Timmermans et al: Evaluation of soft palate thickness in brachycephalic dogs 3 months after folded flap palatoplasty versus standard staphylectomy
Veterinary Surgery 1, 2026

🔍 Key Findings

  • Soft palate length, volume, and cross-sectional area decreased significantly after both folded flap palatoplasty (FFP) and standard staphylectomy (STS).
  • Middle thickness (MTH) of the soft palate decreased after STS but increased after FFP, indicating FFP may not thin the soft palate long-term.
  • Rostral thickness (RTH) increased in both groups, suggesting regional variation in healing or remodeling.
  • Clinical improvement (exercise tolerance) occurred in most dogs: 6/8 in FFP and 10/10 in STS group.
  • One major complication in FFP group led to death despite revision surgery; another mortality occurred in STS group (likely due to severe laryngeal collapse).
  • No difference in minor complication rates between FFP and STS groups.
  • Histological remodeling or edema may explain lack of MTH reduction in FFP at 3 months.
  • Immediate postoperative imaging may be needed to evaluate initial reduction effects of FFP.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

How critical is this paper for crushing the Boards?

🚨 Must-know. I’d bet on seeing this.

📚 Useful background, not must-know.

💤 Skip it. Doubt it’ll ever show up.

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the articles vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Timmermans et al: Evaluation of soft palate thickness in brachycephalic dogs 3 months after folded flap palatoplasty versus standard staphylectomy
Veterinary Surgery 1, 2026

🔍 Key Findings

  • Soft palate length, volume, and cross-sectional area decreased significantly after both folded flap palatoplasty (FFP) and standard staphylectomy (STS).
  • Middle thickness (MTH) of the soft palate decreased after STS but increased after FFP, indicating FFP may not thin the soft palate long-term.
  • Rostral thickness (RTH) increased in both groups, suggesting regional variation in healing or remodeling.
  • Clinical improvement (exercise tolerance) occurred in most dogs: 6/8 in FFP and 10/10 in STS group.
  • One major complication in FFP group led to death despite revision surgery; another mortality occurred in STS group (likely due to severe laryngeal collapse).
  • No difference in minor complication rates between FFP and STS groups.
  • Histological remodeling or edema may explain lack of MTH reduction in FFP at 3 months.
  • Immediate postoperative imaging may be needed to evaluate initial reduction effects of FFP.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

Know What Matters in the Literature - and Why

We distill peer-reviewed surgical studies into clinically relevant summaries and
exam-style questions, so you can make informed decisions with confidence.

Free Access. No Spam. Just Smarter Surgical Learning

Multiple Choice Questions on this study

No items found.

Access the full library of surgical summaries and exam-style questions.

Educational content developed independently and supported by Simini.

The maker of Simini Protect Lavage.