Your Custom Quiz

In Galliano 2022 et al., on vascular access ports, which factor did **not** correlate with the development of complications?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. No statistical correlation was found between catheter tip location and complications.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Catheter tip position.
No statistical correlation was found between catheter tip location and complications.

🔍 Key Findings

  • SVAPs placed in axillary (aSVAP) or femoral/external iliac veins (fSVAP) during limb amputation remained functional in 92.3% and 100% of cases, respectively.
  • Complication rates were lower in aSVAP (23.1%) and fSVAP (0%) compared to jSVAP (47.4%), although not statistically significant (P = .12).
  • No catastrophic complications occurred with aSVAP or fSVAP; 2 deaths occurred with jSVAP due to port-related issues.
  • Infection-related port removal was needed in 1 aSVAP (7.7%) and 2 jSVAPs (10.5%) — no removals were required in fSVAPs.
  • Tip placement of the catheter (e.g., right atrium vs. vena cava) did not correlate with complications (P = .66).
  • Shorter surgical time likely with aSVAP/fSVAP as they use the same surgical field as the limb amputation.
  • Survival time median was similar across groups (jSVAP: 177 days, aSVAP: 125 days, fSVAP: 122 days).
  • SVAP implantation during limb amputation offers a practical and safe alternative to separate jugular placement.

Galliano

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Subcutaneous vascular access port implantation in the axillary or femoral/external iliac vein at the time of full limb amputation in dogs

2022-7-VS-galliano-4

Article Title: Subcutaneous vascular access port implantation in the axillary or femoral/external iliac vein at the time of full limb amputation in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Vandekerckhove 2024 et al., which factor **did not** significantly affect LImax?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. None of these factors significantly affected LImax in the study.
Incorrect. The correct answer is All of the above.
None of these factors significantly affected LImax in the study.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Used VMBDmD to quantify hip laxity under increasing force in cadaveric dogs (n=34).
  • 90% of hips reached ≥90% of LImax at 95.32 N, defining this force as sufficient for subluxation.
  • LImax was not significantly influenced by osteoarthritis, weight, sex, or limb side.
  • Position of device (lever length) influenced rate of laxity acquisition, not final LImax.
  • LI curves were repeatable across 5 sessions, indicating elastic—not plastic—deformation.

Vandekerckhove

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

1

2024

Quantifying the Stress in Stress Radiographs to Determine Sufficient Laxity of the Coxofemoral Joint

2024-1-VCOT-vandekerckhove-2

Article Title: Quantifying the Stress in Stress Radiographs to Determine Sufficient Laxity of the Coxofemoral Joint

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Carrera 2024 et al., what was the observed long-term effect on aLDFA and tibial torsion at 1-year postoperatively?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Extensor mechanism alignment was maintained long-term, with no reluxations or deformity progression:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}
Incorrect. The correct answer is All values remained close to immediate postoperative values.
Extensor mechanism alignment was maintained long-term, with no reluxations or deformity progression:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 5 juvenile dogs (mean age 7.2 months) with grade III–IV MPL were treated surgically.
  • Most had femoral varus + external tibial torsion; some had shallow trochlear grooves.
  • Distal femoral osteotomy was performed in 4/5 dogs; Tibial tuberosity transposition (TTT) in 3/5; Sulcoplasty in 2/5.
  • Mean time to weight bearing: 9.8 ± 5.5 days; healing: 55 ± 24 days
  • No reluxations, and final radiographic values for aLDFA and torsion were maintained at 1 year.
  • One complication due to domestic trauma, not surgical failure.
  • Early surgery appeared to preserve alignment and prevent deformity progression.

Carrera

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

2

2024

Early Surgical Management of Medial Patellar Luxation in Juvenile Dogs

2024-2-VCOT-carrera-4

Article Title: Early Surgical Management of Medial Patellar Luxation in Juvenile Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Wylie 2025 et al., on femoral implant accuracy, what was the overall effect of internal brace augmentation on pivot shift grades at 6 weeks?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. At 6-week follow-up, 90.9% of stifles showed improvement in pivot shift grade, regardless of implant positioning accuracy.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Pivot shift grades improved in over 90% of stifles.
At 6-week follow-up, 90.9% of stifles showed improvement in pivot shift grade, regardless of implant positioning accuracy.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Accurate femoral isometric placement was achieved in 63% of cases, significantly more with SwiveLock (78.6%) than FASTak (38.9%).
  • Inaccurate placement was associated with increased internal tibial rotation at follow-up (p = .009), suggesting potential implant failure.
  • Pivot shift grade improved in 90.9% of stifles postoperatively, regardless of implant positioning accuracy.
  • SwiveLock implants had a faster learning curve and higher placement accuracy than FASTak.
  • Higher patient weight was linked to more accurate implant placement (p = .012), likely due to easier anatomical landmark identification.
  • No correlation found between implant type or positioning accuracy and final pivot shift grade at 6 weeks.
  • Minor and major complications were low and not significantly different between implant types.
  • A simplified 2-grade pivot shift system was proposed for clinical use (Grade 1: glide, Grade 2: clunk), aiding intraoperative decision-making.

Wylie

Veterinary Surgery

7

2025

Evaluation of femoral isometric placement accuracy of internal brace implants and its impact on stifle stability in the management of pivot shift phenomenon following TPLO

2025-7-VS-wylie-3

Article Title: Evaluation of femoral isometric placement accuracy of internal brace implants and its impact on stifle stability in the management of pivot shift phenomenon following TPLO

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Longo 2022 et al., on CT-guided osteotomies, what clinical outcome was observed in 94% of dogs after femoral and/or tibial detorsional osteotomy?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 17 of 18 dogs had full or acceptable function at follow-up.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Full or acceptable function.
17 of 18 dogs had full or acceptable function at follow-up.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 3D CT volume rendering and CAL measurement successfully guided correction of femoral and tibial torsion in dogs with patellar luxation (PL).
  • Physiological patellar tracking was restored in 100% (22/22) of cases after detorsional osteotomy.
  • 94% of dogs (17/18) had either full or acceptable functional outcomes post-surgery.
  • CAL-based correction was accurate in 19/22 cases, confirming reliability of the measurement technique.
  • Complication rate was 45%, with major complications in 2/22 cases—both involved combined femoral and tibial osteotomies.
  • Combined femoral and tibial osteotomies in the same limb were linked to a higher risk of complications and poorer outcomes.
  • Diaphyseal osteotomies offered more implant space, but metaphyseal locations were associated with faster bone healing.
  • Use of a TPLO jig or goniometer was not essential—CAL-based bone marking was sufficient in most cases.

Longo

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Three‐dimensional volume rendering planning, surgical treatment, and clinical outcomes for femoral and tibial detorsional osteotomies in dogs

2022-7-VS-longo-5

Article Title: Three‐dimensional volume rendering planning, surgical treatment, and clinical outcomes for femoral and tibial detorsional osteotomies in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Raleigh 2022 et al., on pericardiectomy complications, which surgical tool was most frequently associated with the onset of ventricular fibrillation?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. In 15 of 16 dogs, electrosurgical devices were used, and VF coincided with their use in 8.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Bipolar electrosurgical device.
In 15 of 16 dogs, electrosurgical devices were used, and VF coincided with their use in 8.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Ventricular fibrillation (VF) occurred in 3% of pericardiectomy cases across reporting institutions.
  • 14 of 16 dogs (88%) that developed intraoperative VF died, indicating high mortality.
  • Electrosurgical devices were used in 15/16 dogs; VF onset coincided with their use in 8 dogs, suggesting a potential but unproven association.
  • Preoperative arrhythmias were seen in 7 dogs (e.g., VPCs, VT, bradycardia), possibly serving as early warning signs.
  • Thoracoscopic approach was used in 75% of cases; however, conversion to open surgery was required in 9/13 thoracoscopic procedures after VF onset.
  • Defibrillation was attempted in 13 dogs, but only 3 converted to sinus rhythm, and only 2 survived postoperatively.
  • VF may result from stray current or cardiac manipulation; bipolar energy devices were implicated despite lower theoretical risk.
  • Preventative strategies include judicious electrosurgery use, close ECG monitoring, rapid CPR preparedness, and preop cardiac risk assessment.

Raleigh

Veterinary Surgery

4

2022

The development of ventricular fibrillation as a complication of pericardiectomy in 16 dogs

2022-4-VS-raleigh-3

Article Title: The development of ventricular fibrillation as a complication of pericardiectomy in 16 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Hanlon 2022 et al., on short screw sacroiliac fixation, what was the mechanical advantage of using two short screws versus one long screw?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Two short screws (SLS and SPS) produced >2× peak load, yield load, and stiffness compared to a single long screw.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Peak load and stiffness were more than doubled with two short screws.
Two short screws (SLS and SPS) produced >2× peak load, yield load, and stiffness compared to a single long screw.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Two short screws (SLS or SPS) provided >2× peak load, yield load, and stiffness vs a single long screw (LLS) for SI joint stabilization.
  • No mechanical advantage was seen between the two short screw types (lag vs positional).
  • All short screws terminated lateral to the spinal canal, avoiding spinal impingement.
  • Ventral sacral foraminal impingement occurred in 3 short-screw cases (1 SPS, 2 SLS), all involving the caudal screw.
  • LLS group showed more abaxial displacement at osteotomy sites, suggesting inferior stabilization for concurrent pelvic fractures.
  • Short screw constructs had longer total screw length (48 mm) than LLS (40 mm), contributing to increased stiffness.
  • Positioning of caudal screw in a cranial/craniodorsal trajectory may help avoid nerve foraminal injury.
  • No significant difference in displacement at peak load among groups; stiffness and load capacity were the primary benefits.

Hanlon

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Mechanical evaluation of canine sacroiliac joint stabilization using two short screws

2022-7-VS-hanlon-1

Article Title: Mechanical evaluation of canine sacroiliac joint stabilization using two short screws

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Rocheleau 2023 et al., on shoulder stabilization, what was the overall targeting accuracy of the intra-articular aiming device (IAD) during shoulder stabilization?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Use of the intra-articular aiming device (IAD) resulted in an overall targeting accuracy of 88%.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 88%.
Use of the intra-articular aiming device (IAD) resulted in an overall targeting accuracy of 88%.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Arthroscopically assisted stabilization with an IAD was feasible in cadaveric canine shoulders using both bone anchor and suture-toggle techniques.
  • Suture-toggle repair was successfully performed in all specimens, while bone anchors could not be deployed in 3/10 shoulders, indicating lower feasibility.
  • Median surgical time was shorter for the suture-toggle group (25.5 min) compared to the anchor group (37.3 min).
  • Postoperative abduction angles returned to baseline in the anchor group, while the suture-toggle group had slightly reduced angles, suggesting possible overtightening.
  • Violation of the articular surface occurred in 2 anchor specimens and 1 suture-toggle specimen, but none were considered likely to be clinically significant.
  • Overall targeting accuracy using the IAD was 88%, supporting its utility in guiding tunnel/anchor placement.
  • CT measurements showed acceptable bone stock and insertion angles, but anchor insertion angles were lower than optimal for mechanical pullout strength.
  • Suture-toggle technique was considered simpler and more consistent, with fewer complications and faster execution than anchor placement.

Rocheleau

Veterinary Surgery

4

2023

Ex vivo evaluation of arthroscopically assisted shoulder stabilization in dogs using an intra-articular aiming device

2023-4-VS-rocheleau-2

Article Title: Ex vivo evaluation of arthroscopically assisted shoulder stabilization in dogs using an intra-articular aiming device

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Eskelinen 2025 et al., on Plate–Pin fixation for MPL, what was the authors’ recommendation regarding the number of screws for TT fixation?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. In cases with screw breakage, only two screws were used; authors suggest at least three.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Three or more screws.
In cases with screw breakage, only two screws were used; authors suggest at least three.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Plate–Pin TTT fixation resolved MPL in 64/65 stifles with low recurrence (1.5%) and good lameness outcomes postoperatively.
  • Complication rate was 21.5% (14/65 stifles), mostly minor (57%); major issues included pin migration, fracture, or capsular failure.
  • Pin-related issues accounted for 8 of 20 total complications, highlighting implant refinement is needed.
  • No avulsions, TT fixation failures, or luxation recurrence occurred in cases where surgical technique was followed precisely.
  • Surgical deviations increased complication risk 11.3× (p < 0.05), suggesting adherence to protocol is critical.
  • Single-session bilateral MPL surgery had comparable complication rate (3/20) to unilateral surgery (11/45).
  • Screw breakage occurred in 3 cases, suggesting at least 3 screws may be needed for secure TT fixation.
  • Authors suggest temporary pin fixation and later removal may reduce complications, though prospective studies are needed.

Eskelinen

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

4

2025

Outcome and Complications Following Medial Patellar Luxation Corrective Surgery with Tibial Tuberosity Transposition Using a Locking Plate and a Pin Fixation: 45 Unilateral and 20 Single-Session Bilateral Procedures

2025-4-VCOT-eskelinen-5

Article Title: Outcome and Complications Following Medial Patellar Luxation Corrective Surgery with Tibial Tuberosity Transposition Using a Locking Plate and a Pin Fixation: 45 Unilateral and 20 Single-Session Bilateral Procedures

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Cruciani 2025 et al., on portal placement, what functional outcome was observed in most dogs at long-term follow-up?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 11 of 14 dogs had full or acceptable function at long-term follow-up.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Acceptable or full function in majority.
11 of 14 dogs had full or acceptable function at long-term follow-up.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Study Design: Retrospective case series of 15 dogs (19 tarsi) with talar OCD.
  • Technique: Modified arthroscopic approach with both scope and instrument portals on the same side as the lesion.
  • Outcomes:
    • Good to excellent mid-to-long-term outcomes in 11/14 dogs.
    • Statistically significant improvement in CBPI (p < .05) and VAS scores (p < .05).
    • Minor postoperative complications (synovial cysts) in 4/13 tarsi, all resolved spontaneously.
    • No major intraoperative complications; 1/19 required mini-arthrotomy due to fragment size.
  • Degenerative Joint Disease (DJD): Progression noted in 10/14 cases, despite good functional outcomes.
  • Fragment Characteristics: Multiple osteochondral fragments were present in most cases, with 17/19 lesions on the medial talar ridge.
  • Technical Advantage: Lower conversion rate to arthrotomy (1/19) compared to previous studies (Gielen et al. and Miller & Beale).

Cruciani

Veterinary Surgery

1

2025

A modified approach to portal placement for arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the tarsocrural joint in 15 dogs (19 tarsi)

2025-1-VS-cruciani-2

Article Title: A modified approach to portal placement for arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the tarsocrural joint in 15 dogs (19 tarsi)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.