the triceps tendon and carpus.
  • Nerve transections (e.g., superficial radial or ulnar branches) were commonly needed to maintain fascial margins, though often with minimal functional loss due to overlapping innervation.
  • Digital and metacarpal pads lacked clear deep fascial borders, making digit amputation necessary for oncologic margins in distal tumors.
  • Dissections revealed fascial junctions as either Type A (easily separable) or Type B (risk of disruption), guiding resection plane selection.
  • Findings provide a surgical map to guide preoperative planning for superficial tumor excision on the forelimb.

Latifi

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Fascial plane mapping for superficial tumor resection in dogs. Part II: Forelimb

2022-1-VS-latifi-2

Article Title: Fascial plane mapping for superficial tumor resection in dogs. Part II: Forelimb

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Sanders 2024 et al., on feline anastomosis techniques, which method had the shortest mean time to construct completion?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. FEESA without oversew had a mean construction time of 79 seconds, significantly faster than all other methods.
Incorrect. The correct answer is FEESA without oversew.
FEESA without oversew had a mean construction time of 79 seconds, significantly faster than all other methods.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • ILP and MIP: No significant differences in leak pressure between HSA, FEESA, and SS techniques (p > .05).
  • Construct Time:
    • FEESA (no oversew) fastest: 79 ± 30 s
    • HSA-SI slowest: 397 ± 70 s (p < .001)
  • Tissue Thickness:
    • Jejunum thickest: 2.28 ± 0.30 mm
    • Stomach thinnest: 1.66 ± 0.28 mm
  • Staple Malformation: Noted in 2 FEESA-O constructs, vertical staple line.
  • Leak Locations:
    • HSA: All leaked from suture bites
    • FEESA: Leaks from vertical and horizontal staple lines
    • SS: Mostly from staple holes

Sanders

Veterinary Surgery

2

2024

Gastrointestinal thickness, duration, and leak pressure of five intestinal anastomosis techniques in cats

2024-2-VS-sanders-1

Article Title: Gastrointestinal thickness, duration, and leak pressure of five intestinal anastomosis techniques in cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Berger 2023 et al., on elbow COR estimation, what was the most common exit location of axes in *normal* elbows on the lateral cortex?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. In normal elbows, 93% of lateral exit points were cranial and distal to the lateral epicondyle.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Cranial and distal to the epicondyle.
In normal elbows, 93% of lateral exit points were cranial and distal to the lateral epicondyle.

🔍 Key Findings

  • COR of elbows with FMCP was significantly more caudal compared to normal elbows, based on CT-derived geometry.
  • In normal elbows, 74% of medial and 93% of lateral axes exited cranial and distal to the epicondyles.
  • In FMCP elbows, 81% of medial and 70% of lateral axes exited caudal and distal to the epicondyles.
  • Different landmark combinations produced slightly different COR approximations, especially between humeral vs. radius/ulna-based axes.
  • The medial-lateral axis using trochlea and capitulum centers provided the most consistent COR approximation.
  • COR estimations based on diseased elbows may not match normal joint geometry, impacting implant alignment accuracy.
  • External epicondylar landmarks may be useful intraoperatively to estimate COR location, but variability limits precision.
  • Drill diameter size may buffer small COR differences, but impact in advanced disease or bilateral cases remains unclear.

Berger

Veterinary Surgery

1

2023

The use of subchondral bone topography to approximate the center of rotation of the elbow joint in dogs

2023-1-VS-berger-1

Article Title: The use of subchondral bone topography to approximate the center of rotation of the elbow joint in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Violini 2024 et al., on 3D-guided spinal stabilization in brachycephalic dogs, what clinical finding was reported in 7 of 10 mid-term cases despite all being ambulatory?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Most owners reported residual abnormal gait (scuffing, wide stance) despite ambulatory status:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Abnormal gait.
Most owners reported residual abnormal gait (scuffing, wide stance) despite ambulatory status:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Spinal stabilization with 3D-printed patient-specific drill guides (3D-PSGs) was safe, with no immediate perioperative complications reported.
  • 84% of pedicle screws were optimally placed, and only 0.5% breached the spinal canal, reflecting high placement accuracy.
  • 80% of dogs experienced no neurologic deterioration postoperatively, indicating reliable short-term safety.
  • 3D-PSGs were accurate and reproducible, even across multiple institutions and surgeons.
  • Mid-term outcomes were favorable: all dogs were ambulatory, and 90% had static or improved neurologic signs.
  • 7 of 10 mid-term follow-ups showed abnormal gait, though owners rated lifestyle ≥3/5, suggesting acceptable function.
  • 3D-printed guides enabled precise pedicle screw placement in deformed vertebrae, expanding options in small breeds.
  • One dog suffered a T4 spinous process fracture due to overextension of PMMA cement, emphasizing the need for cement placement caution.

Violini

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Clinical outcomes of 20 brachycephalic dogs with thoracolumbar spinal deformities causing neurological signs treated with spinal stabilization using 3D-printed patient-specific drill guides

2024-4-VS-violini-4

Article Title: Clinical outcomes of 20 brachycephalic dogs with thoracolumbar spinal deformities causing neurological signs treated with spinal stabilization using 3D-printed patient-specific drill guides

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Tobias 2022 et al., on perineal hernia repair positioning, which technique was used in 22 out of 23 dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. IOMT was used in 22/23 dogs; it was the primary technique in this cohort.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Internal obturator muscle transposition.
IOMT was used in 22/23 dogs; it was the primary technique in this cohort.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Perineal hernia repair was feasible in dorsal recumbency in all 23 dogs, allowing simultaneous perineal and abdominal procedures without repositioning.
  • Internal obturator muscle transposition (IOMT) was successfully performed in 22 dogs, with tendon transection facilitating improved muscle elevation.
  • Complication rate was 60.9% in-hospital and 47.8% post-discharge, mostly minor (e.g., swelling, drainage), with infection suspected in 4 dogs (17.4%).
  • Recurrence rate was 19% overall, but significantly higher in dogs with prior hernia repairs (50% vs 5.9%; p = 0.053).
  • Dogs without prior repairs or organ pexies had no recurrences (p = 0.035), suggesting primary repairs without preexisting interventions fare better.
  • Castration and adjunctive abdominal procedures (e.g., colopexy, cystopexy) were often performed concurrently (18/23 dogs).
  • Colopexy did not prevent recurrence, although it aided in surgical visualization during perineal repair.
  • Dorsal positioning allowed simultaneous access to the abdomen and perineum, improving surgical efficiency without added complications.

Tobias

Veterinary Surgery

5

2022

Perineal hernia repair in dorsal recumbency in 23 dogs: Description of technique, complications, and outcome

2022-5-VS-tobias-3

Article Title: Perineal hernia repair in dorsal recumbency in 23 dogs: Description of technique, complications, and outcome

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Viitanen 2023 et al., on zygomatic sialoadenectomy, which surgical complication was specifically avoided by using the intraoral approach?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. IOA avoids the palpebral branch of the auriculopalpebral nerve, reducing risk of lagophthalmos.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Palpebral nerve damage.
IOA avoids the palpebral branch of the auriculopalpebral nerve, reducing risk of lagophthalmos.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Intraoral approach (IOA) reduced surgical time compared to lateral orbitotomy (median: 42.0 vs 65.7 minutes, p = .005)
  • Ease of closure (Stage III) was better with IOA (p < .001), though gland removal (Stage II) was easier with LOA (p = .039)
  • Complete gland removal was achieved in 8/10 IOA vs 10/10 LOA cases in cadaveric study
  • All 3 clinical cases had uneventful recoveries post-IOA, including one carcinoma, with no intra- or short-term postoperative complications
  • LOA had superior surgical exposure, but was more invasive and time-consuming
  • IOA posed greater difficulty in complete gland removal in brachycephalic dogs, with remnant tissue noted in 2/10 cadavers
  • IOA avoids osteotomy, reducing potential complications like delayed union and postoperative pain
  • Cosmetic outcomes and healing were better with IOA, and no E-collar was required postoperatively

Viitanen

Veterinary Surgery

2

2023

Intraoral approach for zygomatic sialoadenectomy in dogs: An anatomical study and three clinical cases

2023-2-VS-viitanen-2

Article Title: Intraoral approach for zygomatic sialoadenectomy in dogs: An anatomical study and three clinical cases

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Mazdarani 2025 et al., on simulated muscle loading, what was the clinical significance of using hip mobility in limb press models?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Hip mobility improved the physiologic realism of simulated quadriceps forces.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It allowed force ratios closer to in vivo values.
Hip mobility improved the physiologic realism of simulated quadriceps forces.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Simulated quadriceps and gastrocnemius forces increased proportionally with axial load in all three femoral fixation models.
  • Model 2 (rigid fixation) resulted in subphysiologic quadriceps forces and abnormally high gastrocnemius forces, reducing model fidelity.
  • Models 1 and 3 (with hip mobility) produced more physiologic quadriceps and force ratios, especially under 30–40% bodyweight loads.
  • Force ratios were significantly lower in rigid fixation (Model 2) compared to hip-mobile models (p = .007), suggesting model design affects simulated muscle coordination.
  • Joint angles (stifle and hock) remained within acceptable limits, though slight flexion occurred with increasing load.
  • Relative foot position differed by ~3.9 mm between models 2 and 3, with model 2 showing a more caudal position.
  • Model 3 preserved benefits of hip mobility while allowing radiographic documentation, making it a preferred setup for future studies.
  • The study suggests that models used in feline stifle stabilization research may underestimate physiologic forces, especially with rigid fixation designs.

Mazdarani

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Proximal femoral fixation method and axial load affect simulated muscle forces in an ex vivo feline limb press

2025-5-VS-mazdarani-5

Article Title: Proximal femoral fixation method and axial load affect simulated muscle forces in an ex vivo feline limb press

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Fracka 2023 et al., on patient-specific guides, what best describes the effect of PSGs on sagittal plane alignment of femoral cuts?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. PSGs significantly improved sagittal alignment of both distal and cranial femoral cuts (p = .018, p = .043).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Significant improvement in both cranial and distal cuts.
PSGs significantly improved sagittal alignment of both distal and cranial femoral cuts (p = .018, p = .043).

🔍 Key Findings

  • 3D-printed patient-specific guides (PSGs) improved tibial cut alignment in the frontal plane compared to generic guides (mean error 1.03° vs 2.41°, p = .036).
  • All tibial cuts using PSGs were within 3° of target alignment, while 2/8 of the generic group were outliers.
  • PSGs significantly improved sagittal alignment of both distal (p = .018) and cranial (p = .043) femoral cuts.
  • No significant difference was found in varus-valgus femoral alignment or closing angle between PSG and generic guide groups.
  • Tibial sagittal slope alignment was not significantly different between groups.
  • PSGs provided better intraoperative usability, including improved visibility, no loosening, and ease of use.
  • Femoral sizing and component fit were equivalent between PSGs and generic guides, ensuring proper prosthesis alignment.
  • PSGs may offer training advantages for novice surgeons, especially in anatomically complex or deformed joints.

Fracka

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

3D-printed, patient-specific cutting guides improve femoral and tibial cut alignment in canine total knee replacement

2023-5-VS-fracka-2

Article Title: 3D-printed, patient-specific cutting guides improve femoral and tibial cut alignment in canine total knee replacement

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Turner 2025 et al., on TPA changes after SH-1/2 fracture repair, what does the study suggest regarding further surgery when TPA remains high immediately postoperatively?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The study supports avoiding further surgery despite high TPA if reduction is imperfect but stable.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Monitor, as TPA may reduce without intervention.
The study supports avoiding further surgery despite high TPA if reduction is imperfect but stable.

🔍 Key Findings

  • TPA decreased significantly from preoperative to follow-up (mean 5.89°; p < 0.001), and from immediate postoperative to follow-up (mean 2.2°; p = 0.018)
  • Use of tension band in addition to K-wires did not significantly improve TPA reduction compared to K-wires alone
  • Cranial K-wire positioning may attenuate growth at the cranial tibial physis, allowing relative caudal growth to reduce TPA over time
  • Dynamic TPA reduction may reduce risk of cranial cruciate ligament rupture even when initial TPA is high
  • Small breeds (e.g., French Bulldogs) were overrepresented; further research is needed in larger breeds with more growth potential
  • Surgical reduction is difficult, but perfect alignment may not be essential if TPA reduces postoperatively
  • Radiographic TPA measurement was reliably performed with low interobserver variability
  • K-wire removal at 3–8 weeks may facilitate continued growth in growing dogs

Turner

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

5

2025

Tibial Plateau Angle Changes following Repair of Salter–Harris Type 1 and 2 Fractures in Dogs

2025-5-VCOT-turner-4

Article Title: Tibial Plateau Angle Changes following Repair of Salter–Harris Type 1 and 2 Fractures in Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.