In De Moya 2025 et al., on antebrachial deformity correction, which surgical maneuver was used to correct antebrachiocarpal incongruency?
A. Dorsal carpal release
B. Flexor tendon lengthening
C. Radioulnar ligament transection
D. Partial carpal arthrodesis
E. Capitate osteotomy
Answer: Radioulnar ligament transection
Explanation: The radioulnar ligament was transected to allow mobility of the distal radial segment for angular correction and carpal congruity.
In De Moya 2025 et al., on antebrachial deformity correction, which of the following was a **major complication** reported?
A. Persistent loss of carpal extension
B. Radioulnar synostosis
C. Carpal flexor contracture
D. Serosanguinous pin tract drainage
E. Temporary carpal pain
Answer: Carpal flexor contracture
Explanation: One major complication was a permanent carpal flexor contracture; minor complications included synostosis, pin tract drainage, and carpal stiffness.
In De Moya 2025 et al., on antebrachial deformity correction, what was the mean total radial lengthening achieved after distraction osteogenesis?
A. 12 mm
B. 17 mm
C. 22.6 mm
D. 28 mm
E. 34 mm
Answer: 22.6 mm
Explanation: Mean lengthening was 22.6 mm, representing ~11% increase compared to the contralateral radius.
In De Moya 2025 et al., on antebrachial deformity correction, what was the most common radiographic outcome following CESF and distraction osteogenesis?
A. Complete resolution of elbow osteoarthritis
B. Improvement in aLDRA within normal range
C. Overcorrection into radial varus
D. Persistent radial head subluxation
E. Failure of osteotomy union
Answer: Improvement in aLDRA within normal range
Explanation: aLDRA improved significantly from 71.6° to 85.6°, entering normal range; radial head subluxation and elbow incongruity were also resolved.
In De Moya 2025 et al., on antebrachial deformity correction, what percentage of the recorded distraction translated to actual radial lengthening?
A. 60%
B. 70%
C. 80%
D. 90%
E. 100%
Answer: 80%
Explanation: Only 80% of the distraction measured on the fixator resulted in actual bone lengthening, likely due to soft tissue and frame mechanics.