Your Custom Quiz

In Sullivan 2025 et al., on TTT stabilization methods, which stabilization method showed significantly different failure force or stiffness?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All methods showed comparable failure force and stiffness.
Incorrect. The correct answer is No significant differences were found.
All methods showed comparable failure force and stiffness.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Spacer pin fixation showed no difference in failure force or stiffness compared to tension band wire (TBW) or 2-pin techniques.
  • All constructs failed under loads >1000 N, exceeding estimated peak quadriceps force in dogs during walking (~240 N).
  • Patellar ligament failure was the most common mode of failure across all groups (5–8 samples per group).
  • Distal tibial crest fractures were seen only in 2-pin and spacer pin groups, not in TBW group, suggesting TBW may protect against crest failure.
  • No failures occurred at pin tracts, possibly due to pin placement within patellar ligament footprint.
  • Spacer pin technique avoids placing pins through the tuberosity, potentially reducing risks of soft tissue complications like tendinopathy or irritation.
  • Use of partial osteotomy with robust distal crest may substitute for TBW without compromising initial mechanical strength.
  • Further in vivo or cyclic loading studies are required, as this cadaveric study tested only acute tensile failure.

Sullivan

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

3

2025

Biomechanical Comparison of Spacer Pin Fixation to Two Established Methods of Tibial Tuberosity Transposition Stabilization in Dogs

2025-3-VCOT-sullivan-1

Article Title: Biomechanical Comparison of Spacer Pin Fixation to Two Established Methods of Tibial Tuberosity Transposition Stabilization in Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Scheuermann 2024 et al., on 3D-printed reduction guides for tibial fractures, what was the most common plane for angular pin-guide placement error?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Axial plane showed the highest angular discrepancies for both proximal and distal pin guides.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Axial.
Axial plane showed the highest angular discrepancies for both proximal and distal pin guides.

🔍 Key Findings

  • The study was a prospective clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of a three-dimensional (3D)-printed, patient-specific reduction system for aligning diaphyseal tibial fractures stabilized using minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in fifteen client-owned dogs.
  • Virtual surgical planning (VSP) and fabrication were feasible within a clinically relevant timeframe, with a mean of 50.7 hours. Surgical efficiency improved with experience.
  • Pin-guide placement was accurate, with median translational discrepancies of 2.7 mm (proximal) and 2.9 mm (distal), and angular discrepancies highest in the axial plane.
  • The proximal guide was easier to apply (median Likert score: 8) than the distal guide (median: 6).
  • The 3D-printed system enabled near-anatomic reduction in 87% of cases and acceptable reduction in the remaining 13%; no unacceptable reductions occurred.
  • Postoperative alignment and tibial length were well-restored, with all dogs within 5° or 5 mm of contralateral measurements.
  • Temporary circular fixation was occasionally used to assist reduction and improve alignment.
  • Precontoured plates fit easily, with a median Likert score of 9; total surgical time was shorter than conventional MIPO at the institution.
  • The study lacked a control group but builds on prior cadaveric feasibility work.

Scheuermann

Veterinary Surgery

6

2024

Efficacy of virtual surgical planning and a three‐dimensional‐printed surgical guide for canine segmental mandibular reconstruction in a cadaver model

2024-6-VS-scheuermann1-1

Article Title: Efficacy of virtual surgical planning and a three‐dimensional‐printed surgical guide for canine segmental mandibular reconstruction in a cadaver model

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Kang 2024 et al., on sacroiliac fixation strength, which implant required significantly longer placement time?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Mean placement time for HCS was 712 sec vs 379 sec for CS group (p<0.001)
Incorrect. The correct answer is 2.3-mm headless cannulated screws.
Mean placement time for HCS was 712 sec vs 379 sec for CS group (p<0.001)

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 20 cats with pelvic fractures treated using locking plates with only cortical screws
  • 28 fractures stabilized (ilium: 17, acetabulum: 6, ischium: 3, pubis: 2)
  • Implants: Primarily 1.5/2.0 mm LCPs or String-of-Pearls plates
  • Major complications in 2/20 cases (10%): sciatic entrapment, malunion requiring THA
  • Minor complications in 2/20 cases (10%): plate impingement, transient lameness
  • Clinical union in all cats by 8 weeks; all cats returned to full function
  • Authors conclude cortical screws alone can provide adequate fixation in feline pelvic fractures if screw purchase and bone quality are sufficient

Kang

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

1

2024

Biomechanical Comparison of Double 2.3-mm Headless Cannulated Self-Compression Screws and Single 3.5-mm Cortical Screw in Lag Fashion in a Canine Sacroiliac Luxation Model

2024-1-VCOT-kang-5

Article Title: Biomechanical Comparison of Double 2.3-mm Headless Cannulated Self-Compression Screws and Single 3.5-mm Cortical Screw in Lag Fashion in a Canine Sacroiliac Luxation Model

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Mazdarani 2022 et al., on CBLO and stifle biomechanics, which statement best describes the **patellar ligament angle (PTA)** after CBLO?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. CBLO resulted in a parallel but lower PTA curve, indicating effective flexion induced by the osteotomy.
Incorrect. The correct answer is PTA was consistently lower than intact, mimicking flexion.
CBLO resulted in a parallel but lower PTA curve, indicating effective flexion induced by the osteotomy.

🔍 Key Findings

  • CBLO reduced tibial plateau angle (TPA) from a mean of 28.1° to 9.7°, aligning with its goal of flattening the tibial slope.
  • CBLO eliminated cranial tibial translation (CTT) following CCL transection and meniscal release at all angles except 140° without hamstring load.
  • Hamstring loading (20% quadriceps load) significantly reduced or delayed the onset of CTT, improving stifle stability.
  • Medial meniscus was confirmed as a secondary stabilizer; its release (MMR) caused more CTT than CCLx alone.
  • PTA (patellar tendon angle) increased with joint extension; CBLO shifted the PTA curve lower and parallel to intact values, suggesting effective flexion of the joint.
  • Combined CBLO and hamstring loading resulted in the most stable joints, especially from 50° to 135° joint angles.
  • Residual CTT occurred in CBLO-only limbs at higher extension angles (e.g., 140°), but hamstring load mitigated this.
  • Stifle stability post-CBLO is multifactorial, depending on joint angle, meniscal integrity, and hamstring activation.

Mazdarani

Veterinary Surgery

6

2022

Effect of center of rotation of angulation‐based leveling osteotomy on ex vivo stifle joint stability following cranial cruciate ligament transection and medial meniscal release with and without a hamstring load

2022-6-VS-mazdarani-5

Article Title: Effect of center of rotation of angulation‐based leveling osteotomy on ex vivo stifle joint stability following cranial cruciate ligament transection and medial meniscal release with and without a hamstring load

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Alvarez 2022 et al., on rehabilitation modalities, which modality had the most studies showing positive postoperative effects in dogs but also had high risk of bias?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Exercise had the most studies showing positive effects, but most were Level III or IV evidence with high RoB.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Exercise.
Exercise had the most studies showing positive effects, but most were Level III or IV evidence with high RoB.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Exercise-based rehabilitation showed benefits in 6 of 7 studies, including increased peak vertical force (PVF) and reduced lameness, though most had high risk of bias (RoB).
  • Cold compression therapy (CCT) had 2 high-quality (Level II, low RoB) studies showing improvements in pain scores, range of motion, and swelling, supporting its clinical use.
  • Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) was supported by 2 Level II studies; only one had low RoB, showing short-term benefits in patellar ligament thickness and PVF, but no long-term benefit on bone healing.
  • Photobiomodulation (PBM) had mixed results across 3 Level II studies (all low RoB); only 1 showed positive impact on PVF, limiting its recommendation.
  • Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) showed no significant impact on gait analysis or bone healing in a Level II, low RoB study.
  • Electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) improved lameness and thigh circumference in one Level III study, but had high-moderate RoB and involved experimentally-induced CCL rupture, limiting clinical relevance.
  • No modality beyond exercise and CCT had consistent or strong evidence for efficacy in post-TPLO or extracapsular repair rehabilitation.
  • The absence of standardized protocols, small sample sizes, and inconsistent outcome measures limited the generalizability of findings.

Alvarez

Veterinary Surgery

2

2022

Systematic review of postoperative rehabilitation interventions after cranial cruciate ligament surgery in dogs

2022-2-VS-alvarez-1

Article Title: Systematic review of postoperative rehabilitation interventions after cranial cruciate ligament surgery in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Rocheleau 2023 et al., on shoulder stabilization, why were anchor insertion angles considered suboptimal in the study?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Suboptimal anchor insertion angles (<30°) could compromise mechanical pullout strength, per CT assessment.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Angles were <30°, reducing pullout strength.
Suboptimal anchor insertion angles (<30°) could compromise mechanical pullout strength, per CT assessment.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Arthroscopically assisted stabilization with an IAD was feasible in cadaveric canine shoulders using both bone anchor and suture-toggle techniques.
  • Suture-toggle repair was successfully performed in all specimens, while bone anchors could not be deployed in 3/10 shoulders, indicating lower feasibility.
  • Median surgical time was shorter for the suture-toggle group (25.5 min) compared to the anchor group (37.3 min).
  • Postoperative abduction angles returned to baseline in the anchor group, while the suture-toggle group had slightly reduced angles, suggesting possible overtightening.
  • Violation of the articular surface occurred in 2 anchor specimens and 1 suture-toggle specimen, but none were considered likely to be clinically significant.
  • Overall targeting accuracy using the IAD was 88%, supporting its utility in guiding tunnel/anchor placement.
  • CT measurements showed acceptable bone stock and insertion angles, but anchor insertion angles were lower than optimal for mechanical pullout strength.
  • Suture-toggle technique was considered simpler and more consistent, with fewer complications and faster execution than anchor placement.

Rocheleau

Veterinary Surgery

4

2023

Ex vivo evaluation of arthroscopically assisted shoulder stabilization in dogs using an intra-articular aiming device

2023-4-VS-rocheleau-5

Article Title: Ex vivo evaluation of arthroscopically assisted shoulder stabilization in dogs using an intra-articular aiming device

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Mazdarani 2025 et al., on simulated muscle loading, what was the clinical significance of using hip mobility in limb press models?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Hip mobility improved the physiologic realism of simulated quadriceps forces.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It allowed force ratios closer to in vivo values.
Hip mobility improved the physiologic realism of simulated quadriceps forces.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Simulated quadriceps and gastrocnemius forces increased proportionally with axial load in all three femoral fixation models.
  • Model 2 (rigid fixation) resulted in subphysiologic quadriceps forces and abnormally high gastrocnemius forces, reducing model fidelity.
  • Models 1 and 3 (with hip mobility) produced more physiologic quadriceps and force ratios, especially under 30–40% bodyweight loads.
  • Force ratios were significantly lower in rigid fixation (Model 2) compared to hip-mobile models (p = .007), suggesting model design affects simulated muscle coordination.
  • Joint angles (stifle and hock) remained within acceptable limits, though slight flexion occurred with increasing load.
  • Relative foot position differed by ~3.9 mm between models 2 and 3, with model 2 showing a more caudal position.
  • Model 3 preserved benefits of hip mobility while allowing radiographic documentation, making it a preferred setup for future studies.
  • The study suggests that models used in feline stifle stabilization research may underestimate physiologic forces, especially with rigid fixation designs.

Mazdarani

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Proximal femoral fixation method and axial load affect simulated muscle forces in an ex vivo feline limb press

2025-5-VS-mazdarani-5

Article Title: Proximal femoral fixation method and axial load affect simulated muscle forces in an ex vivo feline limb press

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Case 2024 et al., on feline pancreatectomy, what conclusion was made regarding long-term pancreatic function?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Despite a drop in TLI, both endocrine and exocrine function remained clinically adequate long-term.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Function was preserved.
Despite a drop in TLI, both endocrine and exocrine function remained clinically adequate long-term.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Success rate: All 9 cats underwent successful laparoscopic partial pancreatectomy.
  • Complications:
    • 1 minor intraoperative hemorrhage (Grade 1)
    • 1 sterile peritonitis (Grade 2) post-op, resolved conservatively
  • Pancreatic function:
    • fTLI decreased by 37% (p = .03), but stayed within normal limits
    • fPLI and A1C were unchanged
  • Resection details:
    • Mean weight: 3.0 ± 1.4 g
    • Mean surgical time: 59.7 ± 16.2 min
  • Follow-up: 250–446 days — all cats remained clinically healthy
  • Conclusion: Ultrasonic LPP is safe and effective in healthy cats, preserving endocrine/exocrine function

Case

Veterinary Surgery

2

2024

Laparoscopic partial pancreatectomy of the left limb using a harmonic scalpel in nine cats

2024-2-VS-case-4

Article Title: Laparoscopic partial pancreatectomy of the left limb using a harmonic scalpel in nine cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Huerta 2025 et al., on leakage in canine lung lobectomy, what was the odds ratio of leakage for PL-30 compared to TL-30 at 30 cm H₂O?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The odds of leakage for PL-30 vs TL-30 at 30 cm H₂O was 437 (p = .003).
Incorrect. The correct answer is 437.
The odds of leakage for PL-30 vs TL-30 at 30 cm H₂O was 437 (p = .003).

🔍 Key Findings

PL-30 group (partial, TA30-V3 wedge):

  • 100% leaked
  • Median leakage pressure: 10 cm H₂O
  • Most failures from periphery of staple line

PL-60 group (partial, TA60-3.5):

  • 100% leaked
  • Median leakage pressure: 18 cm H₂O
  • Better than PL-30 (p = .006)

TL-30 group (total, TA30-V3):

  • Only 1 of 11 leaked (at 22 cm H₂O)
  • All others resisted pressures >50–65 cm H₂O
  • Significantly higher leakage pressure than both PL groups (p < .001)

Odds ratios (leakage vs TL-30):

  • PL-30: OR 437 at both 20 and 30 cm H₂O (p = .003)
  • PL-60: OR 437 at 20 cm H₂O and 133 at 30 cm H₂O (p = .003)

Recommendation: Prefer TL-30 when possible. If partial needed, PL-60 superior to PL-30, but all partials leaked at physiologic pressures.

Huerta

Veterinary Surgery

4

2025

Leakage pressures of partial and total lung lobectomies performed with thoracoabdominal staplers in cadaveric dogs

2025-4-VS-huerta-5

Article Title: Leakage pressures of partial and total lung lobectomies performed with thoracoabdominal staplers in cadaveric dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Vandekerckhove 2024 et al., which factor **did not** significantly affect LImax?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. None of these factors significantly affected LImax in the study.
Incorrect. The correct answer is All of the above.
None of these factors significantly affected LImax in the study.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Used VMBDmD to quantify hip laxity under increasing force in cadaveric dogs (n=34).
  • 90% of hips reached ≥90% of LImax at 95.32 N, defining this force as sufficient for subluxation.
  • LImax was not significantly influenced by osteoarthritis, weight, sex, or limb side.
  • Position of device (lever length) influenced rate of laxity acquisition, not final LImax.
  • LI curves were repeatable across 5 sessions, indicating elastic—not plastic—deformation.

Vandekerckhove

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

1

2024

Quantifying the Stress in Stress Radiographs to Determine Sufficient Laxity of the Coxofemoral Joint

2024-1-VCOT-vandekerckhove-2

Article Title: Quantifying the Stress in Stress Radiographs to Determine Sufficient Laxity of the Coxofemoral Joint

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.