Your Custom Quiz

In Alvarez-Sanchez 2023 et al., on SLN mapping in canine MCT, what percentage of dogs had the same SLN identified by both ICTL and NIRF?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. ICLT and NIRF identified the same sentinel node in 80% of dogs, showing strong concordance when both methods were used together.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 80%.
ICLT and NIRF identified the same sentinel node in 80% of dogs, showing strong concordance when both methods were used together.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Combined ICTL and NIRF detected the same SLN in 80% of cases; each method alone missed sentinel lymph nodes in some dogs.
  • ICLT failed in 5% of dogs, while NIRF failed in 20%; combined use resulted in only 5% failure in SLN detection.
  • Metastatic lymph nodes were detected in 95% of dogs, despite most tumors being low or intermediate grade (95%).
  • 27 of 41 nodes (65.8%) were histologically metastatic (HN2 or HN3), many of which would have been missed using ALN alone.
  • ALN matched the SLN in only 45% of cases with ICTL and 30% with NIRF, supporting the need for SLN mapping.
  • ICLT and NIRF were complementary, often identifying different SLN, with some only fluorescent or enhanced in one modality.
  • Subcutaneous MCT had higher metastatic rates (7/8 dogs) than previously reported, challenging older assumptions about benign behavior.
  • Removing both ALN and SLN (from both methods) improved detection of metastasis to 85–95%, reducing risk of understaging.

Alvarez-Sanchez

Veterinary Surgery

3

2023

Comparison of indirect computed tomographic lymphography and near-infrared fluorescence sentinel lymph node mapping for integumentary canine mast cell tumors

2023-3-VS-alvarez-sanchez-1

Article Title: Comparison of indirect computed tomographic lymphography and near-infrared fluorescence sentinel lymph node mapping for integumentary canine mast cell tumors

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Silveira 2022 et al., on GTO in canine THR, what was the main surgical reason for performing a greater trochanter osteotomy (GTO) during total hip replacement?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. GTO improved broach alignment by preserving gluteal tendons and providing exposure to the femoral canal.
Incorrect. The correct answer is To access the trochanteric fossa and preserve gluteal musculature during broaching.
GTO improved broach alignment by preserving gluteal tendons and providing exposure to the femoral canal.

🔍 Key Findings

  • GTO enabled successful cementless THR in dogs with severe medialization of the greater trochanter or chronic craniodorsal hip luxation.
  • All 5 hips had acceptable long-term outcomes (median follow-up: 48 months) with full function and no persistent complications.
  • Only one major complication occurred—a luxation unrelated to the GTO and successfully corrected with cup revision.
  • GTO facilitated femoral canal access and gluteal preservation, reducing risk of iatrogenic injury during broaching.
  • All GTOs healed radiographically (4 by 6 weeks, 1 by 12 weeks), with no cases of nonunion or implant migration.
  • No complications related to GTO or PTBW fixation (pins + tension band) were observed in any dog.
  • Surgical planning included templating both THR and GTO to ensure ideal alignment and reduce fracture risk.
  • GTO may be especially valuable in luxoid hip dysplasia phenotypes or chronically fixed luxations.

Silveira

Veterinary Surgery

2

2022

Greater trochanter osteotomy as a component of cementless total hip replacement: Five cases in four dogs

2022-2-VS-silveira-1

Article Title: Greater trochanter osteotomy as a component of cementless total hip replacement: Five cases in four dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In McCagherty 2025 et al., on WID detection accuracy, what was the primary utility of the wound imaging device (WID) in small animal wound management?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The WID confirmed infections at the time of imaging, aiding immediate intervention.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Real-time visualization of clinically significant bacterial infection.
The WID confirmed infections at the time of imaging, aiding immediate intervention.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Bacterial fluorescence was detected in all wounds (17 dogs, 4 cats) using the point-of-care wound imaging device (WID).
  • The WID confirmed the presence of clinically relevant wound infection in all evaluated cases at the time of imaging.
  • No significant difference was found in bacterial yield or burden between image-guided and non-guided swabs (QBC and PCR; p > 0.05).
  • The WID helped guide wound debridement in some cases by localizing areas of fluorescence, especially in necrotic tissue.
  • Most infections were polymicrobial and dominated by anaerobes, highlighting the need for anaerobic culture inclusion.
  • PCR analysis showed low bacterial DNA yields, often complicated by host DNA contamination, limiting its utility.
  • The study did not evaluate sensitivity/specificity of WID, as only fluorescence-positive wounds were included.
  • Clinical utility of WID lies in immediate visual confirmation of infection, supporting timely antimicrobial treatment decisions.

McCagherty

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Diagnostic value of a point of care bacterial fluorescence imaging device for detecting wound infections in dogs and cats

2025-6-VS-mccagherty-1

Article Title: Diagnostic value of a point of care bacterial fluorescence imaging device for detecting wound infections in dogs and cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Cherzan 2023 et al., on subcutaneous mast cell tumors, what impact did incomplete surgical margins (<1 mm) have on recurrence rates of subcutaneous mast cell tumors?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Incomplete margins were not significantly associated with recurrence (*p* = .085).
Incorrect. The correct answer is They had no significant impact on recurrence.
Incomplete margins were not significantly associated with recurrence (*p* = .085).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Local recurrence occurred in 17.8% of dogs, and was associated with significantly decreased survival (551 vs 1722 days, p = .0038).
  • Lymph node metastasis occurred in 26.7% of dogs and was significantly associated with shorter disease-free interval (194 vs not reached, p = .0012) and lower survival (551 vs 1722 days, p = .043).
  • Mitotic index >7 was significantly associated with higher recurrence (80% vs 22.5%, p = .02), shorter DFI (139 vs not reached days, p < .001), and shorter survival (247 vs 1722 days, p = .05).
  • Infiltrative growth pattern was associated with shorter DFI (268 vs 1864 days, p = .011), but not with survival or recurrence.
  • Incomplete margins (≤1 mm) were not significantly associated with recurrence (p = .085), but did correlate with shorter DFI (p = .043).
  • Chemotherapy or radiation therapy was associated with shorter DFI and survival, likely due to selection bias for more aggressive disease.
  • Tumor size >3 cm was associated with decreased survival (p = .031), but not with recurrence or DFI.
  • Multinucleation and necrosis were not associated with prognosis outcomes.

Cherzan

Veterinary Surgery

4

2023

Factors affecting prognosis in canine subcutaneous mast cell tumors: 45 cases

2023-4-VS-cherzan-4

Article Title: Factors affecting prognosis in canine subcutaneous mast cell tumors: 45 cases

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Philips 2025 et al., on radiographic IAIP detection, how did implants placed 2 mm into the joint perform in terms of accurate classification?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Implants placed 2 mm into the joint were correctly classified in 97.2% of cases.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 97.2% correct.
Implants placed 2 mm into the joint were correctly classified in 97.2% of cases.

🔍 Key Findings

Overall accuracy of radiography to detect IAIP: 77.9%

Sensitivity: 97.2%
Specificity: 67.6%

False positive rate: 32.4% of non-penetrating implants were misclassified as penetrating

Implants directed toward the lateral tibial condyle had higher misclassification (23.8%) than medial (8.3%)

Most accurate detection: Implants placed 2 mm into the joint (97.2% correct classification)

Least agreement: For implants placed at 0 mm (subchondral level), especially lateral (AC1 = 0.48)

No palpable abnormalities (e.g., crepitus) observed during ROM for any group

No significant difference in detection by specialty field or reviewer qualification

Suggests radiographic misclassification risk and supports considering CT/fluoroscopy in equivocal cases

Philips

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Detection of intra‐articular implant penetration of the canine stifle with radiography: A cadaveric study

2025-3-VS-philips-5

Article Title: Detection of intra‐articular implant penetration of the canine stifle with radiography: A cadaveric study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Nash 2024 et al., on esophageal pH monitoring, how did proximal GER characteristics in nonbrachycephalic dogs compare to those in brachycephalic dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Brachycephalic dogs had significantly higher and longer-duration GER, highlighting their risk for complications like aspiration.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Proximal GER was less frequent and shorter in nonbrachycephalic dogs.
Brachycephalic dogs had significantly higher and longer-duration GER, highlighting their risk for complications like aspiration.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Esophageal pH-monitoring was well tolerated in all 35 nonbrachycephalic dogs, with no major adverse events reported.
  • Distal GER occurred in 80% of dogs, but events were typically brief and non-productive; proximal GER occurred in only 39%.
  • Upper reference limits for GER were 2.4 events/hour (distal) and 0.4 events/hour (proximal).
  • Cumulative acid exposure was minimal: upper limits were 2.3% (distal) and 0% (proximal).
  • Comparison with brachycephalic dogs shows significantly higher GER frequency and duration, validating the diagnostic utility of pH monitoring.
  • Transnasal probe placement under light anesthesia was safe and less morbid compared to percutaneous or conscious techniques.
  • No expelled or productive regurgitation occurred, despite some GER events, indicating efficient esophageal clearance in healthy dogs.
  • Diet and fasting duration may affect GER, but these were not controlled variables in this study.

Nash

Veterinary Surgery

8

2024

Esophageal pH‐monitoring in nonbrachycephalic dogs: A reference

2024-8-VS-nash-5

Article Title: Esophageal pH‐monitoring in nonbrachycephalic dogs: A reference

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Simpson 2022 et al., on feline cholecystectomy outcomes, what was the survival rate to hospital discharge?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 18 of 23 cats survived to discharge, equating to a 78.3% survival rate.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 78.3%.
18 of 23 cats survived to discharge, equating to a 78.3% survival rate.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Cholelithiasis was the most common indication for cholecystectomy in cats.
  • Perioperative complications were frequent, with intraoperative hypotension in all recorded cases and postoperative anemia in 14 cats.
  • Perioperative mortality was 21.7%, lower than historical rates for feline biliary surgery.
  • 78.3% of cats survived to discharge, and 83.3% of those lived >6 months; 44.4% survived >3 years.
  • Vomiting was the most common short- and long-term complication, though most cats were medically managed.
  • Concurrent EHBDO was not a contraindication provided CBD patency was restored.
  • Positive bacterial cultures were found in 15 cats, with E. coli and Enterococcus faecalis most common.
  • Owner-reported outcomes were excellent in all cats that survived long-term.

Simpson

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Cholecystectomy in 23 cats (2005‐2021)

2022-1-VS-simpson-4

Article Title: Cholecystectomy in 23 cats (2005‐2021)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Nagahiro 2023 et al., on quadriceps-femoral mismatch, which variables were significantly associated with a decreased QML/FL in the final regression model?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Multivariate regression revealed QML/FL decreased with increased femoral torsion angle (FTA) and aLDFA, but increased with age.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Age, FTA, aLDFA.
Multivariate regression revealed QML/FL decreased with increased femoral torsion angle (FTA) and aLDFA, but increased with age.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Quadriceps muscle length/femoral length ratio (QML/FL) was significantly lower in dogs with grade IV MPL than grades I–III (p ≤ .002).
  • Shortened QML was associated with increased femoral torsion angle (FTA) and increased aLDFA, indicating correlation with femoral deformity.
  • QML/FL increased with age, possibly due to muscular development or reduced deformity in older dogs (p = .004).
  • Grade IV MPL dogs had QML/FL < 0.87, the lower normal limit based on healthy beagles, suggesting clinically significant muscle shortening.
  • PLL/PL ratio (used to diagnose patella alta) was not associated with QML/FL or MPL severity in small breeds.
  • QML/FL can help preoperatively identify candidates for femoral shortening ostectomy, improving femoropatellar alignment.
  • Multivariate regression model confirmed QML/FL is independently influenced by age, FTA, and aLDFA (R² = 0.45).
  • CT-based 3D measurements enabled objective, noninvasive quantification of femoral and muscle alignment parameters.

Nagahiro

Veterinary Surgery

4

2023

Evaluation of the quadriceps muscle length to femoral length ratio in small breed dogs with medial patellar luxation

2023-4-VS-nagahiro-3

Article Title: Evaluation of the quadriceps muscle length to femoral length ratio in small breed dogs with medial patellar luxation

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Almeida 2025 et al., on TPLO and partial CCL rupture, what impact did partial CCL rupture have on postoperative patellar ligament shortening?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Partial ruptures were not significantly protective against PLL shortening.
Incorrect. The correct answer is No significant effect.
Partial ruptures were not significantly protective against PLL shortening.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Transecting the CCL remnant during TPLO did not reduce patellar ligament thickening (PLT) at any measured point (proximal, mid, distal).
  • Transection also failed to reduce postoperative patellar ligament shortening (PLL) at 6 weeks.
  • Both groups (transected vs non-transected) showed significant thickening and shortening, with greatest PLT increase at the midpoint.
  • Increased PLT was positively correlated with tibial plateau rotation (p = 0.02) and postoperative TPA (p = 0.04).
  • No correlation between TT-O (tibial tuberosity width index) and PLT, suggesting narrow osteotomies did not influence PLT in this population.
  • Partial CCL rupture was not significantly protective; dogs with partial tears still developed ligament thickening.
  • Post-TPLO mid-patellar ligament thickening may relate to Gelpi retractor placement and osteotomy mechanics rather than CCL status.
  • Authors do not recommend CCL transection during TPLO to prevent desmitis, citing possible increased instability and degeneration.

Almeida

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

4

2025

Effect of Cranial Cruciate Ligament Transection during TPLO on Patellar Desmitis in Dogs with Partial Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture

2025-4-VCOT-almeida-5

Article Title: Effect of Cranial Cruciate Ligament Transection during TPLO on Patellar Desmitis in Dogs with Partial Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Longo 2022 et al., on CT-guided osteotomies, what percentage of dogs had physiological patellar tracking restored following surgery?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All 22/22 cases had restored physiological patellar tracking at follow-up.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 100%.
All 22/22 cases had restored physiological patellar tracking at follow-up.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 3D CT volume rendering and CAL measurement successfully guided correction of femoral and tibial torsion in dogs with patellar luxation (PL).
  • Physiological patellar tracking was restored in 100% (22/22) of cases after detorsional osteotomy.
  • 94% of dogs (17/18) had either full or acceptable functional outcomes post-surgery.
  • CAL-based correction was accurate in 19/22 cases, confirming reliability of the measurement technique.
  • Complication rate was 45%, with major complications in 2/22 cases—both involved combined femoral and tibial osteotomies.
  • Combined femoral and tibial osteotomies in the same limb were linked to a higher risk of complications and poorer outcomes.
  • Diaphyseal osteotomies offered more implant space, but metaphyseal locations were associated with faster bone healing.
  • Use of a TPLO jig or goniometer was not essential—CAL-based bone marking was sufficient in most cases.

Longo

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Three‐dimensional volume rendering planning, surgical treatment, and clinical outcomes for femoral and tibial detorsional osteotomies in dogs

2022-7-VS-longo-2

Article Title: Three‐dimensional volume rendering planning, surgical treatment, and clinical outcomes for femoral and tibial detorsional osteotomies in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.