Perry et al: Outcomes of 243 dogs with traumatic fractures treated with the I-Loc interlocking nail
Veterinary Surgery 8, 2025

🔍 Key Findings

  • High union rate with low complications was achieved using the I-Loc angle-stable interlocking nail across 243 canine long-bone fractures.
  • Mean time to clinical union was 8.3 weeks, faster than many historical plate-rod or non-angle-stable nail reports.
  • Major complications occurred in only 5.3% and minor complications in 9.1% of cases.
  • Most fractures were diaphyseal (75%) and comminuted (62%), demonstrating effectiveness in complex fracture patterns.
  • Ancillary implants were uncommon (21%), mainly used in epi-/metaphyseal fractures or for anatomic reconstruction.
  • Postoperative missed bolt rate was very low (0.94%), reflecting improved targeting accuracy.
  • Open fractures carried a substantially higher risk of SSI and implant removal compared with closed fractures.
  • Prebending of tibial nails was strongly recommended to follow natural recurvatum and avoid iatrogenic alignment errors.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

How critical is this paper for crushing the Boards?

🚨 Must-know. I’d bet on seeing this.

📚 Useful background, not must-know.

💤 Skip it. Doubt it’ll ever show up.

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the articles vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Perry et al: Outcomes of 243 dogs with traumatic fractures treated with the I-Loc interlocking nail
Veterinary Surgery 8, 2025

🔍 Key Findings

  • High union rate with low complications was achieved using the I-Loc angle-stable interlocking nail across 243 canine long-bone fractures.
  • Mean time to clinical union was 8.3 weeks, faster than many historical plate-rod or non-angle-stable nail reports.
  • Major complications occurred in only 5.3% and minor complications in 9.1% of cases.
  • Most fractures were diaphyseal (75%) and comminuted (62%), demonstrating effectiveness in complex fracture patterns.
  • Ancillary implants were uncommon (21%), mainly used in epi-/metaphyseal fractures or for anatomic reconstruction.
  • Postoperative missed bolt rate was very low (0.94%), reflecting improved targeting accuracy.
  • Open fractures carried a substantially higher risk of SSI and implant removal compared with closed fractures.
  • Prebending of tibial nails was strongly recommended to follow natural recurvatum and avoid iatrogenic alignment errors.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

Know What Matters in the Literature - and Why

We distill peer-reviewed surgical studies into clinically relevant summaries and
exam-style questions, so you can make informed decisions with confidence.

Free Access. No Spam. Just Smarter Surgical Learning

Multiple Choice Questions on this study

In Perry 2025 et al., on I-Loc fracture fixation, what technical recommendation was emphasized for tibial fractures?

A. Avoid distal bolts
B. Use dynamic fixation only
C. Prebend the nail to follow recurvatum
D. Always add a plate
E. Limit to ORIF techniques

Answer: Prebend the nail to follow recurvatum

Explanation: Prebending tibial nails was recommended to maintain alignment and avoid increased tibial plateau angle.
In Perry 2025 et al., on I-Loc fracture fixation, which factor most increased the risk of surgical site infection and implant removal?

A. Use of ancillary implants
B. MINO technique
C. Closed fractures
D. Open fractures
E. Tibial location

Answer: Open fractures

Explanation: Most SSIs occurred in open fractures, with implant removal required in over 20% of open cases.

Access the full library of surgical summaries and exam-style questions.

Educational content developed independently and supported by Simini.

The maker of Simini Protect Lavage.